Hello Lucia forgives the bother but I am new in wikipedia I want to ask him as I can join the WikiProject Anime and manga Greetings -- RLR123 ( talk) 18:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Please do not revert productive and constructive edits as you did at Ghost in the Shell, I am in the process of updating it, and if you must take issue with the content itself please discuss it on the talk page. This page is for the media franchise, not the manga. They are different subjects and are to be treated as such. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 20:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 20:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I do not need notifications. Lucia Black ( talk) 21:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I undid you revert of ChrisGualitieri for the under construction tag removal. If a user wants to identify that they have the intentions to improve an article, it a best to assume faith and leave the tag present. Now secondly I advised Chris on the actions to take upon moving the nominator from on hold to failed as the article is not near a good quality for that status. Thirdly your opening of a RfC was inappropriate and the first cause of action should have been an actual discussion with Chris or getting a third party to review. John F. Lewis ( talk) 23:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Ghost in the Shell/GA1, you may be
blocked from editing.
ChrisGualtieri (
talk) 23:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC) - Removed, it appears accidental on second view.
ChrisGualtieri (
talk) 06:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 01:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Do me a favor and post this to the Anime page, I can't believe this merge proposal has sat on an FL for this long. Your reasoning is right, so it won't be canvassing to discuss this at the relevant wikiproject. I can't close it as no consensus, but I just made a case for what should be done instead. That banner is an eyesore to me... ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 06:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Ghost in the Shell". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 14 January 2013.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 21:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Alright, seriously, explain YOUR version of the continuity because it is completely different from mine then. The manga has the SAC cast in it, it also takes place before SAC and while much can be said of artistic interpretation the canon material from the manga to the SAC flows pretty easily. Even more so that Motoko's behavior and abilities compliment her 'marriage' and merge with the 2501. It actually put Oshii-san's interpretation with the movie out by focusing on the case, and the rest has members of the Section 9 featured. And Section 9 disbanded in 2029 after Motoko's little stunt in the manga, but the rest is as your know. How about explaining your deal with it, because you deny all day, but you don't support anything. SAC is based on the manga after all. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
To put it simply: Manga=Fuchikomas, SAC= Tachikomas, Film series= No fuchikoma nor Tachikoma.
But to be more complex:, SAC series has an established timeline, just because each episode is different plot, doesnt mean its not linear. The established timeline for SAC is 1st=2030, 2nd season=2032, TV-film=2034. Within that timeframe Motoko Kusagani leaves section9 in 2032 and returns in the TV film but not completely. In which the manga she left in 2030 and she merged with the Puppeteer (making it obvious that the manga and the SAC series are not one in the same because by 2030, Motoko wouldnt be in the series). The interpretations differ even further: Characters such as Yano, and Azuma, they appear alonside eachother as rookies in SAC 2nd Gig but the manga shows Yano in the first manga and died before they even showed him alive, and Azuma appears almost as Motoko's replacement in Ghost in the Shell 1.5 manga.
Mamoru Oshii's condensed the series not only on the case but the timeline. In the manga, each chapter has a date and the events of "Robot Rondo" (and you can tell by the date in the chapter being 2029 and the Puppeteer merger in 2030) happened before the merge of Kusanagi and the Puppeteer, however that story happened after the merge in the film sequal: Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence and adds further differentiations with Motoko/puppeteer together. Plus fuchikoma dont exist in the film series.
I can go on about every single difference but these are the ones that make it obvious.
