In general, I prefer conversations about specific articles to be held on the corresponding article talk pages instead of here, so that other editors can follow them too.
If you are referring to a particular edit, it is best to use a diff link.
I usually reply here. I am often working on several things at the same time, so if I haven't answered yet even though I am online and editing elsewhere, please have some patience - if it is really urgent, prod me with a follow-up message.
I can often be reached via IRC, too (HaeB on Freenode).
It appears Ohconfucius is continuing to play up with his battling and edit-warring on Signpost pages ( [1] [2] [3] [4]). As it were, Tony1 seems to suggest that the "first author spot" is reserved for whoever creates the report first. Even if that is the case (which it hasn't been since I began writing the report earlier last year), it would not justify this in the newssroom; it shows he is using Signpost as a battleground and your lack of intervention is concerning. You promised that you'd have a talk with him and that would be the end of it; evidently, there is no end to this issue, and he has also resorted to grossly uncivil commentary both in edits and edit summaries ( [5] [6]) that shows that he is unlikely to collaborate. He is not heeding the warnings he has been given so it seems there is little choice but to escalate this through the normal route. I'd still prefer to see what you will do to resolve this issue so I'm giving this note to you now. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 11:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
The great potential of the Arb report is to render in simple, crisp language and form what are extraordinarily (and IMO often unnecessarily) complex proceedings. It's not always going to be an easy or quick job, and we all know ArbCom specialises in acres of bloated text and has never been good at deadlines and evidentiary limits. We owe it to the community to "translate", as it were, into plain language, skilfully summarised, a record of AC proceedings. Why not embrace the idea of a co-author? I would be pleased if other editors volunteered to help with F and A—it's a mammoth job to do weekly.
Could we come to an amicable arrangement so that the AR can be tended to happily by more than one editor? Can we explore the notion of being nice to each other? It should be the norm, IMO. Tony (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
I hope you weren't expecting a quiet week – I've just written a fair amount at Arb Report this week. So get ready for the same old, same old... – Ohconfucius ¡digame! 16:08, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Do you think I could get some sort of special insert about what's going on at WT:RfA published in the next Signpost? I was thinking of something like this with a short introduction. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 13:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
You are able to read it here [9]. Wondering if this is worthy of sign post? Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 19:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for quick reply :]. I just added my account to this list.
Thank you for help. PMG ( talk) 15:18, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
First, a thank-you for maintaining these.
Second, are you still maintaining Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/2011? I don't see anything since early January.
Third, is this a task that a bot could do? davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 18:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost Barnstar | ||
I'm continually impressed by the quality and consistency of The Signpost under your editorship. This Signpost Barnstar is for excellent coverage of the gender gap mailing list this week, and for excellent and extensive work every week.-- ragesoss ( talk) 02:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
"Following the success of their Imperial College Recruitment Drive, the Contribution Team will be hosting similar events at the Universities of Nottingham, Sheffield, Leeds and Manchester between the 1st and 4th of March. For more information or to sign up as a volunteer or attendee, see the events page."
While WMUK and other chapters have made school and university visits before, this is, to my knowledge, the first week-long "tour" of flying visits. Ironholds ( talk) 00:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I think your edit/comment there is misinformed. All of those folks serve on the same board at the Open Source Initiative. They're pretty closely connected and editing each others' articles in tandem. Simon Phipps has self identified himself as Open Source Guy and Webmink, Russ Nelson is self-evident and Danese Cooper is on the board. Please self revert. Toddst1 ( talk) 16:04, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey HaeB, I left you a note on that talk page in regards to the tags you had applied to the article. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 15:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi HaeB,
sorry for bothering you over here. Isn't it about time to take care of that open issue? I got the impression that your backyard depraves in to an boxing ring. Maybe this isn't in our best interest. As a member of the ArbCom I know that decisions take time and I respect that. If you need more helping hands, don't hesitated to inform the community. Greetings, -- buNt. 15:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Sitting in the FCDW backwaters is this fine little idea. The page is, of course, beyond outdated. The idea is to take a look at other wikipedias and see what their Featured Content processes and numbers are like. Would you like to take the lead with the German Wikipedia? I'm not even sure if I should make a page for it, yet. Looks to be a big collab. Need to scout out some interbabel people. Cheers, Res Mar 15:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey HaeB! I have an idea in mind for the next Arbitration Report or as a separate article -- an analysis of the amount of requests for arbitrations the Committee has accepted over the past 18 months + a review of how long it has taken for cases from acceptance to final decision. Thoughts?
Best regards, Lord Roem ( talk) 23:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Try Wikipedia talk:RefToolbar 2.0#Troubleshooting and let me know if you have any luck. Kaldari ( talk) 18:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the mistake. - Mabeenot ( talk) 21:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I've finished my first article. I really have no idea what to do now so I thought I'd let you know. Gamaliel ( talk) 02:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I was a contributor to the Wikiproject Feminism interview. Is it alright if I'm only referenced as Danger? I'm going through a name userption right now and I really really despise the old one at this point. I've changed it, but if this isn't kosher, revert away. -- Danger ( talk) 00:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
I agree that WP Japan needs to be postponed in light of the disaster and ongoing trauma in Japan. If still possible, I'd like to have the Report page published in the Signpost with a brief note and the news sidebar. - Mabeenot ( talk) 01:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want some background here, I wrote the article back in 2007/8 (as User:Doc glasgow. When I was told it was about to appear as TFA, I was mucking about seeing how it played on Google. I discovered the NPG was using it - and without any attribution to Wikipedia - indeed falsely claiming their own copyright. I posted the matter to wiki-en-1, [11] because I found it amusing that the NPG which so objected to someone allegedly breaching their copyright, (see [12]) was being so blaze about infringing mine. "They threw bricks at Derrick, now it appears they are inhabiting a glass-house.". HTH.-- Scott Mac 01:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
What is your opinion? Are the number and size of images currently OK? Should changes be made? Generally, I dislike galleries, and prefer to select just a few images and display them large. Tony (talk) 16:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
I've made the advised changes to my report; anything else that needs to be done? Ironholds ( talk) 21:01, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Sue Gardner has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. From Sue: HaeB, I hereby bestow upon you this cookie in appreciation for your editing of The Signpost. The Signpost is really, really great at helping the enWP community stay informed about important goings-on: I am really glad you are working on it :-)
†
|
Ragesoss has given you a cupcake! Cupcakes promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cupcake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. One treat isn't enough for you. It's hard to overstate how great you've been for The Signpost.
†
|
for responding on signpost, Tom B ( talk) 23:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
You recently contributed to the Template:Infobox journalist. Your input is requested for the following discussion: Template talk:Infobox journalist#Twitter. Thank You. -- Flyguy33 ( talk) 06:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
-- Tinu Cherian - 17:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
-- Cheol ( talk) 07:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Hiyas HaeB,
as you are part of the CheckUser-team in de-WP and the designated member for the case of de:Benutzer:Diskriminierung according to the discussion there, I'd like to know if there will be any update message (or even result) about that specific case in the sooner future. -- Odeesi ( talk) 16:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
WP was cited by the New York correspondent of the BBC on the World Service/Radio 4 this morning, before the president's confirmatory announcement, as already having Osama bin Laden's death on his page. I am surprised that he was surprised.
Rich
Farmbrough, 19:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC).
The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive. Awards and barnstars We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest |
You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:24, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello HaeB. I saw your name as a person who is active in delivering the Signpost. User:YellowMonkey, inactive since last year, is still getting the Signpost, even though his name is not on the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist. Do you know any way the deliveries could be stopped? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 00:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Hallo HaeB, falls du es nicht schon gesehen hast: Schau doch bitte mal nebenan vorbei: de:Wikipedia:Administratoren/Probleme/Checkuser-Problem mit HaeB. Irgendeine Form von Statement wäre sicher hilfreich. Wenn ich Marcus richtig interpretiere, schiessen die Gerüchte ins Kraut. Schöne Grüße,-- Wiggum ( talk) 14:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've buzzed you at the Signpost IRC. Tony (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
I notice that you've reached 20,000 edits. Congrats! - Mabeenot ( talk) 00:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Did you get them? Rcsprinter (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Howdy HaeB. By tomorrow, we should have the March board minutes and a new chapter approval coming out. – SJ +
[15] Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Got your IRC note. I don't think I'm a good choice to write this up; I'm good at collating information, but the style of writing here isn't my forte. However it should be summarized enough that anyone can take it and put it into an appropriate tone and use it with very little time or effort. My aim was mainly to ensure it was accurately covered by summarizing the event carefully. FT2 ( Talk | email) 18:39, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Please see a suggestion I made at User_talk:TheDJ#Communication_idea. What's the best way to pursue discussion? (Probably not at TheDJ's talkpage.) Thanks. Rd232 talk 23:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I removed about a dozen of them from NAN. And corrected a raft of - hyphens – into the almost universally required dashes. Would you like to include the dash script in your vector space? Hundreds do. Please don't use a hyphen in the FC subtitle that goes out to talk pages. Tony (talk) 04:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Sure; I've been interested in the work of the "Critical Point of View" group, & wished I could have participated in it beyond a reader. Thanks for thinking of me. I'm snagging the first section, & will try to get it to you ASAP. (BTW, I've been wrestling with writing a review of Richard Yeo's Encyclopedic Visions. While I believe it is of great interest to Wikipedians, it is a, well, encyclopedic work, & requires a lot of thought to distill down into a brief review.) -- llywrch ( talk) 23:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Create a mini-project to bring the articles of Neda, Mohamed Bouazizi, Khaled Said, and Hamza Ali Al-Khateeb up to GA/FA status. Possibly expand to include others whose deaths became symbols of war and peace (i.e. Pat Tillman). Would you like to work on something like this? Ocaasi t | c 23:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I believe that you, as the executive editor of the Signpost, you should be made aware of the situation developing in this coming signpost's WikiProject interview section. Please see Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-06-06/WikiProject report and User talk:SMasters#Signpost editing. I enjoy reading the signpost, but this is now the second time that poor editorial form has made me regret contributing to it. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
I proposed a new piece for next week: Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom Is that the right way to do so? See the notes on a possible series. – SJ + 01:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I left a question at Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost#Op-ed_pieces.3F. I know you're busy, but I'm just hoping for a quick answer :) Cheers, / ƒETCH COMMS / 03:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
... and still no result on de:Wikipedia:Checkuser/Anfragen#(8. Dezember) - Benutzer:Diskriminierung. Six months is quite a long time for a CU, even it may be not that easy to say X is Y is Z-sockpuppet. But as you are very active here on en-WP, it starts to look like you aren't really interested in ending this CU-case, especially as the administrator problem was closed and prolly the Schiedgericht will not accept the case with the reason that they aren't really responsible for the case. So I'd suggest you give the users @ de-WP another update message or give the case to someone who really is interested in solving that case. Sincerly
-- Odeesi ( talk) 22:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
If you not even want to answer no but just not comment on my question, I still would be very much interested to know whether you have read my question by Wikimail from 2011-06-08. -- Pjacobi ( talk) 16:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
@HaeB: "Do we agree that the purpose of Checkuser in such cases is to provide evidence of potential abuse" Yes! Thats the point. Witch evidence of abuse does exist, justifying a CU?
If you see evidence, than you should provide them on the CU page. Even a preliminary result of your investigations would be helpful. For everyone. Within the context of that case allready existing administrator statements, which see indications of an evangelical network, manipulating the german wikipedia. ("dass es Indizien dafür gibt, dass [...] nur ein Teil der Aktivität eines Netzwerkes mit evangelikalem Hintergrund darstellt, welches die deutsche Wikipedia unethisch und regelwidrig zu manipulieren"
[17]) The rumors, spreading since six month, are far more detrimental than the disclosure of facts of evedidence you can provide.
If you have no evidence, than just do what a CU has to do: terminate the CU with that conclusion. It is not the task of the CU to investigate several month in a case, just to find "something". --
Arcy (
talk) 17:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Decide this. I tend to lose these arguments anyhow. Res Mar 02:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
YHM, Roger Davies talk 14:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, HaeB! In September 2010, you wrote: "I hear that there are plans at the Foundation to set up its own shortening service, which would be covered by the Foundation's privacy policy." Is there any news on that? Please join this discussion. Good luck! -- NaBUru38 ( talk) 00:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The latest GOCE backlog elimination drive is under way! It began on 1 July and so far 18 people have signed up to help us reduce the number of articles in need of copyediting. This drive will give a 50% bonus for articles edited from the GOCE requests page. Although we have cleared the backlog of 2009 articles there are still 3,935 articles needing copyediting and any help, no matter how small, would be appreciated. We are appealing to all GOCE members, and any other editors who wish to participate, to come and help us reduce the number of articles needing copyediting, as well as the backlog of requests. If you have not signed up yet, why not take a look at the current signatories and help us by adding your name and copyediting a few articles. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! :) SalimJah ( talk) 14:43, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Would you mind explaining this edit, specifically your removal of my link to the Wikinews article regarding the National Archives Wikipedian in Residence? I understand that my formatting may not have complied with the Signpost's style, but I don't see why the link had to be removed. Ragettho ( talk) 15:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I would just like to take the time to apologise for not forewarning of my absence on the Tech Report for yesterday (I got back at approximately midnight, and was thus unavailable). I can only assume that this was an oversight on my part when sending the various notifications out immediately before I left. Sorry for the hassle and for picking up the dropped ball on this one. (I shall also leave a note for Ryan.) Just about to copyedit the report - only tiny things though, per protocol. Regards, - Jarry1250 Weasel? Discuss. 11:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Could you look over [20] please? I understand that in general, the Signpost does not do major post-publishing edits. But honestly, we're not some monolithic bureaucracy; I cannot see any justification for rejecting a clarifying edit like the one I added. NW ( Talk) 15:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
For superbly dedicated management and editorship of the Signpost. — Tom Morris ( talk) 18:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC) & Ncmvocalist ( talk) 22:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For keeping the Signpost rolling. Mabeenot ( talk) 21:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC) & Ncmvocalist ( talk) 22:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
Again, congratulations! You'll be missed. I look forward to your final from the editor piece.
—
Pretzels
Hii! 22:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
The Guild of Copy Editors' Award | ||
The Guild of Copy Editors (GOCE) presents this special GOCE Gold Star Award to HaeB, for his support of the Guild and its activities in The Signpost during his tenure as its editor-in-chief, as well as his contributions to the standards and craft of copy editing in The Signpost. We wish you all the very best in your future endeavours. Lead coordinator:
Diannaa ~ Coordinators:
Chaosdruid,
The Utahraptor and
Slon02 ~ Coordinator emeritus:
SMasters |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your incredible work on The Signpost, I give you this Barnstar of Diligence. Keep it up! Saqib Qayyum ( talk) 10:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for your hard work at the Signpost.
