Hello. It is the same. Sidi Bou Zid is older and I think obsolete spelling. - Darwinek 11:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support on my
Request for adminship, which was successful, with votes of 49/0/0.
Lemme know if you need help on something I might know a little something about....( check my userpage). | |
---|---|
cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 14:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
There is the risk that we will have disruption from one anonymous troublemaker who is suspected to be a sock puppet of a blocked user ( User:Serafin). Hopefully, he will not make any more trouble but, in any event, we should encourage anonymous editing per Wikipedia principles and therefore I think it is time to take semi-protection off Expulsion of Germans after World War II.
Thank you.
-- Richard 00:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting it, as you can see from the talk page it is still not calm down but al least people are talking instead of rv each others entries. Thanks RaveenS 13:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Fayssal. I see you mentioned on Mel's talk page that you are thinking of a visit to Joujouka. An excellent idea. I will be very interested to hear your impressions. I have never been there myself and don't speak the language. However, I was in Morocco last Xmas and actually drove past Tetuan but didn't stop. My lasting memory of Tetuan was the huge open-air sheep market along the road heading south towards Chefchaouen. Jonur 16:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
The same set of edit pattersn in the above mentioned article, no discussion but wholsale removal of journal citations. Can you help restore normalcy in this article. This is the peer reviewed aricle that has been removed archive of it Thanks RaveenS 16:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Zazaban tries to impose some baseline of topicality to the talk page discussion. [1], [2]. The second of these was reverted by Wjhonson. [3]. I seconded Zazaban’s edit, but was likewise reverted. [4], [5]. Wjhonson left both of us vandalism warnings, [6], [7] to which I replied as follows: [8] What is your opinion on this matter, as it will surely arise in the future? As it is, the talk page remains a nearly unusable mess, and I feel like Zazaban and I are being told that violates policy for us to change this. Proabivouac 17:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you please look at Shatt al-Arab/Arvandrud article; the official name of the river is Shatt al-Arab. The other name is only used by Iran .Khoikhoi removed the article and made some unverified edits (obviously he gave his opinion somehow).The river is about 75% in Iraq. The U.N uses Shatt al-Arab as the name of this river. It is unfair to apply some roles on The Persian gulf article and not apply it on Shatt al-Arab article especially when an admin like Khoikhoi did that [9].-- Aziz1005 22:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Firstmachine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Iamunknown 04:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Salam. Why don't you answer my mails. I've sent about 4 mails to you and you didn't answer them.
There is a debate about notable articles of Muslim civilization in Wikipedia talk:Vital articles#Eurocenterism Unfortunately I don't have enough information about Islamic-Arabic part of it. Please participate in this debate or ask another knowledgeable Arab to participate. Please don't invite any pan-Arab.-- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 08:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Dear editor,
You recently took part in the discussion of
this move request. The format of the move request has been modified, to simplify the discussion and thus help the closing WP:RM administrator.
You are invited to re-state your opinion on the issue, or modify your previous comment, under the new format. - Best regads, Ev 20:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. -- Anthony.bradbury 14:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rubenrausing.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. — An gr 05:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rubenrausing.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — An gr 05:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Firstmachine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — An gr 05:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
To let you know that Casino Royale (2006 film) has undergone improvement in the last week and I have now nominated it for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. I have worked extensively in polishing it off and I would very much appreciate you taking the time to review the article and state your opinion. Thankyou. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E" 09:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Here. ;-) Kirill Lokshin 02:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Salam. Kayfa anta ya akhi?
Unfortunately 1 or 2 guys vandalizes Hezbollah:[ [10]]. What should we do?-- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 02:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
FayssalF, whoever is behind User:Funnypop12 has opened a new puppet, User:Albertbrown80, who continues the very same disruptive behavior. Additionally, his first edit of 28 March evaded Funnypop's last block. Proabivouac 19:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
This is totally trivial, but...
Could you look in on my question at Talk:Islamic Honorifics? I was trying to tell a user why I had reverted his changes at Muslim. In making links to encourage him to look around, I ended up at Islamic Honorifics. With the subject of PBUH in mind I couldn't immediately figure out which of those phrases PBUH could substitute for. Could you answer, or pass this on to someone else? Shenme 03:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Nice work on the Ottoman Portal. Is it really so that you chose the Vaslui battle as the first event to the portal? Either way, it's an honour to have the article added there. Keep up the good work. -- Thus Spake Anittas 14:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
<div>
but no corresponding </div>
; when the subpage is rendered onto the main portal page, this breaks the layout of everything that follows after it. You just need to be careful not to leave unclosed tags in anything you're transcluding.
Kirill Lokshin 15:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the support vote in my recent RfA. Although it wasn't successful I appreciate your vote of confidence. Anyway, I'm continuing on with editing Pacific War-related articles and hopefully you'll see several of them on the FA nominations page in the future. Cla68 22:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support on my
Request for adminship, which finished successfully, with unanimous support of 40/0/0.
I will do my best to serve Wikipedia and the community. Again thanks. | |
---|---|
-- Meno25 08:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC) |
Hi FayssalF,
DavidYork71 is evading his latest week-long block with transparent sockpuppet
User:BongHitz4Musa. I am certain that an extension of his block will meet with the community's approval.
