This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
Threads older than 20 days are typically archived. Some may be archived sooner.
Kat Dahlia
I've taken it out as spam rather than copyvio as the page you cited doesn't seem to contain any text at all. Now. Probably did then. Not the first time that's happened. Text can go at the first mention of a copyvio here.... It was pure unadulterated spam anyway.
Peridon (
talk) 20:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. I recall that the page had information at the time I visited it, from which the copyvio CSD tagging was based.
Northamerica1000(talk) 20:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #47
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Development
Extended diff view to include references now
Fixed bug where incorrect statements revision was shown in diff view
Added first version of Linked Data interface (RDF/XML); will be accessible from Special:EntityData
Rollout of phase 1 (language links) on all remaining Wikipedias is still planned for March 6
Next update on wikidata.org is also planned for March 6. This will have bugfixes and if all goes well string as a new available data type.
Proposal was made to the Hungarian, Hebrew and Italian Wikipedias to be the first batch to use phase 2 of Wikidata (infoboxes). Scheduled timeframe for this is end of March
I just deleted a sentence which was not found in the citation. Also, words like "common" violate
WP:PEACOCK.
Curb Chain (
talk) 00:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I rewrote the sentence as a re-addition to the article, along with the source. In the future, please consider moving sources to the Further reading sections of articles, rather than removing them in entirety.
Northamerica1000(talk) 00:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Sure I can consider it. The source should be relevant to the article. Also, I just deleted
[1] since the source has nothing the information is supposed to glean from.
Curb Chain (
talk) 00:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
The Silver Heart Club
Wikipedia is extremely confusing to someone like myself who has little experience with the layout, and rules.
Thank you for helping me. From reading the notes you had written, it seems as if you have revised the biography and approved your edits? I am satisfied with what is there. I am confused with what you were saying with "copy edit", but if there is no further action that is needed from me, let me know. Thank you.
If possible, could you put "Photo credit: Calinn Weber" as the photo caption?
Thanks again! Very much appreciate your help! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
174.124.5.136 (
talk) 01:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and thanks for the response. "Copy edit" refers to editing text. I've added your requested photo credit above to the article and to the description at the Wikimedia Commons page for the image, located at
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Silver_Heart_Club_(2013).jpg.
The Silver Heart Club (band) article is presented in an encyclopedic style with a neutral point-of-view and non-promotional tone, which is very important on Wikipedia. Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 01:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Photo credits in articles are not permitted by per
WP:CREDITS. I have removed it and updated the image information page with
this edit.--
ukexpat (
talk) 01:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing this, Ukexpat, and for providing the Manual of style link regarding this. Struck part of my comment above. Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 01:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I also moved the article back to
The Silver Heart Club - the disambiguating parenthesis is not required as there is no other article to disambiguated from.--
ukexpat (
talk) 02:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Yep, I noticed that. I figured the "(band)" part would help to distinguish that it's a band, rather than a club. I'm fine with the current title. Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 02:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mobile advertising networks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
My name is Bo Weber. I represent the recording artist The Silver Heart Club. The
Silver Heart Club has a distribution deal with Spotify LLC, and iHeartRadio Inc.
Both companies wrote me an email explaining that I will need to submit a
biography of the artist to Wikipedia, in order for our information to be viewable
on the music distribution sites, for Wikipedia is where they stream information about artists from.
I have had trouble with the article being submitted, because of the "subjects
notability". This artist has more than enough notability on and off the web.
Regarding topic
notability on Wikipedia, the notability in itself is based upon Wikipedia's standards. While many topics may be notable per other standards, Wikipedia editors have developed notability guidelines through consensus regarding content in the encyclopedia. Also, per
WP:NOTPROMOTION, part of Wikipedia's policy page of What Wikipedia is not, the encyclopedia is not to be used for promotional and advertising purposes. The AfC submission at
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Silver Heart Club requires copy editing to eliminate
promotional tone and to be written in an encyclopedic style with a
neutral point-of-view.
Sources in the submission from VolumeOne magazine and the Tribune Press Reporter are functional to demonstrate notability. At this time, the topic appears to have borderline notability per
WP:BAND, and copy editing the entry to base the submission solely upon what is stated in
reliable sources will likely increase the chances of the submission being accepted. For example, the source
[2] in the submission doesn't qualify as a reliable source, because it's a blog that is largely based upon personal opinion, and its publishers may not have a proven reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Information sourced from these types of questionable sources should typically be omitted from encyclopedia entries on Wikipedia.
Hello!
Mr Northamerica1000 Would you please be kind enough to spare some of your valuable time and see
this page as well as the related
article's history. Since you are a renouned editor on wikipedia, I do hope you can improve this article very well.
121.245.17.96 (
talk) 15:42, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello!
Hello!
MrNorthamerica1000 Would you please be kind enough to spare some of your valuable time and see
page as well as the related
history. Since you are a renouned editor on english wikipedia, I do hope you can improve this article very well.
121.245.17.96 (
talk) 15:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello: I don't have much interest in the
Ram Prasad Bismil article, but I've performed some basic layout clean-up, formatted a source in the article with the cite book template and added a portal.
Northamerica1000(talk) 19:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thanks for your help....how would i upload the picture which was taken in january — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Angealt (
talk •
contribs) 00:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Angealt (
talk) 00:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Force (Teletoon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Wikidata weekly summary #48
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Development
More work on widget to add language links on the Wikipedias directly without having to go to Wikidata
Bug fixes for Wikipedias, including:
don't show edit link when noexternallanglinks magic word suppresses Wikidata links (
bugzilla:45037)
use Q## links instead of linking to Special:ItemByTitle for “edit links” link (
bugzilla:44536)
preference for showing Wikidata edits by default in watchlist (
bugzilla:44973)
Catching up on writing tests for untested functionality
More work on the Lua support for accessing data from the repository (wikidata.org) on the Wikipedias
Updated Wikidata’s Vagrant development machine
Created initial QueryStore interface
Created initial setup code for the SQL QueryStore
Discussed and created initial schema for the SQL QueryStore
Simplified code for client settings, including which namespaces can have Wikidata links. The default is now all namespaces, without needing to explicitly specify them in the settings
Improved code for sorting interwiki links in the clients, with step towards allowing the communities to specify custom sort orders per Wikipedia
Improved handling of deleted properties
Further work on replacement for current search box
More work on improving error reporting and edit summaries in the API
Tim and Aaron killed the mystery bug that caused corrupt login tokens (
bugzilla:41586)
Asked the Italian, Hebrew and Hungarian Wikipedias if they want to be the first to use phase 2 (will ask a few more to join the first batch later today)
Is a specific bug report really important to you? If you have an account on bugs.wikimedia.org you can easily add yourself to the CC list of the bug and then receive updates about its status via email
Hey Northamerica! I heard you had tried some COI community question framing in the past and I wanted to know if you had any opinions on this draft:
User:Ocaasi/coiquestions. Cheers,
Ocaasit |
c 19:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Ocaasi: thanks for the notification. This isn't a significant area of interest for me at this time, but I'll consider contributing there.
Northamerica1000(talk) 20:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
note
Note that simply appending a source to information does not ascertain the information is in the citation.
Curb Chain (
talk) 05:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #49
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Development
Design improvements to the SetClaim API module
More work on implementing the
simple inclusion syntax that will be 1 way to access Wikidata data on Wikipedia
More work on Lua (the second way to access Wikidata data on Wikipedia)
Added parser page property to hold entity id in client. This fixes:
bugzilla:45037 - don’t show edit link if noexternallanglinks has suppressed all Wikidata links
bugzilla:44536 - have the edit link go directly to the Q### pages, instead of Special:ItemByTitle which shall make the link be more reliable and work for all namespaces
Selenium tests for deleted-property-handling
Selenium tests for multiline references
Selenium tests for add-sitelinks-from-client
Selenium tests for Entity-Selector-as-Searchbox
Selenium tests for language-table
Implemented in-process caching for entities
Lua support to access the repo data and implement getEntity (so you can use stuff like entity = mw.wikibase.getEntity("Q1459") in Lua modules)
rebuildTermSearchKey is now ready for production (this still needs to be run but once done it will make search case-insensitive)
Improved error reports from the API
Ground work for better edit summaries from the API
Added a table of content to item pages
Added debug functionality to be able to investigate why it takes longer than it should for Wikidata changes to show up on recent changes and watchlists on Wikipedia
Finished implementation of References-UI
Implemented GUID generator in JavaScript
Worked on fixing a bug related to deleted properties where the UI would display wrong information
Minor fixes/additions to the JS datamodel implementation
If you add a Babel box to your user page Wikidata will show you items and descriptions in other languages you speak as well without you having to switch the language
Want to know which items use a certain property? Try the “what links here” link on a property page
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenna Rose (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
You had been involved in the discussion the last time I nominated this article for AFD, and I hope you may review the current discussion. Thanks
Rogerthat94 (
talk) 10:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi North. A while back I showed you
Template:COI editnotice and you felt the notice would raise objections if applied broadly. It's been modified greatly since then to reflect WP:COI as closely as possible, be more concise, and includes a "Click here" button that auto-fills a Request Edit, etc.
I've been applying it to articles that I edit boldly and have gotten good feedback so far. I was wondering if you could take a fresh look at it and share your thoughts.
CorporateM (
Talk) 01:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey, if it's working out, go with the flow. Information at
WP:COI strongly discourages COI editing, but does not outright ban it. Per the lead section at WP:COI it is "strongly discouraged." The same goes for paid editing, in which at WP:COI it states "Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question." Perhaps utilize it on articles that have received COI editing for a limited amount of time. I've posted a comment at the discussion at
Template talk:COI editnotice#Request for Comment.
