Just popping by to say that the full protection of Mustang is due to expire tomorrow. Given the tone at the talk page and the article improvement sandbox, I have zero faith that edit-warring will not immediately resume. I have made a protected article edit request and we shall see what happens, but I'd just be grateful if you'd watchlist the article and be ready to slap full protection down on it again immediately (at currently protected version) if edit warring begins again. Montanabw (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Not sure semi was the right call on this (per privileging registered users over unregistered users). The IP stopped edit warring, used the talk page, and they do have a point (both in their edit summaries and talk page post). -- NeilN talk to me 01:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You recently semi-protected the article Michelle Keegan, and that expired earlier today. Well, we've already had two more IPs edit the article to change her surname to that of her new husband's just today, so I'm wondering if putting semi-protection back on the article may be necessary... Just so you know! -- IJBall ( talk) 04:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Cambridge thank you for the Page protection on the Vietnam People's Air Force, can you revert the last entire, the IP had changed reliable sourced text, with no counter reference per his/her claim -regards FOX 52 ( talk) 16:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello.FOX 52 Didn't Understand Why I Have An Reason.No.1,I was Actually Erase The Su-30MK2 And He Restored Back.36 Su-30MK2 Was In Service and 12 More MK2Vs On Order.So Please Don't Make A Point Of Numbers.Since When They Have a Sorces.I Mean The Su-30 Varites On The Qantitiy Need To Erace Actually.See The Sukhoi Su-30 MKK 4+20 In Services.Thank You. 175.141.22.214 ( talk) 06:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey,I Think You May Need To Check It The Older Vietnam Air Forces.Seems Vietman Air Forces Dos Not Have 35 Su-27 And On Order Su-30 MKK.Cheak The Real Version.And We Need To Investigate The Vietman Air Forces. Kornet GSR ( talk) 06:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
AN IP, immediately after my protection ended, starting harassing me on my talk page again. To say it bluntly, he has no life, and I need my page protected again, thanks. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 23:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
If I up an indefinite PC-1 to a semi for one week, how do I make sure the article falls back to PC-1 at the end of the week? -- NeilN talk to me 23:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
When you semi–protected Petr Čech, you placed {{pp}} which caused the template to be displayed incorrectly, the template is usually placed like this ({{pp-semi|small=yes}}). I have fixed it for you to save you time, this may help you when editing in the near future. Thank You TeaLover1996 Talk to me ☏ 22:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Ghosts eat toast halfway up the lamp post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John5545 ( talk • contribs) 06:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Please block Against frustrated slovak IP editor agent ( talk · contribs). It is obviously the same with the confirmed sock Againt frustrated chauvinist slovak IP ( talk · contribs) 31.193.140.164 ( talk) 08:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello CambridgeBayWeather. On 19 November 2014 you template-protected The Who ( log). As template protection is only meant to be used for templates, or other highly transcluded pages, did you perhaps mean to select a different level? Thanks, Evad37 [ talk 19:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi CBW! Wondering if you can protect Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport. An IP from Indonesia keeps adding Manado for United Express which barely has a working plane to fly Guam-Saipan. Also Sam Ratulangi International Airport. Thanks! HkCaGu ( talk) 03:32, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi CBW! Now that the vandal has been identified with Cyntiamaspian, and most edits now coming from IPs, can you protect Juanda International Airport? TIA! HkCaGu ( talk) 05:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I am currently trying to insert a table of climatological data to show statistics for improving the article Climate of Argentina, similar to how the featured articles Climate of Minnesota and Climate of India used it. However, I am having trouble with the sorting part of the table. It is currently in my sandbox that I will add in shortly once all the details are done. It seems like that when I click on the sort button, it does not sort properly. I did try going to the help page for sorting tables although I could not find anything to solve the issue. Could you provide any useful advice that could help allow the table to be sorted properly? Thanks. Ssbbplayer ( talk) 16:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
The article Regis Learning Solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Vrac (
talk) 01:05, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
you and paul are filthy bastards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.107.93.87 ( talk) 10:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
No, you can't be clean! because your mother was a "filthy bitch" and your father was a "dirty liar". that is why you cant be but a "filthy liar".-- 5.107.93.87 ( talk) 10:53, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Why do you call my edits "vandalism" I'm just trying to add things people don't know about that person it's not vandalism
Based izeah ( talk) 10:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Regarding the adding of the contextual fact, held up later on the same page and by definition in all dictionaries, that the Apache people are the current ongoing sufferers of genocide and ethnic cleansing, undo your removal and unlock the page. Your move was unnecessary and my edit didnt break any rules. If you want it fully sourced then you need to require it of the whole page, otherwise your cherry picking shows signs of whitewashing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.123.59 ( talk) 09:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
So my son was blocked on the wikipedia yesterday, he was in a timeout for 5 hours, should we discuss about my son. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.82.65.119 ( talk) 02:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