Bearian (
talk) 00:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to give you a heads up that I reverted your edit at Jay Maisel. In your edit summary you mentioned a discussion on the talk page. I believe you were referring to an earlier discussion and missed the most recent discussion at Talk:Jay_Maisel#Relevance_of_Controversy. If I am mistaken, please let me know. Dimension31 ( talk) 04:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
I'm sorry to read you're stepping down from The Signpost. You've done great work there, and I wish you the best of luck in your new role. :) — Cirt ( talk) 18:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for all the hard work and diligence you've put into The Signpost. For the past year, I've read each issue religiously and without exception have found it informative and genuinely interesting. Rivertorch ( talk) 22:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I emailed you. Tony (talk) 06:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-07-25/Recent research, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the
the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~
EBE123~~
talk
Contribs 20:26, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for this edit. It's probably the first time I've ever contested a page-move such as this, and wasn't really sure what to do with it. Happy editing, and regards. :) -- WikHead ( talk) 01:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I had an inquiry about whether a story on it has ever been run in The Signpost. Can't find anything in the archives, so might you recall? Cheers. Tony (talk) 02:49, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I've had a lengthy period of absence from Wikipedia which left me with a backlog of Signposts to catch up on, which I've been working through these last couple of weeks. And so it is that I have only just learned of your departure from that esteemed organ. So, just wanted to say you will be missed and that I feel SP was bloomin' marvellous under your tenure. Good luck in your new role with the WMF, I'm sure you will thrive. -- bodnotbod ( talk) 06:18, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
So, how would I go about including this statement of his intent?--
Appanouki (
talk) 07:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Reviewing my talk page before archiving it at the end of the year, it occurs to me I never acknowledged all the nice words left here after started to work for the WMF. Thanks everybody for these kind words, they were very motivating, and as you may have seen I have still been contributing to the Signpost, and also documenting the community's achievements in my new capacity. Regards, HaeB ( talk) 21:30, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
The edit partial revert: "(professional) historian" would be POV too, cf. historian: "...and is regarded as an authority on it." doesn't make any sense. First, the article did not say "professional", but I think the fact that he is repeatedly paid to write books on history clearly makes him a professional, so it would be fine though unnecessary to include that. Second, he *IS* regarded as an authority on the topics in history he writes about - hence the continuing publishing contracts, the respect of his professional peers, and the multiple news sources calling him a historian. If you think otherwise, you need to prove it with some pretty strong reliable sources saying he *isn't* regarded as an authority, otherwise you are engaging in original research that ends up pushing a POV. DreamGuy ( talk) 04:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
http://www.ubcmj.com/pdf/ubcmj_3_1_2011_32-33.pdf Not sure if this is worthy for signpost. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:53, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Just to let you know, Sko sent out an SOS saying that ITN and N&N alternates needed to be activated. You're an alternate for both, an old hand, and one of the few people on the list who has edited in the past 48 hours, so I figured I'd message you first. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the help with ITN, much appreciated. Would you mind taking a quick look over my sections of ITN and the special report for any glaring errors? We are ready to publish otherwise... Skomorokh 11:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi there you put a warning on the above regarding Royal Brompton Hospital. The editor is back with a vengeance. Perhaps you'd like to review? I'll watch this page if you want to contact me. Cheers. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 17:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I am desperate. I really need help with my wiki. Can you help me please?
Please write me [email protected]
Thank you very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.127.220.14 ( talk) 01:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi , I am desperate. I really need help with my wiki. Can you help me please?
Please write me [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.127.220.14 ( talk) 01:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi - I have reverted back to before the large expansion of the claims about this persons ancestry. Many of the sources that the user has been adding are not reliable for wikipedia - I left the User:Ksrjm a note about my reversal and a link ot the talkpage discussion - the discussion is on the talkpage here, please join in if you feel to - thanks
- Youreallycan ( talk) 20:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Are you at the congress this year? -EKaspersky (forgot my pass) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.76.43 ( talk) 00:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Here migh be better proof 176.99.116.107 ( talk) 22:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Bump good sir. You control the URL or know who does? Res Mar 23:04, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
I've emailed you. Tony (talk) 10:56, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
How is this update process run? Re: User talk:Nickj/open-wikiblogplanet-config.ini#Stopped_updating. 173.166.109.241 ( talk) 00:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to interview the former editors in chief of the Signpost for an article in the Signpost. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new contributors to the newspaper. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. Have a great day. - Mabeenot ( talk) 04:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to You have two cows, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Hghyux ( talk to me)( talk to others) 03:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at You have two cows. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Hghyux ( talk to me)( talk to others) 00:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about those stupid edits. I was not paying full attention to the article and blindly re-hit the button. You deserve an apology. I have stopped using Stiki until it has time to reset. Hghyux ( talk to me)( talk to others) 01:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
What is your interest in Philip Lader? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.12.187.97 ( talk) 23:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey HaeB, could you check this edit to make sure it is accurate? Thanks, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 16:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi HaeB! I wanted to know if you'd be interested in being the 4th interviewee for the Signpost interview series I've been working on. I would supply you a list of about 20 questions on-wiki, and then you'd have 1-2 weeks to respond to them at your leisure. I would organize the questions for logical flow and trim some parts for succinctness but otherwise it would be entirely your words as you crafted them. As an experienced and thoughtful Wikipedian with serious concerns about paid editing, I'd really like to have your voice in the interview series. Let me know! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:55, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
I've thought of an idea that might break our current logjam with paid editing. I'd love your sincere feedback and opinion.
Feel free to circulate this to anyone you think should know about it, but please recognize that it hasn't agreed upon by either PR organizations or WikiProjects or the wider community. It's also just a draft, so any/many changes can still be made. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:55, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
please read this: Moseley's law "Moseley was able to show that the frequencies of certain characteristic X-rays emitted from chemical elements are proportional to the square of a number which was close to the element's atomic number; a finding which supported van den Broek and Bohr's model of the atom in which the atomic number is the same as the number of positive charges in the nucleus of the atom." waiting for the answer
i might be wrong or interpreted wrong but in the page "Moseley's law" also says Foundational quantum physics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdrg22 ( talk • contribs) 04:27, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I will comment on APCO's talk page in a moment with respect to One Malaysia/Israel. I would appreciate your comments and input Monkeyassault ( talk) 05:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help with citations :)
Pardon any total n00b errors if this is not supposed to be where I talk?
Understood all further citations required except the Canadian Defence League one ... that was the right url, just needed scrolling down to Sep 1 ... how do I link that? Appreciate all your help. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Canadian-Defence-League/196328817044491?fref=ts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corruptedcryptonerd ( talk • contribs) 08:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Also ... I thought there was masses of secondary sources? What else for notability is required? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Corruptedcryptonerd (
talk •
contribs) 08:51, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, sorry, I responded to you as below on my chat where your answer was but not sure if you got it there:
Hi and thanks :)
Ok.
Facebook - ok, that was the most permanent link I could find to stuff that was more followed up on Twitter and outside ... include or no? It was this one, not the one you found: http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=222565861205573&id=196328817044491
Hmm. not sure I understand given that she was the key person in Wikileaks Central, Global Square, Occupy etc ... compared to for instance these she must be more notable? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_Noel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadim_Kobeissi and many others who have wikipedia pages just for participating in orgs she created? As a person ... not sure how personal = notable ... plus is a privacy advocate and wikileaks so not much personal out there, just many orgs involved with.
I am trying to fill out the bios that need to be linked to CryptoParty but could probably reach her on twitter. Will ask around for better links whereever you say tomorrow. (This is one linked to cryptoparty I used as a model - if this is notable then? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinn_norton)
Re political theory stuff, she was at the Berlin Biennale talking about that for two months this year and there is a lot of reference on Occupy-ish places, and some random radio audios but not sure that any would be considered link worthy: http://www.google.ca/search?aq=f&ix=seb&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=berlin+biennale#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=berlin+biennale+heather+marsh&oq=berlin+biennale+heather+marsh&gs_l=serp.3..33i38.14220.18437.0.19656.18.17.1.0.0.1.289.1946.6j9j2.17.0.les%3Bcesh..1.0...1.1.kbo6R8RhHSU&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=9c11953bcbc45462&biw=1328&bih=645&ix=seb Global Square is still very active in Github and irc.
