Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Narconon. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
You have stated that you are a biologist and have described my work as "sloppy". It may be fair comment, I am not really in a position to judge. I notice that you looked at the article Gastrotrich which I had recently expanded and has since become a GA. You made some small changes, mostly with regard to spelling, but no substantial ones. What did you think of the article? Did you think it should be given an "accuracy warning tag" as suggested in your ANI post quoted below? Do you think that I should be restricted from working on such an article? Was it perhaps an itsy-witsy bit sloppy to spell my username so incorrectly?
"I'm all for some kind of editing restriction on Cwimhraeth, and I'm all for some editing restriction on AfadsBad. As said above, they are both a mixture of good and bad: good faith but sloppy editing on one hand, useful criticism in a sea of harassment on the other. Both need to stop. What I would do, if I were running this place, is: 1)Restrict Cwimhraeth new article creation and article-space editing until a comprehensive review on her edits has finished 2)Put some accuracy warning tag on all articles Cwimhraeth has created, so that at least we can warn readers 3)Enforcing on-wiki harassment of Cwimhraeth by AfadsBad to stop: if AfadsBad wants to do useful criticism and/or fix stuff herself, all the best, but any more personal attacks will not be tolerated. Again, if I were running this place, but luckly I don't." Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
This may be true of individual species but these are of no use at the level of a higher taxon- This is utterly wrong and only shows you have no real familiarity with academic literature. You can find loads of high quality academic sources on higher taxa. Here is what I found on Gastrotricha in five minutes of googling: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. -- cyclopia speak! 12:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Seahorse. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Since you have more than five WP:DYKs you need a WP:QPQ. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 14:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Maybe tthe hook should be modified. Also, maybe the hook should have the name Speyer wine bottle directly in it? And what about the picture? 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 16:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Please respond on the template. I am not very good at this DYK stuff either. Even though I actually have a lot (they are buried mainly in my archives), I usually was along for the ride as a passenger. Somebody will help, I expect. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 16:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Lest we misunderstand one another. If you choose not to leave those two references in I will pull my tick. Reuterdahl, Magnus (March 25, 2011). "A few words on prehistoric and historic wine imports, etc". Retrieved April 26, 2014. Reuterdahl, Magnus (December 10, 2011). "Should the Speyer wine dated to ca 325 AD be opened?". Testimony of a wine junkie. Retrieved April 26, 2014. I will pjll the tick. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 17:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
cyclopia speak! 17:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the new Speyer wine bottle article, and for expanding Wikipedia's coverage of notable historic container and wine topics. NorthAmerica 1000 02:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC) |
At my editor's review you offered to help me improve my article writing skills. InvertZoo has been giving me instruction and would appreciate some input from someone who is "capable of very careful checking and prepared to call you on things that seem inappropriate." I think you answer the description of someone who checks carefully and I would appreciate it if you could look at the two linked articles, this and this. The instruction from InvertZoo is on the talk pages and you could comment there. Thank you. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 05:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Voting system. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:02, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ganymede Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ganymede Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. -- Bejnar ( talk) 15:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Not sure why you have targeted the Primitive Species template, but please stop your deletion attempt. AtsmeWills☯ talk 01:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Calendar. Thanks. Dogmaticeclectic ( talk) 18:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Did you mean to put this where you put it? I thought it was an indentation mistake, but now it seems more complicated, so I don't feel like I can fix it for you.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:5:2 diet. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 01:14, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Cyclopia, I do like the improvements we've made to the sturgeon article, and wish we could have started off that way instead of the way things are now in the template and category Rfds. FYI - I recently took the alligator gar article from a "starter article rating of low importance" to a "Class C rating of mid importance", and I'm shooting for GA status on it and several other articles. I welcome quality collaboration on the other articles in the series.
When Mr. Fink and I collaborated on a title for the template, "primitive fishes" seemed to fit best. The term is ubiquitous, still in use in scientific journals, and most readers can quickly identify. The template and category are strictly navigational aids, nothing more. I don't know how much more I can emphasize their benefits in linking a specific series of articles that are relevant to a finite group of magnificent ancient fishes. I saw where you deleted "part of a series" from the template title, and also removed the IUCN Red list link from the template. The species listed on the IUCN, and/or protected by CITES are of the utmost importance to link as they are probably among the most sought after by a wide range of readers. It needs to go back on the template. What was your reason for removal? I also think the template is a bit too small, although I don't object to reducing its size from the original. In fact, I prefer it. I asked Mr. Fink to look into reducing its width, and he said he would look into it. I think he got busy on something else. Anyway, please try to think outside the taxobox to see the benefits of the template and category as navigational aids. Atsme 📞 📧 23:24, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
On 2 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Speyer wine bottle, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a 1650-year-old bottle of wine (pictured) found in Germany has been called the world's "oldest existing bottle of wine"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Speyer wine bottle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 09:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Dear Cyclopia, as you know in the past I experienced some difficulties dealing with User:Director. For this reason I have filed a RfC/U to discuss about Director's conduct, because I genuinely believe he dealt with me with improper language (inaccaptable, regardeless of the difficulties of communication we experienced). I did not file an AN/I because I am not looking for a sanction but rather I would like to have a large discussion about the issues I have dealing with Director. I honestly believe I am not the only one experiencing this problem.
I need two or more users certifying the basis for the dispute (they can be "Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute" or "Additional users endorsing this cause for concern"). It is a very bureaucratic process but it's like that. Please note that if by the 4th of July 8:30am two users have not certyfied the basis for the dispute, the entire RfC/U is archived and I will have to edit an AN/I which I would like to avoid.
You can access to the RfC/U form at [ [7]] and fill the section "Users certifying the basis for this dispute". Silvio1973 ( talk) 19:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bowfin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Congrats - our collaborative efforts made a difference. [8] Atsme 📞 📧 22:29, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
The article Gastrotrich was tagged for reassessment during my editor review. It seems that it was an "individual reassessment" and as such, should be concluded by the user who started the reassessment, the rules for this are here.
Now I don't think that AB will wind up this reassessment nor do I propose to ask her to do so, so I wondered if you, as an uninvolved user who knows the background of the matter, would consider removing the reassessment tag (unless you think that other criteria are unmet). Josh Milburn did the original review in February this year and is a well-respected reviewer. Thanking you in advance. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 05:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Respectfully, you stick to your guns as a biologist abit. You do mention (speaking from what I've read at the template only) wikipedia policy. However your arguments require a review of policy and other things. If for instance you call something a psuedoscience it's helpful if that claim is verifiable. Which obviously it is verifiable but to me it's helpful if you help in that verification process. Also I would like to mention the part of the discussion about, "Citing from scientific research papers is WP:OR." While unsure it does seem to me that they are speaking directly of primary sources and specifically talking about editor interpretation of primary sources. Which I haven't reviewed the sources in question or any other sources for that matter. Serialjoepsycho ( talk) 19:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Honorary degree. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bowfin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scale ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For your expertise and knowledge in making a bad article good, a good article better, and a better article outstanding! Atsme☯ Consult 04:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC) |
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cold fusion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
There is a proposal for a merge of certain information in the article Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) to the Steven Emerson article, and then deletion of the IPT article because there is no such entity. The article was created and includes information based on the pretext that the Investigative Project on Terrorism actually existed as a non-profit entity. It did not, and still does not. What did exist is Steven Emerson's think-tank, The Investigative Project, and Steven Emerson as a CNN reporter and later as an independent terrorism expert. He founded the Investigative Project on Terrorism FOUNDATION years later - April 2006 - which is the only official non-profit foundation organized legally. Unfortunately, editors are trying to combine all of Emerson's past work as a CNN reporter, and individual terrorism expert (dating back to the Oklahoma City bombing and before) into one big hodge podge of inaccuracies in the current article, IPT. Please read the discussion at Talk:Steven_Emerson#Merge and delete the IPT article. Thank you in advance. Atsme☯ Consult 18:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kozyrev mirror. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
You just [14] my edit, because you didn't like the use of the word "Eurosceptic". There was no need to revert the entire edit; you could have simply removed the word, or substituted another. Please edit more collaboratively, and work to make improvements, not preserve old version of articles. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation Museum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JeffHawke h6866-h7289.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JeffHawke Omrid.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Please be sure to notify Squeakbox on their talk page about your topic ban proposal. Thx, - Wikidemon ( talk) 18:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mensuration. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
This is an invitation to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful frog as neither of the listed species is known as the "beautiful frog". -- Bejnar ( talk) 19:11, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 August 16#File:Hearts XP.png. Thanks. Dogmaticeclectic ( talk) 12:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
You are included in ym request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Porn and BLP. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 22:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
You are now on a possible future hit list which was generated by someone that I think you know. Guy1890 ( talk) 22:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Porn and BLP". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 31 August 2014.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 22:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Cavarrone 23:43, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Latrodectus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Artificial intelligence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Porn and BLP, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
User:TransporterMan (
talk) 16:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Canvassing? ...but you just had to be told about this AFD. Cheers, St★lwart 111 12:59, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
secrets of nature
Thank you, editor interested in "political uncorrectness" and "deep secrets of nature", for quality articles such as
Andiva and
Life on Another Planet, for saving articles from deletion by improving them, for insight on
consensus and
bias, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 628th recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Three years ago, you were recipient no. 628 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Four years now! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prehistoric Bajada "hanging" canals of southeastern Arizona. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
What can be fixed by editing must be fixed by editing, per our deletion policy. I guess you volunteer to make an article out of List of Pakistani family names? The Banner talk 01:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dental amalgam toxicity. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Climate engineering. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Oseltamivir. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:JeffHawke moonlanding prediction LARGE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nibiru cataclysm. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:International Space Station. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
.
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lift (force). Legobot ( talk) 00:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Magneto (generator). Legobot ( talk) 00:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Freddie Gray. Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wanderer of the Wasteland (1945 film). Legobot ( talk) 00:02, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Infinite monkey theorem. Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Prices. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:FlightGear. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stack Overflow. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please help me with getting the article on Mircea Itu published on Wikipedia.
I highly appreciate your expertise and support. I strongly believe that this academic is notable to have a page on Wikipedia, despite some deletitionists' view. [15]
Thank you in advance. Clairec78 ( talk) 22:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MDMA. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Psychology sidebar. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Google Watch. Since you had some involvement with the Google Watch redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Periodic table. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Norepinephrine. Legobot ( talk) 04:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Cyclopia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Cyclopia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Pekin. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microscope. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox software. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Medical resources. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Cyclopia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International System of Units. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:USS Nimitz UFO incident. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)