Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello, I'm
Jim1138. I noticed that in
this edit to
Pempek, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jim1138 (
talk) 05:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Pempek. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk) 05:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 21:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 21:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
EtherealDreamscape ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was immature (14 years old at that time) and inexperienced in using Wikipedia. I did not realize that my actions actually violated the rules of Wikipedia as I thought that I can do anything I like such as doing pranks on multiple pages and uploading copyrighted files. I am really sorry and promised not to do them again. The main reason why I want to be unblocked is to change my name due to privacy reasons. Amirul Azimin ( talk) 02:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Assuming good faith and unblocking. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Jpgordon. It seems that I wrote the unblock appeal template on the wrong section and cannot reply to it. Yes, I promise to be clean 100% and behave well. I will contribute positively from time to time. Amirul Azimin ( talk) 03:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |