This is an archive of past discussions with Hilst. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - ... (up to 100) |
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Happy editing! Cheers, wizzito | say hello! 05:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
I saw that you posted Template:Uw-paid1 at User talk:KWMR Radio. Please consider using Template:Uw-coi-username instead next time. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 06:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "TotallyJimmyFallon", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 00:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I saw that you marked Andrada Polytechnic High School for speedy under 2 criteria, A7 and G11. I have gone ahead and deleted it under G11 as it was unambiguously promotional. However, for future reference I wanted to let you know that A7 does not apply to schools and educational institutions. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 21:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for flagging the warning provided on my talk page about the page The Catacombs of Solaris. What happened in that situation is that I was using the page, which I had created, as a template to create another page, Bernband. It looks like I made a mistake and attempted to create the article in the Catacombs edit box with what I thought was the new article field. Thanks again for the pickup on that. Vrxces ( talk) 01:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi MaterialWorks. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi MaterialWorks. I noticed that you recently used rollback to roll back this edit to Alicia M. Soderberg while using Huggle. The content that you restored claimed that the article subject is suffering from "alcohol addiction", and was sourced to a primary source crime log in a local paper and an arrest log in another local paper. These are not generally acceptable as sources in line with WP:BLPCRIME, and neither of the sources state that she actually has an alcohol addiction. I appreciate your work to combat vandalism, and I understand that edits where an IP removes sourced content without providing a reason are commonly vandalism. Going forward, please be careful to check that the edit you are rolling back is vandalism and that the content you are going to restore is properly sourced, especially when the article is a BLP. Happy editing! — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Could you please stop changing the title of this article? There is no use of massacre in the Peruvian media nor well know international news outlets. This is being changed by politically motivated persons, please Stop. 2A04:EE41:7:6028:9459:A0A3:1231:87A1 ( talk) 11:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
My edit was removed because it linked to an outside source. However, I'm not sure why it didn't come under the list exception. Under the heading "Global industry" the three largest US and one Indian firm are listed and linked. I attempted to add another firm iconikapp.com that is a vote service provider largely for individuals.
As the current entry on Proxy Firm notes: "not all firms provide voting recommendations and those that do may simply execute client voting instructions." iconikapp.com helps mostly individuals (but also institutions) create a proxy voting policy and have it voted automatically. The firms listed in the existing entry allow customers to automatically vote as the advisor recommends or according to a policy provided by the subscriber.
It seems to me the existing list is incomplete without the link to iconikapp.com which offers a very similar service. It appears I would need to add a page on iconikapp.com first and then link to that Wikipedia entry at the Proxy Firm entry. Is that correct? Corpgovnet ( talk) 00:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey 96.61.91.149 ( talk) 00:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on my (shared) IP talk page about my edit to Rhona Mitra. Sorry, I got distracted while adding information about Mitra's appearance on Ben Fogle: New Lives in the Wild shown last night on Channel 5 (UK), and I never got to finish my edit session properly. However, this has raised one question on how I can reference the content of a TV show? - I have been unable to find a transcript, and the only other reference I have been able to find is a brief program summary & review at the Radio Times: https://www.radiotimes.com/programme/b-9bir4k/ben-fogle-new-lives-in-the-wild-season-17/?episode=b-ppm2f4 (this is the same reference used in the show's article for the episode S17E4). I have added a brief line about her appearance on the show in the list of television appearances (this time with the above reference), but I would like to add a "Personal life" section to the article on Mitra, and include some of the details that viewers learned about Mitra's life since 2012. Even though I am an experienced Wikieditor from years ago, some guidance would be useful on how best to achieve this. 134.238.51.161 ( talk) 20:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:ROLLBACKVECTOR22 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 6 § Wikipedia:ROLLBACKVECTOR22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aaron Liu ( talk) 13:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I recently modified the Wikipedia entry for this album, as it inaccurately credits the album to only one person, Bela Fleck. It is the work of a trio. I added his collaborators' names - tabla player and percussionist Zakir Hussain and bassist Edgar Meyer - to the first sentence of the entry, and to the info box, and I removed the Bela Fleck chronology part of the info box. I suppose it would make more sense to add multiple chronologies to the info box (that of Hussain and Meyer). At any rate, I saw that the reason for removing my edits is that they were uncited. I did not think it needed to be cited since their names appear together, in alphabetical order, on the album. Furthermore, there is no citation included which would justify crediting this album solely to Fleck and thus implicitly treating it as a solo album of his. Were I to cite my edits, The AllMusic entry for the refers to the three album's performers/composers together, under the title of the album, separating their names with /'s. The other issue is perhaps a bit more complicated: I modified the title of the opening track from Babar to Bahar, a Hindi/Urdu word for springtime, mentioning in my editing comment that Meyer can be heard introducing the song (clearly enunciating its title as "Bahar") with Hussain then supplying the English translation, in the NPR Tiny Desk Concert performance the trio gave in 2010. I could provide the link and time stamp if necessary. However, it seems that the album itself was first issued with a misprint, and "Babar" is what is seen on the back cover with the track listing; something that has been copied uncritically in places like AllMusic. Please advise. Premiumshlock ( talk) 01:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
