This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 105 | ← | Archive 109 | Archive 110 | Archive 111 | Archive 112 | Archive 113 | → | Archive 115 |
Archive 111: February 2023
Hello! I have updated the page on the Institue which you tagged as having issues with notability and primary sources. I believe I added what is required but please let me know if you'd like to see anything more specific. My motivation for creating the page is due to how many news article recently publishing are referencing its reporting of the Memphis police killing of Tyre Nichols. Still, from my research, the organization had some degree of notability before that. [[User: LowElectrical9168| LowElectrical9168]] ([[User talk: LowElectrical9168|talk]]) 7:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I voted to delete Penzance, Arizona, then afterward noticed you had created it. I've also had a few interesting places nominated for deletion because they were working towns, with no permanent population. It's unfortunate there isn't some other category where we could put these once-important places. Cheers. Magnolia677 ( talk) 11:35, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
I appreciate your effort to watch Wikipeda, but I think that you should keep in mind that - as a rule of thumb - every bigger building in Europe built before 1800 is either notable per WP:NBUILD or can be merged with something notable / expanded to something notable. If you see two or more interwiki links, you can surely bet that it IS notable itself. Therefore there is no need for sources to prove notability (although good sources are of course always welcome). Cheers. Jan Spousta ( talk) 13:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I appreciate your review for the pages I recently created. You've left comments regarding the complete absence of the entity, that the article was created for, in the references.
To clarify:
There were two kings who ruled by the name Shivadeva. The article is for Shivadeva the First (Shivadeva I) the other one being Draft:Shivadeva II, which is also one of the articles that you have reviewed and left a comment on. If you look closely at the references, all the references mention both kings. Shivadeva I was deposed by Amshuverma, and Shivadeva II was the successor of Narendradeva.
On the name of the kings (Sivadeva or Shivadeva). All the references use Shivadeva for Shivadeva I and some references use Sivadeva for Shivadeva II. However, the correct spelling for both would be Shivadeva as the names are derived from a significant deity in Hinduism, Lord Shiva.
I hope this addresses your comments on the articles. If not, could you please suggest ways to improve them? Thanks :) Atyuttam ( talk) 14:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I have restored the references which Wikipedia's page translation tool removed from the article as I translated it (again, not my creation). What can be done about the tool causing this problem? It seems like a lot of unnecessary work, and I know I will be less likely to use that tool in the future. Londonbeat41692 ( talk) 14:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for checking this page. I undid your (total) deletion because I thought it was a mistake. The article had all necessary sources (needed at this time) who can be verified in objective dutch webpages and news sites. You verified the 2022 page and it doesn't have any more sources. So I don't really understand why you first: deleted the whole page of the 2023 season and now you only kept a small part. This season is still ongoing and eventually more sources will be added... -- SmartGwen ( talk) 15:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I'm curious. How is this a copyright violation of this page? It seems that site posted the page on January 28 and a user on Wikipedia wrote the content a day before here. Mike Allen 15:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Greetings. Thanks for the nudge to provide more citations for the article on Warner E. Hodges. I have inserted quite a few. In your view, are more still needed? I also started a talk page for the article. Rory1262 ( talk) 15:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Holden Commodore SS and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 1 § Holden Commodore SS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Colonies Chris ( talk) 16:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, thank you for your notification on my talk page. Indeed there are sections which are wholly uncited. Yet these sections don't contain quotations, material whose verifiability has been challenged or contentious matter about living persons. I'm curious: what do you see as bold claims that are likely to be challenged? Knowing this I could find sources to these claims. KatVanHuis ( talk) 16:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Please stop contacting me. Do not leave any more messages on my pages.
Thanks.
KatoKungLee ( talk) 19:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
I have commenced a private discussion about the new user Elttaruuu on a reviewer's talk page. I'd be interested in seeing your opinion before advancing my concerns to ANI. Thanks. BusterD ( talk) 19:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chetco, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 01:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I am not at all agree with the reason you given and moved the wiki page to draft.If you notice carefully I have provided reliable, independent source justifying the notability of the source. I would request you to go through the reference once again and move back the article from draft to main space. Risu43 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Good evening, I added sources in the summary of the page and returned the previous page information - adding sources about the production, housemates, nominations and evictions. I also added Episodes that can be retrieved in the Weekly Summary. I hope this gives enough sources needed. -- SmartGwen ( talk) 16:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi there! I’ve been tinkering with pages of UK-based political and business leaders (mainly because that’s where my area of interest lies).