Alternate endings are different from alternate storylines. What I'm saying whatever is introduced in SAC stays in SAC, for example: World War III and IV. That was only in Stand Alone Complex. look at character articles of NGE, they each separate the continuities because each one is different. Neon Genesis Evangelion is a poor article that needs an overhaul. SAC is based on Ghost in the shell manga, and the same for the films but not in the sense that the story. Tenchi muyo is also a poor article and deserves an overhaul aswell. Ghost in the Shell is different in the sense each series has its own article. Lucia Black ( talk) 04:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
FYI, I have opened up a discussion regarding the use of ActiveAnime as a reliable source at WT:ANIME#Is ActiveAnime considered a reliable source?. Also, just so you are aware, there's an RfC on Niemti here. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 19:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
WikiWomen - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Lucia Black! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its
sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 00:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
I just resurrected the articles for Finn and Jake. Any chance that you would like to help me make them into proper articles like I did with Marceline? It does seem weird only having a character article for her. Anyway, the articles are really just stubs right now, but that could soon change.-- Gen. Quon (Talk) 06:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Ghost in the Shell, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK
[•] 21:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
But I did post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention. Best wishes to you. If you have specific questions you could ask me at my talk page. Biosthmors ( talk) 22:21, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I'm dealing with a discussion now where I think reason isn't being applied well! So I know how you feel. Biosthmors ( talk) 22:24, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
The issues just never get enough attention is what im saying. Lucia Black ( talk) 00:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Until the same editor claiming to be well experienced returns. Thats the problem, i can easily rearrange this to the way i want but i wantmy contributions to stick. If i do any more editing that goes further into my goal, then itlk be considered WP:POINT. Lucia Black ( talk) 21:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
In this article yu-gi-oh I made a table and it seems that you have deleted it. Is there a reason why can't it be there? -- Oskars Čaikovskis ( talk) 23:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
You mean the 3 separate ones? -- Oskars Čaikovskis ( talk) 23:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
It's not a big deal, but when you go on wikipedia, almost every page about a franchise has a table like that. Why is this an exception? -- Oskars Čaikovskis ( talk) 16:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I read your post on the Anime project's page, and I'm sorry that you don't feel welcomed. It sounds like you're feeling very frustrated right now. I hope you feel better. Rapunzel-bellflower ( talk) 19:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
You have my thanks. I will continue the good work, and I hope we can work together on many other pages. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 20:17, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Youre welcome. And yeah sounds good. Lucia Black ( talk) 20:20, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Just so you are aware, I've started an RfC subpage on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Niemti at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Niemti/Additional Evidence. If you have the time, can you provide some evidence there? Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 15:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
You have previously commented on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Niemti.
As an outside editor, I have moved that this RFC/U be closed. If you wish to comment on the Motion to close, please do so here. Fladrif ( talk) 14:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
No consensus was reached. An agreement between only two people is not a consensus. If you have issue with my edits than start a discussion on it rather than blindly reverting them. Consider this a warning before I report you for inappropriate behaviour. This is not the first time I've witnessd you stubbornly reverting on this page. -- G-Zay ( talk) 20:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I will take your advice, for the time being. By the way, can you describe more clearly what you would like done with Final Fantasy Dimensions? I know I've done a lot of plot fixes and additions over the past few months (I think), but I can't clearly see what's wrong with this one. Unless it's the fact that it seems to tail off rather abruptly. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 07:29, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Would you calm down a bit? I hadn't been on Wikipedia since I reverted you, so I hadn't even realized there was a discussion. (Come on, what was it, like 10 hours ago only?) Furthermore, I left a pretty clear edit summary, so its not like I didn't discuss at all either. Now, I'll respond on the Sonic series template talk page, but yikes, tone it down some... Sergecross73 msg me 10:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Would you please make a statement on the formatting on the template to Izno? He believes that because you edited the template in the form that he preferred that it is your opinion that you also prefer that form because you did not revert the edit that he made (he took the SAC episode list link out of the parentheses).— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 02:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is " Ghost in the Shell, Talk:Ghost in the Shell". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 15:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Lucia. I know you are understandably upset over the Wikipedia-related situation with the GITS article and issues with other users. I am so sorry if I have caused you or any other users any trouble, and I know you don't want to be blocked for this matter, so please don't get stressed out when dealing with difficult users. Per our no personal attack policy. "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done. When in doubt, comment on the article's content without referring to its contributor at all." Also, per this policy, "serious accusations require serious evidence". Also, please note that when someone has asked you not to post on their talk page, you really shouldn't unless you have to. Continuing to post on others talk page after being asked not to violates the Wikipedia policy of harassment, see WP:HUSH. If you have concerns about a user's behavior, take it up to a noticeboard like WP:ANI or WP:AN and provide your evidence (i.e. diffs) there, or discuss things constructively (but do watch out for the WP:BOOMERANG effect). If you want to let off some steam, please take a step back from the computer and come back when you feel refreshed. Also, remain civil in discussion. Discuss changes on the talk page if one reverts you. Otherwise, you will end up being blocked for edit warring and worst of all, you don't want to be violating WP:3RR. Since Wikipedia works by consensus, discussion is necessary between other users and consensus can change. Just calm down. Okay? Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 00:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I put it up at GA nomination. We should add the Nintendo Power stuff, and can we cut the Japanese links we used from the talk page to do? I don't know which ones were used, my Japanese is rusty! And finally, I have a link to a 1993 famitsu scan, and the author says its a top ten best gameboy games list with FFA listed in it, do you know Japanese? Does it say that? If we could site famitsu, we will be golden for GA. Here's the link. Famitsu Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 01:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I am sending this message to the users who I have closely collaborated with. I will be taking a temporary Wikibreak for at least 5-7 days to let off some steam and get myself reenergized. Some of the stress has got to me, so I think it's best if I should take a couple of days off. I also have final exams coming up as well, so I have more important things to worry about. I, however, will be here to contribute to some articles that I have worked on. Until then, farewell. With my very best and warmest regards, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:37, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Would you consider coming back to help out? It has almost been two months now and I feel that your input has been useful on the articles. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 22:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Oda Mari ( talk) 07:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
What are your thoughts on merging Ghost in the Shell: S.A.C. 2nd GIG to Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex and then just having the 2nd GIG episode list at the 2nd GIG article?— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 05:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
You treat them too broadly. And I have no plans to merge anything. Lucia Black ( talk) 21:11, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
"THE GHOST IN THE SHELL" is the Japanese subtitle for part 1.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 15:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Look, I'm not going to determine what the kanji says (some sources state Kokaku can also be translated as "Ghost Shell" but I'm not going to verify that). And that's not really the issue Chris. What is the issue is what is considered part of the Japanese title. Just because its on the cover doesn't mean its part of the Japanese title. And sometimes japanese sites add the intended english title but its not officially part of the Japanese one. I have not found a single first party/second party source mentioning "The Ghost in the Shell" as part of the Japanese. these things have to be verified thoroughly. Many Japanese covers use english titles intended for english release, example: Detective Conan/Case closed situation.