On the Masset page I noticed you changed the data for precipitation information. The thing is that you changed the numbers to numbers that don't exist in the source on the page. Was it a mistake or is it in another climate chart that I couldn't find on the EC climate database? Air.light ( talk) 06:59, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
I just figured it out. You combined some of the numbers from rain days with precipitation days. Air.light ( talk) 07:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Ellalan (monarch) is at the original title (since 2009) before the edit war began but the talk page is not: Talk:Ellalan (monarch). Ogress smash! 10:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Hey why did you protect Vektroid? It's not vandalism just because you don't like it, or just because one of your friends comes crying to you. Do you even know anything about Vaporwave or MACINTOSH PLUS? Wikidude3333 ( talk) 10:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Well could you unprotect it? I was making a good faith edit, the reason i did a lot of edits was because i have no clue how to edit wikipedia so i changed content gradually. I did not intend vandalism, Vektroid's gender and real name are hard to pinpoint — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
I agree that "Articles don't start with Wikipedia as in Wikipedia:Innovation Act of the 114th Congress"
I don't know how to edit the title. How can the title be edited ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
As you know, there was an issue yesterday with Blackknight12 edit-war moving a page against consensus and unilaterally (no discussion), Ellalan (monarch). Now we're discussing things officially, but just now I ran into a page he moved a year ago: Alagakkonara. That's where it is now based on the Sinhalese name; I moved it. It was (and remains) a page about a Sri Lankan dynasty of some kind of South Indian Dravidian origin (Tamil or Malayali). And where was the page? It was at Vijayabahu VI of Gampola. I swear I did not go looking for this; I was editing Kingdom of Kotte and there was a green (redirect) link so I followed it... and it was not about the notable advisor from the Alagakkonara family, it was "Vijayabahu VI of Gampola". The page wasn't even edited. In no place on the page is Vijayabahu VI of Gampola mentioned.
I feel weird about digging around in someone's edit, so I haven't done it, but I'm worried based on things I've seen that this editor might have been engaged in shenanigans on Sri Lanka topics for some time now - he moved the page in August 2014. I have absolutely no idea what to do about this, especially since I was in a recent spat with him and we're trying to work through the drama he caused on Ellalan. But there have been a number of interactions that have set of my Wikidar (I'd be happy to elaborate) and now I'm asking for advice on how to proceed. Ogress smash! 09:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear CambridgeBayWeather
Thank you for your feedback. I realy try hardly to published this articel about the International Family Equality Day and published on the category of Civil awareness days. Where can I get some help to success? Warm regards, -- Maria von Känel ( talk) 13:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)Maria von Känel
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Democratic Party candidates, 2015 Canadian federal election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clyde River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)== Mustang ==
Just popping by to say that the full protection of Mustang is due to expire tomorrow. Given the tone at the talk page and the article improvement sandbox, I have zero faith that edit-warring will not immediately resume. I have made a protected article edit request and we shall see what happens, but I'd just be grateful if you'd watchlist the article and be ready to slap full protection down on it again immediately (at currently protected version) if edit warring begins again. Montanabw (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Cleaning up the backlog at RfM, and closed Ellalan (monarch) as 'moved'. However, couldn't actually move it due to the protection. Could you either move or unprotect, perhaps temporarily? It was a malformed request, and the discussion was based on nationalism and never addressed WP policy. Per COMMONNAME, however, the name should clearly be Elara: there are many refs to a Tamil king "Elara" in the English lit, but relatively few for a king "Ellalan". — kwami ( talk) 20:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
I did not say I couldn't remember why I said what I did, I said I couldn't remember the search parameters I used. But whatever. Ogress smash! 07:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Can you semi-protect this article? The Bangladesh Airport Vandal has struck again on this article. Thanks! 97.85.113.113 ( talk) 04:04, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Why do you protect the page to 25/8/2015! if you want to protect it protect it for three, four days but not to 25/8 and thanks. Mostafa Elsherbini ( talk) 21:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Please remove the protection from the page because there is matches are annouces and a new theme song. CambridgeBayWeather. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mostafa Elsherbini ( talk • contribs) 20:52, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Please remove the protection on Summerslam 2015 page because we want to add the new matches and new theme song . So please remove this protection . and Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamed Eldakak ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Fully protecting Summerslam 2015 is not a good move. Just ban the warring users instead (but that's my opinion and input not an order). It's not like we're talking about the Super Bowl or World Cup. I hardly think that having Summerslam 2015 being semi until Aug 26 is going to make the earth implode . RbAxM33320 ( talk) 04:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Can you please lift or shorten the restricted editing on Summerslam (2015) as it can not be updated for new matches or when the event is happening on August 23rd. Thank you for your time. I Am Awesome 061796 ( talk) 00:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
This template is excellent in terms of quickly updating multiple pages, but I have noticed that certain capacities on the SPFL website do not match up with those on official club websites. For example, the capacity for Kilmarnock FC is 17,921 on the SPFL website and 18,128 on the club's own website. My instinct would be that the the clubs are more likely to have accurate information than the league, but I appreciate that using the same source for all clubs does ensure consistency. Would it be sensible to use club websites where possible?