I’ve tried to create a new page for the first time (Leon Emirali page). I picked that subject as I believe they’re fairly notable with good sources (The Times, PR Week etc), but wanted to understand a bit more about the process as this one was deleted and moved to draft.
Happy to work on this one again or chose another topic if you think it categorically doesn’t meet notability criteria
I know you might not have the time, but would you be willing to help out a new Wikipedian with some more feedback on why the article wasn’t approved and what I can do to be a better editor?
Thanks so much Fluffy JoinFluffy250 ( talk) 11:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Onel5969. I noticed you tagged "notability" on the articles Ramón y Cajal (scholarship) and Juan de la Cierva (scholarship). I created both, and I thought I included enough references for notability, including 20+ sources, most of them reliable secondary sources like news articles from relevant newspapers. I also included wikilinks to scientists that have received these fellowships. Would you please advise on how do you think I should improve the article for it to be ok to remove the notability tag? These have been the main two sources of funding for Spanish scientists for the last 20 years, and they are still nowadays, so I would like to help prove they are notable. Thanks Samer.hc ( talk) 17:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm out of energy on that one.
maybe the wiki system should identify people who'd like to get this sort of situation 'over the line', and alert them.
I guess organisations operating in sensitive areas will necessarily have limited media coverage, and therefore limited references - and therefore be structurally underrepresented on Wikipedia. JCJC777 ( talk) 18:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
I really don't have time to waste dealing with the kind of obstacles you present. JQ ( talk) 19:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Template:Arizona year nav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
My villages exist and they are legit places, why it is been moved to draft with the notability tags? AdesamSA ( talk) 09:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, I hope you're doing well. My recent article Gajesh Naik had some issues to deal with, so I thought maybe I'll ask you if this certain admin is correct. Could you please check this edit [2] if they are right on their part? I wonder why this source can't be actually considered a as "RS". Is it because it's written like a blog post?
Also here's the link to the source that was removed along with the content [3]. Please do let me know if they're alright on their part or if it's a mistake? I'd just like to know more about it, since I do trust your intentions well. ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 12:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
About W. D. Martinez General Merchandise Store and other articles about Arizona NRHP-listed places, I am glad you created them, despite there being some confusion about PD status or not of photos. For a long time i was struggling to create Arizona NRHP articles, I think I was trying to reach some target I had in mind for what should show at wp:NRHPPROGRESS. I believe I noticed some progress being made somehow, which was by your creations.
Anyhow, could you possibly indicate agreement that several sets of photos, including some for the Martinez store, should be deleted from Commons, at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_from_npgallery.nps.gov_or_catalog.archives.gov? I want to make progress there, will request that some admin come by and do the deletions where we are agreed. --Doncram ( talk, contribs) 04:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for looking at the article - please could you explain the tag you added on the talk page of the article rather than on my talk page - thanks Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. You reverted my change in uru-chan saying Ringo Awards is not a relevant award. With all due respect, but on what basis do you make that claim? I ask this because, in the field of comics, he is, indeed, a relevant award right after Eisner and Harvey. I would just like to understand your criteria for defining it as not relevant. Thanks Lucio Luiz ( talk) 16:24, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
I think you managed to put an end to my activity on wikipedia. Tell me how I can delete everything I wrote here without leaving any trace of my passing here. There are other sites besides Wikipedia. Florin ( talk) 20:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. The main purpose of this article was to record the winners, finalists and final scores for each year that this competition has been played since inception 100+ years ago. It was at one time the second most important club competition in the county. As it is a local not a national competition, it will be impossible to find online sources pre-Internet area. For the years 2000 onwards, I have included the appropriate online sources and links. As there are no available online sources before then, I have referenced John Mulligan's The GAA in Louth: An Historical Record (1984) and his follow-up, The GAA in Louth - An Historical Record Updated (2000) in the article. The winners, runners-up and final scores included in the article pre-Internet era were sourced from these very informative books. If anyone interested in Louth GAA wants to obtain information on the history of this competition over the last 100 years, they would have to find a copy of the books (probably quite difficult to purchase) for their own use or borrow from the county Louth library. This is the challenge anyone who wants to create a comprehensive online local Gaelic Athletic Association history resource faces. The above is also the approach I adopted for the other two championship pages I created Louth Intermediate Football Championship and Louth Minor Football Championship User talk:Moresthepity - Wikipedia Moresthepity ( talk) 03:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for taking the time to review my article! There are a couple points in the the comment you left me that I wanted to follow up on. First – yes, you are quite right, I do have a personal relationship to the subject of this article. As a comparatively new user, this is my first article and I neglected to put that on my talk page. I'll absolutely include it there when the article returns to the mainspace. I'm currently working on another article about something (it's a boat... yes, a boat) that I have a tangential personal relationship to as well. I'll be sure to include that COI disclosure when I'm done with it. For my first articles, I figured it would be easier to write about something I have a base level of personal knowledge about to help guide my writing. But I believe the subject of the current article is objectively notable, and I tried to be really thorough with the sourcing. This is another question I had for you – you mentioned that "Information that can't be referenced should be removed". Was there something in particular that you were referring to? Because I feel the article is pretty thoroughly sourced, more so than a lot of articles that I've been practicing copyediting on... So I'd like to be able to rectify anything specific that you had in mind. And then lastly, sorry about moving the page independently – I was under the impression that was valid per WP:Moving a page. One thing I've been struggling with is how information on the same topic is sometimes spread across several different WP pages. Anyway, please let me know about the reference issue specifically, and then I'll submit for review again. Thanks for your time! Genly Ai ( talk) 15:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. You mentioned in the page FC Twente in European football that it needs more citations. But every single game has the citation link in it from uefa.com in the "result" section of the template. Am I missing something here? Regards... Magawla61 ( talk) 19:16, 7 February 2023 (UTC)mgwl Magawla61 talk
Hello, Onel5969,
While I greatly appreciate all of the work that you do here, over the past two weeks, you have draftified this article THREE times! That's way too much. Draftify an article once if it is appropriate, if it is moved back to main space or recreated then either work on improving the article or seek a form of deletion if you feel the article is unsuitable for Wikipedia. I've never seen you do this three times so you might not have remembered that you have already moved the article but please do not get into a move war over a bad article. Thank you for all of your contributions. Liz Read! Talk! 03:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For reviewing 97,296 articles. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 12:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC) |
:D | |
Hey, thank you for reviewing my article Sindhi Australians, happy contributings in advance! Starkex, 8 February 2023 (UTC) |
Hello Onel5969, thank you for your help back then. I don't wanna sound childish but David Gerard's edits are just a pain now. While I thought they'd be more matured with respect to their years of adminship on Wikipedia, it doesn't likely seems so.
I'm not sure if you know me well, but you have reviewed ALOT of my articles; prior to me getting the NPP role. Now we have David here who is persisting that I have COI with the subject (Gajesh Naik). They have reverted twice today as of IST timings. Here's the latest revision [4]. While I've kept my cool and have stated multiple times on the AFD related with the article and my talk page that I'm not engaged in any COI yet they keep tagging the article.
I was wondering if I should take this to ANI? because I don't think any better has come from our talk page discussion. Lemme know what you think, cheers! ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 18:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
I support that "vs" replace "vs." and "v" in boxing match titles.
However, to get consensus on this issue, I've opened an RfC on the issue.
Please comment and offer your opinions on it.
See: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#rfc 029C646
Thanks, --Tbf69 userpage • talkpage 19:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Now that I have added one more source, please reconsider the notability tag that you placed there earlier. I would appreciate having it lifted for my DYK nomination. Thank you. NotReallySoroka ( talk) 04:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
You have reviewed this Parul Mishra Wiki page before and we have already discussed on this. I again strongly object your action on putting his to draftspace. All the reference provides are reliable, independent justifying the notability of the source.
I request you to go through the reference again and move back the article from draftspace to mainspace.
Further request you not to touch this wiki page. User:Risu43( talk) 13:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
This is back. New article in mainspace, same primary editor as the last article you moved to draftspace.... UtherSRG (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosebud, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 04:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
hi Could you make this Article Draft I tried it but I don't know how And please don't make it a redirect Because I want to improve it Gerçois ( talk) 06:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that you moved my page to a draft. If you look at the references, you see that the league, MLS Next Pro and the parent club, Los Angeles FC, have both announced the founding of the team in addition to the new team having its own website on the parent clubs' page, [5]. The newest reference I added was from SB Nation. This team will start next month after the conclusion of the MLS training camps which end before the end of the month since the MLS regular season starts on February 25th and all those players who didn't make the parent club roster will be assigned to this new club. If you follow baseball, it's the same process. That's why there is only one player listed on the new team since we don't know yet who makes the parent club roster and who doesn't. Now if this satisfies your notability guidelines, release this page from being a draft. Thank You... Roberto221 ( talk) 09:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
I hope you are doing well.