These things have to be verified. Here's an example: Kodansha nor any retail site has it with "the Ghost in the Shell". The "cover" doesn't prove anything. Lucia Black ( talk) 20:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
I just thought you aught to know, Final Fantasy Versus XIII is under threat. It's one of the user IP numbers that seems to be G-Zay. This one is 92.18.158.199: he/she put in a whole lot of unnecessary info about Versus XIII in there. Sound familiar? I've reverted it, and done a little extra editing alongside that, but I thought you aught to know. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 08:26, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
A focused and clean discussion of the future of the article is underway, because you made comments on Ghost in the Shell I am notifying you for your input in the debate. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Differences aside, we need to work together! Here's to cooperation in the future. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks. I will remember this. Lucia Black ( talk) 05:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 18:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Appleseed (manga), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ONA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't want to appear critical or hostile, but why did you delete that whole raft of referenced material that had been cut down to the bone by a user who only wants to help? On top of that, you did not seem to see that someone had put in stuff about VGleaks and used fansite Nova Crystallis as a reference again (not a G-Zay puppet, I checked). Orphaned refs have needed to be salvaged and it looks more like something that has had a hatchet taken to it in a wild rage than anything carefully thought out. You didn't even give your reason. I'm not siding with anything G-Zay did in saying this, but your actions do not seem to add up to me. So...why? --
ProtoDrake (
talk) 20:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Read WP:HARRASS. I am notifying you that your reversion of my removal of your off-topic comments on my talk page is harassment and I will not tolerate it. Talk pages are quite suitable for discussing editor behaviour, but not for debating issues that properly belong on the talk page of the relevant article or template. Keep your unwanted and irrelevant comments off my talk page in future. -- RexxS ( talk) 01:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
"Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page."I now request that you revert yourself immediately, or I shall seek to have you topic-banned from that page for disruptive editing. -- RexxS ( talk) 07:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Final Fantasy Dimensions Battle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Before Crisis gameplay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Final Fantasy Adventure Screenshot.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Appleseed1-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 17:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. You haven't said the nicest things to User:ChrisGualtieri. You claim he attacked you, well prove it! He provided several examples, you didn't. Please don't attack. Thanks. WorldTraveller101( Trouble?/ My Work) 20:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
I've removed the sock template from this page. Was confirmed as WP:LTA Jonathan Yip who has a repeated problem of actual trolling. The bad English, the claims, Lucia - like others before her - was targeted unfairly for the sake of drama. While I may be involved in a etc.)it of a dispute with Lucia, she is clearly not a troll and would not stoop to blatant meatpuppetry or sockpuppeteering. Please do not reinsert the template; because this little 'episode' only serves to feed JY. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk) 05:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Lucia Black ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Just because Chris gualtieri wont accept that smartphone issues causes accidental autocorrect, doesnt mean it warrants a block. editing is incredibly difficult when it comes to smartphone, especially with multiple tags. Often time the cursor would jump at a random spot in the talkpage and have to rewrite everything because I just realized my comment is being written in the middle of someone elses. Another issue is that sometimes autocorrect wont function and I have to move my cursor back to the typo and then move it back to where I left off. And trust me just making this comment is a hassle. Thats why half the time I dont even bother with manually correcting typos. Also, that one sentence, is incredibly minor, anyone with common sense would see it as an accident. Theres no need for blocking. Just tell me the issue and I can fix it. I didnt fix the last one because RexxS warned me, I fixed it because it was an accidental error. Lets stop getting trigger happy just because some of you dont like me. Lucia Black ( talk) 07:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Suggesting that you were blocked because "some of you dont like me" is pretty much the opposite of how the guideline for appealing blocks suggest you should handle an unblock request. In addition, if you are aware that editing with your Smartphone causes disruption, is difficult to control, and creates confusion for other editors, why would you continue to do so? You need to take responsibility for your edits, and that includes the technology you use to make your edits. Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 17:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lucia Black ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The occurance is Rare. And I believe this goes against the blocking process as its obvious it could have been avoided. The disruption is incredibly minor, rare, and reversable, and accidental. Its not constant, its not intentional, and could have been avoided altogether. ChrisGualtieri knowing full well he could have simply told me I edited his comment, couldve avoided this. Taking responsibility for my edits doesnt mean blocking. I do take responsibility for mine, I fix the accident in the first place. The claims of "persistent" disruptive editing is false. And the disruption is minor too to even call it "disruptive editing". Lucia Black ( talk) 20:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's a short block, only 48 hours, and to be fair given the intemperate behaviour demonstrated below, I think it would be enormously unwise to unblock you. Please, for your own sake, take a deep breath, relax and just sit out the 48 hour block, come back in a positive frame of mind ready to collaborate productively with everybody else. Nick ( talk) 23:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lucia Black ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My very last unblock request. I find it injustice, that the declining for unblock isnt actually based on the actual block. Im asking for a completely unbiased, strictly on the situation review to determine unblocking. I removed a whole discussion merely because it fuels anger. This is my last unblock request. I understand the situation, however this block was incredibly premature and wrong. The issue is not persistent whatsoever and based solely on one edit. The system to block was ignored in this situation. Lucia Black ( talk) 00:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No, this is not a block for a single incident, the incident is merely the last straw after all the issues raised at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive798#User:Lucia Black and previously. I have no previous involvement with any of this, but reading over the history it is clear to me that you have an attitude problem which is making it unnecessarily difficult for people to work with you. During the remaining hours of your block, please read WP:BATTLE, WP:AGF and WP:NPA, and think seriously about them. If you can follow the advice to "comment on content, not on the contributor", you will get on much better; if not, I am afraid you may find yourself facing longer blocks. JohnCD ( talk) 22:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Actually its not. The issue of WP:BATTLE, WP:AGF, and WP:NPA are not relevant. That ANI is purely based on the fact that I compromised another editors way to being an Admin, and I can prove it. For one, the "personal attacks" was when the "accuser" was involved. Despite most of the issues being of the accuser. The other factors were completely off with personal attacks. Comenting on "content, not on editors" is impossible for ANI. ANI is meant to discuss the editor. Assuming good faith doesnt always work. Theres history here. Even the sockpuppet (despite the fact that it was a sock, this sock had no involvement whatsoever with me, it proves that this editor who is accusing me is the same editor poisoning the discussion and falsely accusing of personal attack and forgets this editor has the exact same issues. The only thing thats different is that Im having difficulty for actually proving it with links and the not so occasional accidental edit. The only thing that ANI proves is an editor having their last straw with me, not that this edit was the last straw of disruptive "persistent" edits and deserved Immediate blocking. The warning was received by RexxS, but again, if one is to assume good faith, dont you think editing another persons edit should be leave an editor to assume good faith by thinking it was an accident, especially if it has already been addressed with difficulty?
Drmies even addressed that there was little to no action, but changed when I dismissed the ANI. Now the block was imediate without AGF.
This being the last straw isnt that good. The blocking has to be done when it cant be avoided. Which is why ive requested unblocking 3 times. The first rejected by irrelevant matters while the second based on my anger which ironically fueled by this wrongfully block.
Ive reported the accuser 3 times, but uts a matter of which admin actually wants to keep tabs. And this is a sloppy way of keeping tabs because what you state is "the last straw" is incredibly minor and fixable. It was very rushed, and doesnt even give one to explain. This unblock request is completely on principle. Lucia Black ( talk) 04:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Lucia, I just wanted to give you a heads up: earlier, the impostor User:Lucia Block started an ANI thread in your name. Not to worry, I've closed the thread and blocked the impostor. Cheers! Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 18:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Im sorry if I made you mad, only trying to make both sides happy.
