![]() Archives |
---|
User:Kranar drogin is working on an Illinois National Register of Historic Places project in his own userspace. I recall you are expert in grabbing data from NRHP fields. He requested my assistance on Cook County, Illinois, but I think you might be able to produce a quick script which would save countless man hours. Let us know if you can help.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
One other thing, would you be able to do the rest of the counties starting with Gallatin County? I would appreciate that very much.-- Kranar drogin 03:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, I am going to need you to run your program again. We have decided to remove counties all together, and we are going to seperate Cook County from the overall list to make their own list since there are just so many of them. We will add a See Also down at the bottom of both lists so they can crisscross. Having the county just seems to be very repetative, and will just change it. What do you think?-- Kranar drogin 07:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Ok, with the list there are some changes that I forgot to tell you about, so sorry! Could you set it up like this:
Let me know if this is going to be a problem. Thanks!-- Kranar drogin 19:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="width:100%" ! width="*" |'''Site Name''' ! width="*" |'''County''' ! width="*" |'''City''' ! width="*" |'''Built/Founded''' ! width="*" |'''Date <br />designated''' |-- ||[[F. D. Thomas House]] ||[[Adams County, Illinois|Adams County]]||[[Camp Point, Illinois|Camp Point]] ||? ||[[July 28]], [[1983]] || |-- }}
And could you have it sorted by the county, not the city. This will save us a lot of time. Also can you check to make sure it is the most recent NRHP list for Illinois? Again, sorry for all the work, but we do appreciate it A LOT.-- Kranar drogin 23:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject Illinois Barnstar | |
For you work on Illinois related articles, especially on the Illinois NRHP list, I hearby award you WikiProject Illinois Barnstar. Keep up the good work!-- Kranar drogin 02:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC) |
In Darwin D. Martin House article, the prior version was very clear that the building was added to NRHP one year, designated NHL another later date, but your NRHP infobox generator gives the later date. I can verify the NHL designation date several ways; am not sure how to verify the NRHP date, I have been relying upon your infobox generator. Can you clarify what date it outputs, perhaps when NRHP add date is not available but NHL date is? It would help for it to generate both dates, actually, consistent with new infobox formatting that includes NHL designation date. Thanks for all your help... doncram 02:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Elkman, seeing that you are an admin with a lot of image uploading experience I'm wondering if you can take a look at this for me. Appraiser recently added an image to 2007 Midwest flooding. It came form an NOAA web page, but the author is not a government employee and instead contributed the photo to the NWS. I'd always assumed that images like this were not allowable in wikipedia, until Appriser found this disclaimer: Use of data and products. This looked legit to me, so before I go hog wild in uploading images like this, I'd like to get an admin's blessing. Can you do this, or there somewhere else that would be more appropriate? The image I upload is here, and the original that Appraiser uploaded is here. thanks! Gopher backer 18:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the info boxes. I also just tried the info box generator and it works good, that is cool. Just an FYI after trying to generate a couple of other info boxes the coordinates on some bridges are not as accurate as my GPS coordinates. Just FYI..... Histrylover34 21:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 11:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, if you read the source page there's a bit more to it than that, but by and of itself it's true and does sound sort of funny. Perhaps I should submit it to DYK ... there are town elections coming up in these parts, and to be fair I am on the Democratic Committee of another nearby town ... but it's irrestibly DYK stuff all the same (I had also been thinking of the bit about how it was rolled in on logs). Daniel Case 04:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Elkman, thank you for your support during my RfA. If the concerns that were brought up by other editors gave you second thoughts, rest assured that I'll keep all of the comments in mind in the coming months, and will try again later. In the mean time, if you see me doing something stupid, please let me know. See you around.-- barneca ( talk) 12:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I can't find Kenwood Park Water Tower on the NRHP list. Do you know if it's on there? Thanks-- Appraiser 14:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Elkman,
Thank you for your participation in
my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on
my talk page. Special thanks to
Walton
One and
Dihydrogen
Monoxide for nominating me.
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by
Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by
Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
I'll be less hasty with my speedy delete tags in the future. Thanks for taking the time to leave me the advice. Clerks. 15:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Regarding the Searles Valley Minerals Inc. article, thanks for quickly bringing sense to that situation. I was a bit brash in responding the speedy tagger's user talk page and maybe I'll tone it town when I calm down. It's good to know there are level headed editors like you out there. -- Oakshade 04:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification of the speedy deletion policy in terms of notability. I will take more time to determine an article's eligibility to be speedily deleted. -- TheBressman 07:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
I have just created Category:List-Class Chicago articles. Can you set up the template to recognize the List or list parameter for the class field.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi... I think you closed this keep but it seems like the AFD notice is still on the article. Did you mean to leave it for some reason? Thanks. ++ Lar: t/ c 17:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to explain rationale on this. If an IP address ignores several final warnings, I would think that in itself merits a temporary block, regardless of imminence of threat. JNW 02:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I just noticed that Class=low does not register as class=low. I think I have previously discussed the right side of the equal sign for case sensitivity. I don't think we have talked about the left side. Let me know what can be done.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hola, in F. Scott Fitzgerald you spelled you Wikilink wrong: F. Scott Fitgzerald House...looks like you were in a hurry.