After a long time, today I am back to my user account. I figured out that you have decided to redirect Oubeid Allah Hlal page to his comedian group page Les inqualifiables. I believe there is enough in-depth press coverage from independant and reliable local sources to show independant notability. I think that the person is even more known as a doctor-influencer than a comedian & part of "Les inqualifiables". This is can be confirmed by checking their social media accounts or Oubeid's TV/Radio appearances where he is invited to talk as an influencer in medecine and health care field. However, the most important criteria is press sources talking about him (as a an influencer). Here are a few examples:
https://fr.hespress.com/280618-interview-oubeid-allah-hlal-un-medecin-pas-comme-les-autres.html
http://www.babmagazine.ma/oubeid-allah-hlal-lart-pour-informer-et-lhumour-pour-guerir
https://www.h24info.ma/culture/oubeid-allah-hlal-mon-reve-devenir-le-premier-cardiologue-humoriste/
please tell me what do you think?
Cordially, Art&football ( talk) 22:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
I've added quite a few new references. Some of them are pretty extensive and all of them cover all the content of the article. What else needs to be done? -- Silve rije 23:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, could you please consider to wait before adding orphan templates etc. to new articles. Egeymi ( talk) 12:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinta, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 16:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Onel, do you have any information on the source "Packman, J. & Packman L. (1966) The Sexton Blake Catalogue"? I looks like a self published work. I asked about the publisher, but got a wall of text with no real information.
Greetings from Los Angeles // Timothy :: talk 18:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Onel5969:, could you please create a draft for American actress Rita Flynn, who appeared in with James Cagney and Jean Harlow in The Public Enemy (1931) and also has an article but in the Italian Wikipedia 190.140.147.233 ( talk) 03:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC) 190.140.147.233 ( talk) 14:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedar Springs, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
– dlthewave ☎ 19:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Canyon Mesa, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
– dlthewave ☎ 19:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coyote Springs, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
– dlthewave ☎ 19:16, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flat Rock, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
– dlthewave ☎ 19:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm probably being thick here but what source are you saying has been copvio'd? The reddit thread or https://slife.org/proto-indo-european-mythology/ which says it contains material from WP. Immanuelle says that this article contains content from other WP article, and while there might be a small attribution issue to be sorted out in relation to that, I'm not sure where the copyvio is. Nthep ( talk) 22:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. You made a few couple edits to the BPIFB5P page I authored... thanks for fixing the underscore. But there's a problem with the banner you applied. Yes, I see that it appears to have no other articles linking to it -- the right hand menu shows that status as does the tool provided in the banner -- but there already IS a link to it on an existing, page "Category:Genes_on_human_chromosome_20" which I guess is a reciprocal link and don't know if it counts. But I'm going to manually add another link on two pages for related genes/proteins where it makes sense and would be useful. Plus there are trivial links to the page in an exchange with User:Boghog. So there are plenty of links to justify removing the banner. But I'm puzzled why the existing link isn't showing up. Is this something to be ignored? Lapabc ( talk) 20:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
hi to you, i hoping taht you are feel well, so for the article of Gogogligo, He is a person recognized in my country, Togo and even the President of the Republic decorated him for that, I do not know why we doubt his notability and in addition the article is well accepted on Wikipedia in French Videke ( talk) 15:09, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmanuel Mission, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Mission, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troweek, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troweek, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
WP:GNG just says multiple sources are expected, there is no minimum. WP:THREE is only a userspace essay. Peter James ( talk) 16:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969,
I see you have put the article on the journalist Rachida El Azzouzi to the draft section, as I did not see any comments that specified what could have been done different, I have changed some parts, but I would really appreciate it, if you could give some more notes on how to change the original article.
Have a nice day!
With Regards,
Fred Fredellis01 ( talk) 18:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Can you explain why the industrialist Nadir Dias de Figueiredo is not a relevant person for Wikipedia? Thank you! Gondolabúrguer ( talk) 20:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
Did you have time to review my request? I think all criteria is here to undo the redirection.
