![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ABC (block cipher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABC (block cipher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nageh ( talk) 23:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Related to above AfD you may be interested in a discussion I started at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cryptography#When_is_a_cryptographic_algorithm_notable.3F. Thanks! Nageh ( talk) 17:54, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Another editor has added the {{
prod}}
template to the article
Xenon (cipher), suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and
Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at
its talk page. If you remove the {{
prod}}
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
KTC (
talk) 11:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank You for pointing out the mistake.I will let you know if it passes the nomination.Cheers! Ayanosh ( talk) 02:53, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your many pics added to NRHP list-articles in Utah, including within List of RHPs in Utah County. I like this Baxter House one.... -- do ncr am 22:05, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ntsimp, Thanks for your help with the image. Even though I'm very familiar with web site editing, I manage the Fluke Calibration websites, 9 regions, 9 languages, but the Wiki system is a new and different content management system. Took me two days just to figure out how to get the image to appear on the Wasatch county listing page.
You might also like the south view image:Snake Creek Power Station South Side.jpg of the building that more clearly shows the haunches that are a big part of the Swiss architecture that is much a signature of Midway.
I plan to get all the Midway sites that do not currently have images and perhaps some of the Heber one's too. I already have the John Huber house and creamery, taken the same time as the power station photos. I may not get them all in time for contest entry but that's okay. And who knows after that. I'm actually traveling to New England in a few weeks and will try to get some from there as well.
Regards, Wayne L. Newland 23:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WLNewland ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
I would like to come back to comments you wrote many years ago: [1]. You were of course completely right: finding regular non-vertex-transitive graphs is not so hard, if one does not demand that the graph is connected, as well as its complement. In the article Vertex-transitive graph, there are now two examples of cubic non-vertex-transitive graphs, that are connected as well as their complement: the Frucht graph and Tietze graph. The Bidiakis cube is another one. I do not know if there are such graphs with less vertices.
At the time, you mentioned original research, that would be difficult to put in the article. However, just the observation that complements of graphs with non-isomorphic regular components with the same valency, are regular and not vertex-transitive, could be worth mentioning.
Kind regards, Evilbu ( talk) 17:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
oops -- Thanks for catching! Cheers, Pete Tillman ( talk) 16:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
---|---|
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 03:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
Would definitely be appreciated. Smallbones( smalltalk) 04:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi there - I am the Director, Community Advocacy for the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that supports Wikipedia. It's very important that I talk to you - would you please email me at philippewikimedia.org at your earliest opportunity? Again, it's very important and urgent that I speak with you. Thank you.
Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (
talk) 06:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey Ntsimp; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 23:14, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey thanks for helping out at Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Progress by adding data for Utah, Idaho, and Vermont. I have been busy for the past day and a half after I created the page, so I'm glad to see it isn't just sitting there. There is one thing that I would like to ask, though. When tallying this data, have you been taking duplicates into account? When I announced the page at WT:NRHP, I tried to kind of stress the detailed referencing of duplicates on this list so that it could be easily updated if those duplicates were to be articled/illustrated in the future. See for example the Alabama section. It includes a citation explaining that two articles are present in multiple county lists and thus the sum of the numbers in the column is not the actual total number of listings in that state. It further includes the detail that one duplicated listing is unillustrated and unarticled, while the other duplication has both an image and an article. This fact means that the columns for #Illustrated and #Articled should be offset by only 1, not 2. I have basically been copying/pasting the reference for the "Duplicates" row in the state lists (e.g. National Register of Historic Places listings in Alabama#cite note-4) and editing it a bit. Would it be possible for you to add these refs to the data you compiled? Thanks!-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 01:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ntsimp. I see you noticed i started articles for the 2 Piute County ones, am just going for the cheap thrill of an easy-to-get dark green area within Utah, in the article progress graphic to come out soon. :) I'd like to address NRHPs in Tooele County, too, with big area having sparse NRHP coverage, easy to score....
To keep things simple for Utah reconciliations in the future, maybe we should start articles for all the duplicate ones that overlap a county. And get pics for them too!
Thanks for your many contributions to Utah articles, and for your edits to many Utah new articles in recent weeks. -- do ncr am 20:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Yes. I have them all but the library, which I will get the next time I'm in Kanab if nobody beats me to it. I've been uploading the images slowly, in between other tasks. I live far from Kanab, and I don't get there often, but it's a place I like. I happened to be there on Easter this year in the early evening, and the weather was balmy. It was fun walking around town taking photos of NRHP buildings. Some are gorgeous; others seemed a bit neglected. Finetooth ( talk) 16:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
A discussion has been opened - where subsequent discussion should take place - at:
Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Is_MoStudies_Review_a_publisher_of_review_articles.3F.
(Neutral statement: At issue is the description of a scholarly journal, turning on allowable summary or interpretations from statements within what may or may not be held as reliable sources.)
-- Hodgdon's secret garden ( talk) 18:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind comments. Richmond sounds like a great town and I'm happy to help them show off their history.
Cheers. Richard Apple ( talk) 23:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Your entry at [2] doesn't appear to address the question. Here is an example of how your town might be used in a sentence; use in a title is similar. Here is another. And another. And another. Are there are any uses where where what follows is NOT set off by a comma? Only if there's a period or semicolon or end of title or heading instead. Dicklyon ( talk) 04:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject National Register of Historic Places Award | |
For helping WP:NRHP to illustrate 50,000 historic sites. Keep up the good work! Smallbones( smalltalk) 14:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC) |
You had been "pinged" recently to provide some input regarding a discussion involving Mormon Studies Review and so are now being appropriately canvassed (per wp:CANVASSING) to participate in the deletion discussion for the Review's brand-new "step-sibling" journal, Interpreter -- here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture. Thanks for your consideration of this request.-- Hodgdon's secret garden ( talk) 18:10, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I came across this article, 17th Utah Territorial Legislature, and found it difficult to use or repair. There are no references listed, and when I looked for a reference (so I could fix the article) all I found were Wiki-type articles. Some of the information listed is also incorrect. For example, "An Act incorporating Franklin City, in Cache County", links to Franklin, Ohio, when it should link to Franklin, Idaho. My feeling is the page should be deleted. I wonder if you agree. Thanks. Richard Apple ( talk) 14:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |