Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bellator MMA Rankings—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols ( talk) 18:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Dr. Chaotic: I didn't remove the people you added, so I can't answer why someone would do that. Technically everyone who is 7-0 or better is eligible for the list, I just add the people I find in the more known promotions, ala. ACA, KSW, ONE, Bellator, etc. HeinzMaster ( talk) 18:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Michelle Waterson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 02:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Rickson Zenidim, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Yes thank you. I have now completed the article and moved it back to normal space. I will make sure to use the draftspace for future unfinished testing. Dr. Chaotic ( talk) 20:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Rickson Zenidim, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx ^Talk? 20:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Make it suitable then, there's literally nothing else to add. Either suggest things I can add to it and other sources or leave it alone. Saying its "not suitable" but then not providing any examples of what I can add is NOT helpful Dr. Chaotic ( talk) 20:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Then the subject isn't notable. ~Styyx ^Talk? 21:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

I have added several more sources. /info/en/?search=Tony_Alanis This page has 2 sources and far less information than the one I created, so mine should be more than sufficient now with these updates Dr. Chaotic ( talk) 22:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rickson Zenidim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^{( talk)}/_{( contrib)} 23:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Dr. Chaotic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 23:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Don't remove fighters before the result is read Nswix ( talk) 23:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Dr. Chaotic:

I've started a vote to change the number of fighters from seven to ten. Do not revert unless you gain a majority of votes, as the change was allowed by WP:BOLD.

Nswix ( talk) 15:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I agree with starting a vote, but do not revert or change it unless people explicitly tell you they want too. You are the one trying to instill change, not me. Therefore we keep things the way they were until the majority says otherwise Dr. Chaotic ( talk) 21:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey, be sure to use this dash –

in records, not the small one (-). Nswix ( talk) 20:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Dr. Chaotic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rickson Zenidim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Dr. Chaotic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Rickson Zenidim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Nswix: loop in Nswix since you and the editor started the conversation of the matter. Hi Dr. Chaotic, pls do not remove or add any fighter for the list above until the vote is final and take this as the warning of disruptive edit and if you continue to do so then you will be blocked. You and Nswix were discuss about this matter and a disscussion is raised on the article talk page - see here Talk:List of undefeated mixed martial artists under the discussing name "7 to 10". All you have to do is state you support or oppose. Once the vote is final then whatever the vote result will dictate the manner and edit on the article can be resumed. Pls act/vote. Cassiopeia talk 00:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC) reply

No, go to tell that to Nswix. I only edit the page to delete fighters that have lost, or to make changes to the format and update records. I’ve already noted down the names of all the fighters below 10-0 that were going to be removed, so I don’t care either way. I agree that 7 wins is too inclusive, but 10 seems too guarded. Anything in between also feels weird. So even though me and Nswix started this, I’m going to end up agreeing on just changing it to 10-0. Less work for us I suppose Dr. Chaotic ( talk) 20:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC) reply

You need to state your decision/vote at Talk:List of undefeated mixed martial artists under the discussing name "7 to 10" and not at your talk page as the vote/discussion is there not here. Cassiopeia talk 20:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC) reply