Hello, Marshal Davout III, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Sdrqaz ( talk) 21:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Marshal of the Empire—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 21:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Dear Commnader Waterford,

Your edits undid an hour of work. My plan is to list the battles of fought by Napoleons marshals, I already did most and Deleated MacDonald and Bessier will only take more time. It is constructive beacuse it lists the battles fought by the marshals. I also plan on adding commands held and potentailly a quick Bio. All bad links will be fixed. Just dont interfere again.

ok, please in the future bundle your edits and provide an explanation in the Edit Summary of each edit. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 22:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Of course. Thanks for the heads up. I Would Appreciate if you helped restore my work.Bundle means all together right. I will countinue my work later.

Hi Marshal Davout III! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

As you know, wikilinks (like [[This]]) take our readers to related Wikipedia articles. Please check each link as you create it, to ensure that it leads to a relevant article, rather than a disambiguation page (list of articles with similar titles) or the wrong article. Where the correct article title includes text not to be displayed, please use a piped link, for example [[ Italian campaigns of the French Revolutionary Wars|Italian campaign]]. Thanks, Certes ( talk) 17:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello Marshal Davout III. It seems that “Marshals of the Empire” has been expanded by your corresponding edits. A recent list of edits from you have not been constructive, and have been reverted manually. But you can still edit on the page, of course. I suppose that you make a new title inside the page, called Grand Marshals of the Palace, after the introduction, and can begin your work there! Thank you for cooperation. Thegreatsoldiers ( talk) 18:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Calm down please. Can you just leave the article alone for a few days? The article is poorly sourced, with a lot of independent research. Too much information that isn’t proven may lead to all your work being reverted.

Burgundian Feudalism

Good point. Ill source everything

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Marshal of the Empire

added links pointing to Battle of Abukir, Moncey, Ebersdorf, Army of Italy and Battle of Bautzen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you so much

If we are describing not only Marshals of the Empire, but more marshals of different types, then what’s the point of this article? There should be separate pages about these Marshals. (Plus, the list of Marshals of the Empire.. let’s just say there’s not just regulars marshals on that list.) From Burgundian Feudalism ( talk) 18:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC) reply

We might as well move the page. From Burgundian Feudalism ( talk) 18:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC) reply

If you look closely, Marshal of the Empire isn’t Marshal of France. From Burgundian Feudalism ( talk)

I won’t be too harsh. You tried. Just that this article is very specific. It happens to me as well. (Just leave the list alone) From Burgundian Feudalism ( talk) Maison, clauzel and gerard were all important generals during the war, made marshal afterwirds,

This article talks about Marshal of THE EMPIRE, not generals. From Burgundian Feudalism ( talk)

You may create a separate article on it From Burgundian Feudalism ( talk) 19:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Napoleonic generals later made marechal Im not adding random ones in

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Marshal of the Empire. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} ⚓ 03:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marshal of the Empire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Battle of Paris, Battle of Landshut and Battle of Stockach.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia always need sources. You said that you would find sources. Where are they? How did you get information on Marshals of the Palace? If you don’t prove your answer, the edits all have been reverted. Also, this article is about Marshals of the Empire, not Marshals of the Palace. They are separate titles. Again, Saint Hilaire never had his baton, with historians only PREDICTING, not entirely trusting alternate reality, that Hilaire, because of his service, and if he lived through 1809, could gain his baton. Thus, Hilaire is only a DETAIL in the article, and doesn’t have to be throughly researched. Also, Generals were NOT given their baton by NAPOLEON, and don’t have to be included in THIS article. Reminder, poorly sourced information may be reverted by other editors. From Burgundian Feudalism ( talk)

I am busy at work, mark my words my sources will be found

I’ll wait for your return. 
From Burgundian Feudalism  (
talk)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2021 storming of the United States Capitol

added a link pointing to Thomas Marshall

List of incidents of political violence in Washington, D.C.

added a link pointing to Thomas Marshall

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:52, 22 April 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marshal of the Empire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Battle of Abukir, Battle of Fleurus and Battle of Neerwinden.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Thanks for contributing to the Guillaume Brune article. I reverted your edits there some days ago, which you have since re-added and improved. However, the text still contains problems that might cause it to be reverted. I'm going to point them out below, along with some links to Wikipedia guideline (WP) pages that will give you a good explanation on each issue.

• When citing sources in the text, don't write things like "Source Dunn-Pattinson" or "[3]" at the end of sentences. WP:CITEFOOT explains how to use Wikipedia's reference templates. In the case of the Dunn-Pattinson source in the Brune article, you can simply insert, in source editing: "<ref name=Pattinson>" (with a "/" before the ">").

• The text from the Dunn-Pattinson source was copied, even if with some changes, largely identical to full paragraphs of the original text. Even though the work is reliable, the full text may be uncomfortably long for readers and some less important parts should be cleaned up (see WP:NOFULLTEXT).
  • Like the source, the text in the article is displayed in overly long paragraphs, like the 12-lines long one in section "Holland" (see WP:Paragraph).

• If you are citing an YouTube channel, as with "[6-Epic History Tv]", it needs the link to the especific video that provides the information, not to mention the use of the Reference templates previously mentioned. Nevetheless, I suggest you take a look at WP:VIDEOREF before using Youtube as reference.
  • This also applies to the " Charles Nove" citation, as in this case he's just the narrator for the cited channel.

• Due to direct copy from the source, there are still some WP:POETIC issues. For example, the phrase "he soon brought the rebels to their knees" should be rewritten simply as "he soon defeated the rebels".

I hope this helps you with the Brune article and in all your future edits, and feel free to ask me or at the Help desk for assistance.

Again, thank you for your contributions.

Excommunicato ( talk) 15:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marshal of the Empire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Battle of Paris, Battle of Montebello and Battle of Tarvis.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Napoleonic battles

added links pointing to Battle of Abukir, Battle of Toulouse, Samuel Hood, Battle of Paris, Sidney Smith, Battle of Smolensk, Siege of Acre, Battle of Bergen, Siege of Gaeta, Siege of Badajoz, Siege of Tarragona, Siege of Mantua, Battle of Alkmaar, Siege of Riga, Battle of Valencia, Battle of Mount Tabor, Battle of Krasny and Battle of Bautzen

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Officers who Died under Napoleon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jean-Baptiste Girard.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Independence Day (United States), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 00:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, List of officers who died under Napoleon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra ( talk) 21:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Marshal Davout III. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of officers who died under Napoleon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm RolandR. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to COVID-19 lockdowns have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. RolandR ( talk) 00:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Marshal Davout III. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of officers who died under Napoleon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Twitter suspensions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Byrne.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Marshal Davout III. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of officers who died under Napoleon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply

I'd appreciate your input on this topic to resolve some long disputed issues about modern Taino movements. /info/en/?search=Talk:Taíno#Request_for_Comment_on_Modern_Taino_Identity Poketama ( talk) 11:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Katie Hobbs—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. –  dudhhr  ^talk  _contribs (he/they) 05:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Its the truth, She stole the election, Kari Lake won

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Katie Hobbs, you may be blocked from editing. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 06:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply

No its the truth Marshal Davout III ( talk) 23:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

i wont edit it again, but its the truth man Marshal Davout III ( talk) 23:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Seriously, you were warned about this right above this message. Making changes like that one on Katie Hobbs and then instantly reverting is STILL vandalism. Cut it out. —  ser! ^{( chat to me - see my edits)} 07:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Katie Hobbs stole the election and we all know it! Wont do it again Marshal Davout III ( talk) 18:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pacific Ocean theater of World War II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Rabaul.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC) reply