Also, this looks better:
Carry on. WikiDon 05:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
For more on the houses of Summit Avenue:
I have made changes to Social Parking. Please check it out. Perhaps you might change your mind about it. - IDNexpert —Preceding unsigned comment added by IDNexpert ( talk • contribs) 00:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, although I understand your point of view, would you mind rewording your comments here to more follow Wikipedia's Civility and WP:NPA policies? Thanks. Corvus cornix 21:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. :) I didn't mean take them out altogether, just tone them down, but thank you for addressing it. Corvus cornix 22:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you have any better pictures along the Midtown Greenway? Your garden picture is of a pretty dismal looking garden, I know we have a lot better ones. Thanks, at least you start the leg work for the rest of us :) 75.72.162.175 08:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Can you set up class=disamb and class=disambig to direct to Category:Disambig-Class Chicago articles. Right now it seems that only class=dab works. Also, can you tell me if FL would go to an Category:FL-Class Chicago articles if one existed?-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 05:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm in the right mind to tell you off. As for my last 100 edits, mind your own business. >=[ Just remember.....there's nowhere to run to when death becomes you. † Tyler † ( talk/ contribs) 17:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello Elkman,
Thank you very much for supporting my RfA; it ended earlier today rather successfully. I wanted to take the time to express appreciation for the cogent analysis you provided with your support. Hitherto the nomination, I never interacted with you; however, the case you made in supporting my candidacy was the kind that shows a genuine interest in my goal. I was concerned that the UAA incident would derail the nomination, but I believe that the insight you provided went a long way to keep that from happening.
For me, the promotion was about being trusted to be responsible with the tools. I assure you that I intend to uphold that trust with my service to the community.
Thanks again, and I hope to see you around. Cheers, -- Aarktica 23:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice. I will keep that in mind while editing, even though my friend mentioned the same thing you said over and over again. She can be very annoying sometimes.
Bushcarrot
Talk
Please Sign!
Let's go Lightning!
01:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Heinrich Christian Schumacher.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the update. -- !! ?? 21:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Thanks! Sorry for posting it on ANI but I compared the urgency versus some ANI posts. For example, CSN is moving to ANI even though CSN discussions take days (not "it must be decided on immediately, this second!"). That was a reason for doing it. Thanks again. Archtransit 22:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
How is reference tampering a content dispute. Mr.Guru talk 21:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Love the pic! Shot info 01:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey can you redelete Nick goldstein? Twinkle created a new page when I clicked to tag it. Sorry! Laaabaseball 23:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vincent Thomas Bridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps, I think it has made some people a tad bit angry with me, anyway, so prolific that you didn't notice, there were two articles in that update by me, missed Minor attacks of the Black Hawk War, at least the cred on my page. IvoShandor 04:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm thinking of sending [1] this to UAA, as they have created a offensive Jewish article, but the username isn't that offensive depending on how you construe it. Phgao 03:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I've nonminated them all, they appear to be vanity articles by the developer. Thanks for pointing it out. J Milburn 16:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
This is a message from me to whichever bot is checking out my image uploads this time. I uploaded Image:Keltenfürst Glauberg Gesicht.jpg and copied the GFDL license from the Commons version. I'm sure one of you really helpful bots will complain to me anyway, of course. -- Elkman (Elkspeak) 03:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi elkman. It's just been the third time you notified me of stuff I worked on being put on DYK. Makes me feel appreciated. Thanks. athinaios 17:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Please block this user. He/she had vandalized the Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan and Uchuu Keiji Shaider articles so many times. Thank you... - Danngarcia 16:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I have protect the Zaido article. I have copied whole article to notepad so that if there's vandalism again, I'll replace it again... Thanks and MABUHAY.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbr999 ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I saw your message- Sorry, but I don't know Tyler very well, so I wouldn't happen to know very much about what he does. I try to stay out of arguments that don't really have anything to do with me. I hope that you guys can work this out somehow. Ciao! -- Polar Wolf ( grrr... ) 21:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Elkman. Do you happen to know if this is Gethsemane Episcopal Church? I thought so but it looks newer. - Susanlesch 02:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Umm i don't know why he said that i guess he was just upset with bushcarrot for falsely accusing me. anyway sorry for that when i took my sig of bushcarrots thing is because i thought he was upset with me. sorry i can't be of better help -- Summer luvin 02:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I was planning on semi-blanking this users talk page, as the warnings which mention the articles name probably violate BLP. Hope that's not a problem. Best, -- Bfigura ( talk) 03:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Elkman, a long time ago in the FAC for Larrys Creek, you asked if I could write an article on the covered bridge over the creek as it is on the National Register of Historic Places. Larrys Creek will be WP:TFA Friday October 19 and I finally wrote Cogan House Covered Bridge. It is up for DYK and I think I will submit it for GA. Thanks again for the original request, and sorry to be so slow. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, this image is not Non-free content, as it's a company's logo. Logos are commercial images/designes which are free content. If you did not know this, logos are free content, because anyone who uses them [physically, technologically, etc.] giver a certain ammount of publicity to the product, company or group. For these reasons, the link you sent me: [2] is not applicable. With all due respect, do not try to argue with these points, because I know what I am talking about. Have a nice day, Lex94 Talk Contributions Signatures 21:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm willing to put what happened behind me, but I don't wanna hear from you or Bushcarrot. That's all I'm asking. Tyler Warren ( talk/ contribs) 01:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
-- Wizardman 15:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Elkman.
