Hello, CordialGreenery, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Delme Bryn-Jones. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rekonedth ( talk) 07:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey just stopping by to say be careful, try and focus on the content for the articles and how sources support them. It is nothing but trouble when focusing on users per WP:PERSONAL. Also watch that WP:3RR bright line.
That said I think there is a case to be made for changing it to far-left and expanding the body for the militant stuff and violence they do. Lets see what we can come up with on the talk page. PackMecEng ( talk) 05:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CordialGreenery reported by User:Bradv (Result: ). Thank you. Bradv 🍁 05:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
As the notice says, this is just a notice to let you know that extra editing restrictions are in force for post-1932 American politics and related people. I do note, however, that you have made at least four reverts today at BAMN, breaking even the normal 3RR rule. Go careful. GoldenRing ( talk) 11:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
What part of 3RR is unclear to you? Please self-revert or you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 23:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
When you grow up, "Shabby" is willing to discuss. Until then, Dumbo, your unconstructive changes will continue to be reverted. For the same reasons as before. Which you seem to be too proud or too stupid to understand. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 05:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Claiming that editors have harassed you when you clearly violated 3RR shows a lack of good faith and is a personal attack. It makes you look bad. Doug Weller talk 16:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
I have removed the quote per WP:POLEMIC. If you restore it, you will be blocked. 331dot ( talk) 20:47, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk) 20:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)CordialGreenery ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
absolutely ridiculous block. Did not make any disruptive edit at all. CordialGreenery ( talk) 20:53, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Block changed to indefinite because you're a sock puppet of User:OnceASpy. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 06:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CordialGreenery ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm now being accused of being a sock. I simply quoted an aggressive comment by another editor and I'm being shut down. CordialGreenery ( talk) 06:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This sort of edit summary is just going to get your ability to edit your talk page taken away. ST47 ( talk) 06:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CordialGreenery ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have broken no rules. CordialGreenery ( talk) 06:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ST47 ( talk) 06:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have seen editors with with a "hall of shame" list on their user pages of editors they've gotten banned. I've seen multiple editors with a collection of mean quotes they've received, linking to the diff. I've even seen admins doing the same thing. Why am I being blocked for literally quoting someone aggressively insulting me? CordialGreenery ( talk) 20:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
NinjaRobotPirate, User:ST47, User:331dot, I didn't know the user got hisself blocked again and then CU-blocked: I came here to address this off-wiki harassment, but I guess that's all hypothetical now. GorillaWarfare, Opabinia regalis, I don't know if ArbCom still has an interest in off-wiki stuff. Drmies ( talk) 14:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
CordialGreenery ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm being accused of something that I have not done. I'm being framed for something that I am not. Simply for quoting an editor who posted on my talk page CordialGreenery ( talk) 06:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That is not the only reason you are blocked. You are blocked because you have repeatedly been grossly incivil in your edit summaries, and because a CheckUser has used technical evidence to determine that you are already indef blocked under a different account. Since you have repeatedly posted "I'm not listening" unblock requests, I am revoking talk page access. ST47 ( talk) 06:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CordialGreenery ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #25439 was submitted on Jun 02, 2019 11:42:50. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 11:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
CordialGreenery ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #25440 was submitted on Jun 02, 2019 12:27:43. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 12:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
CordialGreenery ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #25442 was submitted on Jun 02, 2019 15:37:59. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 15:37, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
You have been
indefinitely blocked by the
Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the
guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by
emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).
For the Arbitration Committee, AGK ■ 07:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)