Northamerica1000(talk) 08:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. We borrowed the language from WP:NOPAY: "you are advised to refrain from editing articles directly" but perhaps that's a problem with WP:COI that it uses different language in different spots. Your vote confirms a "no consensus" ruling for an edit-notice vs a Talk template. So maybe I'll start with a Talk template, which is less objectionable, then put it to another vote to upgrade to an edit-notice if it's successful. I asked a PR friend of mine for input and he said "yah, that would be helpful if it was on the edit-screen".
CorporateM (
Talk) 12:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
I saw you PRODed this article before I sent it to AFD. The rationale for me sending it to AFD- Somebody would most likely have pulled the PROD down. Just wanted to let you know. Cheers!
...William 12:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
All right. Yes, there's always the possibility of a prod being declined. Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 23:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Invitation to join Wikiproject Conflict Resolution
Thanks for the invite, and I'll consider it. Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 09:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Del Monte Kenya
Hello! Your submission of
Del Monte Kenya at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —
Rodtalk 10:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Article and hook are good, but QPQ review of another nomination is still needed.—
Rodtalk 10:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
List of food list articles that could use improvements, ordered by improvement ideas they would benefit from. These are culled from the first part of
Template:Lists of prepared foods, “By type.” (Additional articles not in the template are also present.) Stay tuned for part 2 in the near future, which will be assessed from articles in the second part of the template, under “By origin.”
List of rolled foods – The article has only 1 description; significant potential for expansion
List of sandwiches – In good shape, but has some missing descriptions, and some are rather short
List of soups – Several entries are missing descriptions, and many are very short
Needs more images
List of hamburgers - Also has potential for expansion. Update: Done, more images added, and significantly expanded.
Northamerica1000(talk) 05:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
List of pasta – Also, some descriptions are very short
(Posted a copy of the above here on my own talk page for reference).
Northamerica1000(talk) 08:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Food
I see you have begun a little project of improving some food articles. Fun. Do you have any image needs? Also, what do you think of the
hamburger image. I have been thinking about replacing it. Do you think it is sufficient or could a possible replacement be in order, larger, more detail, different composition?--
Amadscientist (
talk) 02:06, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I've been working on food-related articles for a great deal of time. Check out my list above on this talk page (
here) for food list articles needing more images. Images licensed under Creative commons on Flickr are often usable. Check out Flickr and then
Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr for specifics. I think the lead image in the Hamburger article is fine; it is high-quality, doesn't have cheese (which would make it a cheeseburger) and adequately conveys what a hamburger is.
Northamerica1000(talk) 02:35, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I mean if you want something original.--
Amadscientist (
talk) 05:18, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I see, and thanks for offering.
Hamdog could use images. Additionally, I'm working on
List of hamburgers, in which a few entries lack images (Barbecue burger,
Carolina burger, Curry burger). Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 05:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Also, original images are always a great improvement for the encyclopedia; feel free to prepare these foods at home, photograph them, and then upload to Commons, as time allows! Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 14:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
You bet. Some of them sound tasty...not sure about the soybean stuff but my dad used to prepare a lot of that so at least I am familiar with it!--
Amadscientist (
talk) 19:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
It's always an option to upload. Here's a dish (right) that I prepared at home in 2011 and uploaded to Commons.
Northamerica1000(talk) 10:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
I started taking picks of some of the foods I thought needed replacing only because the images that were there didn't seem to represent the food in the best possible way. I uploaded this to Jambalaya.--
Amadscientist (
talk) 17:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Looks nice in the lead at
Jambalaya. That's an article that would certainly benefit from more sources and inline citations. Regarding the image, the only thing I'd change is to take the tails off the shrimp before serving it (just kidding)! Actually, the shells add flavor.
Northamerica1000(talk) 02:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Sign up for the
March drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by
EdwardsBot (
talk) 15:03, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
There's been so much published over the years about Disneyland, its lands, and its rides that I knew good sources had to exist for this topic. Thanks so much for the barnstar - I appreciate it and the nice words! Cheers, Gong show 17:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Development
Rolled out new code on wikidata.org. The new stuff you probably care about is:
Improved references. They can now have multiple lines. This should make references much more useful. You can now have one reference with for example values for each of the properties "book", "author", "page" to describe one source.
Fixed the prev/next links in diff view (
bugzilla:45821)
Widget to add language links on the Wikipedias directly: added setting to enable/disable it per wiki and made it available for logged-in users only
Widget to add language links on the Wikipedias directly: improved layout / size
Made it so that the “edit links” link on Wikipedia is also shown when the corresponding item only has a link to this one language and no other languages
Submitted improved Apache config patch to make wikidata.org always redirect to www.wikidata.org, which is awaiting code review and deployment.
