Something came up a couple minutes ago for Sunday, and I defenitely cannot go. However I will give my opinions tomorrow. If you wish to take these to meeting, go ahead. Mitch 32 contribs 23:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pharos! How did the meet up go? I could not attend despite being in NYC :( Anything on the Hebrew manuscript?-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 03:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I think I will move back the article about Judeopolonia to this name, since the name League of East European States doesn't appear on any google search outside of Wikipedia, the term Judeopolonia has been adopted (rightly or wrongly) as the widespread name of this concept. While some may feel discomfort at this, Wikipedia is not a place to judge accepted naming, similar situation is in Polish Corridor article which is a propaganda term that describes an area of Polish administrative region with different name, yet the propaganda name has entered widespread usage. Also a proper move should be be made after voting and discussion. The term Judeopolonia is widespread enough that I thin is notable to have an article on wiki.-- Molobo ( talk) 04:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Perhaps a an article about Attempts to create Jewish state in Central and Eastern Europe ? But at beginning they will be similiar to each other.-- Molobo ( talk) 04:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up about this. At the moment interest is a bit low in the PA chapter because of all the delays, so there isn't much to talk about. Plus, i'm trying to be patient and work through all problems we discussed with delphine and the chapcom. If we have need of it, we will definitely consider wikback for our communications. thanks! -- Whiteknight ( talk) ( books) 23:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Precise source and license, please?-- Jusjih ( talk) 02:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
You're invited to the
Sixth Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
January 2008
Time: January 26th, 5:00 PM
Location:
The Marathon Grill, 10th and Walnut
You have received this message because you are on the
invite list, you may change your invite options via that link.
BrownBot (
talk) 21:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Mythological information on the Giant Otter was precisely what I was missing! Marskell ( talk) 20:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Pharos,
I am the archivist for the language subcommittee. You sent a message to the language subcommittee on January 29th 2008 about historical languages. Discussion with the subcommittee is regularly copied to a public archive for transparency. Since you have not agreed to archival, your messages are currently replaced with the message "<this user has not agreed to public archival>".
Do you agree to the public archival of all your emails? Even if you do agree, you can mark any email or comment as private and the message will be replaced by an appropriate note to that effect. The archives can be edited at any time to remove a message you forgot to mark as private.
Thanks. —{ admin} Pathoschild 15:17:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I placed a note on scheduling the March 2008 meeting here: Wikipedia talk:Meetup/NYC#6th NYC meetup tentative date in March 2008 — Becksguy ( talk) 15:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Enphon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 04:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
The schedule sounds good to me. I have had zero luck getting anyone from the library to talk to me. You might give it a try. ScienceApologist ( talk) 16:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Rare books or the medical library might be the best bets. ScienceApologist ( talk) 15:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Please come settle the current debate raging over there. Thank you. Serendipod ous 11:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey. Got a question. What do you do if no other users chime in on an AfD page? Should I delete the article outright? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 20:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you have participated in Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder ( talk) ( Contrib) 18:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Is this page the source of Image:Two Stickney circa 1836 drawing.png?-- Pharos ( talk) 23:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your contribution to the Wikipedia Signpost article. I think it was considerably improved by the changes. There are couple of things that I think needed to be corrected, however:
I have made a few other cosmetic changes which I don't think alters anything of substance. The main one was a shifting of the text
to a later part of the article which seemed to me to be a more logical place for it. — David Wilson ( talk · cont) 12:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I think we agree more than disagree. Certainly there are some who raise the conjectural images innocently enough, but it seems that there are others who persist in arguing against them do to their inaccuracy even after acknowledging that they are conjectural images. While a caption would catch the former, I'm not so sure it would do much to dissuade the latter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MasonicDevice ( talk • contribs) 01:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)