Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
The dress you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ribbet32 --
Ribbet32 (
talk) 21:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
The article
The dress you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:The dress for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ribbet32 --
Ribbet32 (
talk) 17:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
The way you moved that article "without leaving a redirect" created a mess, which I had to clean up. Next time, DO NOT MOVE "without leaving a redirect" (unless in in special circumstances which did not apply to that article). Thank you. AnonMoos ( talk) 19:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Tila Tequila self-identifies as a Nazi - look, so calling her a "Celebrity Nazi" in a discussion thread is simply fair comment. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
I would like you to reconsider your close of Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 2#Template:Batsmen with a ODI batting average above 40. I don't think Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket was informed of the deletion discussion, and if they had been, I think the consensus would have been in favour of keeping. As it is, there were only two deletion !votes. One was based on 40 being an arbitrary number, but in fact in ODI cricket 40 is always used as a benchmark average. So, please relist. St Anselm ( talk) 20:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanbashi-dōri-yonchōme Station did not address the multiple other articles nominated. Perhaps you could amend your closure to be more explicit? -- do ncr am 05:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | On 16 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cara Mund, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Cara Mund is the first contestant from North Dakota to win the Miss America pageant? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cara Mund. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:Worshipers of the Mandarax, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark ( talk) 03:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Feminist, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 22:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deplorable. Since you had some involvement with the Deplorable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, regarding the questions you left at the RfA for User:Megalibrarygirl could you please see the notes left there? Could you either elaborate on how those two terse questions relate to adminship, or remove them? In isolation, the second one comes off as obtuse and jarring. That may not have been your intent. But some elaboration or clarification might help. ( diff) Also, the talk page of the RfA has a discussion as well. Thanks. -- Fuzheado | Talk 14:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Take the Wheel. Since you had some involvement with the Take the Wheel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Europe's last dictatorship, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ibicdlcod ( talk) 16:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Feminist: Makes sense. Thanks. Acad Ronin ( talk) 13:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Feminist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Feminist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Just a heads up, your IABot job 1153 job has been frozen for several days at 878/4604 pages complete. Balon Greyjoy ( talk) 13:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I notice that you have taken an interest in my drafts. My first priority for these would be building the disambig resolvers, which will replace disambiguation pages with missing primary topics for the terms. Cheers! bd2412 T 20:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Similar to my last post, you are showing a job on IABot (1178) as frozen. It has not completed a single page since it was submitted, and @ Iggy the Swan: submitted your job without Claude Debussy, which was completed. Balon Greyjoy ( talk) 01:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Please let the current multi-move requests for train station moves get processed before entering any more. The system is stressed to its limits and running at maximum capacity. Thanks, wbm1058 ( talk) 17:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:World Taekwondo 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
I notice you're adding station disambiguation tags to many dab pages. In a few cases like Grand Central Station (disambiguation), Columbia Station (disambiguation), Alexandria Station, the page contains entries that are not railway stations. I don't know if that makes any difference, but I thought I'd bring it to your attention in case it does. If not, no problem. Station1 ( talk) 07:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
| Hello, Feminist. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Resistance to diversity efforts in organizations at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you very much for the recognition. It is very much appreciated!
Regards,
Spintendo
ᔦᔭ 18:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, this closure does not seem non-controversial to me. I wonder if you would be open to letting someone else close it? K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your nomination. My argument is which policy group seems to be in question or conflict (CoI)? Habatchii ( talk) 18:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Flow Free screenshot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 04:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
On 28 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Digiday, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a website run by Digiday generates random absurd Twitter bios followed by profanity-laced commentary? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Digiday. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Digiday), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 12:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
1976 Anapa mid-air collision at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk) 00:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Feminist. Bit confused about what happened at 'Murica. You closed the RfD as retarget, a closure I agree with. But then seven hours later the redirect was deleted by RHaworth per WP:G7. Can you clue me in as to what happened in those intervening hours? Thanks. — PinkAmpers & (Je vous invite à me parler) 01:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
I am not sure this is the correct way to reach you (user Feminist), but it's the only way I found after roaming around in your profile for half an hour. I am a third year student in Winchester school of art and I am starting a project about gender inequality in Wikipedia. Seeing your username, I was instantly interested in hearing your viewpoint and would like to know if you're happy to discuss this topic via email. Could you please give me yours ? I am not sure how Wikipedia's works yet and am sorry if this is not the right way to contact you!
