| This is Rahio1234's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
MapleStory: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —
Paper9oll (
🔔 •
📝) 13:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting some very problematic edits at Neolithodes brodiei and Neolithodes. I have removed the false positive report from ClueBot: it is usually very good but it does make mistakes. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse or feel free to ask me. Johnuniq ( talk) 05:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, just an FYI that there's no need to tell a vandal their edits have been reverted if they've already been warned by somebody else for the edit. You may find these templates useful for warning users, or alternatively the Twinkle tool (automated). AbsoluteWissen ( talk) 12:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
It's unfair to add dark brown hair and true black hair into the same category as "black". Wish l ( talk) 12:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Please read your talk page Rahio1234 ( talk) 12:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rahio1234 reported by User:AlphaBetaGamma (Result: ). Thank you.
ABG (
Talk/Report any mistakes here) 11:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Drmies (
talk) 16:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)- @
Drmies Sorry, i don't make mistake anyway. Why did block my account?
Rahio1234 (
talk) 07:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please think before editing or writing a comment. Did you see the "Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion" section just above? The link they provided no longer goes to the right place but it should be pretty simple to find your user name and see what the problem was. Some thought regarding edits at A Thousand Times Repent would show that reverting an IP six times in under half an hour was not a good idea. Johnuniq ( talk) 08:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- I WAS REORGANIZING THE ARTICLE NOT VANDALIZING IT
91.152.225.81 (
talk) 10:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide a
reliable source.
Rahio1234 (
talk) 10:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Then why did you remove all my added content? Surely some of my text was properly sourced even if you don’t think the official website of an organisation is “reliable”??
2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (
talk) 10:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you revert my edits this time???
2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (
talk) 12:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- This a unreliable source Rah io 1234 12:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you revert my edits this time???
2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (
talk) 12:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Then why did you remove all my added content? Surely some of my text was properly sourced even if you don’t think the official website of an organisation is “reliable”??
2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (
talk) 10:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide a
reliable source.
Rahio1234 (
talk) 10:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
You reverted eight times in a little over an hour, and you didn't explain why--not a single time. Drmies ( talk) 16:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Bbb23 (
talk) 13:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Rahio1234 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot ( talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| CianPolonorte ( talk) 14:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Note that I have placed this notice on behalf of the requestor, and that I have no part to play in the dispute 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is partially blocked or sitewide?
Rah
io
1234 14:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ Rahio1234 I do not understand your question, nor its relevance to this notice. I have no interest in whether anyone is blocked. Participate in the DRN or not, it doesn't matter to me. I have no rose in this race. It is polite, however to tell the DRN folk whether you intend to participate or not. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)