Sorry, I forgot about that message, and to be honest I really didn't know much about it. Sorry it took so long for you to get a response. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 00:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Everything looks all right in the current version of Safari (3.1.2), so I guess everything is fixed there. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 02:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I completely agree. Most people are used to the list article, so it should be very prominent - as you said right near the lede. I don't know the template, so you could change it back. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 15:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I really can't figure out that Meteo-France data. I'd guess it would be m/s. MF has the storm type in the data, which goes only up to 4, and 4 is a tropical cyclone (64+ kts). Not sure though. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 00:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
So are you thinking the values are in m/s as well as 10-min sustained? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on 1998–99 Australian region cyclone season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
NuclearWarfare
contact me
My work 23:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
I thought this might help you i saw it in the Austrlain/Spac Tropical cyclone operational plan a few nights ago about wat a Tropical Disturbance is defined as by Nadi
A Tropical Disturbance is a nonfrontal system of synoptic scale originating over the tropics with persistent enhanced convection and/or some indications of cyclonic wind circulation. Where as a Tropical Depression is defined as a tropical disturbance with a clearly defined cyclonic wind circulation in which the central position can be estimated, and the maximum 10minute average wind speed is less than 34 knots (63 km per hour ie gale force) near the centre. There may be gale force or stronger winds in one or more quadrants but not near the centre.
Hope This helps Jason Rees ( talk) 02:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm really not sure. I would guess they would have to be done manually. I'm pretty brain-dead when it comes to bots, but I don't think there would be an easy way. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
The NHC archives for EPAC go back to 1988, and the first depression in the season was called TD 1E. The 1986 MWR called the second depression TD 2, without the suffix, and I should note that was the EPHC, not the NHC. So I'd guess the letter was added when the NHC took over the EPAC. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 15:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I use firefox which does have Spell Check.-- Leave Message or Yellow Evan home 13:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
i do.-- Leave Message or Yellow Evan home 17:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your assistance, but, Hurricanehink fixed the timeline. I don't know why it works that way anyway; I borrowed the parameters from 2006. Thanks, again. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 06:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
I realize that, and it does add whitespace as a side effect. However, we've gotten yelled at for this in recent FACs, as screen readers begin reading the infobox when ideally they should be reading the hatnote first. (By reading the hatnote, a blind user can hear that there is an article that deals with that particular storm in more detail, so he has the chance to go read it instead of having to hear the infobox and then realizing that he didn't have to hear all of that.) Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 05:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Potapych
Is there a way to add Tropical Disturbances and Severe Tropical Cyclones to the infobox without it causing "formatting issues". Jason Rees ( talk) 20:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi - we need to add a seprate paramater for Tropical Disturbance. As both RSMC's Nadi and La Reunion use disturbances. Jason Rees ( talk) 20:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou Jason Rees ( talk) 20:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah i would agree but i think i will take it season by season Jason Rees ( talk) 22:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
I actually saw that earlier and wonder how I would Webcite that. I tried WebCiting it earlier, but then the site wouldn't load. I tried again just now; if it works it will appear here. The report is large (18.9 MB), and the IMD server is very slow (~5 KB/sec) so it may take a long time. -- RattleMan 21:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
I saw your edit summary to this edit, and I was wondering which signatures in particular you find disruptive to the conversation. Cheers, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Potapych - I had a little play around with the Template:South Pacific ocean Tropical Cyclone Intensity Scale correcting the values that were a bit off using the source you cited on the WPTC main page. anyway can you take a look at it and let me know if a few values are off before i put it on to the Australian one? Thanks Jason Rees ( talk) 00:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Why should the importance be low. it caused the heaviest rainfall in the Untied States by an EPAC storm and serve damage it should be high. Leave Message , Yellow Evan home , Sandbox Happy Veterans day 15:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
You seem to me making several substantial edits to this template. If it's not too much of a bother, would you mind discussing them on talk pages prior to implementing them? Thanks, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
I tried to use numbers assigned in real-time in the database I have online. I have never thought we should use HURRICANE TEN in the wikipedia articles, because NHC never numbered them either in real-time or after the fact. I feel differently about TD numbers, but they're tricky in the 1970s and 1980s, since they were reassigned after the fact. Thegreatdr ( talk) 22:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
I've got a reply from the BoM. See the reply at Talk:Cyclone Tracy#Info box. Bidgee ( talk) 13:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean. I checked the 1993 AHS (one of the ones I edited), and I didn't see any italics in the coding. The image description was italicized, is that what you mean? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
All advisories are tropical depressions
Can you do these, I already asked Ramisses but he seems to be away. -- Ir[[User talk:Irmela|me]] l a 19:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Can you update the map for Hurricane Omar (2008) using the data below?
15.2N/69.6W-Tropical Depression
14.8N/69.8W-TD
14.5N/69.6W-TD
14.3N/69.4W-Tropical Storm
14.1N/69.1W-TS
13.9N/68.8W-TS
14.0N/68.5W-Category 1
14.4N/68.0W-1
14.9N/67.5W-1
15.5N/66.6W-1
16.7N/65.2W-Category 2
18.2N/63.9W-Category 4
19.6N/62.1W-Category 2
21.1N/60.4W-Category 1
22.8N/58.8W-1
25.1N/57.1W-1
27.9N/55.7W-1
30.1N/54.4W-1
31.3N/53.2W-Tropical Storm
32.4N/52.1W-TS
33.0N/51.3W-TS
33.5N/50.5W-TS
34.0N/49.7W-TS
34.5N/49.0W-Low (Tropical Depression)
35.1N/48.3W-Low
35.7N/47.5W-Low
36.4N/46.8W-Low
37.0N/46.2W-Low
37.6N/45.3W-Low
37.9N/44.3W-Low
38.3N/43.3W-Low
This information is from the running best track (which has been updated with what is most likely the final track for Omar). Thanks, Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 23:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Tropical Depression One
25.0N/90.0W-Tropical Depression
25.2N/90.4W-TD
25.4N/90.9W-TD
25.7N/91.2W-TD
26.0N/91.8W-TD
26.2N/92.1W-TD
26.4N/92.7W-TD
26.8N/93.0W-TD
27.0N/93.5W-TD
27.4N/94.0W-TD
27.8N/94.5W-TD
28.0N/94.9W-TD
28.5N/95.2W-TD
29.0N/95.7W-TD
29.5N/95.7W-TD
30.0N/95.5W-TD
30.5N/95.0W-Low
Tropical Depression Four
15.0N/21.0W-Tropical Depression
15.2N/22.5W-TD
15.8N/24.2W-TD
16.7N/25.9W-TD
17.8N/27.1W-TD
18.8N/28.7W-TD
20.0N/30.0W-TD
21.0N/31.7W-TD
22.0N/33.0W-TD
23.2N/34.3W-TD
24.8N/35.9W-TD
27.3N/37.2W-TD
30.0N/36.6W-TD
32.1N/34.4W-TD
33.8N/31.9W-TD
35.2N/29.0W-TD
36.7N/26.2W-TD
Tropical Depression Six
15.9N/31.6W-Tropical Depression
15.8N/34.0W-TD
15.7N/35.3W-TD
15.6N/36.9W-TD
15.5N/38.3W-TD
15.4N/39.8W-TD
15.4N/41.0W-TD
15.3N/43.0W-TD
15.4N/44.9W-TD
15.8N/46.8W-TD
16.0N/48.8W-TD
16.7N/50.8W-TD
17.8N/52.7W-TD
19.0N/54.3W-TD
20.5N/56.0W-TD
22.0N/58.0W-TD
22.5N/60.0W-TD
Tropical Depression Fourteen
13.0N/80.0W-Tropical Depression
13.4N/80.7W-TD
14.0N/81.2W-TD
14.4N/81.9W-TD
15.0N/82.4W-TD
15.9N/83.0W-TD
16.4N/83.5W-TD
17.1N/83.8W-TD
18.0N/83.9W-TD
18.8N/83.8W-TD
19.4N/83.6W-TD
20.0N/83.3W-TD
20.7N/83.0W-TD
21.1N/82.9W-TD
21.7N/82.8W-TD
22.2N/82.7W-TD
22.9N/82.8W-TD
23.9N/82.9W-TD
24.4N/83.0W-TD
25.2N/83.2W-TD
26.0N/83.5W-TD
27.2N/83.2W-Low
(Tropical Depression)
28.0N/83.0W-Low
29.0N/82.0W-Low
30.0N/81.0W-Extratropical Depression
Thanks in advance, Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 04:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes it is :) -- Ir me l a 19:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Yea, I think would be a good idea. I did email the agency, and they confirmed all of the winds of the best track were in 1-min, but they might change it to 10-min (since they said on the FAQ that all of the data should be in 10-min). That reminds me - did you assume that data was 1-min or 10-min? Aren't SHEM track maps usually 10-min? We can probably go ahead and make some changes, but we should do a bit of thinking first. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:05, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
The version I threw on the season talk pages were straight from NHC, but they were not sure of the quality of the information. The version on the HPC page has had some quality control. That's what I mean. Thegreatdr ( talk) 12:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Can you update the track for Typhoon Nabi in 2005? BT Data link Thanks, Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 22:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that you've been using the track map program made by Jdorje. I've been trying to figure out how to download it and get it up and running but I can't figure out how to do it all. Since you have it, you likely know how to do all of that so I'd greatly appreciate if you could tell me how I can download the necessary programs for it, where to get them, and how to start using it. Thanks, Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 16:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Heh, I think you finally got it. Good job noting that the best track was 10-min, and not 1-min. I think it's right. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Is their a way you could add in a paramater for Tropical Depressions, that exceed 35 knots but are not upgraded to Cyclones in RSMC Nadis AoR? Thanks Jason Rees ( talk) 00:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
For the South Atlantic tropical cyclone article, a track map of the 2006 storm would be very helpful and informative in giving the location of the storm. The tracking points can be found in Gary Padgetts February 2006 TC summary located here. Thanks, Cyclone biskit 19:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Could you give me a reason for the using Visible Marie picture? HurricaneSpin ( talk) 03:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Can you upload a track map for this typhoon? I recently furnished the article. Thanks! CVW ( Talk) 03:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you've been reverting numerous edits on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale article. It would be advisable to read through WP:OWN and WP:3RR. Cheers, 14:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, quick question. Could you possibly include the remnant low positions for Daniel 06, as provided by the CPHC? Thanks if you can. --♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Can you update Faxai's track with data from the JMA? If I remember correctly, you said that the tracks are smoothed out like the JTWC/NHC but for this storm, the RSMC track is needed. Concerning the issue with the commons upload, just chance the information after you upload it. Thanks, Cyclone biskit 03:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
18.8N 134.4E - Tropical Depression
20.0N 133.4E - TD
21.4N 132.6E - TD
23.0N 131.7E - Tropical Storm
23.9N 131.2E - TS
25.0N 131.7E - TS
27.1N 133.9E - TS
29.3N 136.0E - TS
33.4N 139.6E - TS
35.6N 142.2E - Extratropical Storm
38.2N 146.2E - EX
39.9N 149.3E - EX
40.5N 152.6E - EX
41.1N 157.0E - EX
42.8N 162.9E - EX
Like this? It didn't seem to fix the problem, which is odd. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)