Thanks very much again, I appreciate all your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corruptedcryptonerd ( talk • contribs) 18:35, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Waiting to hear back, but here are a couple of the prior links I posted http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/building-on-wikileaks-20111028-1mo38.html http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/fivelive/pods/pods_20120221-0400a.mp3 (at 6.30) ... would these be considered about her vs the projects? I have been looking at several other wikipedia profiles like the ones I mentioned above and am not understanding your points about "information about her as a person" ... most of the profiles I have seen seem to deeply discourage that as 'trivial' so I think I am not understanding you.
I volunteered to create Wikipedia articles for a couple of the speakers we considered notable enough to give messages of support to international cryptoparty events (I just picked this one actually) and am trying to get it in clean enough form that it will be up and your boxes of concern removed then I probably won't be back since I don't usually edit wikipedia ... so any help you can give me getting this up to standard before I leave would be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corruptedcryptonerd ( talk • contribs) 03:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
So these articles (Sydney Morning Herald and BBC that I posted in the other chat) are not ok? They are pretty about her I think?
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/building-on-wikileaks-20111028-1mo38.html
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/fivelive/pods/pods_20120221-0400a.mp3 (at 6.30) Or the CryptoParty international message?
http://soundcloud.com/cryptoparty
Sorry, not trying to be lazy but not a Wikipedia editor either and would like to tick a box that says I created an article that has no warning boxes on top :-D Would these two work? I have found some radio stuff of various quality too, and the Berlin Biennale must have stuff about her besides in Occupy-ish places but in other languages. What do I need to get this article to a no-warning-boxes state?
I am pretty certain she is of note, since she was asked to do an international message of support, but what is needed to prove? I can't find stuff like age, but she was the founder of some major groups and many of them so I think more important than Wikileaks Central (since she is also Global Square, first known mention of Occupy, prominent early person in day of rages, Hope Riders, anon etc). I looked to do a Wikileaks Central article, but since most well known media don't directly quote them as a source that would be harder (even when they do quote them they say Wikileaks not Wikileaks Central). And it would leave out all the rest.
Sorry to bug, but Sydney Morning Herald for Wikileaks Central and Occupy, BBC for Global Square and political philosophy to technology, plus CryptoParty ... if I got a Berlin Biennale reference too would this work? Does that have to be der Speigel or would a random radio or blog do?
Regarding Quinn Norton ... there is an age but no reference, so I could make one up ... actually that is true for all of these? or Pedro Noel ... all of those seem to be orgs affiliated with him being a wl central writer ... Nadim Kobeissi 'early supporter' of orgs as opposed to created, references his own tweets and blogs ... Moxie Marlinspike pseudonym, no name much less birthdate etc etc Smári McCarthy also no personal, references his tweet stream etc. Jillian York references own work and good reads profile?! Christopher Soghoian Incredibly little of this is referenced. Dan Kaminsky no personal information, zip. Matthew Green absolutely no references, no personal, one paragraph. Dima Khatib one of many many journalists self referencing all the way. And on and on, not to beat this drum but because ... I thought I did much better :(
So I understand wikipedia is a work in progress but having trouble understanding the 'personal coverage' part in context. I have interviews with her and articles about her, both in major outlets? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corruptedcryptonerd ( talk • contribs) 08:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
No idea if you would consider a public 'book in progress' by a published author with a chapter on her writings an acceptable source ... http://desktopregulatorystate.wordpress.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corruptedcryptonerd ( talk • contribs) 18:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Happy Holidays! | |
Hope you and your family are enjoying the holiday season, Tilman! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you very much! I don't know so much english, so I contribute at spanish wikipedia. However I can remove small mistakes in articles. Best regards. -- Shalbat ( talk) 13:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, HaeB! Thank you for your heart. Niazza ( talk) 11:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, any chance you could give an opinion here? Thx Tony (talk) 12:54, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
There has been quite a bit of work done on the PhET Interactive Simulations article that you flagged in June and I wonder if you would take time to look at it. Perhaps you will see if the flags could be removed or if you have ideas that would help the article and add to the Talk:PhET Interactive Simulations#Problems due to_ conflict of interest editing section. thanks, Patricia.Loeblein ( talk) 00:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Assault Attack may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:06, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to San Francisco cable car system may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 21:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
I understand that the relationship between Scientology and Wikipedia over the years has not been the best of relationships. For the record, I am not a a Scientologist and I do not endorse Scientology. However, this acrimony between you two should not be an obstacle for having an accurate description of matters. The fact is that a lot has happened in 2013 in the field of psychiatry that has made the editing to the "Marketing of Madness" necessary,
- Tom Insel, director of the US National Institute of Mental Health, 2013, says that DSM labels lack scientific validity: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtml
- David Kupfer, chairman of the DSM-5 task force, replying back says that indeed, there are no biomarkers for any the DSM disorders: http://www.psych.org/File%20Library/Advocacy%20and%20Newsroom/Press%20Releases/2013%20Releases/13-33-Statement-from-DSM-Chair-David-Kupfer--MD.pdf
- Allen Frances, chairman of the DSM-IV task force, 2013, publishes a book criticizing the medicalization of ordinary life in DSM-5 http://www.amazon.com/Saving-Normal-Out-Control-Medicalization/dp/0062229257
- The Division of Clinical Psychology of the British Psychological Society, 2013, bashes psychiatry, as promoted by medical societies worldwide, http://dcp.bps.org.uk/dcp/the_dcp/news/dcp-position-statement-on-classification.cfm
The whole point of the "The Marketing of Madness" was to precisely denounce that while psychiatry was telling one thing to patients, the facts of psychiatric practice told a very different story. The documentary is from 2010 and yet it foretold events that happened in 2012 (the GSK fine) and 2013 (the public falling out between the APA and the NIMH resulting in both acknowledging criticism to psychiatry that only recently they had labelled as anti psychiatry talking points).
The best advice I can give you is that you watch your documentary yourself https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgCpa1RlSdQ . Unlike other CCHR/Scientology productions this one is measured and is painstakingly well documented.
When I first watched it last year I went through the pain of independently verifying, through Wikipedia and other sources, all the claims made there about the lack of scientific validity of psychiatric labels and the conflicts of interests it denounced. As I said, the controversy surrounding the Paxil Study 329 resulted in GSK paying hundreds of millions of dollars, part of the 3 billion dollar settlement, to settle criminal and civil charges with the DOJ on the matter.
The current content of the page presents as facts things like the validity of mental illness when in fact both the APA and the NIMH now recognize that no psychiatric label has been shown to have biological validity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychsurvivor ( talk • contribs) 08:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
A Tesla Roadster for you! | |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 ( talk) 23:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. It seems like I received a notification that you liked my recent additions/edits to the Barbary Coast, San Francisco article. I just finished creating a new article on a related subject called Terrific Street, which involves the early days of jazz in San Francisco. I need to have someone read it, so that they can remove the un-reviewed tag at the top of the article. Do you think that you could give it a read and remove the tag? Thanx. James Carroll ( talk) 17:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
If you think, the Coat of arms map is an interesting use-case for Wikidata. It would be nice if you could write a little article in the Signpost. More infos in the Kurier. -- Kolossos ( talk) 17:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam ( talk) 09:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
(The Wikimedia Highlights issues from some recent months have not been distributed via this notice, but can be found in the archive.)
I come back to the Signpost and almost the first thing I do in the first article I write is plug a big picture of you front and center into the draft. I swear it's not idolatry—I just can't think of anything better at the moment! Congratulations on migrating from behind behind the print to in front of it, I guess. The reason I'm using your headshot as the graphic and not anything out the report is that (A) half of the story is the internal change in format; and (B) I feel that there isn't a good and obvious image to summarize the contents. If you object to this treatment (I'm kind of meh about the image anyway) or, more importantly, have a better image that can be used as the lead there, let me know. Res Mar 06:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, HaeB,
The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.
You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.
More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.
Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Lee Kuan Yew. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan ( TALK) 17:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)
Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I was directed here by Resident Mario in regards to my writing of an opinion piece on whether modern Wikipedians understand foundation values.
"Mostly in reference to the five pillars.
I think that it is imperative that we have an op-ed (at least) that covers whether the Wikipedians of today agree with the same principles of the early Wikipedians, or if there has been a shift in outlook since 2001 within the minds of Wikipedians."
He said that you could probably point me to some studies that may help me in writing this piece.
Might you be able to do that? Tharthandorf Aquanashi ( talk) 16:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
TLS review you might be interested in. I note you're in the page history of the bio-article on him. Tony (talk) 10:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I was told that you would be the person to get into contact with about cleaning up, and revising some of the content on the Aaron Peskin Wikipedia page.
There are a few things on the page I would like to touch up, but the most noticeable error is in the first paragraph under the 'Controversies' section. The references used lead either to dead webpages, or to a page with dead links.
Can this be removed due to the lack of a verifiable source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.59.234.124 ( talk) 20:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect How wikis work. Since you had some involvement with the How wikis work redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer ( talk) 05:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Close para/copy vio was one of main reasons the article failed its first GA-review. Everything suspected of such should be nicely reworded now, so thanks. :) Jonas Vinther • ( Click here to collect your price!) 22:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
The sheer number of edits can't be a coincidence. Half Shadow 07:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello HaeB, I believe you don't work with editing any Wikipedia pages to do with Malaysia, but you're only one of two users I could think of at the moment that works to make sure Wikipedia is used properly. I have asked users (on their talk pages) Muffin Wizard and Alexander Iskandar why they changed the Ethnic groups in Malaysia template, Muffin Wizard replied and fixed the template to an extent but I believe this is not fair. Alexander Iskandar changed the design completely without any discussion on the template's talk page. A template is only supposed to be used a a guide but it appears to be informing the reader who in Malaysia is considered " Bumiputera Malaysian" and who is considered "non-Bumiputera Malaysian". The previous version of the template worked fine without politicising it. All it did was address the ethnic groups in the country. ( 124.180.199.116 ( talk) 10:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC))
Remember to mark your CSD pages as patrolled! :P JTtheOG ( talk) 05:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't know what you are talking about. The reuters quote is a complete fabrication and can be found no where within the reference. The figures you re-added lacks information supplied by the sources. There may be a corresponding quote but the relevance of it to the text is not sufficient. They can also be removed per WP:OR. The text needs sources to support the figures. 172.100.212.147 ( talk) 23:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for your feedback on the Khmilnyk page. I will work on researching sources for famous people connected with the town and adding them.Some of the sources are other wiki pages but I don't think they count. I hope we can leave the names in there while I research sources. I am a bit slow to make additions. Sorry. Neverbeengone ( talk) 20:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you for your input regarding my Wikipedia submissions.
NAMM (National Association of Music Merchants) is a non-profit organization that has an archive of Oral History interviews similar to the Library of Congress or Smithsonian. We have no relationship with the persons interviewed except to honor their contributions to the music products industry.
Our organization’s events are not open to the public, nor can we offer membership to the general public. Our sole purpose in connecting these interviews with Wikipedia is to highlight aspects of individual careers that may or may not be part of their existing article, and to promote their contributions to the music products industry.
If there is a better format to use to submit the interviews, please let us know how best to incorporate them into the articles. We can submit a paragraph and imbed the interview within the paragraph, or we can add the interviews to the reference list if that’s better. If it’s policy to submit the proposed edit to the talk page for each person, we can do that if necessary.
It is not our intent to make the interviews more important than anything else in the article, we just thought that was how to link an external interview. We welcome suggestions to better incorporate and not violate Wikipedia policy, but we do feel the interviews are an important addition to the articles, as being interviewed for the NAMM Oral History program is like a recognition award, and is therefore important to be mentioned. I look forward to your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allisonhargis ( talk • contribs) 18:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to God emperor - because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.20.236.158 ( talk) 09:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Greetings, Want to thank you for correcting the 14:10, 2 June 2016 Moredecai edits introduced on this page. I'm still not very good at the Undo process & so I just corrected the Schedule wikitable portion. Cheers! — JoeHebda • ( talk) 14:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
15:25, 3 June 2016 Moredecai (talk | contribs) . . (20,528 bytes) (+6,626)
and
15:31, 3 June 2016 Moredecai (talk | contribs) m . . (20,542 bytes) (+14)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Novak Djokovic. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Noël Coward. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just confirming -- I believe you'll be contributing a Research Report to our upcoming edition of the Signpost. True? - Pete ( talk) 02:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox organization. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jane Austen. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
On 21 September 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rose Pak, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T♦ C 14:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:University of Queensland. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Drury Hotels. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Motion picture rating system. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mia Khalifa. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, HaeB. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, HaeB. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Just so you know I'm starting an SPI on the Yang Hyun-suk vandals. Primefac ( talk) 17:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
This refers to your edit on Bounded Rationality page. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bounded_rationality&diff=751579327&oldid=751530005 This article satisfy WP:RS requirements as this is a published article published by a peer reviewed journal. Kindly let me know what is the concern/issue. Thanks !!!
TANI0208 ( talk) 16:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Moazzam Begg. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:16, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Silicon Alley. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Inside (video game). Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Last week, while making edits, I got involved looking at art schools and I noticed that there is mention of a controversy in the introductory paragraph of the Wiki of the Academy of Art University. It seems to me that unless a controversy is of such major proportions that it has become a defining event in the subject at hand, it should not be in the lead. Especially now that the lawsuit has been settled, it seems it should just be mentioned as part of the history of the school, and not a major event worthy of the lead. I took a look at some other art schools' wikis, and I wasn't able to find even one other case where a controversy such as this was placed in the introduction. There was one particularly serious case, ( California Institute of the Arts), where a university was the subject of a federal investigation concerning how they mishandled *rape* allegations made by a student, and yet even this was not placed in the introduction. Reading the Wiki manual of style, the footnote next to the guidelines for the intro section cautions editors not to give undue attention to less important controversies in that section. I am asking if you therefore agree that the sentences about the controversy should be moved down to the History section, as suggested by the anonymous editor? Thanks for any guidance you can provide. Cornflakecraze ( talk) 07:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:JavaScript templating. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Clean coal technology. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Willie and Joe. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, HaeB. I appreciate your help. Can I just take down the page? Jenv Corre ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corey Stewart (politician). Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1873 in Germany. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of manufacturers by motor vehicle production. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lagardère Sports and Entertainment. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on File talk:Einstein and Locker-Lampson.jpeg. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of pharmacies. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Harrison. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you.-- 79.178.24.71 ( talk) 10:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Your response to the speedy deletion request that I had was excellent. Is there a way to group all those templates together? Even though each one is accurate, it is distracting. I'll move on. I admire your handling of this.