Improved the script that is responsible for taking Wikidata changes to the Wikipedias
Added a few ways to better debug the script responsible for taking Wikidata changes to the Wikipedias. This should help with investigating why some changes take way to long to show up on the Wikipedias.
Started work on automatically adding edited items to the user’s watchlist (according to preferences)
Finished script for rebuilding search keys, so we can finally get case insensitive matches in a lot of places
Support for multi-line references in diff view
Selenium tests for inclusion syntax
Improved parser function (that will be used to access Wikidata data on the Wikipedias) to accept property ID or label
Increased isolation of data model component to increase clarity and visibility of bad dependencies
Worked on schema access in the SQLStore (of the query component)
When you edit a statement there is a little wheel in front of the text field. This lets you choose between “custom value”, “unknown value” and “no value”. “No value” means that we know that the given property has no value, e.g. Elizabeth I of England had no spouse. “Unknown value” means that the property has a value, but it is unknown which one -- e.g. Pope Linus most certainly had a year of birth, but it is unknown to us.
Hey, please stop making changes to the page. If you wish to make changes, please discuss it. The project page is not an article, and it is not designed to be easy contribute to. In fact, you've made the page more complex to edit as now stuff that was on the front page is now located on inaccessible sub-pages. --Jeremy(
blah blah •
I did it!) 21:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but per
WP:OWN, your stance in this instance is incorrect. Editors on Wikipedia are encouraged to be
bold, and minor changes to
WikiProject Food and drink's main page that I performed to encourage participation in the WikiProject are quite functional. Conversely, the notion that the project page, as you stated above, "is not designed to be easy contribute to", contradicts Wikipedia's goals to promote collaboration. Wikipedia's user-friendly interface is designed to be usable for people to contribute to, not vice-versa. Why do you prefer that the page there should be designed to be more difficult for people to contribute to, rather than easier?
Northamerica1000(talk) 21:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
This is not an own issue, but in your case a
WP:Assume good faith issue. I have dealt with this issue before with the
Beer WikiProject and a consensus was reached to redesign the page. This concerns the project as a whole and changes should not be made because a single contributor doesn't like the layout. If you want to make wholesale changes to the page, please discuss it on the talk page. Further, stop playing with the code and use the sand box to get everything working before deploying it. This prevents issues from popping and leaves the code intact until a consensus is reached, if one is reached. --Jeremy(
blah blah •
I did it!) 04:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Northamerica1000. You have new messages at
WT:TAFI. Message added 12:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC). You can
remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to
disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk) 20:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
There was another new reply. About image we can contact
this guy to donate an image! What do you think? --
Tito Dutta (
contact) 08:27, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tito: I've replied at the Noticeboard for India-related topics.
Northamerica1000(talk) 19:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Sign up for the
April blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by
EdwardsBot (
talk) 20:00, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
For your tireless work improveing the lists of foods articles.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 01:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Right back at ya, and well-deserved. I am giving you The Tireless Contributor Barnstar because that's the last one you got so they will go side by side and people will think you're extra doubly tireless and possibly superhuman. Plus they spin round and round, which is good too.
The tables are really starting to look good. Compare them to 2 years ago -- huge difference. Like Laura Hale once said, what's the purpose of a list that's just a list? That's the same as a category.
You know what they say, there are two kind of people in this world: those who divide people into two parts and those who don't. Kidding. There are people who like lists, and those who don't. One of the reasons I like you is because you like lists and tables. I do too.
I hope it's okay to have the colour in the tracking subpage. The bold is so hard for me to see. You can change it back if you like, or certainly pick a color: (
List of colors, see bottom). And to think, you were trying to track all of this in a talk page section. Now you have a great place to keep us organized. :)
Consider getting EditPad. I don't know what you use to handle lists, but that's a great program. Tiny and with easy macros and good search and replace. It also has tabs, which is good. If you get it, I can email you the .ini file that will give you all the right goodies up top and yellow on black, which is easy to see.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 01:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anna, thanks! I find lists to work wonderfully for summarizing content on Wikipedia. Regarding my editing history, I had one sole previous account on Wikipedia,
User:Unitedstates1000, which I created in May 2011. I liked this user name better so after creating this account I abandoned the old one. Prior to that I edited as an unregistered user. There are definitely benefits to being a registered user versus being an IP one.
As I stated on your talk page, I like the highlighting of entries at
User:Northamerica1000/Food articles for differentiation purposes. That works!
I downloaded EditPad Lite (the freebie version for now) and will check it out in the very near future. Feel free to email me the ini file at any time. If you do so, just please advise after sending, because I don't check the account regularly. I look forward to further collaboration to improve the food list articles (and potentially others too). Sincerely,
Northamerica1000(talk) 02:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Northamerica1000. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.