Hello, E1Char, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing!
Ahunt (
talk) 13:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to
HAL Tejas Mk2, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some
guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the
test Wikipedia. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
BilCat (
talk) 19:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
BilCat ( talk) I've requested on HAL Tejas Mk1 talk page but nobody replied or objected so I thought its okay to move as nobody objected; also the change was minor a small letter k replaced by a capital letter K so I thought it's okay (my bad!); sorry I'll not do that again without consensus (how does that work?) Also can you guide me to the dos and don'ts in Wikipedia editing before I end up doing something violating the guidelines and policies? Thank you-- E1Char ( talk) 05:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, I was disappointed at that time when you was reverted my edits and complaint to the Ranaboy for that. And also I have made some non-sense for your thought about wikipedia. I am not like that . When I get disappointed I do what seems right at that time. Please forgive me if feel bad for that behaviour. And please edit your user page and I have returned your loving thought you . If you want any help from than feel free to contact for that purpose or write on my talk page. Happy editing( I ame Shears ( talk) 08:20, 6 June 2021 (UTC)).
I don't know what you're talking about, that's why I did not respond E1Char ( talk) 05:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
You are going with the rapid pace.I am behind from you by number and experience. I want to do friendship with you and you are not replying.I think you are not disturb from me . YOU NEED ONLY 25 EDITS TO BECOME EXTENDED AUTOCONFIRMED USER . Good my friend . Happy editing. I ame Shears ( talk) 06:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
It would be a lot better if u refer those reference properly. The arjun has 500 EFC compared to 250 of the T" series anks used by the IA, it would be better to know why u have removed that. And second thing is there has been no plan to equip the arjun with 125MM smoothbore gun no need to add those things. Helios007 ( talk) 09:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, so, far there has been many half boiled liberals out there who just blindly follows some random guy on YouTube who criticize everything for his living, so,there has been many rumours spreader by those guys " that The rifled barrel used in the Arjun is shitty coz,it's life is far lower than smoothbore gun ,but in reality that's not the truth , the barrel life is 500 rounds compared to 250 rounds of T' series tanks which has an smooth bore Helios007 ( talk) 10:52, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
So, that barrel life data is very important to prove that so called tank experts on social media are wrong. Helios007 ( talk) 10:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
@Echo1Charlie I have seen your recent vandilism of infos that I have provided with detailed link,plz don't discourage others from making valuable changes. see those and if there's any issue leave an message on talk page. The arjun tanks are equipped with "SPADE" steel armour [1] . The "SPADE" armour is used for manufacturing the structural parts and base armour of the tank [2]. The spade armour offers enhanced protection of about 25 percent against APFSDS(125mm) rounds and 10-15 percent against 7.62 and 12.7 mm armour piercing rounds over existing RHA plates [3]. The SPADE armour also offers easy weld ability required for the construction of the structure over existing RHA plates. [4] Helios007 ( talk) 08:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
That's not your job mister, if you are unable to understand the values then it does not mean that it has zero value. Its your lack of knowledge, don't Just vandilize the info which would be helpful for others Helios007 ( talk) 08:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
What excuse you have now??? This Wikipedia is not your property or your father's property to delete others work delebirately, teh data might be useful for someone who is interested in it,don't vandilize it like an illiterate, provide any valid info for deletions. Helios007 ( talk) 09:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Helios007: Why are you abusing fellow editors?? โ Echo1Charlie ( talk) 09:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Abusing??? Its all about the person who takes the thing. Could u please provide me an proper statement for removal of spade armour?? The DRDO had even made the research article public and publically stated that it's been used for Arjun tank. What's the problem with u??? @Echo1charlie Helios007 ( talk) 09:27, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia is for improving the knowledge,there's nothing wrong in learning those details which have been released by the govt . If you find no use with it its your problem @Echo1Charlie ,we need to provide info the people ,no need to sensor those details which have been publically revealed there's no use in that. Helios007 ( talk) 09:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Helios007: You've abused fellow editors, you made disruptive edits on a article ignoring all warnings( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Arjun_(tank)&diff=1033872601&oldid=1033833092), you attached malicious link ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Arjun_(tank)&diff=1033874544&oldid=1033873446) link to Wikipedia, I think you need to understand that wikipedia is not a forum where you can abuse anyone add anything - Echo1Charlie ( talk) 09:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