Thanks Art&football ( talk) 12:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Do you think that acting in the popular series Lo Que Callan Las Mujeres / programa "Lo que Callamos las Mujeres" - is enough for her to have notoriety? (Angélica Magaña)? Thanks. HistoricReminder ( talk) 00:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, could you be so kind and review article titled Britt Weerman (a Dutch high jumper). It is the Dutch record holder and silver medallist of the World Under-20 Championships so she is notable - just I did not add enough sources initially (it is an athletic stub however) - there is a problem with sources for athletes from "smaller", non-English speaking countries. However I found notable Dutch references (secondary notable per wiki) and added them. Article is waiting several days now so if you could review it soon I would be grateful. Regards, Track1News ( talk) 18:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for reviewing Desperate Measures (2013 Australian TV series). I realise that it is light on third-party mentions, but that is partly the nature of the beast. It is an important historical source, and the individual episodes are mentioned all over the place. It's just not the type of thing that turns up in news sources or popular press. It has quite a number of incoming links, plus there are other TV series of the same name that most likely need articles one day (see Desperate Measures). I have now added to it, having discovered that there were actually three series, and found some academic sources. I hope that this will be enough to pass the notability test. I would not like to see my work on this (and related articles, with incoming links) wasted, and it can be expanded with series 2 & 3. Series such as this (like First Australians) often get repeat showings, and the fact that it is currently available on SBS streaming service is also a sign of its notability. Would you please have another look at it? Thanks. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 06:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockledge, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
– dlthewave ☎ 13:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Onel5969! I saw you reviewed Tehran Summer Code earlier today and, as I am in the process of reviewing Overclock scientific research group (the event's main organizer), there seem to be some notability concerns. I've been unable to find much information about Overclock scientific research group, let alone justify its role as an "independent" research group, and I think it might be a promotion attempt with a lot of WP:REFCLUTTER that's spread out across several pages in an effort to support notability. I am inclined to CSD Overclock scientific research group as G11, but wanted to first check in with you about the conference page and see what your thoughts are. Thanks! Ppt91 ( talk) 21:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Good morning. In this edit you adjusted the AfD template. Is that an issue that needs addressing in Twinkle, or did I mangle something? Thanks! Star Mississippi 14:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi there! @Onel5969 I saw you recently add the multiple issues tag on an article I wrote, I just did some changes to it.. could you please consider removing the tag now. Thank you! Defunkedmaster ( talk) 14:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Just an FYI, not even an hour after you had moved it to draftspace, Nostalgia Zone moved the article back into mainspace... Magitroopa ( talk) 16:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, how is it going? I've seen you completely deleted an article I wrote without an actual discussion. I believe you should repristinate the page, sources were there and had full coverage. If you thought more were needed, either add those yourself or add a tag calling for further action. Your approach is not very collaborative neither constructive. Honestly, if I slowed down contributing to this language version of the project, much of the fault resides in your behavior. I'm sorry to write you this, but this is how I feel. I hope you can understand and that compromises can found. Thank you, Plumbago Capensis ( talk) 18:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Onel. Thanks for reviewing chiliz. Kindly look through it again. I've added categories and linked it to few articles. Still working to improve it though. Thanks Ghostfishing ( talk) 08:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. I have seen that you have reverted my AfC action. I have visited all the references to verify the article's claims. Further, I have checked coverages about the article person. As I respect you as a good editor, there should be reasons to revert mine. I would be happy to get assistance from you about my mistake on that draft. Please reply. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 12:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jan Spousta ( talk) 13:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Onel. Thanks for reviewing chiliz. Apologise for removing the tag. I'm new here and learning. Kindly look through the article again. I've added categories and linked it to few articles. Regards.
Thanks Ghostfishing ( talk) 14:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you [[User talk:Onel5969| — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghostfishing ( talk • contribs) 17:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Onel5969. Thank you for your input.
You have tagged Innocent Gangaidzo as, may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for academics
However according to Wikipedia:Notability_(academics). Innocent Gangaidzo is notable because "6 The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society." He is President of ECSACOP which is the highest academic administrative post for a major medical organization covering covering 7 countries.
You also tagged it as relies excessively on references to primary sources
However according to Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources "Primary" is not, and should not be, a bit of jargon used by Wikipedians to mean "bad" or "unreliable" or "unusable". While some primary sources are not fully independent, they can be authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, expert-approved, subject to editorial control, and published by a reputable publisher." The sources used are are largely independent, accurate, high quality, from reputable organizations, etc.
Please may you kindly remove the tags you placed?
Ear-phone ( talk) 15:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sprucedale, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 01:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Why did you redirect my article to the Nickelodeon Kids’ Choice Awards page? I know it doesn’t have any sources but, come on other articles based on the KCA have minimal sources so why are you going after me? Nostalgia Zone ( talk) 02:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969: thank you very much for all your previous work reviewing the articles I have created. Following the indications I have incorporated the template "Connected Contributor" to my discussion page but I can't manage to put more information because the template doesn't open, I have tried to put it also in the user page and the program doesn't allow it. Some articles have been remunerated, others have not. In some cases I have been asked for help to solve problems. I would like to place this information, but as I say, I can't get the template to open. If you can tell me how to do it, I would appreciate it. Miskito89 ( talk) 10:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. I am just here to take an opinion/advise regarding my AfC review done till the moment. I have accepted some per guidance and declined most per notability issue. Kindly advise me if I have done anything wrong. Would love to hear from you. :) Twinkle1990 ( talk) 12:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Don't mean to be rude, but do you mind not making edits like this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Conjugated_oligoelectrolytes&oldid=1140528434
I just started the article. I'm working on it. It isn't helpful to say it's orphaned and needs categories. I know I know it needs categories. Those boxes just makes the article look bad and make more work for me to go and delete them. Rather than saying this need categories, why don't you add some? It takes just as long. Miserlou ( talk) 14:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank You for your help St. Therese Church, Abu Dhabi Apostolicus ( talk) 16:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC) |
Hello @ Onel5969. As mentioned before, I have requested a third opinion Talk:Innocent_Gangaidzo#Notability. Ear-phone ( talk) 00:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
Thank you for cleaning up this new article about Charles A. Birnbaum - I am grateful for your help on many of my articles - you have always made them better and I wanted you to know that I notice! This barnstar is for you! Minard38 ( talk) 13:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you for your kindness in reviewing this article despite my general grumpiness about BLAR at ANI. I hope nothing I've said there has reflected badly on you; I don't think the job of new page reviewers or AfC people is easy. I'm keen that Wikipedia's plethora of policies and addiction to acronyms shouldn't intimidate new editors, I get frustrated about the acceptance procedure, and I wish AfD were more friendly and collegial; but on the other hand, if there weren't acceptance procedures, and "pesky" notability requirements, WP would be full of all sorts of unsourced trash. So please keep up the good work and know that you are appreciated. Elemimele ( talk) 14:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi - I removed the redirection to Off The Kerb Productions as the companies are independent of each other - as evidenced by the Companies House link. Whilst both companies were set up by Addison Cresswell, they have always been separate entities. Could you let me know what further proof would suffice for this? Thanks. Tequester ( talk) 14:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you marked Sarah Forbes (cricketer) as "reviewed" with no notes. Just wanted to drop a quick reminder that WP:NSPORTS requires actual in-depth coverage to establish notability, so this article probably should have been nominated for deletion or at least tagged for notability. I went ahead and restored the redirect since there was already consensus to delete. – dlthewave ☎ 15:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
You moved the Yussuf A Aleem article to the Draft domain, though a talk page for it remains in the main space. Can you initiate its deletion? Thanks — ADavidB 22:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
hi there the correct link is Saudis not Saudi Arabia, will you correct your mass edits, thanks, Egeymi ( talk) 11:53, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
It seems like you redirected my article and I would like to know the rationale behind that. Thank you in advance. Shamsu Rabiu Galadunchi ( talk) 13:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Onel5969
Some reliable secondary sources added to the article. The article is translated from the Persian Wikipedia and most of the sources are in Persian but, I found sources from Washington Post as well.
Cheers, Eh.eb 16:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I reject COI because
AFD Accepted
Keep : Article follows BLP Policy and Notable. meet WP:GNG (some sources:
1
2 and
3).
Endrabcwizart (
talk) 17:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Arran Gaelic, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Investigating, but I strongly suspect this content was copied from Wikipedia, not the other way around. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Onel5969:
Thank you for attending to the Order of Merit of the Republic of Cyprus article, which you have tagged as "may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline". Why, efharisto?