There are some changes to be made in the Wikipedia page of Maratha Empire. The first is the script of the official language of the empire which is Marathi and The Seal of Emperor Shivaji I is not the seal of the Empire. It was used till 1680 and many monarchs, Peshwas and nobles used their own. But, even after continuously correcting it, one Norwegian gentleman is repeating the same wrong exits. 2405:204:971F:6D68:0:0:A84:A0AD ( talk) 20:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
I’m sorry I wasn’t aware. Thank you for your concerns. - 174.91.109.231 ( talk) 02:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
I'm trying to update information on the KSKQ radio station.
My name is Brad Smith and I'm the News Director. I used information from our website. How else am I going to update it? BradSmith313Z ( talk) 21:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanye West (2nd nomination), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanye West (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanye West (2nd nomination) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 22:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
I removed the “right for parents knowing what their kids are learning” because it has never been explicitly ruled on, unlike the other implied rights. For example, the right to privacy was decided as precedent in Griswold v Connecticut. The “right for parents knowing what their kids are learning” has never been decided, so therefore it is not an implied right yet. While some cases like Wisconsin v Yoder have let parents withdraw their kids from school based on the content in school, the court has never required the school to inform parents exactly what goes on in school. 72.19.133.130 ( talk) 23:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary.. If you believe your edit is constructive, please restore it with an edit summary explaining why you made that change. Material Works (contribs) 00:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, MaterialWorks. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
The page which you moved to Hum Rahein Na Rahein Hum after the brief move discussion on talk page has been restored to previous version by an editor who went against talk page consensus instead of starting a new move discussion. Please warn that editor and rename the page according to move discussion which supported the move according to the official streaming app Sony LIV and broadcasting channel Sony Entertainment Television Pri2000 ( talk) 20:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1) ... with no comments. Per WP:RMNOMIN, "No minimum participation is required for requested moves. If no one has objected, go ahead and perform the move as requested unless it is out of keeping with naming conventions or is otherwise in conflict with applicable guidelines or policy." [underline added] This appears to be the case with:
... but they were closed as "The result of the move request was: not moved." May I ask why?
2) ... with no consensus. Per the next paragraph, "If objections have been raised, then the discussion should be evaluated just like any other discussion on Wikipedia: lack of consensus among participants along with no clear indication from policy and conventions normally means that no change happens (though like AfD, this is not a vote and the quality of an argument is more important than whether it comes from a minority or a majority). However, sometimes a requested move is filed in response to a recent move from a long existing name that cannot be undone without administrative help. Therefore, if no consensus has been reached, the closer should move the article back to the most recent stable title. If no recent title has been stable, then the article should be moved to the title used by the first major contributor after the article ceased to be a stub." [underline added; two further explanatory paragraphs not quoted] The situation underlined here appears to be the case with:
... but when these were closed as "no consensus", again no return was made to their stable status quo ante. May I ask why? – .Raven .talk 17:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
I replied on your archived thread because you pointed me there. I hadn't realized it was archived already. You may want to consider not archiving something if you are going to point someone at it. :D Archiving implies closed. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Just FYI that your move might need to be reversed if the NCWS is changed or simply left as-is per the RfC to clarify this kind of situation (whether the script or alphabet is primary in an article that covers both), since that is one of the two topics in the RfC. — kwami ( talk) 22:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, but I find your RM closure at Talk:ONE Championship rather dubious. After a claim that all sources that use the proposed form are old, three supporting already-cited sources were identified that were one year old or less, and there was no response to that. The position in favor was supported by the Wikipedia MoS, and the last comment in opposition was based only on a vague unsourced claim about "most people". The number of editors in favor of the move was equal to the number opposed, so how can a consensus be declared to not move the article? Based on what? I suggest to revert the closure and possibly to relist it (see WP:RMRELIST). — BarrelProof ( talk) 20:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
When sources are mixed, Wikipedia avoids all-caps in such cases, I didn't evaluate is as well as 162's !vote. Looking back at it, a "no consensus" result would've probably been more appropriate, but since it's essentially "keep the status quo", I don't think it makes much difference.