Don't be shy. HavenBastion ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is a single purpose account, here only to spam his website. You should have no hesitation blocking such users. I never bother with short blocks for that sort of thing, especially when their talk page consists largely of threats and taunts. Guy ( Help!) 17:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, you apparently didn't revert my talk page after you moved it back, but that was easy enough to fix. Thanks for your watchful eyes. (PS: I wouldn't mind at all if that account were indef-blocked as a vandalism-only account. :) ) shoy 19:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
A quick note: I really enjoy your image Image:Soo Line High Bridge 7.jpg. Great job! Royalbroil 23:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Elkman,
You deleted the Foneshop entry yesterday with the reason that it was advertising, even though the article was factual and gave the history of the company with just an explanation of it's purpose. The content was similar to that of other telecommunications companies, such as couldnine communications and Netopia. I would be grateful if you could possibly give me a more specific reason for the deletion, so i know where i went wrong?
Thanks!!
Scogman 09:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on GlenIvyHotSprings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G11.
Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Ioeth (
talk
contribs
friendly)
18:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
It seems at the same exact time you deleted Super k! I added the CSD tag then it got recreated you might want to delete that again sorry about that! Yourname 01:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Help! Once it's 8 hours late, we would have missed a full update!! I've moved hooks to the next update page. Need admin help to move to the main page. Thanks. Archtransit 15:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. Just decompress from the meeting. WP will survive (barely) without you and WP needs you in a refreshed state of mind. If there were the title of "assistant deputy administrator" with DYK powers, I'd do it but there's just big man (admin) and little man (editor), nothing in between. Archtransit 16:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I was looking for some feedback from you after your initial response on Wikipedia Administrators Noticeboard. The thread is now in archive. I am going to make a formal request for arbitration soon. However, I see that you are very busy and any comments would be appreciated. Useruser1x 16:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, when you have time, please take a look at this. Thanks Taprobanus 19:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
— Wknight94 ( talk) 23:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[3] Kinda like "He threatened to kill me in public!" "Why would he want to kill you in public?".
Sorry, I've just got that type of sense of humour tonight. Thanks for the laugh! :oD ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 20:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
You deleted this, but somehow it still shows up on the parent category's page Category:Lists of pieces. Is this normal and/or can you fix this? Dafoeberezin3494 18:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Elkman, could you look at recent edits to Faribault, Minnesota and the question posed at User_talk:Kablammo#Notable_Noyes_Hall.3F? It involves whether mention should be made of a NRHP-listed building in the article about the community, which is rich in such sites. There is no edit war, just a discussion, and your input would be helpful. Thank you. Kablammo 08:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Elkman, I am writing regarding your recent declining to handle the vandalism of the St Matthews University article. You indicated that this is a content dispute. I would like to appeal to you and demonstrate that this is plain vandalism. First, Jfdietrich is a suspected sockpuppet for Drjcoby. Indeed, Drjcoby made the same section blanks last night, never made any comments in the talk page why (despite pleas to do so) was warned 4 times and finally blocked by admin C.Fred here. Today, the same section blanks are being made by Jfdietrich and Traveler1019. Both are Single Purpose Accounts, both have refused to discuss their reasons to blank this section on either their own or the article's talk page. Lastly, there seems to be a COI with these accounts and their editing of the page as exhibited here [4]. It seems they are connected somehow with the school and thus their edits are COI. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Bstone 21:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair enough! I shall take note of this advice! sorry for all inconvenience —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryankendallissocool ( talk • contribs) 19:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the star. Some of them go together pretty quickly. I'm working on ones that have pictures readily available; that saves a lot of time.-- Appraiser 20:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Firstly, thanks for the furnther information that you provided for me a while back regarding the deletion of the Foneshop article. I have found an article that discusses Foneshop.com: it is in a technology supplement of the Guardian newspaper - the web address for the online version is http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2004/oct/14/internet.onlinesupplement. Given that the guardian is a well respected and reliable source, and that advertising can not be purchased within this specific section I believe that this may constitute notability. If possible could you please tell me if i'm right?