Prabash
What? 00:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Grrrr....just STOP! youre not going to make both sides happy. Because the only way to make one side happy is to make the other recognize their faults and apologize for them. I hate that editor, and I hate that editor with a passion. I see that editors name on my talkpage and I see red. Lucia Black ( talk) 00:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
WorldTraveller101 Breaks Fixes 01:49, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Take these strawberries and have a wikibreak for a week or so, I can see you are getting involved in all of these things, I would just wait for the fuss to die down and then come back to edit. ( WP:BREAK) - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 02:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WorldTraveller101 Breaks Fixes 02:08, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
The way things happened was very unfortunate, and I apologize for them on behalf of my adoptee WT101. Could I offer you a cookie in return? TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 14:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC) |
Could you add the Quoted information from the to do list on the talk page? I'm not exactly sure how to phrase it's inclusion, and it could be nice to cite a magazine like Famitsu that was from the time. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
I dont remember, theres only a link to the image at the talkpage. Its from some blog. Famitsu BEST...thats all I got, not even a page number. Lucia Black ( talk) 00:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
No its not that one. This one was called Famitsu Best and featured 4 other gameboy games. The other three were ff legend, I forgot the other. Lucia Black ( talk) 05:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Lucia!
I'd just like to drop you a note that I am currently reviewing Final Fantasy Dimensions for its GA status. Please give me some time as I am a bit busy now. But I will do it soon :) -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 08:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Ok. Lucia Black ( talk) 18:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Final Fantasy Dimensions is now a Good Article | ||
Congrats! The article you nominated
Final Fantasy Dimensions was just promoted to Good Article status! Great job to all of your hard work! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 07:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you. Hopefully this is a stepping stone for more. Lucia Black ( talk) 07:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
I’m aware that you edit and discuss on Wikipedia on your phone. But I’m sure that your phone has the ability to input colon characters. Please indent your Talk page comments per the Talk page guidelines, as it does help readability: it makes it more clear that a comment is a reply, and it shows what it’s replying to. Thank you. — Frungi ( talk) 18:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I deleted the page because we don't keep sandbox copies like that to edit, especially not with reasons such as another user refusing any edits to the page. I would honestly recommend trying to talk to the other user rather than create another page just for you to edit. If the person is claiming complete ownership of the page, then you might want to bring in a third opinion or go to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and open up a discussion there. This just wasn't a good way to create the page. I can put a copy in your userspace, (and I've done so at User:Lucia Black/Dragon Ball Z) where you can work on it until there is a consensus on whether or not to create a separate section for DBZ. Creating sandboxes in the mainspace just isn't really a good or viable option for this, especially when the reason is because you say someone else is claiming ownership of the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I beg to differ. And I doubt I can get such an administrative action based on the fact that theres two sandboxes. This wasnt really meant to be the main article. I think WP is stepping their ground a bit when it comes to sandboxes. Even if one claimed it wasnt necessary. Speedy delete shouldnt be an option and I dont think G6 should apply to sandboxes. Lucia Black ( talk) 08:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I think theres too much jniversal preference in wikipedia. I dont see the issue, even if they are discouraged, that shouldnt mean their unallowed. Ill be proposing open-sandboxes to be allowed, similar to a page incubator. Having user-based sandboxes is too difficult. Amd how is one get admin action on someones personal page? I dont understand this issue at all.... Lucia Black ( talk) 08:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
In recognition of your excellent work building an article that has been in need of restoration to Good Article status for five years, I hereby award you The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar! Please keep working on and nominating Good Articles! Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 19:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you. Lol, but I hardly consider it random. But I accept. Thank you. Lucia Black ( talk) 20:57, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Having the number in the track listing does no harm, it provides further information. You dislike my choice to include it, fair enough. At that point you removed and I reverted. Per etiquette instead of reverting, you should take it to the talk page as what you are describing is a matter of opinion and not supported by a consensus or guideline. Reverting me back is simply inflaming the situation and crap judgement. You should start a discussion and educate others as to why you think it should be removed. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 23:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
That last obnoxious user that left you a message was not who you probably thought it was. It was an impersonation account. It wasn't Andy. I've indef blocked them. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 23:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was hoping to have your opinion for List of Persona 4: The Animation episodes. At first, I didn't care since it wasn't doing harm, but now there is Devil Survivor 2: The Animation and soon Danganronpa: The Animation to follow. There is something wrong with the Persona 4 list and multiple users have bought it up and been shot down. Before I bring this up to the anime wikiproject, I want to see your opinion if there is some sound argument to bring up on why that format shouldn't be used. Thanks for the time. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 09:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
I brought it up in the list talk page. If more editors get involved, opinions and reason become stronger. Only 1 editor is in the pattern of the dispute seems to occur yearly. Lucia Black ( talk) 21:37, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Then we merge them back to the main article until the need to split is more apparent. Unless you mean we make list of X episodes only, which would be an incredibly doffocult thing to propose. The list is part of the anime series. Its hard to cover it as a stand alone list. Lucia Black ( talk) 22:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Alright lets see what we've got, the main problem here is the way the articles mainly Persona 4: The Animation, Devil Survivor 2: The Animation and Danganronpa: The Animation are structured, in that they should have been List-Class rather than franchises from the beginning right? Since Danganronpa: The Animation is in it's infancy a simply restructuring should suffice as well as a naming Move since there isnt much information in the article at present. One other thing, should the information in the infoboxes be moved to the parent articles, for instance Devil Survivor 2: The Animation's infobox --> Shin Megami Tensei: Devil Survivor 2's infobox? The reason for this is that I feel that I should take responsibility for at least the two articles I created rather than having others work out the error in my judgment of again using the P4TA's structure. <KirtZJ> Talk 22:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Square Enix for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 01:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Sjones23 -- Sjones23 ( talk) 03:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Lucia he's doing it again.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 20:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
I am glad that my work is noticed, and remember yours is too! I check your work on occasion, along with others in case they need help or are up to cool stuff. What can I say, I'm a social guy :) Can't wait for our next start to C drive once the GA's are done! Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 00:46, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Ghost in the Shell, List of Ghost in the Shell chapters. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan ( TALK) 14:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
We should really merge this with the first season's page. The article is short and it's just a second season.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 12:59, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry to hear about your family-related issues. You have been a valuable contributor and you are understandably upset about how things are going. Let me be clear: if you get involved with unsavory editors, bullies or sockpuppets of banned users, I would advise that it is best to remain polite and just ignore them as they can be very stressful. Remember, you cannot say that you are bullied if you do not feel bullied and they would not dare talk to you like that if you were face to face; also, Wikipedia is just a website. I can't emphasize that enough. Also, you may want to try other venues of WP:DR rather than cause too much drama at ANI and provide inconclusive evidence. During my time here, I've blown up at users before, apologized and tried my best not to do things like that again. As a user pointed out to me, being involved in a civility dispute is a "soul sucking thing." I almost had that once but I have moved on from that. I hope your Wikibreak goes well and I will await your return. Regards, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Per the result of this ANI discussion, the community has imposed a topic ban on your editing; you are topic-banned from editing at AN/I or on articles related to WikiProject Anime, broadly construed, for a period of three months. In addition, you are interaction-banned from interactions with User:ChrisGualtieri for the same time period. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
This is to notify you about this thread on ANI in which you have been mentioned. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
You are topic banned from anime and manga broadly construed. This means you may not participate or start (unless given leave by the community or higher authority) talk page discussions regarding the articles you are topic banned from. Please do not post on my talk page again regarding this. Topic banning means you must stay away from the topic completely for 3 months. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 00:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drakengard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nier ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Lucia, just a word of warning but your recent edits to Template:Avatar: The Last Airbender are in violation of your topic ban. Remember you are completely banned from topic of Anime and Manga for 3 months. This is a friendly warning that you could be blocked if you continue to violate your ban. Canterbury Tail talk 14:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Lucia, I was wondering what you wanted to do about this review. The original reviewer, SJones23, is blocked from editing anything but his talk page, and has been so since August 17. (It's a voluntary block, but he can't review anything.) The post from a supposed volunteer reviewer on August 6 was the last edit made by that person except for a very short single edit elsewhere on August 19.
We can either put it back in the reviewing pool—it has clearly been abandoned—or request a new reviewer to take over from the current one on the GAN talk page. Please let me know your preference, or you can post on WT:GAN yourself. Best of luck! BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Lucia, I hate that it's come to this, but your constant pecking around the edges and stepping over the line of your sanctions has left me no choice, especially after this which is blatant on both the topic and interaction bans - just because you don't say certain words doesn't mean the content as a whole isn't a violation. You've been blocked for 48 hours as a result, when you are unblocked please stick to the letter and the spirit of your sanctions so that when they expire you can resume productive editing in these topic areas - and please read WP:OWN as well, just because you've worked heavily on a subject does not make it "yours". - The Bushranger One ping only 17:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
I've been doing some revision work on Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy, adding references and so forth. But I've found that I don't seem to have a reference for the l'Cie as they appear in Type-0 (made so by their crystals, living forever, losing their memories). I am trying to make this article eligible for eventual GA and FA reviews, and I don't want to leave anything unreferenced, especially things linked to the games' themes and plots. If we need to wait for the game to come out in English (which is looking more probable recently) to back it up, then so be it, but I can't help wondering where that info came from in the first place. I've done a lot of search work, but I'm not entirely sure I've covered all the possible sources. Could you help, or redirect me to someone who could? -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 09:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm guessing the info came from the game itself. I don't know anyone who has the game itself or anyone else who would have such sources considering this game never came out of Japan. But someone within our wikiproject may be willing to grab their hands on the ultimania and see what it reveals. I'll look around and maybe do some extra info hunting. Lucia Black ( talk) 10:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
— Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Request amendment of Lucia Black's topic/interaction ban. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Ghost in the Shell 2". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 3 October 2013.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 10:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
i can't join until a decision is made in WP:AN. Lucia Black ( talk) 23:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dirge of Cerberus: Final Fantasy VII you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 12:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Dirge of Cerberus: Final Fantasy VII you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Dirge of Cerberus: Final Fantasy VII for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 20:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
I have a question: In Btooom!,
KirtZJ has
added Crunchyroll as an English network, and
argues that it is common practice. Is there a consensus for (or against) adding a streaming website as a TV network (or a licensor) in articles? I thought the |network_en =
parameter is meant only for TV stations, and the |licensor =
parameter for companies releasing physical media in their territories; am I wrong? Is this issue discussed anywhere?