There's no proof that it's an malicious link, if told by someone doesn't mean that it's an malicious link, had u opened at first place??? Don't Just blame others without having enough PROOF. I THINK THAT U MIGHT UNDERSTAND TAHT, DON'T DELETE EVERYTHING WITHOUT DISCUSSION ,coz thats not great thing, spending hours for searching all those things and getting them deleted within seconds makes one fell discourage. Wikipedia is not an forum where u can delete everything by saying "PLZ DON'T DISCOURAGE ME I SPENT LOT OF TIME FOR RESTRUCTURING THAT BLA BAL. everyone have spent their valuable time in contributing to Wikipedia right, tell me the error in my article I will rectify it. Helios007 ( talk) 09:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Just fed off by these unnecessary arguments, just guide me where I did wrong I'll retify it. Just like the Barrel issue that was previously encountered Helios007 ( talk) 09:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
It happened to me too, when I visited that site to verify the claim made โ10:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC) Echo1Charlie ( talk)
Hlo,there , I have noticed your recent deletions of my articles in the armour section which had all the required citation neede. Could u point out the cause for deletion?? DON'T JUST SAY THAT ITS AN UNNECESSARY INFORMATION WHICH HAS NO VALUE. Helios007 ( talk) 11:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
HAL Tejas you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tayi Arajakate --
Tayi Arajakate (
talk) 10:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
The article
HAL Tejas you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:HAL Tejas for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tayi Arajakate --
Tayi Arajakate (
talk) 20:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
I don't think you would get enlighten all of a sudden your discussion proves that here at Talk:Sixth-generation fighter โ subsection "Indian so called sixth-generation fighter program"; also I didn't broken the 3RR rule I had a check on itย :) (verify it) BTW I'm glad that you got the point from the warning, and here is an advice don't take hatred to Wikipedia, here our community is founded on trust, respect, friendship and cooperation. Have a nice day.ย :) - Echo1Charlie ( talk) 16:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC) (htt
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For your tireless efforts on maintaining the Vaccine Maitri page. Keep up the good work! -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 21:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC) |
- Thank you so much This is my first barnstar โ Echo1Charlie ( talk) 15:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
|
The India Star | |
Dear Echo1Charlie, thank you for your contributions to India-related articles, especially your recent edits to the article about the Vaccine Maitri, Kargil Vijay Diwas. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, - N Jeevan ( talk) 18:01, 29 July 2021 |
โThank you @ N Jeevan: bro, this is a great encouragement for me Thank you very much โ Echo1Charlie ( talk) 18:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
For catching a banned user's sockpuppet. Good work! โโ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ( talk) 06:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC) |
Please read WP:BURDEN as it relates to the edits. Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation... I look forward to you either tagging it as such or providing adequate citations. The onus is on you. Thanks, Albertaont ( talk) 05:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Albertaont: I was not aware of this policy/rule, all I thought was we should not remove content but add failed verification template, It was a my mistake. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. โ Echo1Charlie ( talk) 05:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Arjun (tank) has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the article moving forward.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (
talk) 13:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
@
Twofingered Typist: Thank you very much! Much appreciated!! โ
Echo1Charlie (
talk) 15:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Please explain why the statement about replacement for R-77 missiles by Derby missiles was removed. This is one of the aftermaths, hence it is in the aftermath section. In addition, the references are from a reliable source.
Hi. I saw that you are editing in this topic.[ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Insurgency_in_Balochistan&type=revision&diff=1044292873&oldid=1043383521] My writing was deleted.[ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Instrument_of_Accession_%28Kalat%29&type=revision&diff=1044248781&oldid=1042357934] Keep an eye on these and if you can make this right please do that. Wiki31295 ( talk) 13:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
May I add canvassing other users for editing on someone's behalf is against wiki rules and also you are adding material which is clearly from unreliable blogs etc. PremijAnans ( talk) 06:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, with regards to the edits you made, they are still available in the page's history, if you wish to revisit them. Going forward, where possible, if you could be more specific with your summaries, it would be very helpful, ie: which source are you referring to, and if there is a quote or a page number you could add, that would also be helpful. Thanks for helping to improve Wikipedia! - wolf 20:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
I hope this clarifies your doubts. Regards โ Echo1Charlie ( talk) 06:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
1) since this is too much for info for an edit summary, I would've suggested (and still do) that you add this to the article talk page (just the list of info) then revert your changes back in, with a link in the summary pointing to that entry on the article tp.
2) I see that you've already reverted the edit. Typically, once an edit has been reverted and a discussion started, no more reverts or edits of that content should be made until the discussion has concluded. (Basically following wp:brd, a widely accepted norm.) To do otherwise is just bad form. In some instances (not here though), it could be considered disruptive. There's no harm in waiting for a response.
In this instance, I have gone and made these adjustments. The edit details are now on the article talk page (see Talk:Special forces#Bangladesh Liberation War (1971)), with a dummy edit then added to the article page history directing readers there (instead of here). Basically separating the details of your edit, which should be on the article talk page, from the rest of the discussion here. The remainder of this discussion on your tp isn't about the article, but about editing in general. I think you did a great job with the follow up, there is plenty of detail. If I had any further questions about that edit or the article, I would now ask about them there (but I don't). Any further questions or comments either of us may have about this discussion, should be added here, so as to keep the two threads separate and distinct. Thanks again for the follow up, if you have any questions, feel free to ask. (I'll put this page on watch for a week just in case). Otherwise, keep up the great work! Have a good day - wolf 08:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
TrangaBellam ( talk) 07:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Users removing warning templates is not necessarily a sign that they refuse to respond to you. This behavior is generally acceptable. If you want Satrar to respond to you, maybe you should try to be less confrontational ( invoking WP:SILENCE is not the friendliest way to ask for a response). And even if Satrar removes your comments on their talk page, how would posting them here make any difference? - ZLEA T\ C 21:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Saffron terror into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
eviolite
(talk) 19:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution
-- I've already done that for you. And welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here.
eviolite
(talk) 04:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Materialscientist Admin can I have a word with you? โ Echo1Charlie ( talk) 14:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Block message:
Editing from 2401:4900:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 has been blocked (disabled)
Decline reason: There was a time when I would have been allowed to lift this block by granting IPBE, and it looks like you would be a good candidate for it. But, we are stricter in our ways now and all I can do is refer you to WP:IPEC and commend you to follow those instructions. โ Daniel Case ( talk) 04:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Daniel Case Sorry to bother you I tried the WP:IPEC, it asked for ip affected but when I submitted ip it says "Appeal for "2401:4900:0:0:0:0:0:0/32" (although submitted ip was "2401:4900:264e:baa:2c97:100f:26fa:2bbc") Appeal status INVALID Blocking administrator Materialscientist Block reason CheckUser block -- please do NOT modify this block without consulting a CheckUser -- revert to original; not needed Time submitted 2021-10-12 05:12:21" and "This appeal was marked as invalid." โโWhat is this means? Can you help me? โ Echo1Charlie ( talk) 05:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC) Daniel Case ( talk) 06:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikiwings | |
For tireless work overhauling and de-spamming HAL Tejas. - Ahunt ( talk) 14:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC) |
Hi Echo1Charlie. I recently responded to your request at RFPP and blocked an IP that was engaged in an edit war with you on 2019โ2021 Jammu and Kashmir lockdown. After reviewing the history of that article in more detail, I realized that I misunderstood what was actually happening. For some reason, I believed that the IP was making mass deletions, and you were restoring them. I'm not sure why I reversed it in my head like that. Suffice it to say, you seem to be deleting large portions of the article, and another editor has disputed your deletions. Therefore, per WP:BRD, it's now your responsibility to start a discussion, explain your deletions in a bit more detail, and see if you can find consensus for them. I've unblocked the IP and reverted my revert on the page back to the IP's version. Please try to start a discussion about these edits before reverting the IP again. โโ ScottyWongโ โ 17:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
You are repeatedly restoring a circular redirect in Religious discrimination in Pakistan, and the IP address is correct in pointing out that you are not paying attention to what you are doing. This can get you blocked for edit warring. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 18:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Please see this thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Echo1Charlie's disruptive editing. MarnetteD| Talk 17:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Please self-revert your latest edit to
2001โ2002 IndiaโPakistan standoff, otherwise administrators may take action against you for violating
WP:1RR.
Cipher21
(talk) 14:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Please kindly do not threaten me with petty fabricated warnings of vandalism when we are discussing issues to try and reach consensus. I will take this to WP:ANI. NarSakSasLee ( talk) 17:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For calling out dubious/poorly sourced/pov content Suthasianhistorian8 ( talk) 19:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
NarSakSasLee (
talk) 20:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)"}}
I have filed an arbitration enforcement request against you, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Echo1Charlie. Please respond there.-- NarSakSasLee ( talk) 21:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an American website, not an Indian website.
