Chacor, sorry, but you gotta calm down a bit. This is a community after all, and several people are getting a bit annoyed. While it's alright being bold sometimes, no one person has more authority over anyone else. It almost seems like you're taking things a bit too seriously, with all the rule mentions. True, we have several policies, but your constant reminders of civility are getting a lot of people annoyed. Take a chill pill ;) Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my page. -- Nlu ( talk) 19:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Can this source do for the article on Typhoon Xangsane? [1] - Deogene 07:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Is the website www.accuweather.com a spamsite ? This is used by FOX News on their news service to report on the weather. Does it rate a article here, just as the Weather Channel does ? Martial Law 22:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I've finished the preparations section. Feel free to look it over in case I missed something. I'm gonna head to bed now, so I'll work on impact later today if I have the time. -- Core des at ( talk) 08:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
FYI you forgot to undelete the prior versions of the article and corresponding talk page after the move. – Ch acor 14:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I don't know what happened. (I'm on a slow PC right now.) :-O 1ne 16:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Chacor,
Why is my entry being deleted by you from the Get The Picture page?
Bill
Your articles on Typhoon Joan (1970) and Typhoon Dot (1985) are currently a Start-Class hurricane article, and is being proposed for a merge. If you wish to to keep the article, you should state your thoughts on the article's talk page, or consider expanding the article. Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
-- Peta 10:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
As per Tropical Disturbance Advisory Number A11 issued from RSMC NADI issued on Dec 28/0831 UTC 2002.
The Tropical Cyclone ZOE 04F Minimum Central Pressure was [890hPa] located near 12.5S 169.5E at 280600 UTC. with Maximum 10-minute average winds near the centre estimated at 130 Knots.
Should I go ahead and edit article on Cyclone_Zoe?
I have downloaded a file Tropical Disturbance Advisory Number A11 issued from RSMC NADI from ftp site.-- Ugaap 16:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Umm, the image you removed from 2000AHS: [[Image:Alberto 2000.jpg]] is from NASA and was taken by a NOAA satellite, that's as public domain as it gets. There is nothing resembling a copyvio here. -- § Hurricane E RIC § archive 00:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I had checked that archive but RSMC advisories for Tropical Cyclone Mala are incomplele and nowhere could I find the maximum wind speeds as well as minimum pressure for this Cyclone. Your posting of the minimum pressure for Mala 954 [hPa] is from RSMC as per your edit. Isn't there any other source we could get data for RSMC New Delhi?-- Ugaap 16:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Please be more careful when reverting. – Ch acor 17:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry. Still thinking about this. A "consensous" built on the foundation of a lack of response, is really no consensous at all. And a "consensous" to violate standards and (what appears to me to be) common sense (Tropical Storms placed in Hurricane categories) just strikes me as wrong. So I'm still thinking about all this. - TexasAndroid 11:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
My apologies for that - I wasn't thinking. -- Crimsone 11:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
How embarassing. Thanks for pointing it out and letting me take care of it. -- Storkk 16:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Wow, I didn't notice those. I just Ctrl + F and I didn't see my name anywhere on the RfA pages. Nishkid 64 14:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for tweaking my userpage; didn't know that formatting trick existed. Thanks for the offer, but I am going to respectfully decline to be a part of cyclone or meteorology Wikiprojects. I am more into US History right now and just happened to stumble across that article. Civil Engineer III 14:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello! Don't forget when removing withdrawn/failed RfAs to complete the process and add {{subst:rfaf}}, {{subst:rfab}} to the top and bottom of pages respectively and to list the RfA on Wikipedia:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies. Regards, (aeropagitica) 15:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Hang on, this article is not ready for merge yet, I might add more info when the TCR on the storm comes out. And dicussion of moves should be on the talk page of the article requested to be moved not on the main RM page. Storm05 17:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Why i am not allowed to add a quote when the wiki founder himself has encouraged to edit his user page? Mahawiki 06:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
While I understand your concern, could you please check the talk page and the history page. We've been doing a lot of work that a protect would fix. I'm unable to find the rule that only admins can add a sprotected to a page, could you please direct me to that rule. Please leave instruction on my talk page. Mark1800 12:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Blame WordPress no I :) -- Tawker 17:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed on October 17, 2006 with a tally of 53/6/0. I am equally elated and humbled by my new capacity as administrator of Wikipedia, and I send my heartfelt thanks for your unflinching support. If you need me for anything, just ask me! With gratitude, 210 physicq ( c) 02:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
Hi, Chacor! Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 75/0/1! I hope I can live up to the standards of adminship, and I will try my best to make Wikipedia a better place. Feel free to send me a message if you need any assistance. :) |
-- Core des at 14:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi I have cited the source it is a NASA picture Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello :-) There has been long term harassment of User:Mantanmoreland by sockpuppets and meatpuppets. If has required Oversight of many pages, including AN/I, on more than one occasion. Can you help me keep watch and keep this off of AN/I? FloNight 11:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for offering to help with the Wikipedia Weekly podcast. Episode 2 will soon be recorded and release, and so we've started planning for Episode 3, to be recorded next Friday. If you'd like to be on the panel, or suggest any content for the show, feel free to edit that page with the details. Don't feel limited to the five places on the panel, either - there are two extra places available for alternate hosts, who would fill in if the others are unable to speak.