Craig1989 ( talk) 00:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Is there any chance I can make some edits to the page SummerSlam 2015 as I have found out some new matches through watching Monday Night Raw tonight
Yours
Gareth Roberts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.251.16 ( talk) 03:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
The SummerSlam 2015 article needs some serious updating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyhh2002 ( talk • contribs) 04:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Could I draw your immediate attention to this? The article is receiving insane amounts of traffic for a news less than barely an hour old. We need protection. Mar4d ( talk) 19:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't think we are getting through to this editor.
"I have been blocked for 24 hours.It's nothing but just a small time, tomorrow I will edit again..But I'm not going to vandalize anymore, but if I edit something based on sources, do not dare to threat me again.I'm tired of your warnings, every time even if I contribute on something, you will warn me again and again.Let this not happen again". -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 23:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello CambridgeBayWeather. Some advice please. I made a redirect Deception Bay, Quebec to Salluit and then realized they're not quite the same place, 53.5 km apart. Should I leave it like that or put a delete tag on it? I've seen you around here for a while now - Nunavut hey? Slight Smile 00:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi! You reverted changes i made to the eWAY page. What was the problem with my edits? I was adding new information ( Gfennell ( talk) 05:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC))
Hi, I am a member of Omega Kappa Mu Multicultural fraternity Inc. We've recently created a Wikipedia page consisting information of our fraternity and it was recently deleted because of "non importance". We used the username: OmegaKappaMu , and then OmegaKappaMuMulticutural. I would like to know is their anything we can do to have our page view to the public. Please get back to me ASAP. OmegaKappaMuMulticultural ( talk) 03:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, is there a problem with Braun Stowman's wiki page as everytime I go onto it I get this... TRIIIIIIIIIPLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.130.85 ( talk) 01:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
I had thought that the meaning of "edit conflict" was obvious, at least from experience, if from nothing else. An edit conflict is what happens whenever 2 people try to edit a page simultaneously. After one person saves his edit, the other can not. When he tries to save, he will get an "edit conflict" message. Theoretically, one can resolve an edit conflict if he is some kind of computer scientist or specialist. I have never been able to do that. Also, it should be obvious that editing a page that has a construction tag is likely to produce an edit conflict. 76.93.209.228 ( talk) 06:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mertensia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluebell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Block of Faizan. Thank you. Hasteur ( talk) 17:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Just letting you know that I fully protected the template, because the edit warring continued after you semi'd it. -- wL< speak· check> 05:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that you put this on PC yesterday. However, when the vandalism resumed today, I reviewed the page history and found that no substantial improvements had been made since at least March. I therefore saw no harm in elevating the protection to semiprot for two weeks and left your original PC provision intact, so it'll be on PC after the two weeks. Hope that works for you. Cheers, Samsara 10:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I would like to ask you to move the following pages back to their original names and fully protect them for some period of time.A user has been moving them without consensus at the various talk pages.He translated the Spanish titles to English without seeking consensus.The reason I say this,the English titles change overtime and are usually just for the understanding of the Spanish title and other countries often change those English names.So therefore I would like you to consider my plea has I cannot move them as I may provoke a,move war.The pages are * The Color of Passion to El color de la pasión
The reported user moved page: Hasta el fin del mundo severally last year. Please take this to consideration as I have low experience in tagging requests that may bring major problems at the respective Talk Pages. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyanchoka ( talk • contribs) 06:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
The problem is my browser,I've tried listing them their but they don't seem to align as they should be.Please list them for me.I'll appreciate it. User:Nyanchoka,nyanchy 10:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
First, I am reticent about communicating with anyone who fails to disclose their identity. You operate behind a false name. Kindly review my comments with John CD, regarding the improper deletion of my user page. My page reveals my name and pertinent information about me. This information is available for any administrator or editor or contributor to review and have the full benefit of knowing whom they are communicating with. It is self evident that my user page is NOT a blog. It is NOT self promotional. In fact, the User Page is not subject to any search within Wikipedia. It is not subject to a specific/key search on any search utility. Further note that the fact that I listed that my page "was under construction and may be moved for Article review," does not require that I submit my page for article review. I had decided that I will not submit my page for article review. Rather, the information is important to provide an understanding of my background. You are incorrect in your application of the "independent source" for reliability of content. I am NOT establishing myself as the authority for reliability or notability of an article's content. However, I am insistent that if I state that a SOURCE is a scholarly source in contrast to a propagandistic source for content, then the administrator/contributor who disagrees can review my background to determine whether there is a credibility and education in recognizing the conventional scholarly material, as opposed to footnotes and content which is based on propagandistic material.
I am bothered that you have deleted my page. Apparently, unlike you, it is a substantial contribution to Wikipedia for me to participate voluntarily. My time is valuable, expensive and limited. I am not in the habit of having to waste time, in wars with others who have interrupted my work and disrupted my ability to provide detailed information for the Wiki community, to provide the benefit of fully understanding the person they are communicating with.
This is not the case with you or with your page. I have no idea what your background is or what your name and demonstrated achievements might be.
I am restoring my page to the format and with the content that I choose. There is no Wiki policy/provision which prohibits the construction of my page in a manner that I deem fit. Again it is not a blog. It is NOT social media. (There are no persons having engaged in any form of communication with me, other than you and John CD.) My page is NOT a presentment of me "as a source of reliability" for content of an article. That is a misapplication of the provisions and is specious reasoning. My USER PAGE content is used to present a professional background for accurately determining whether a "source is a conventional scholarly source." My background is provided to establish credibility on my determination on whether content is "supported in academia" and "whether contrasting arguments or opinions serves the free dissemination of scholarly opinion." You should be able to recognize that distinction between "using oneself as an independent source of reliability" and "using oneself as experienced in identifying academic and scholarly sources."
I will restore my page with my personal information.
I do not want any further wasted valuable time addressing Wiki administrators who find it more pleasing to themselves to remain anonymous to the Wiki community. False screen names fell into disuse more than 20 years ago, when presenting oneself in the public internet venue.
Ray Oliver Ray Oliver, Esq. 02:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RAYOLIVERESQ ( talk • contribs)
Just double checking; you protected that because of vandalism/high visibility, right (judging by the history/original request)?
Saqib (
talk ·
contribs) has an {{
editprotected}}
and I didn't want to accidentally edit the page if you felt it was a content dispute or something. :P --
slakr\
talk / 10:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
...for protecting Xylocopa violacea. Any blocks you see fit to place on numerous accounts would be welcome. Cheers, JNW ( talk) 11:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the protection! It was turning into a freaking mess. I had just placed a warning on the article's talk page and the users' talk pages since no warnings were given. Regardless, I thank you for your help. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
I replied to you on my talk page. -- P.T. Aufrette ( talk) 16:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why, but his talk page won't go away from the speedy list. I know you did something to the sandbox, which is now off the list, but the talk page is on. I've tried a null edit, which often works, but didn't here. Beyond me... Peridon ( talk) 11:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Peridon, and beyond me I tried emptying the sandbox but no luck. I've posted at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 140#Tagged for deletion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Looks like Suvarnabhumi Airport could use a protection. Thanks! HkCaGu ( talk) 18:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure I understand this decision. One editor made six reversions of three separate editors in a 24 hour period. No one else was engaging in edit warring, as far as I can tell. Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like a case where a temporary block, a warning, or no action would be more sensible than locking the article completely for a week. Isn't that usually reserved for more serious cases where there's rampant bad behavior? Nblund ( talk) 21:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi CambridgeBayWeather, you recently deleted this as an expired WP:PROD, but I swear I contested the tag and removed it. Was it re-tagged after my removal? I don't think it should be deleted under WP:PROD since the policy specifically says "it cannot be used with redirects". Also, per WP:R#KEEP the redirect is still used in article space, so deleting it breaks some links, and it's useful for pointing searches to the correct article. Can you please restore it? TDL ( talk) 12:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. You made the right choice I'm sorry i got heated. I just don't think Johanna should be called Princess, just because the Hessian Grand Ducal family didn't accept that a bunch of smelly peasants could abolish their titles, just because they happened to be the government. Paul Austin ( talk) 14:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Dear Sir,
We are working on this Wikipedia page for an historic Olympic organization founded by the late great Al Oerter, Olympic icon, with several dozen notable high profile Olympic athletes, including world record holders, Olympic champions and numerous Olympic medalists, most of which can be verified on Wikipedia. This organization has been in existence for 9 years, including a physical museum/gallery located in Fort Myers Fl for almost four years. Most of the activities and files have been hidden, tucked away or lost. We are in the process of tracking down all or at least most of the past activities and creating our virtual presence, under the leadership of Cathy Oerter, Chairwoman of AOTO and widow of the late Al Oerter. We will / are linking to videos, articles, press coverage and other documentation to validate the organization and all of its accomplishments as you - Wikipedia - require. We've started with an Instagram account and last week we created the "Art of The Olympian" YouTube channel that now has a dozen videos including a 30 minute documentary video narrated by 1968 figure skating champion and AOTO artist Peggy Fleming. As well we will be improving our existing website.
The "Art of the Olympians" were given permission to use the USOC Olympic Rings and the word "Olympian", an act protected by congress. We are in the process of becoming an official IOC (International Olympic Committee) recognized organization.
I am one of the founding members. My name is Roald Bradstock, 2 time GB Olympic javelin thrower, former world record holder and current masters world record holder for over 50. I am also nicknamed "The Olympic Picasso" by the media and am now in charge of the Art of the Olympians (AOTO) organization. It is essential that we have a Wikipedia page for this organization.
If you need any more questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you.
Kind regards
Roald Bradstock 770 882 7799) Yogurtboy ( talk) 15:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC) Yogurtboy ( talk) 16:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Can you userify the two pages I made which you recently speedied under A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events). They are Robin Parisotto and Michael Ashenden. Many thanks ( Msrasnw ( talk) 19:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC))
Hi CBW, I'm confused about the recent article move from "Production of Baahubali" to "Baahubali" and I fear it will cause further confusion. The main film article is Baahubali: The Beginning. I believe the follow-up is Baahubali: The Conclusion. The "Production of Baahubali" article was presumably created to get into the details of production. Another editor moved that article to "Baahubali (film series)" without discussion, which I opposed, because I felt it warranted discussion. I don't see how moving the article to plain-old "Baahubali" is going to prevent confusion, and I'm also unclear on why "Production of Baahubali" is insufficient. If the scope of the article is the production, that seems a reasonable title. If the problem is that the article contains information that is outside of the scope of that title, it makes more sense to retain the title and pare the content. Thoughts? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hmm. Actually, after looking at Kill Bill, I think I see your point. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, CambridgeBayWeather. You have deleted this article. But several hours ago I worked on it. If there is still some copyvio issues could you restore it on my page? I will work on the text again. -- Interfase ( talk) 20:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Full protection for one week: I think a jump from no protection to indefinite full protection is a bit much. From the talk page conversation started yesterday, it looks as though the debate had already died down even before you protected it. Cebr1979 ( talk) 21:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi
I am trying to publish a page about the late Dr Frank Brennan, I believe it was removed because "which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject"
I list a national paper piece in the Irish Independent newspaper
I had not noted this piece on the page but most of the references were included.
I look forward to your response.
~~Eamon M~~ [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eamon M ( talk • contribs) 13:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, CBW,
This is in regard to List of monarchs in Britain by length of reign.
Many persons both within and without Wikipedia have argued about the precise date on which Queen Elizabeth II will surpass Queen Victoria's reign. No problem there -- people disagree with each other all the time. But there appears to be an inconsistency within the article itself. The chart says Victoria reigned for 23,226 days and that she reigned for "63 years, 216 days". Right below that, the chart says that Elizabeth II also reigned for 23,226 days, but then says "63 years, 215 [not 216] days". How can they both have reigned for the same number of days, but not the same number of years and days?