Thanks!!
Scogman 15:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Do you happen to know if this photo from NOAA(sp) is legal use? I saw a note from someone somewhere, maybe on the talk page of another WikiProject Minnesota member--probably Appraiser or maybe Gopher backer--that there was some discussion of NAOO(sp) images but I really don't want to take an anonymous user's word for this one because I used it on part of a Web site belonging to me and my business. No reply necessary but I wondered. Thanks either way. - Susanlesch 21:33, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Would you mind taking a look at this article? I've listed it at AfD, since on close examination, it didn't seem to be an attack page, and had some forms of sourcing and asserted notability, but it looks like a BLP minefield. Acroterion (talk) 02:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Try not to delete things from my personal page. Just tell me if a userbox is not there anymore. Metal Head 15:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
I understand that this is a school IP but I strongly disagree that 1 month is an adequate block. There haven't been any positive contributions from this IP. Look at their previous 10 blocks - vandalism occurs immediately upon expiry. Last 2 blocks were for 3 and 6 months respectively and the disruptions came a day or 2 after expiry of the block. I politely ask that you reconsider extending the block to at least 6 months. Even though it is a school. -- SWik78 ( talk) 21:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I see you declined a speedy on this article - correctly as it had been speedied A1 and that clearly didn't apply. However it is a G12 being a cut and paste copyvio of http://www.sahra.arizona.edu/programs/isotopes/glossary/. As speedy has been declined I can't nominate again but as it is a copyvio I am concerned that a PROD will leave it hanging around to long. I'm going to PROD it anyway but wanted to let you know incase you felt you could over-ride and delete immediately as a copyvio. Thanks in advance, Kind regards, nancy 09:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Elkman. I am sending out a few invitations to the Minnesota State Fair. They will be more or less copies of the one that I wrote on the Lynne Cheney talk page (I left a note there that I will send a copy to Mrs. Cheney by regular United States Postal Service mail in the next day or two). On that talk page, I thanked you for being a sysop here. Thank you for being a sysop here. Only kidding. Is this plan all right with you? Copy of the invitation is here. - Susanlesch ( talk) 15:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for adding the coordinates to Minneapolis Pioneers and Soldiers Memorial Cemetery, so when I was looking for something to do on Sunday it showed up on the map of requested photos. I think I've got one other useful one that I'll toss in tonight. The place happens to be closed for the season so I was limited by the fence. ( SEWilco ( talk) 20:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC))
Why don't you honor my deletion requests instead of playing all high and mighty like you always do. 67.173.131.28 ( talk) 22:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Elkman. Can you please tell me how to close my Wikipedia, Wikiquote and Wikimedia accounts? - Susanlesch ( talk) 05:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up on the John Hancock IP spammer. I left a note on User:Damslerset's talk page trying to explain why this looks like spamming, but I see s/he has left a note on their user page saying they've quit (perhaps reborn as an IP??). Anyways, I appreciate the notice, and reverted those spam links too. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 13:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Elkman. Do you know the tag to add to Talk:Minneapolis, Minnesota/Archive 1 to stop a robot from updating an archive? I undid an update but can't find the tag in Google at the moment. Thank you in advance for any help. - Susanlesch 22:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Have you thought about getting Durova's triple crown winner's circle award? hbdragon88 00:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Elkman, Can you please explain the deletion of article on NotJustBrowsing?
Given Reason: Article does does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.
Will it be publishable after adding the subjects importance or significance? Or am I wasting my time? -- Ebbee ( talk) 21:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
7. No indication of importance/significance. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is distinct from questions of notability, verifiability and reliability of sources. If controversial, list the article at Articles for deletion instead.
My article is not about any of the above, so why reason is mis-interpreted? -- Ebbee ( talk) 21:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Reason provided was "db-bio", to which I explained the misunderstanding of the system? Why every single person of wiki administration ignored that reason and giving pretended reasons? -- Ebbee ( talk) 22:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
The uploader claims he is the owner of Image:Missionvision.gif and other similar logos. Do you think that's possible? He also wrote a lot of Hennepin County Sheriff's Office and added some very insider-looking pictures.-- Appraiser ( talk) 02:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)