Thanks again for the offer of support, and see you soon. :) Daveydw ee b ( chat/ patch) 11:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to my RFA. Unfortunately it failed (final tally 26/17/3). As a result of the concerns raised in my RFA, I intend to undergo coaching, get involved in the welcoming committee and try to further improve the quality of my contributions to AFD and RFA. All the best. Cynical 14:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC) |
Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. Recently, you expressed an oppose opinion with regards to my RfA. I would like to thank your feedback on this but I need another critical feedback from you. If you could spare a few minutes to voice any concerns you may be having with regards to my contributions to this project since my last RfA on this page, I would be most grateful. Once again, thank you for your time! -- S iva1979 Talk to me 06:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I know Nilfanion's usage of WP:CHILL may have been inappropriate, but could you calm down at least a little bit? Wikipedia isn't a battleground, and someone asking you nicely to calm down is trying to assume good faith, not showing bad judgment. Besides, I made a suggestion that might be more of a compromise between "none" and "open ocean". -- Core des at 18:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! Hehe, I do remember that. BTW, do you know when I should start sending out those thank-you messages? — Khoi khoi 03:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Chacor, could you copyedit my sandbox article ( User:SpLoT/Cryoseism) when you're free? Thanks so much. - SpLoT / ( talk) 09:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll do that. →Cycl one1→ 15:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. I appreciate that you took the time to comment, as I do find it a valuable thing to understand how I am perceived by others in the Wikipedia community. If there is anything that I can do in the future to help further address your concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. -- Elonka 09:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I finally decided to clean up the page. Took out all typos and made sure every standard measurement had a metric conversion. Is it still a start? If so, what else is needed? I just thought I'd ask you specifically, since you added the clean-up tag. →Cycl one1→ 01:36, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
That's what I assumed at first as well, but tell me if you see another verb in that "sentence", because I certainly don't. The only way to make that group of words comprehensible is to use "associated" as a verb. -- Spangineer ws (háblame) 15:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA that I have passed with 73/2/1.-- Jusjih 09:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for putting a comment in my talk page. Yes, I realize that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and that it's often better to edit pages rather than use all my time posting comments in talk pages. I am currently working on Articles I have created. By the way, if my subpage becomes good enough, it might be turned into an article. I think i'll work on my articles now. AstroHurricane001 15:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Mets shows no interest in following policy. It's one thing for him to ignore me when I tell him that his actions aren't allowed, but this was discussed at AN/I. He participated in the discussion. And yet he continues to ignore policy, ignore a discussion on AN/I, and has now taken to attacking me. I don't care whether he chooses to attack me or not - this isn't about me. It's about an admin who refuses to accept either policy and pretends that the consensus on AN/I somehow doesn't apply to him. Guettarda 01:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Chacor (I still have to stop myself from calling you NSLE), thanks very much for reverting my talk page last night. I really appreciate it. Cheers, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 05:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Chacor,
I read your comment on about Hildanknight's "arch nemesis" comment on his Talk Page and also on the Esperanza proposals page.
You are well within your rights to take offense but I'd like to ask for some compassion and understanding. Hildanknight is a 15-year old high school student (male). He has done some good work here at Wikipedia including a new program ( Requests for Feedback). Howeveer, he has also made some mistakes including some inexcusable vandalism that caused him to get blocked. I do think he needs to be "cuffed about" a bit to teach him some Netiquette but go please go easy on him. His heart is in the right place even if he does get a bit carried away at times.