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for helping me.♥ Blacksxn ( talk) 11:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monogram Pictures. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fighter aircraft. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fox News. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Family Guy. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
There have been a couple editors who have been mass deleting sourced content from the Art Renewal Center WP page. Please help protect this page from disruptive editing. ArtMajor ( talk) 00:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rihanna. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, HaeB. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ibicdlcod. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Taiwan seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ibicdlcod ( talk) 13:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zoë Quinn. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Toby Keith. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Harvard Crimson. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Flagg!. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Personality rights: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. KNHaw (talk) 06:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
You are unnecessarily deleting verified content from the Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.96.249 ( talk) 17:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lord & Taylor. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello HaeB,
I've been working on a new article that's currently in the draft space, and am eagerly awaiting feedback. I want to know that I'm doing this in the right way (for example, I began by disclosing a conflict of interest that I hope is clear and by-the-book). Here's the link:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Boundless_Immigration
I've been following your work as an editor, and wondered if you might have the time and interest to check out my draft article and let me know if it's on the right track. I'm also curious to know how long, in your experience, it takes for an article to make its way through the draft queue. Messier6 ( talk) 18:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Ogden Stiers. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I believe what I’m adding will help young learners and I’d like to know why u have the audacity to remove it. Thanks The new year HpNy2k18 ( talk) 04:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Tell an admin to block me :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GhostlxSmh ( talk • contribs) 06:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
~ Amory ( u • t • c) 18:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Osmosis RfC. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jessica Valenti. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi HaeB, my company handles public relations for Danielle Steel. She is not now nor has she ever been a category writer of any kind except fiction. She does not write romance novels. She writes novels about a wide range of subjects, children’s books, poetry and lyrics for songs.
Best, Agerson112085 or Aron Gerson Nancy Seltzer & Associates [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agerson112085 ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore Airlines destinations. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:InfoWars. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:WUPV. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Martha McSally. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sarah Jeong. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tom O'Carroll. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi HaeB. I think page protection may be called for soon. The vandalism by Virgin Media IPs and socks is getting a bit predictable. What do you think? Martinevans123 ( talk) 22:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eugene Gu. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies). Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anne Akiko Meyers. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, HaeB. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi I was wondering which was the best way to get my article published I have posted it and a kind gentleman read the article and has left a comment for another editor to read I was wondering could you take a look at my article please Pin3appl385 ( talk) 18:08, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bekir Fikri. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eva Bartlett. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michel Temer. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Killing of Aya Maasarwe. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aurora, Illinois shooting. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:And Then There Were None. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avengers: Infinity War. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:WikiLeaks. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:British Royal Family. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost Barnstar | ||
This user deserves recognition for their work on The Signpost! That was a great story in the last Recent Research column | ||
{{ The Signpost Barnstar}} |
Smallbones( smalltalk) 23:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electric smoking system. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I have not made any changes to Anna Leopoldovna which require a citation. Indeed, I have not added any new material at all, but only emphasises the number of years they spent in prison. This info is already there in the text, but people reading it may not have realized that nearly forty years were spent in prison. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.63.7.120 ( talk) 14:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African Americans. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
I guess I don't have a secret admirer then [23]. :-(
Oh well, thanks for protecting me against the nefarious bot ;-)
-- Kim Bruning ( talk) 08:31, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Visual arts. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi there.
Thanks for your editorial smarts on my minor contribution! :) Would you mind organizing the byline by weight of contributions? I really don't feel that I should be listed first. That article on page protection (DePP) is really interesting. I haven't had time to look at much else. I will try to help out in future, now that I see the ether-pad list of articles to review.
Best wishes, 🌿 SashiRolls t · c 08:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey can message me need info on Wikipedia ShoppiDon ( talk) 03:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stanley Kubrick. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi HaeB ( talk), thanks for taking a look. As you can see in the diff, this content was removed as part of a wider effort to make the page more readable, organized, and objective. The quote in question "In 2019 the project has been criticized for being "still not usable for websites" in spite of attracting huge investments and creating an "overextended, under-documented, and unfinished constellation of projects"" is from an unreliable source (the author's personal blog), and gives undue weight to a single perspective that is not representative of a majority or large minority opinion (as demonstrated in a basic google search). In addition, the content itself has a biased tone and implies that one individual's experience is a factual assessment of the project's current state. Sorry for not sufficiently documenting that rhetoric in my change description. Are you onboard with me adding this justification and removing this content again?
Thanks for your help! Nala28 ( talk) 16:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC) - crossposting from /info/en/?search=User_talk:Nala28#August_2019
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:IHeartRadio Canada. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wittington Investments. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
When I read the article,I think it is very negative.When I looked through the information,I found that the first person who wrote it also deleted his daughter biography
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RJFF/Thita_Manitkul
The ban and the scandal were political lies that why its was not on his Thai Wikipedia.
He was senator in 1987.I hope you will be ok with it. 180.183.110.84 ( talk) 10:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
The millions baths was a rumor the subject would have been minister of transportation if that were true.
There were three millions Thai Students that went to schools that was found during his administration.
1)Most of Community College in Thailand was founded during his administration. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Translation:Announcement_of_the_Ministry_of_Education_dated_18_June_1997
2)He was Minister of Education since 1995 .He has been promoted his Education for All policy since 1995.
180 days diary November 1996-May 1997 https://books.google.co.th/books/about/180_%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%99_%E0%B9%83%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A7.html?id=aL3KoAEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
The final step to put the following number of students in Schools There were not enough schools for 700000 children between the ages of 3 and 5 years (Early Childhood Education)
There were not enough Primary Schools for 50000children between age 6and11years old .
There were not enough Secondary Schools for 1 millions children aged between 12 and 14 years
There were not enough High Schools for more than 2 millions children between aged 15 and 17
The result of Baby Boom for more than 30 years in Thailand. www.moe.co.th.
3 The newly appointed Duputy Minister was promoting his idea using the minister Email.
The ban have never been approved ,The books say that the writer did not know what happened after the email .
http://www.qrd.org/qrd/education/1997/misc.news.and.resources-04.21.97
In a recent positive development, the Commission on Justice and Human Rights of the Thai Parliament has discussed the matter and decided that the ban goes against human rights principles.
It has never been approved and the minister was doing his Education Reform to founded Schools for Millions of Thai Students .The Number could be founded in UNESCO and World Bank Recorded.
4)LGBTS https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1680244/thailand-still-lags-in-lgbt-issues
If there was the ban it would have been in the article.
5)The subject goal of Education Reform
Sukavich Rangsitpol]], launched a series of education reforms in 1995 ,goal of the education reform is to realize the potential of Thai people to develop themselves for a better quality of life and to develop the nation for a peaceful co-existence in the global community.
Dachakupt, Pimpan (1999). "The current innovation in curriculum development in Thailand". International Journal of Curriculum Development and Practice. 1: 93–101. Retrieved 8 October 2019. 180.183.43.254 ( talk) 02:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
References
The Signpost Barnstar | ||
For the consistent quality of "Recent research" and the DDoS write-up. Thanks. Smallbones( smalltalk) 18:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks - missed that! Pretty unpleasant stuff. GirthSummit (blether) 07:50, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Honda Ridgeline. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tilman,
I'm sure I read research a year or two back that more-edited articles have higher quality by some metric, and that less-edited articles are lower quality or less NPOV. I can't find the reference I'm thinking of. Do you happen to have an idea on it? (I'm 85% sure I didn't imagine it). Thanks in advance for any assistance! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo) talk 01:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello there. Just wanted to tell you that the edits you removed here were actually blatant vandalism. — LeoFrank Talk 17:07, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:21 Savage. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Amis Music Festival at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk to me) 05:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Hers the link for the Piersall quote. https://sabr.org/bioproj/person/6d1d92c8#footnote22_axguezn Bonifacemundane69 ( talk) 02:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Also, references to her impact are a matter of public record. Bonifacemundane69 ( talk) 02:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
How do I follow up? The retraction was swift. Yet the new evidence seems to be slowly applied. Bonifacemundane69 ( talk) 02:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
No, fair enough :) I've just added the reference which I knew of, appears in Nine Lives - his autobiog, mentioned a few times actually from pg9 onwards, relating to his birth, parents, etc. I've been meaning to do a sweep through the book again at some point and ref any other stuff too Altlondon ( talk) 21:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:IWG plc. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Amis Music Festival at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 11:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
On 23 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amis Music Festival, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Taiwan's Amis Music Festival (performers pictured) does not publish its schedule in advance, preferring to focus attention on the overall theme of aboriginal heritage rather than individual performers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amis Music Festival. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Amis Music Festival), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
--valereee ( talk) 00:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi HaeB, firstly thank you for taking the initiative to go forward with the information on the talk page for Jennifer Freyd. I had added this issue to the dispute resolution noticeboard, because I did not know what to do in this scenario. I don't personally deal with these sort of issues all that often, and I found this idea through the WP:EW resolution suggestions. I think I did it at the exact same time as you were writing on the talk page. Does that seem correct? Jooojay ( talk) 06:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Haeb, thanks for editing the John L. Thornton page. I noticed you reversed my changes and would like to discuss this matter with you. That page has been consistently edited with undue weight, highly questionable citations and tabloid quality sources. I noticed you pointed to NYT as what I was claiming to be a tabloid - not at all. If you look at the edit history of that page, cites from a local Palm Beach journal were added, appalling quotes from a book were included and if you look at the book it does not include ANY named individuals who reported those quotes. In other words, all the quotes on the page are from sources such as "some people said". I actually took the trouble to look at the source material. There are many other insinuations which are factually incorrect, which I attempted to remove.
