|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Randall Anthony Jonas has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Randall Anthony Jonas was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://confessionsfromthemagicmountain.blogspot.ca/2014/04/randall-jonas-photos.html,
http://randallajonas.blogspot.ca/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. an
image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
The article Randall Anthony Jonas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Bgwhite (
talk)
05:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I have read all of the helpful feed back from everyone working on the page and many things are improved. I hope you will have a look at it now as it is better than before. I myself am new to Wikipedia and so all comments are appreciated and all suggestions, corrections and additions are also welcome. I am learning.22:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Roguewitch ( talk)
![]() |
Hi Roguewitch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Roguewitch ( talk) 22:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Thank you! I am doing my best to create my first article and many people have helped. It improves with each edit.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randall Anthony Jonas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Anthony Jonas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite ( talk) 16:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Roguewitch ( talk) 22:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)The article is much revised and improved thanks to comments and contributions. I have done my best to check each day and edit to the best of my capacity.
Rougewitch, I'm glad that you're grateful for my edits to Randall Anthony Jonas, but could you please stop spamming my notifications box with your thanks? It would be much appreciated. Thanks, Bensci54 ( talk) 22:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Roguewitch ( talk) 22:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)I was not aware of spamming. When I go back to the page it at times says I have not thanked people. As such, being a new person here, I am assuming that the thanks are refreshed. It is unintentional. And so have the errors been. Roguewitch ( talk) 22:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)