They allow all editors from all countries to edit Wikipedia.
They don't see the truth, they see sources. Don't see Pakistani editors as your enemy.
In WP:AE, you can see that there is a consensus against you.
Learn Wikipedia policies properly before entering India, Pakistan area. Don't get angry.
Wikipedia:List of policies. This page has many blue links, and those blue links will take you to other links. Links within boxes are also important.
This is a similar page which has links to most important policies Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines. However, don't just read first few links, and then ignore the bottom part. You have to scroll down. Don't read and forget. You have to remember the policies and guidelines. Policy pages are marked with a green right symbol. Essays are not important to remember. There are many essays.
I would recommend, read and remember all blue links. You are going to get blocked. Don't put any unblock requests. Don't argue with the blocking administrator.
You have to keep all policies in mind and think about when and how to use them while editing.
If you dislike any editor, don't mention it by typing.
If you have completed remembering the above policies and guidelines, then you have to learn the next part Wikipedia:Manual of Style. This has more links. All links will take you to other pages with more links. You have to see whether the green tick symbol is present. If the green tick mark is present, then read the page. โย Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:1A46:258:A172:D558:325B:FA04 ( talk) 05:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are topic banned from discussing or editing anything related to India-Pakistan, broadly construed, for a period of 90 days.
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanctionโand you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard.ย Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.ย Dennis Brown - 2ยข 00:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Good luck for your future my friend. I really miss you but I hope to see you back again. Lots of love from N Jeevan ( talk) 10:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for your contribution towards India's Defense Equipment related articles. โฏโฏโฏ Pravegย A=9.8 11:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) |
The article
HAL Tejas you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:HAL Tejas for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.
Mark83 (
talk) 10:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editingโespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workโwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeโcounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringโeven if you do not violate the three-revert ruleโshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
You also need to read wp:bludgeon, wp:agf, wp:npa. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Slatersteven (
talk) 14:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
OK. Thanks
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ย
Ponyo
bons mots 18:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Note as well wp:3rr is not an upper limit, you have gone straight back into re-adding this, that is edit warring, stop. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Slatersteven (
talk) 17:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
In the beginning, even I used to get frustrated. Remember that American, European administrators do not care which country is good or bad. Wikipedia is neutral. I would suggest you check how Kautilya3 edits and engages in editing disputes.
Read various debates and posts in WP:ANI WP:AN and WP:AE. You will see how editors are blocked and banned. You will see how Wikipedians think. Only those posts where multiple editors are discussing, not small posts with two editors.
Remember few things:
If I dislike any country or community as they harmed my country or community do not express inner feelings about that country or community. Don't comment on country, religion of editors.
Before debating with an editor with whom you have not interacted previously, check his/her edit count, block log and user rights. These three things will give you basic idea about the editor. โย Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40E1:2E:5111:9061:4694:D0D0:D39F ( talk) 07:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
{{|Url= https://defenceforumindia.com/threads/drdo-tastes-yet-another-sucess-navy-places-order-for-drdos-altas.68284/}} - read post by bhadra. Nagin ia a failed technology demonstrator program. Better sources are needed Julnap ( talk) 21:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
You might keep an eye on HAL AMCA. A user has been making massive unsourced changes and even moved the article without discussion. - ZLEA T\ C 15:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Vis M. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Students' Federation of India seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. -
Vis M (
talk) 09:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Explanation: Your edit
[22] adding the text "Members of the organisation are involved in many criminal cases including ragging, exam fraud, mark list manipulation, rape threat and casteist attack, molestation, rape, attempt to murder, and stabbing.
" to the lead section is a violation of WP:NPOV. It not only gave
WP:UNDUE weight on them, you
WP:SYNTHESISed the statement by combining multiple reports on individual cases.
Undoing my revert [23] and then posting a counter-warning on my talk page are examples of warring. In your very next edit, you de-emphasized criticism of CAA law [24]. You are adding an editorial bias into these article with such edits. Since you were once topic-banned from editing India/Pakistan articles, may I suggest you to also refrain yourself from editing articles of political topics as well. - Vis M ( talk) 07:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)