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:Village pump (WMF) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks a lot Бмхүн ( talk) 20:10, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi MaterialWorks, you closed the move at Talk:History_of_Israel_(1948–present)#Requested_move_18_April_2023 as not moved. Can I ask you to take another look as two of the three oppose !votes are by socks of banned users? Think without those votes theres a clear consensus to move. nableezy - 03:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm surprised to see this relisted? I linked an AFD in the discussion that shows a consensus to merge the article; It should not exist, making the RM moot. 162 etc. ( talk) 16:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, MaterialWorks. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 2023 Copa do Brasil. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay ( talk) 12:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Mertens has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 22 § Mertens until a consensus is reached. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 01:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
move to> Prayagraj Chheoki railway station thanks a lot Prayagraj had already moved 149.78.185.131 ( talk) 16:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
I was leaving a !vote to move somewhere else but was edit-conflicted by your close. Could you please re-open? Thank you! CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 19:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
I mistakenly requested a move for Mertens (disambiguation), I ment Mertens (surname), should I renominate the page to be moved again? ErceÇamurOfficial ( talk) 08:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Regarding the edits you are making that use the {{ section link}} template: note that pages archived by ClueBot III will search for sections that were archived and fix the links to point to the archived version. I'm not sure it will work for section links that use the template. I suggest being careful about editing pages that may point to archiveable sections. isaacl ( talk) 21:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Template talk:Infobox civil conflict on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Haha this is so annoying, when are they going to fix it? Dr. Vogel ( talk) 10:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
Recently there was a page move request for the company Proton_AG to move to Proton_(company). The outcome of the page move discussion was that the Proton page was moved to Proton_(Swiss_company). I opened a page move review (that you helped out with - thanks!) which Endorsed this change.
However, I would argue that Proton_(Tech_company) or Proton_(Internet_company) are better options, if Proton_(company) is not possible. While it is true that Proton is headquartered in Switzerland, 99% of people who use Proton services are not Swiss and probably are not even aware that Proton is a Swiss company.
Are you able to move the page to one of the suggested titles, or would you recommend that I reopen a page move request?
Thanks!
Octazooka ( talk) 10:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
In recognition of your contributions to the articles Nahel Merzouk protests and Killing of Nahel Merzouk. -- Cdjp1 talk 15:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC) |
Hi Material, thanks for closing the B. B. King RM. Can you also move the above category, as well as subcategories, to match the article? Thanks, ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 19:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Can you please stop move national football team’s articles. The closer has not accurately summarised the discussion. T v x1 23:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I’m puzzled by your “no consensus” close at Talk:List of spaghetti Westerns#Requested move 30 August 2023. As nom I’m biased but I think the strength of arguments clearly favored the Support side. And the numbers were 60/40 in favor of Support. Normally that’s more than enough to find consensus. Unless you have a good explanation, I request you either reverse or at least revert your close. Thanks. В²C ☎ 07:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of List of spaghetti Westerns. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. В²C ☎ 04:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
You shut down the discussion prematurely, so I am challenging this as I previously stated.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 01:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I realized U deleted my request. Now please move those two archives. 197.1.169.133 ( talk) 20:05, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Heya, delete-redirect is a pagemover right, but anyone can delete a redirect as long as the redirect page has one revision in its history and is directly redirecting to requested page. Hence my question to find out if there's any other technicalities that is preventing the requester from moving the page themselves. – robertsky ( talk) 03:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hilda Hilst you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider ( talk) 23:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Hilda Hilst you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hilda Hilst and Talk:Hilda Hilst/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider ( talk) 21:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Hilda Hilst you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hilda Hilst for comments about the article, and Talk:Hilda Hilst/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider ( talk) 16:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