Proabivouac 08:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi FayssalF,
User:DavidYork is gaming the system by creating sockpuppets and violating his block. During his block, he has so far created at least 10 socks(7 users + 3 IPs) blocked one after another by a couple of admins; has also further used these accounts to votestack for the Hitler article to be chosen for the GA article drive. Please see my suggestion here: [13] . Thanks -- Aminz 09:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Fayssal,
Since David has access to a floating ip address and creates new accounts, would you please sprotect the articles he has been active in for some time. It discourages him of making new accounts. Thanks. Here are the list of some articles: Terrorism in Australia, Homosexuality , Islam and slavery, Women in Islam, 1926 Slavery Convention, United Nations 1956 Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, Child servitude, 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. Thanks -- Aminz 20:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Archive_S, thanks for your support in my successful
RfA. As the picture shows, the goddesses have already bestowed my new weapons, |
since you edited it before, what do you think of the removal of sourced information from the article, despite it complying with all Wikipedia rules? [20] Weiszman 22:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Was the idea here to link to all military-related portals, or is there some selection criterion I'm missing? If it's the former, there's a few missing; see the bottom of Portal:War. We should probably figure out what we're going to do here, so we can avoid having to keep redundant lists. :-) Kirill Lokshin 12:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Next time, could mark your changes as Minor so I dont have all my watchlist full with this ? thks -- Jor70 12:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Salam. I'm really ashamed that we recognized ourselves as Muslims. I put a comment in Talk:Avicenna. Please go and think about it. We are deserved to be governed by non-Muslims. -- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 13:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
i invite u to write in arabic wikipedia because it suffer from low number of articles, so can u help us -- Mmustafa 22:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you.
-- Meno25 20:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I had asked for peer review of Tamilnet article. In the process it was suggested to rename it TamilNet. When I did it, I lost the connection between [21] and [22] That is what is showing in the talk page peer review page and the main page is no longer the same. Can you help please. Thanks RaveenS 22:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your recent support in my RfA. I am now an admin. J Milburn 16:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I just reverted this by 149.135.88.17 because it looked identical to this by DavidYork71 who you recently blocked. Can you run a checkuser to see if this is the same person? Thanks! -- Whereizben - Chat with me - My Contributions 14:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I have unofficially adopted a bunch of new users who have been taking some time to understand what Wikipedia is about and how we do things here. One of them, User:Coolman76 seems to have exercised his m:Right to vanish. One of Coolman76's friends ( User:Mstare88 asked me what happened to Coolman76's account and, of course, as a non-admin, I can only speculate. Are you able to look at the deletion log and determine what happened? I'm thinking that there might be an edit summary that says something like "User account deleted at user's request". I'm assuming that, short of a CSD, AFD or RFARB, there's no other reason for the account to disappear. Coolman76's account did seem to be a "vandalism only" account but I'm thinking that's a reason for a block, not a deletion.
Another "adoptee", User:9999a9999 found his Talk Page to have been deleted and recreated it with a query as to why it had been deleted. I left messages on that Talk Page a week or two ago so I know it existed a week or two ago. Can you tell me what happened?
Thanks. I'm just trying to help these new users learn how to become valued members of our community.
-- Richard 17:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Archive_S, thank you very much for your support in my successful
RfA. I am thankful and humbled by the trust that the community has placed in me, |
Salaam, Fayssal. I write to elicit your assistance with the continuing edit war at a great number of articles related to the Master Musicians of Jajouka. I am informed by Abelelkrim that you are already aware of the situation, so I will not waste time with details. The anonymous user 141.155.10.116 has been continuously deleting external links from these articles which he claims are libellous. I have encouraged him, as you can see on his talk page, to come forward with evidence of said libel, but to no avail. At this point, my patience has run out. His actions are vandalism, and someone needs to bring a stop to it. I await your response. Thank you for your time. --- Charles 03:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The anon editor had already been blocked for edit-warring and violating 3RR by another admin when I got there. I'll keep a close eye on him, and block again if he continues. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 14:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear FayssalF, Please read my discussion entry to the Bachir Attar article. It would be appreciated if the Brink.com links could be removed from Bachir's biography, as well as Mohamed Hamri's. Thank you for attempting to revert to the former entry for Bachir Attar before someone vandalized it. Be assured it was not me. BKLisenbee
Having read the background to this and given
User talk:BKLisenbee 's concerns and his/her previous involvement in editing related pages I have a problem accepting his recent edits which are in line with blocked IPs. Blocked for repeated vandalism. I would err on the side of caution re. his claims
Abelelkrim 07:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Please lock the page or at least leave it as Raisuni, not Raisuli. I gave all the sources for the correct name. I read many history books about him. Once again, he's my friend's relative, it's stated in a source I gave... The real name should be kept a the real name. If Americans know it as Raisuli, let it be, we ain't going to put a false name cause of that. Encyclopedia Britannica has it Raisuni. Sabertooth 23:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I was hoping that wikipedia may be able to make a section for Holocaust & Genocide as either a project or portal. I thought that it might be part of the Military project of the History section. Looking for assistance with this. Thanks. I would appreciate comments & assistance to be left on my talk page [ [23]]. I hope to hear from you soon. Eric Rodrigues.
- you gave me confidence that Wikipedia works! :-) -- HappyCamper 13:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
As BKLisenbee declined to admit that he had POV, though even that post was actually attempting to justify his POV edits by citing some third parties interview.
I have put a few web links that show his POV and a stronger suggestion that he desist from editing Jajouk/Jouka pages. I would be grateful if you would have a look at BKLisenbee Your POV is confirmed by above post and proved on a quick web search on his talk pages
Thanks
Abelelkrim 20:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Fayssal,
This user doesn't join talk pages and makes sweeping edits to the pages (please see his recent edits to Muhammad or Banu Qurayza). It seems disruptive to me. -- Aminz 09:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Fayssal, Please take a look at history of Talk:Banu Qurayza here: [24] and the way Karl is arguing. It is all nothing but incivility and throwing accusations instead of arguing. -- Aminz 11:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I request your excellency's presence on Gtalk. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 13:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)