Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
My apologies;
this was my first time processing one, and I had followed the cue of another editor who added it to the HP dab page. I have since found out he was wrong toadd it, and I was wrong to select the miscellany for deletion. I apologize if my mistake harshed your calm.
With respect, your assertion that HP is used outside a fan forum in a notable source for Harry Potter is incorrect. There aren't any, and many have looked. -
Arcayne
(cast a spell) 19:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I've undone all these. There was no discussion whatsoever on this. Next tag the pages appropriately and allow adequate discussion time. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Could you please explain what part of the articles you linked on the administrators' noticeboard you find "unacceptable". -- Arctic Gnome ( talk • contribs) 21:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I think I puked in my mouth a little... Good night! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 22:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence § t/ e 18:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
A fair enough explanation, and you'll see what I've done in reply. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 00:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Just re: your comments on my talk page yesterday - I nixed the article because you placed it in the 6th April section. Since expansions are counted from the day they are begun, by putting it in 6th April you signalled that you had begun the expansion on that date, so naturally I went to the last edit made on April 5 and compared the size of the article then with the current size. It turns out though, that you started the expansion on April 5th. Next time, please try to ensure that you nominate the right date, to prevent this sort of misunderstanding arising again. Thanks, and congrats on the DYK BTW :) Gatoclass ( talk) 06:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya... two things. Firstly, your edits here mucked up the first paragraph before the ==plot== section... do you think you could have a go at sorting it out? And secondly... the image isn't really relevant and certainly isn't free, I'm afraid - see the talkpage. — TreasuryTag— t— c 09:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Re, outside references... I'd really rather not. By deleting them, we lost a lot of sourced stuff such as the Fawlty Towers reference; I've weeded out the shit and you can feel free to weed out more if you want to, but there's good material there too! — TreasuryTag— t— c 10:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
OK, how's this for a compromise? You add in...
Still, they're both in the fact-file and worth noting, I think. — TreasuryTag— t— c 10:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
It has been widely reported that Speight's body has been found. It has also not yet been subject to formal identification. There should be no problem with saying that much, as long as we say "it's been reported that..." surely? Steve T • C 11:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, can't oblige on that. A hook goes under the day the expansion was started, not the day it was finished. The count starts from the day you start editing, basically. Gatoclass ( talk) 12:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah. I'm going to disappoint you now. We haven't had the chance to watch it yet, so I'm going to recuse myself from even looking at that. I'm a bit of a spoiler-phobe when it comes to my telly-watching. Hope you understand. :) (Though you have reminded me that I should go and register my !vote at Partners.) All the best, Steve T • C 08:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid your questions have become a subject of consternation. Dloh cierekim 15:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
I declined speedy/G10 on that article. It was pretty thoroughly sourced and seemed like a valid criminal biography. Please let me know if you think I'm missing something. Toddst1 ( talk) 15:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Will, could I suggest that you take a more cautious approach to dealing with articles you don't like, such as Scientology controversies? Blanking and redirecting is not the way to get rid of such articles. It'll only provoke unneeded controversy if you blank and redirect articles that don't meet the criteria for speedy deletion. -- ChrisO ( talk) 19:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
...at Talk:Controversies about the 2004 Madrid train bombings.
I reverted your edit for reasons I explain there.
Thank you for your attention. Randroide ( talk) 19:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Why did you rewrite Ghulam Azam? I cannot seem to find where consensus was reached for this change; thanks for clearing this up for me. Fléêťflämẽ U- T- C 02:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
“ | Blah blah JzG blah blah ScienceApologist blah blah thin skin... come back when you're not rehashing this debate again. | ” |
LOL! I seriously almost wet my sweat pants when I read that. And a good point, too. ;) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 04:40 16 April, 2008 (UTC)
Hiya... I've added Transmorphers to WP:AIV for vandalism after a final warning... do you want to add a brief supporting note if/when certain admins say that he should be nurtured? Cheers, and I didn't say this :-) — TreasuryTag— t— c 16:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't want to join the argument between you and Pixelface but I do agree with you, something that has been for months, or years even should never be removed without discussion first. I hope you can find someone to explain it better to Pixel. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 19:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello Sceptre:
I'm asking here because I just saw your edit on Paris Hilton.