In May, you did a bunch of moves like this one, for which I thank you. But you didn't clean up the over-capitalization in the articles moved, nor in articles that link to them. I've been working on those, but would be happy to have help. Dicklyon ( talk) 03:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, you have "extendedmover" but not the ability to delete pages, so when you wanted to move Timiș to Timiș (disambiguation) but couldn't move-over-redirect you instead moved the existing page to a typo title and then flagged it as {{ db-redirtypo}}? If you're going to do crap like that, use {{ db-moved}} as the correct template. Or, maybe better, let an admin handle it without the move to a garbage title (tag it with {{ db-move}} if you want). Anomie ⚔ 12:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
On 18 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hilda Hilst, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hilda Hilst impersonated a journalist to meet Marlon Brando, and asked him about Franz Kafka's works? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hilda Hilst. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Hilda Hilst), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Kusma ( talk) 00:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Why didn't you move this along with the article? Jenks24 ( talk) 08:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You struck my messages at 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, citing a tje ARBCOM ruling that only extended confirmed users can edit Palestine/Israel articles. I am extended protected, so please self-revrt. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 07:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I was cleaning up Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates and Special:WantedTemplates and noticed that your script page is showing up in this search. This is a quirk in the backend software that parses your javascript page as if it were wikitext. It would be great if you could add
// <nowiki>
to the top of your script and
// </nowiki>
to the bottom of your script to stop it from showing up in this search. This won't impact the functionality of your script since these tags are in javascript comments, but it will help reduce the number of false positives in the reports. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Green Editathon October '23 | ||
At last – here is your barnstar! Thank you for your excellent contributions to GA nomination Hilda Hilst during the WiG "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon. I hope we'll continue to see more of you and your work at WP Women in Green going forward. Best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 18:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
The redirect Yurkey has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § Yurkey until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh ( talk) 00:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! | |
Hello MaterialWorks, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 17:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Due to budget and procrastination limitations, we've only had time to review the first ~39% of the scripts since last issue. Help us out here! Aaron Liu ( talk) 13:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey there Hilst! I want you to move SC de Goa, SC Bengaluru and Mohammedan as it has been seven days since I proposed requested move. Thanks! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 03:25, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
11:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Hello Hilst, any reason why the article was demoted from B-Class to C-Class as it is well-written, all out sourced with reliable sources and ultimately meets the criteria listed under B-Class? I'll be on the lookout for your response, Thank you.
Hilst
[talk]
01:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Thanks for your help with the template! I am currently trying to create the template and it is my first time working with code ish stuff. Could you help? Geardona ( talk to me?) 13:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
13:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)The Technical Barnstar | |
Thanks for your help with the template! Geardona ( talk to me?) 14:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girls' Greater Catholic League, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girls' Greater Catholic League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Would you mind taking a closer look at your close at Talk:Isabella II of Spain#Requested move 26 January 2024? My concern is that though there are a significant number of opposers, they all opposed based on the undisputed ambiguity of “Isabella II”, but without addressing nom’s pre-emptive rebuttal to this position by pointing out this Isabella II is “already the primary topic”. This point about PT was reiterated by every Support !vote because ambiguity is not a policy-based reason to oppose when the topic is primary for the proposed title. Furthermore, no one challenged the PT claim probably because PT has been established here for 20 years with the Isabella II WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to this article. In short, Opposition is not policy-based at all, while Support is solidly based on SOVEREIGN as well as PT.
I should note that in a similar recent RM at
Talk:Ferdinand VI#Requested move 22 December 2023 the closer, upon reviewing
WP:SOVEREIGN, found consensus to move despite an 8 to 3 opposition majority because “none of the Oppose votes are actually based in policy”. This close was strongly endorsed at
Move Review and even lauded as a textbook example of a great Wikipedia close, assessing
WP:CONSENSUS not according to how people voted, but by actually considering which votes followed policy and which didn't.
Please ensure you’re doing that here too, okay? Thanks! —-
В²C
☎
18:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
18:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you very much for your help with my Max Zähle issue, I didn't expect someone responding so quickly to my request. And additionally you did all the neccesary maintainance stuff like editing the article and talk page themselves. Thank you again. Cyfal ( talk) 21:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) |
Hilst
[talk]
21:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)