Primm1234 ( talk) 19:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey I am sorry I didn't mean to get you mad I send 2 days making the 2023 Michigan State baseball page. Why can't it stay I work so had on it if you can explain I would appreciate it I am sorry if I got you mad at me. Kevinthomas20 ( talk) 22:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rail transport in the United Kingdom (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Would you check these two articles: Boys Planet (TV show) and List of Boys Planet contestants? Most of the contents are copy-pasted from Draft:Boys Planet and Draft:List of Boys Planet contestants. The two articles above just created on February 24, 2023 from same user. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️•( 🆃🅰🅻🅺) 12:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello my friend, I hope you are doing well. You delete the articles that I create without considering them. I have not seen such a rule in the Wikipedia rules. I try to create articles by studying sources and standards. I am not able to create a complete article, of course. And Wikipedia also evolves with the cooperation of all users. I extract the minimum resources needed for an article and mention in the article that other users help to complete the articles. Thank you for giving the articles a deadline and not deleting them immediately. This work of yours makes me and other Wikipedia users hope to write in this encyclopedia. And even with the passage of time, if there are any problems, they will be fixed. Thank you. Garshaasp 14:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
I saw that you opened an investigation regarding to editors who write about Uzbekistan. I want to inform you that I also created an investigation with the same subject. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whybob19 and I saw that first four accounts of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whybob19 and third and forth account of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whybob19 were created in the same day with the interval of 1-2-3 hours.
I want that you should merge your investigation with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whybob19 because you opened it at 01:06, 26 February 2023 but I opened Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whybob19 before you at 15:31, 25 February 2023. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 06:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I've run into your helpful edits on a wide range of pages across many projects, all of them being extraordinary and making Wikipedia a better encyclopedia! Scott the Reporter ( talk) 07:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (Sexton Blake) // Timothy :: talk 15:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Regarding your edit here. Methinks the long-ago blocked creator of that redirect, and the editor now making the revert, are one and the same. Editor Interaction Analyser shows multiple edits to the same obscure articles, including this and this. Should I refer it to SPI? Cheers! Magnolia677 ( talk) 17:20, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey, thanks that you reviewed one of page i created. If you do the same with Maurya (surname) and Kushwaha (surname), it will be a great help. Thanks again. Admantine123 ( talk) 17:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Onel5969, Is it okay if I bring back the Kids Choice Award for Favorite Video Game page on the condition that me and other people will improve the article with more sources? Nostalgia Zone ( talk) 17:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granville, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 00:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, dear colleague! Sorry for my terrible English. You wrote that this article may be deleted, because its not notable. I'll add it notable sources. Umarxon III ( talk) 06:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC).
I’ve adjusted the page Leo DaSilva. Review positively.
PS we’re on the streets protesting and defending democracy because they are about to rig in a 90 year old dinosaur as president, so my attention is divided from Wikipedia. Amaekuma ( talk) 12:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, @ Onel5969 I have reviewed David Gonzalez's draft in detail, and I have made quite a few changes to make it have an encyclopedic style and a neutral point of view. I have also found more references. I think that together we can make a better Wikipedia. And really, the article needed an improvement, thanks for sending it to the Draft space. If you can review it, that would be great. Miskito89 ( talk) 14:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
U have redirected my article Deeparadhana even it has reliable sources.it had enough source from well known newspaper Times of India and other reliable articles. Cdusxy ( talk) 17:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
U said well known Times of India is not a reliable source for my article Deeparadhana, but many of our language Entertainment articles are based on that only.How can u say that is not reliable, which was well known news paper. U asked to keep reliable references from newspaper and books but not considering as reliable source.plz remove notability tag Cdusxy ( talk) 17:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
I have added available secondary sources for my article Deeparadhana. They may be enough and removed notability.
Hello Onel5969, thanks for getting in touch regarding the page Paul A. Singh. I think Mr Singh is worthy of a page on Wiki, as he is arguably one of the first creators of the commercial dashcam. He is also a notable road safety campaigner in the UK with several mentions in mainstream UK media. Since you marked the page for deletion I have added several other credible news sources regarding Singh's work in road safety over the years, and also the page is no longer an orphan now, as it links to the page for former police Chief Constable Keith Hellawell who worked with Singh for many years in the area of road safety. If you feel the page still falls short of the necessary number and quality of sources I would very much appreciate any pointers or assistance you can give to get this page to meet the necessary Notability Guidelines. Sean Matthew Obrien ( talk) 13:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi again. Please review Karm Yuddh (Indian TV series) though I am autopatroller, I don't want to misuse of my user rights. Hence, I request you to review. Please... Twinkle1990 ( talk) 13:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)