I'm trying to understand what happened so I know what the Bot does for future.
What I THINK happened was:
Then you made an edit to remove the paragraph "In 2007..."
Is this what happened or am I missing something? Thanks, Wanderer57 ( talk) 00:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
No worries, I'm only interested in your POV, but... I saw you modified
BRMHS and your small note was for the long standing NPOV issue. You deleted ~20K worth of information that I've now reverted. I'm good with deleting the data (or some portion thereof) but so much was deleted that I can't understand your objection. Can you explain the train of thought?
Cheers!
Bgautrea (
talk) 05:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tourist guy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot ( talk) 14:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm glad you've joined, and look forward to working with you on a mission soon! Geometry guy 18:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[1]. Lawrence Cohen § t/ e 20:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I looked over and copyedited Aang. I would appreciate it if you looked over your previous comments at its FAC and see if they still apply. Thanks. — Parent5446 ( t n c k e l) 20:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello Sceptre, there seems to be a bug in this bot's (new?) feature to tag pages for speedy deletion. At Gnilane your bot made a cut&paste move, after it had tagged Gnjilane, which contains the edit history, for speedy deletion - probably caused by the also inaccurate IP edit). Is it possible to fix this, at least for the cut&paste move? Regards -- Oxymoron 83 10:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, when I saw the name show up in my watchlist, I had a feeling it was a troll (similar to Sergeant Snopake). NHRHS2010 has his own Wiki, and Alison and Tiptoety are on that Wiki: I think this vandal was blocked there and came here. No idea why they went after Keilana, though. Acalamari 21:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry about that but I just thought there was something wrong about that it said cheese all over lol -- Icebreaker104 ( talk) 23:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, CSD G5 applies, but the subject of the article is legitimate (i.e. it isn't a hoax, though there are revisionists about who will claim so). I could put a {{hangon}} tag, except that I don't have the spare cycles to work on the article myself. Just a FYI. rudra ( talk) 23:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
OK, consider yourself smacked about the head with the blue flamingo. Daniel ( talk) 01:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Consider yourself whacked on the head with a blue flamingo for this edit [2]. Now, that was a nice joke, but I think that should look for better actions before removing all the fucking content on the article, like, dunno, pointing out on the talk page what exact content is POV-infringing (don't copy paste the whole article content and claim that it's all infringin, dammit :D), and why multiple editors failed to notice the infringing over years of time including Jimbo Wales [3] and so on :D -- Enric Naval ( talk) 15:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps I don't. What's the point that us people don't get? (It's clear that the subject is notable, and it's clear that the article, though quite negative, is well-sourced. There's probably an "undue weight" problem or two, but let's work on those in a detailed way, not by deleting the whole article text.) — Steve Summit ( talk) 16:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Sceptre, I let the last one run because, frankly, I had to remove so many that day I was just too tired to go through the (significant) work of withdrawing yet another. In the future, please take care to follow the instructions at WP:FAC, and not put up a second nom until your previous ones have a good level of support, with opposes resolved. Thanks! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 20:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Comics_Guaranty_LLC&curid=3922553&diff=206948771&oldid=206143290 - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) 20:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on yet another Featured Article! — Edokter • Talk • 23:07, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm here to tell you I've closed your nomination. I'm reproducing the rationale here for you:
If there are any problems, please drop by my talk page or you can swing by DRV if you prefer. :) SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 04:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
The WikiProject Doctor Who Award | ||
The WikiProject Doctor Who Award is presented to Sceptre, for his work in bringing Partners in Crime (Doctor Who) up to Featured Article standard. Well done! Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 06:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC) |
Feel free to revert it but I thought that beast would be less confusing. The devil was used rather jokingly in the episode after all...Thanks for all your work though! Keep it up! -- Cameron ( t| p| c) 14:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Will, if you have the time and the inclination, could you brighten-up my, (simple) user page? I'd be very grateful. Best wishes, Graham. GrahamColm Talk 15:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)