For example:
The subject of the article was never a "consultant" in mongolia. I removed this section and it was rolled back.
The current version of the article states that the subject was nominated to the Ford Board while he was President of Goldman Sachs. This is not true. The citation simply goes to Bloomberg and indicates the date of his joining the Ford Board. I removed this section but you rolled it back.
The scandalous quotes from a book cited on this page are contested and when you look at the sources in the book not a single named individual is referenced. In other words, the quotes are attributed to "some people said" while the subject of the page has refuted these quotes himself.
Finally, the overall tone of the page is not at all in keeping with the reality one can clearly see with a simple google search on the subject of the page. You will find hundreds upon hundreds of stories - including quotes from the most recent White House event where President Trump thanked the individual in question for the China US Trade deal. Yet, this article is edited in a way that presents overwhelmingly negative stories from "publications" such as the Palm Beach journal and quotes cited to unnamed individuals. This is not a balanced representation. Earlier edits to add balance were removed by the same user who has consistently edited this page only with negative commentary. Interestingly, if you look at the history of the user, you will find that they are only interested in this one page. Does that not indicate clearly what is happening here?
How would you recommend balance be brought to this page in line with the obvious reality of the subject's career?
Srichardson2076 ( talk) 19:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, just thought that you should be aware of WP:ARBPIA4, IP editors shouldn't be making contributions like these ones! ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 16:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost Barnstar | ||
For Recent research, other contributions, and putting up with me at The Signpost Smallbones( smalltalk) |
You reverted a quote of the Mueller report in a line starting “The report says”.
The line in the NYT cite fails V for it because the NYT cite is about the Mueller hearing, and a wording from Schumer. It is not something “The report says”.
Please reinstate what cites about the report contain, the direct quote many cites mention “Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts”.
Cheers Markbassett ( talk) 05:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
All of my current reverts are related to a single editor who has constantly been pushing POV criticism of Islam either overtly or (when that fails) covertly and has been campaigning for such as well. See: [26] as well as his history
These issues have been raised previously by other editors as well who have reverted many edits. Edits on less popular articles however go uncontested. See: [27]
Many disputes not involving me directly have been had. See: [28] [29], [30] [31]
The reasons for the edits I have reverted are given on Surah Al Imran talkpage where this the issue of discussing certain topics regarding criticism of Islam (ie topics which critics usually emphasize Jihad, Houris, etc) to the exclusion of others is POV and imbalancing as well. I have been unable to gain response or consensus on the issue. See: [32]
Not sure of where to discuss this. Apologize for breaking 3RR on one occasion. Will take a hiatus for 24 hours. The issues above however remain unaddressed. 119.155.40.215 ( talk) 11:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
A community discussion has authorised the use of
general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (
COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described
here.
MrClog ( talk) 21:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi HaeB, can you clarify what "crazy paving" is on the COVID-19 page? I don't have access at the moment to that particular Lancet Infectious Diseases review you cited and I'm unfamiliar with that particular terminology (I have a feeling many people will be). The wikilink goes to a non-medical page which further adds to the confusion. Thanks! TylerDurden8823 ( talk) 06:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
It's a valid term. At least one chief of police in the US uses it. Well, he's a cartoon one, but he's still a chief of police. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.65.92 ( talk) 09:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost Barnstar | ||
for an outstanding article in the March 2020 issue |
I know you don't need another Signpost Barnstar, but you're getting one anyway! Smallbones( smalltalk) 00:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 06:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC) |
Auspicious bwszd ( talk) 11:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Hi! Just saw your edits and comment :) It's actually the first time I edit a wikipedia article ad post things on talk page so I hope I'm not messing up :) Please correct me if I'm wrong! No offense, just wanted to state the rationale of the section I previously added (which has already been deleted). @HaeB I really appreciate your point that it will be great to include poll results that are specifically about the 1989 Tiananmen events! Unfortunately there isn't such a poll as this topic is censored in China. The reason I initially wrote about the development China made, the consequence of 1989 revolutions around the world and the survey results of how satisfied people are towards the government was that I wanted to provide some contextual information for the shift of the public opinion towards the Tiananmen protests, I was not trying to argue which path is superior, but only to describe what the public opinion on Chinese government was and used it as a context , so it may not be directly related to the Tiananmen events. However I still think it's important to include the facts of the general acceptance of the negative view on Tiananmen protests in contemporary China(i.e. quotes from former democrats, Chinese netizens advocating the government to use tanks on protestors in HongKong on social media, etc) because they are the facts that show that apart from regret and criticism, there is a different voice in China about the Tiananmen events, and this voice as well as why this voice is formed should be included in this online encyclopedia. Happy to hear your thoughts :) Link for the edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests&diff=950150968&oldid=949764701 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auspicious bwszd ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Please revert the propofil page to include my edits. You removed edits that I made to more accurately reflect the cited research, because "I didn't provide citations". The original page *wildly* misreprestend the citations. *I* was making edits *because* of bad citations :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Propofol&diff=949563369&oldid=949562640
I removed this line:
"Researchers have identified the site where propofol binds to GABAA receptors in the brain, on the second transmembrane domain of the beta subunit of the GABAA receptor.[70][71] "
The citation doesn't support the statement. The linked studies didn't identify "the site where propofol bind". That is *grossly* innacurate ... and I didn't replace that statement with a more accurate assesment of the research because it's really complicated and doesn't really add to a simple wikipedia explanation of the science. It would just be *really* confusing, as clearly it already is.
The cited article is talking about GABA-a **potentiation** when it refers to propofil activity with "an amino acid residue in transmembrane (TM) domain 3 of the GABAA receptor β2 subunit". "an amino acid residue in transmembrane (TM) domain 3 of the GABAA receptor β2 subunit" is not a *location* in the brain, it is a *subtype* of GABA receptor. The study found that GABA **potentiation** is effected **only** by a mutation of methionine-286 to tryptophan. Mutation to "alanine, cysteine, glutamate, lysine, phenylalanine, serine, or tyrosine" did not effect propofil activity.
All that is fun and interesting but it doesn't boil down into a simple statement like the original one .. which *butchers* both the science and the jargon.
I altered this statement:
" EEG research upon those undergoing general anesthesia with propofol finds that it causes a prominent reduction in the brain's information integration capacity at gamma wave band frequencies."
to say:
EEG research upon those undergoing general anesthesia with propofol finds that it causes a prominent reduction in the brain's information integration capacity, supporting the information integration theory of consciousness and the cognitive unbinding paradigm of general anesthesia
Here the original statement isn't quite as wildly misleading gibberish as the other edit, but it's still kind of misleading. The study is one trying to prove the *information integration theory of human consciousness*. So if we are going to include it in an article about propofil psycho-pharmacology it would be nice to *at least* include that context.