Regards, Daniela Danielleiv ( talk) 22:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gabriel (footballer). Since you had some involvement with the Gabriel (footballer) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 18:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Please undo the moves you made/are making with Korean railway lines - they absolutely *are* proper names. In Korea and Japan there is a practice of naming railway lines, much as in the Anglophone world we name roads. I can give a lengthier explanation if you like, but one thing that's indicative of them being proper names is the fact that the names are sometimes changed - for example, the line between Seoul and Gyeongju, which is named Jungang Line today, was named "Gyeonggyeong Line" during the colonial era. If it was just a descriptive, then you wouldn't be able to change it... 2Q ( talk) 05:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Achasan station#Requested move 20 January 2018 set limits on Seoul, Daegu, Busan, and Daejeon metro stations. There is no consensus about railway stations like Seoul Station. Please revert your moves. And open the new WP:RM. Sawol ( talk) 11:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, please don't do anything like this again. First, it's not clear that the comments violate WP:NPA. Second, you're involved. Third, you left no edit summary. If the comments rise to the level of personal attacks, in your view, you can ask an uninvolved admin to look at them. (To be clear, I'm involved there too.) SarahSV (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | On 19 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1976 Anapa mid-air collision, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in 1976, an air traffic controller error caused two aircraft to collide over Anapa in the Soviet Union, killing all 70 people on board both planes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1976 Anapa mid-air collision. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
The article My Struggle (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unnecessary disambiguation page after moving the only other two articles to the hatnote of the primary topic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Alex
TW 19:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Rather than make edits to the Alison (Company) Profile, you erased the entire updated version. Can you please share why you did that? The narrative that is there now is five years old, incorrect, and outdated, yet you appear to remark that the old version should "at least be better"??? If what is proposed is too long, we can make it shorter. Every statement added was referenced and in our opinion notable. We had only one link from the page to the Alison website. We have 12 million learners worldwide - they deserve and we deserve better. Alison Comenius2016 ( talk) 17:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Feminist - you erased this revised profile in Feb - however the editor you suggested I discuss it with has not responded to me. Other editors made edits on the profile after my posting - but did not erase the whole lot. Can you work with me please to identify what part of the revised profile you had issue with? I put a lot of time into the revision - it has over 80 links and is an important depository of verifiable, notable information on the topic. Can we connect more directly? Greatly appreciate the work you do. I contribute / edit other websites on topics where I have expertise - have not done so on Wikipedia - although I may start given the many issues being highlighted to me in this instance. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comenius2016 ( talk • contribs) 09:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Well it took two months, but I finally got your job unstuck. It's now running normally.— CYBERPOWER ( Chat) 23:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello and thank you for fixing the calls to {{
station}} to make titles lower case. This is a big improvement but I've come across a few cases where there is a further parameter after the upper case flag and we need to keep the vertical bar. Example:
editing Daejeon station turns {{
station|Jungangno|x|Daejeon}}
into {{
station|Jungangno|Daejeon}}
rather than {{
station|Jungangno||Daejeon}}
. I've fixed the ones I spotted but I suspect there may be more. Do you have a list? Thanks again,
Certes (
talk) 15:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Are you really a feminist? If you are, tell me what you think about it. You can see what I think about it in my talk page. Hope to hear from you soon! :) DaisyCarpenter7 ( talk) 22:51, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
DaisyCarpenter7 ( talk) 22:51, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello feminist - I'm puzzled: you re-created the 9/9 redirect today, against the consensus to delete it at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 18#9/9 (in which you contributed), closed by User:Amorymeltzer. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 9/9, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)