Raamin (
talk) 02:34, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
I am glad to inform you that the article in question has passed. It was a bit of a chore, but it's very good to see this game enter the ranks of GAs. Keep up the good work. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 08:07, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Dirge of Cerberus: Final Fantasy VII you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dirge of Cerberus: Final Fantasy VII for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 08:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Ghost in the Shell 2, in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ghost in the Shell 2, so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.
For the Mediation Committee,
User:Mr. Stradivarius (
talk) 11:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Thank you for taking my defense against a particular user, even if it was fruitless. All I can do is express my thanks. Phailin ( talk) 00:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC) |
The article Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN ( talk) 22:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Ghost_in_the_Shell#Proposed_merge_with_Ghost_in_the_Shell_.28manga.29 Since you commented in the last one months ago, I figured you'd want to know its happening again. I'm contacting all those who participated in the recent merge, as I normally do, who weren't already told or there. Two are there, one was told by someone else, and thus you are the only one left. Dream Focus 13:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 02:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN ( talk) 19:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
I have brought the issue over at WP:ANI as it seems to center around two editors: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive818#This is getting disruptive. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 00:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
— Mr. V ( t – c) 11:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Regarding this page you should take a look at WP:UP#POLEMIC. Unless that page is meant to "be used in a timely manner", which it doesn't seem to be, it's clearly inappropriate. We don't keep enemies lists. Huon ( talk) 20:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
@ Huon: not meant to bring "enemies", but to help prove my point if more issues come across. And due to not having a place to remember and search for every issue that had ever occured when the time is needed to provide evidence of such in ANI. i will be able to bring it in time.
I'm tired of the uncivility, and I will not tolerate it anymore. Anyone who decides to make sly remark, passive aggressive comment, or anything generally uncivil, will go there. Its not designed for others to see, this is purely for me save as "evidence" due ot not having the means to save such evidence last time in ANI. Lucia Black ( talk) 20:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
And for the record, it does say they are permitted if they will be used in a timely manner, and i do full-well intend to do so. Lucia Black ( talk) 20:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello there. Since the Anime and Manga RfC seems to have developed a consensus for the "It depends on notability and uniqueness of each adaptation", I have started a thread to see if we can offer metrics or further guidance for such case by case... erm... cases. I have no idea if such a thing is even possible to draft up, but since having it might help, I figured I'd try. The thread is HERE, and as a previous participant in the RfC I wanted to let you know about it using this overly long, rambling message. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 16:11, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Street Fighter X Mega Man you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix ( talk) 20:05, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello there, Lucia. Just letting you know about a project I'm planning. I'm preparing to create an article for the entire Drakengard series. We have the articles for the individual games (a couple in a questionable state) but no article for the whole series. I remember you bringing the Drakengard games to the attention of WikiProject Square Enix a while back with this post, so I thought I would alert you to this so you could help me with it. The primary thing I need is references (the universal problem with this series). If you find any that you feel would add to an article concerning the whole series, please leave it on my talk page: the discussion, if one is generated, can be continued here as you stipulate. The article may be a while coming, but I'm going to create it. As to the individual games, after a little searching around, I touched up the gameplay section for Drakengard 2 and left a couple of references on the talk page of Drakengard that could well come in handy. Edit: here's the link to my sandbox, where I'm creating the article. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 11:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
@ ProtoDrake: OK thanks, for notifying me. I'll take a look and see what i can find. Lucia Black ( talk) 00:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
In Japan, the original manga is subtitled "THE GHOST IN THE SHELL". That's why you can see "THE GHOST IN THE SHELL" on the book's cover. We've been through this before.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 12:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
A retail site covering the original manga with the subtitle. that's all we need. But considering kodansha itself doesn't cover with the subtitle, it's not looking good. That could've easily been the English version of the title. Lucia Black ( talk) 20:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Do you think it'd be okay to add the mechanics of the game in? I can give this a copyedit tomorrow during my lunch - I'll be out for another 14-16 hours depending on a few circumstances, but I don't want this failed and waiting 3 months. Agreed, to place for GA review if he won't respond to it? ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 01:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
It would be fine, i was just about to add in the mission-based gameplay into the article from the reviews. I'm still looking for a game manual of the game to see if there's something reviews didn't add. If he doesn't respond then, it can be renominated for GA. Lucia Black ( talk) 01:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Street Fighter X Mega Man you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Street Fighter X Mega Man for things which need to be addressed.
Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix ( talk) 02:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Ghost in the Shell (film) is now a GA. You should add it to your list. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 00:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Lucia, you can call me 74. I was helping with this discussion over here, but got sidetracked and was not around for the stuff about ELNO#12. Talk:Young_Justice_(TV_series)#RfC:_Should_a_link_to_Young_Justice_Wiki_be_included.3F. While I pretty much fully agree with you that the wiki in question does not satisfy ELNO#12, there is an argument that it meets other exceptions from the same page. If you have a minute to peek at my bottom-of-the-section reply to yourself and Koavf, I'd appreciate it.
p.s. Judging from your userpage, perhaps you can help with this. I've read one manga, about a decade ago. This one needs some English copy-editing; perhaps you, or somebody you know, can tackle it? By no means WP:REQUIRED of course. :-) Crayon_Shin-chan:_Blitzkrieg!_Pig's_Hoof's_Secret_Mission. Ping my talkpage if you reply and I don't respond promptly. Thanks. 74.192.84.101 ( talk) 06:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Anime is in critical need of some work to pass GA and I dare say that I do not have the time to complete it all. Would you be willing to collaborate to pass this top importance article with me? This would be A&M history in the making of sorts. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 18:12, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
There's a thread of interest, in which you're discussed, at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Anime_and_Manga_RfC_-_Update.2C_request_for_closure. Nick ( talk) 20:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I undid your edit to Doll, because I do not feel that it is redundant sourcing, as you put it. Some of those sentences had quotes in them from the source, and quotes must be sourced. Thank you. :) Rapunzel-bellflower ( talk) 02:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Lucia, I've undone your post to the thread I closed at ANI. I'm really sorry; it's not at all my intention to silence you or to give the others the last word. It's just that I feel very strongly that that thread was counterproductive, and if one person posts after the close, the others will then feel like they have to respond as well, and pretty soon the thread is reopened. It might be better to comment on those editors' talk pages directly, rather than posting to the ANI thread. Again, I apologize for removing your post, but I think that it's in the best interest of the encyclopedia that I do so. Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 17:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Final Fantasy: Unlimited, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kadokawa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Street Fighter X Mega Man you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Street Fighter X Mega Man for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix ( talk) 05:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Lucia. Again sorry this took so long. I was fairly free when I first offered the sources but by the time you confirmed that you wanted an upload I was deep into the end-of-the-year rush. Things are a bit calmer now, but these took a little while to translate. Anyway the first one is a review from one of the better-known Brazilian magazines, Super GamePower (listed here alongside Nintendo World and Official PlayStation Magazine). The magazine scores along a 1 through 5 scale with 5 as the best.
Marcelo Kamikaze. Rubem Barros (ed.). "P.Station: Ghost in the Shell." Super GamePower. No.43. Pg.28. October 1997. ISSN 0104-611X. |
---|
|
The second one is a 2-page review from
Velikij Drakon. It also scores on a 1 through 5 scale with 5 as the best.
Korneev, Valerij sub nom Agent Kuper. "Анонсы: PlayStation - Ghost in the Shell". Velikij Drakon. Issue 35. Pp.10-11. 1997. ISSN 0868-5967. |
---|
|
|
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything more. I think I could find a Chinese source too if you had time to wait for me. Either way good luck on the GAN. - Thibbs ( talk) 21:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
@ Thibbs: ok I added them in. Pretty good, was able to expand the gameplay slightly too thanks to the russian review. I'm in no hurry, so I can definitely wait for the chinese reviews. Lucia Black ( talk) 03:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
@ Thibbs: I was also wondering if you have "Ultra Game Player" January 1997 magazine i think its issue no.93 . I think thats the last English source that i know of. Lucia Black ( talk) 16:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Do you always have to have the last word? Do you think that makes it "win or lose" or something? You don't know what you are talking about and you got called on it and then came all these excuses. You are wrong. Simple as that. Now, WP:DROPTHESTICK if you can't make a congent argument. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
I wish you success and happiness in your endeavours for this coming year, and I hope we'll be able to carry on improving the wonderful project that is Wikipedia together! Keep rocking on! :)
|
Oh thanks. You too Lucia Black ( talk) 01:30, 24 December 2013 (UTC)