In particular, his "arch nemesis" comment seems to have been motivated by a sense that you were stalking him and biting him. Please give him a chance to air his grievances and try not to bite back too hard even if those grievances may seem more imagined than real to you. We were all 15 years old once and some 15 year olds see life with more drama than others.
-- Richard 10:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is in bad form or not, but I have replied to your comment at my RFA, and perhaps you can read over what I have brought up about the Hurricane Ernesto (2006) fuck up :P— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 10:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Chacor, when I created the "memorial" along with the other section headings, I was following the precendent of the Cedar Fire article, which has a similar section. I understand that Wikipedia isn't a place for personal memorials of many sorts, but in this case, I was simply following precedent.Regards, Daysleeper47 13:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
I reverted your change in procedure to WP:RFA and brought it up for discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship#Change_in_RfA_procedure_without_comment. We should at least discuss this on WT:RFA before making the change. Personally, I don't think we should be making the requirements to have a success RfA even more restrictive than they already are. -- Durin 13:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, you may have a point. I'll do that. Does it matter which admin? Or can I ask any admin? →Cycl one1→ 00:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Please see my message; here, and here. Regards Mustafa Akalp TC 09:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For many contributions with limited reward, I present you with this Original Barnstar. Sharkface217 00:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC) |
Gosh, I thought you were just another new, friendly user! Why did you give up your old account? -- ¿¡Exir Kamalabadi?! Join Esperanza! 22:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
I replaced my link at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Katrina because it is absolutely fitting in this location. It is an image that shows damage from Hurricane Katrina on a New Orleans landmark. I placed it in a section called "Images" on the Hurricane Katrina page. All other images in this section are similar. Also, please see my message about the first time my link was removed. I replaced the link because I received no response when I attempted to discuss it with the editor. Seotommy 16:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Whoops, must've made in error when looking at the picture. Storm05 15:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that edit on my userpage. - SpLoT / ( talk) 13:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Chacor. Thanks for your comments. Unfortunately, several of us have tried discouraging Nathan from spurious nominations with little success. I removed Miami from GA nomination once before. He appears to be a young teenager who reacts to criticism with escalation. Hopefully having had two requests for arbitration rejected (one was against me over the above edit and related things) and being asked not to act as an advocate will help him to understand that he needs to focus on editing to improve articles first. If you have any helpful advice for him, he appears to be receptive to some people. Nathan is the only editor who thinks the Miami, Queensland article is important enough to receive significant work at this stage - I focus on South Australian articles and User:WikiCats is interested in getting the main Gold Coast, Queensland article up to a better standard (Miami is only a small part of that area). Thanks anyway. -- Scott Davis Talk 07:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
I wouldn't call it a dispute, but I will try there first. Thanks for reminding me of it. Dev920 ( check out this proposal) 11:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments at my RfA, I'll try and take your points on board! :) H ig hway Ringo Starr! 11:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
The November issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.-- Nilfanion ( talk) 00:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok sorry. But you do have to admit that page is fucking idiotic. ! Policratus 02:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
If you still want an RFA, I would be happy to nominate you. Jaranda wat's sup 01:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
My error. I thought all NASA things were fine-my dumb error. I just put it up for Speedy deletion. Mitch azenia 14:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Heh. I thought there was something funny going on when i saw Tony Blair tagged as {{hoax}}... -- Guinnog 14:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello there! I'm an acquaintance of Ed who has gone on a long Wikibreak and I fear he may not come back. In User:Ed/Statement he left your name in a list of debates he had. As a fellow Esperanzian of his, I'm concerned. If it's not too forward, could you please let me know what's happened between you and he, and also anything about this user. Thank you. Dooms Day34 9 18:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello Chacor, just wanted to thank you for reverting User:FairNBalanced's unfounded edits on my user page. Much appreciated. :-) ( → Netscott) 02:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Heh, you beat me to it BadCop 07:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC) ( Ryulong)
Hello, please confirm yourself for the meetup on the 24th by November 18. If you have any ideas or suggestions, please list them at the meetup page yourself. Thanks. -- Ter e nc e Ong ( C | R) 04:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Dude, calm down, so now driving mew crazy at this. Cyclone1 gets to keep his own but you never let me do mine. And what's that resaon for? — Alastor Moody ( T + C + U) 06:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)