Maybe you can add back in the "gamma wave band frequencies" bit, but it seemed fairly misleading and unnecessary as it was.
Stating the brain *has* "information integration capacity" as if that's a fact.. that can be easily measured with EEG and produces "gamma wave band frequencies" as if there's no other explanation ... without putting it into context that it is *theory* is *very* misleading... especially in an article about propofil's *psychopharmacology* rather than one about say .. our understanding of human consciousness.
I'm not going to come back and edit/argue this again ... so find it in your heart to read the citations next time you want to make edits about citations... and go back and revert the changes you made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:4700:341:1484:B15A:FA43:1783 ( talk) 09:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Regarding your reversions, I have not made any deletions, my only change was the size of the CNN logo - which I felt was too large. Regards, David, David J Johnson ( talk) 09:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Don't believe that I am getting paid because Im not. If you look at the leads of other college pages like notre dame they use the same language, so when Contributor123 pointed out that I shoudn't use the same language I didnt again and changed the notre dame page. If you don't like my edits then go and edit those because i think they are fine. Anything wrong just tell me and ill fix it, like it did for contributor123. Andrewmoody71 ( talk) 05:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Andrewmoody71
On 6 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ping Yuen, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Ping Yuen (pictured), a public housing complex in San Francisco's Chinatown, has an entrance modeled after that of a temple in Beijing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ping Yuen. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Wikipedia talk:Did you know on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Talk:Famke Janssen on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Talk:Abortion on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Talk:Nikola Tesla/Nationality and ethnicity on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Talk:Margot Robbie on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Talk:Square One: Michael Jackson on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, HaeB! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.
RedWarn is currently in use by over 80 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 03:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
I am trying to get through to you about your message this morning Indexing it all ( talk) 15:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Got your message. This page contains many inaccuracies and citations to sources like student newspapers that are unreliable and should not be used. You will see that in the past the page was subject to trolling. I was trying to put things right. I will gradually go through the page correcting it. I am an expert on the person concerned! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indexing it all ( talk • contribs) 08:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Chris needs to publish so we need to stop editing. If need be we can copyedit after publication. IMHO it's this weekend schedule that keeps away many of the copyeditors, but I really need the quiet time at home. Smallbones( smalltalk) 18:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi I tried to add some facts about PSL but my source is the french website of the university. PSL is a young university created by older prestigious schools and universities, so there is not an english reliable source about the number of nobel laureats ect. There is not a lot of information about this uni in english that's why I tried to add more. I don't know if I can provide a source in french...
Thank you. I agree with you and I'm sorry if my only source is the website of the uni. Unfortunately I don't have another source more neutral. It's a public university so the information are real. If I found a better source I'll change it. Regards.
Regarding your recent reversion of my edits, I have a couple questions:
1. I understand why you might want to keep the sentence describing his general ideology in the lede, but why restore the part about his primary victory? I don't see a sentence about primary victories in articles about other presidents (except Obama, who's primary victory has half a sentence likely due to similar biases).
2. I understand why you wanted to keep the link to Political positions of Donald Trump, but why keep a section with two paragraphs that were clearly written before his election describing policies that are mostly discussed later in the article? In fact, later mentions of many of those policies even note that he talked about them in his campaign.
Thanks, Bzweebl ( talk • contribs) 07:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Talk:Space Launch System on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
I had just noticed you had reverted several of the certification edits I made on Tupac’s albums. You are not following the correct source that is listed. As previously stated the RIAA website is the source that is listed, it is the correct company and OFFICIAL company for album certifications. Several of his albums are certified “Diamond” which means sold 10,000,000 units, It absolutely should be nothing lower or higher in the box. You are violating WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE. Not sure why a magazine article is included when the OFFICIAL company that certifies his albums is listed and clearly clarifies the correct numbers. I will be reverting them back, if I catch you starting an edit war I will be going straight to an admin.
Thank you Pillowdelight ( talk) 02:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
I had just saw your message on another users talk page, you are following a magazine article that was published back in 2011. That’s 9 years ago. As previously stated you need to be following the RIAA source. It is the official website for certifications. Pillowdelight ( talk) 02:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Times Radio on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Draft talk:Regus (company) on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Prince George of Cambridge on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I just thought I should alert you to this: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Refspam_across_many_articles as I noticed that you'd written up some of the papers that were spammed in the Signpost and at Wikimania 2018. It's a pretty bizarre case, but hard to believe that it wasn't done for nefarious reasons. SmartSE ( talk) 11:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I have tried to tidy up the Matthew Walker (scientist) page. As a contributor to the page, could you take a look at it and determine whether we can remove the non-neutrality template? I'd do it myself, but I'd prefer if someone else could do so. Thanks. Tom ( talk) 01:24, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
I apologize for all the contributions you done to correct my mess ups. But I don't believe I've left that much. I've been hacked too so that may be the problem. They have vandalized before w me. And threatened. Sorry for the trouble I will try better next time. Steel9210 ( talk) 23:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:List of My Hero Academia characters on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
September 6, 2-4pm E.S.T: NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE | |
---|---|
You are invited to join the Sure We Can community for our NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE - this Sunday, Sept 6th, 2020. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into other languages; as well as, brainstorm ideas about how we could use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19. Please join us, all skill levels welcome! Is there an idea you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? Have an idea how we can use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19? Please, let us know by adding it to the agenda.
|
-- Wil540 art ( talk) 20:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Koala on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Varg Vikernes on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Michelle Williams (actress) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Can you add the related pages to your watchlist to review them? There's a lot of contentious editing right now and the less watched pages seem to be being ignored now.
Harizotoh9 ( talk) 06:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:List of fictional impostors on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Hallo, hättest du Lust, von "Uneven Coverage of Natural Disasters in Wikipedia: The Case of Floods" eine DE-Version für den Kurier zu verfassen? In dem Fall würde ich eine Untersuchung beistellen, was Übeschwemmungsartikel in der DE-WP angeht. Wobei ich zehn Tage, zwei Wochen brauche, um die Infos zusammenzutragen. -- Matthiasb ( talk) 17:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
It was not a no knock warrant according to the most current RS NPOV material as currently reflected on the breonna taylor page itself. If you reverted my NPOV RS encyclopedic factual edit in error, rest assured I have fixed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:46:C801:B1F0:949:25C9:2ECE:BC7A ( talk) 04:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, HaeB. As you can see, I had a problem with an user about Matt Taven. An user said we have to come to an agreement, but he doesn't give arguments and didn't answer at one point. You and other user includeD the content again, but he keeps removing. Since I had a edit warring with him, I think I can't do anything more. Do you have any idea? I would say ANI, but pro wrestling isn't popular between ANI admins. -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 12:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Melissa Benoist on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
I deleted that sentence in Karen (pejorative), was because I thought it was unnecessary. Because regardless of haircut, anyone could be a "Karen". However, I looked into what you meant, and I realize that my edit was wrong and I will leave the original version as is. (It was wrong because, in other parts of the article, there is mention of that haircut. If I removed that sentence, the rest of the article wouldn't make any sense if they brought up that haircut.) Toad62 ( talk) 18:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)(NOTE: Please ignore that pdf below this message, I tried to get rid of it but don't know how it got here.) (Edit on the notice: I just found out the pdf was used as a reference for one talk page message left here.)
Hi, I'm not sure what quote you removed. Not every phrase in Wikipedia needs a citation. I don't do a lot of content editing, and my sentences often come from other parts of the article. Why not just add a citation needed tag? Care to elaborate? tx 2605:8D80:4C0:2B86:2121:3C99:6BA2:2E8C ( talk) 07:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Jitsi: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. I'm pretty sure you know about them, but just a quick reminder ―
sportzpikachu
my talk
contribs 08:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)