Respectfully,
Captain Quirk ( talk) 16:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I Was Adding Some Info On Hits & Beats Page & I Don't How I Removed Advertising Tag..Could You Please Revert It Back So That I Can Add Some More Info & Please Undo The Redirect Too.As I Am Rookie ..I Will Feel If You Help Me In Creating This Wiki /info/en/?search=Hits_%26_Beats
Regards, James Collin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.212.68.141 ( talk) 23:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Looks like this article needs to be semi-protected, the Indian Airport Vandal has struck this page too! Thanks! Citydude1017 ( talk) 05:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
FYI, see Robert Laurie (TV artist) and Robert Laurie (TV Personality). Should we make Bobby Laurie a redirect to TAKE OFF! with The Savvy Stews, then admin-edit-protect it? Not sure you noticed the discussion at Talk:Bobby Laurie. Thanks, Wbm1058 ( talk) 11:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Uh, hey, about the deletion of the Reddit Model World Article, wasn't the "over a thousand people" having been engaged with it enough to justify its page? I was just about to fix the formatting of the citation and add this one: http://redditmetrics.com/r/MHOC which goes further into the enagagement with /r/mhoc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WineRedPsy ( talk • contribs) 12:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I have noticed that you have reverted the hoax speedy delete notices on the above pages. Please see for the TV program schedule for the alleged television channel: http://programme.tvb.com/pearl. There is no evidence showing that these news programs exist. The user created these pages has been blocked and has a history of creating hoax articles and images. Please reconsider speedy deleting the pages concerned, thanks. Wylve ( talk) 14:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Looks like Queen Alia International Airport has been struck by the Bangladesh Airport Vandal and a few other pages too. Citydude1017 ( talk) 19:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your Wikipedia contributions, and for being so far up there keeping the true north strong and free ... while the rest of us are huddled around the border. New Media Theorist ( talk) 01:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC) |
There is no evidence besides the article itself that /info/en/?search=Krum_Corporate is an established entity. All articles listed as citations fail to mention the company itself, and Google search for the company yields nothing except pages that have scraped the wikipedia page. The company is not listed as an investor by any of the companies referenced in the article. The article for the head of Krum Corporate, /info/en/?search=Charles_Krum, is also clearly factitious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.218.53 ( talk) 20:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
The reference that mentions krum corporate is constructed by scraping Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.107.62.178 ( talk) 18:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
The Bangladesh Airport Vandal hit this page too! Thanks! Citydude1017 ( talk) 14:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
So you felt the need to delete this article even after I added four sources and a talk page explanation of its significance. Did you read these or just blindly delete everything? Please put this content back and read. Check some sources, do some googling, do your own due diligence. If you are still not convinced, then restore to my user space. This is coming back. Trackinfo ( talk) 00:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Yo. You deleted the Junjun article with the explanation "(A7: Article about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)".
I'm a little confused. Junjun isn't an organized event, it's an upcoming documentary film by Paul Thomas Anderson. If you think the article didn't sufficiently indicate notability that's fair enough, but FWIW Anderson is a very notable director, and the documentary's subject Jonny Greenwood is a very notable musician. Once the film is released the film will certainly be notable enough to merit its own article, though maybe until then there aren't sufficient sources that can demonstrate the notability?
I don't have strong feelings on the matter, just wanted to make sure we were on the same page. Thanks. Popcornduff ( talk) 06:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Questioning deletion of Davey Browne. Article on its face met WP:NBOX and this fact was sourced from major and well-established sources, including ESPN. This meets the requirement of a credible claim of significance or importance. I see no reason why this was deleted in this manner. If you feed the person is not notable, then I suggest going through full deletion procedures. RonSigPi ( talk) 00:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
Yesterday, I was created BigBshop page on wikipedia but you are delete this page.
So how can Live this page on wikipedia. this is a not a promotional page. it is an E-commerce in India. please check all infoemation on google, facebook & other site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbshop ( talk • contribs) 10:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
I think this edit war could go on for some time with unlimited sockpuppetry, as far as I understand Michael Corby has not relinquished the use of the name. The present group believes they have acquired the legal right to use it. It is the music business after all, so it all seems to be very heated. The reverts by the New Babys seem very aggressive and threatening. One edit on 18th August seems to contain a threat. I'm not sure that they want to understand the concept of Wikipedia as an Encyclopedia rather than a promotional tool. Stedbeat ( talk) 14:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
May I please ask why you deleted DormCo's Wikipedia page? It has been up for 3-4 years without incident. It was a long process to originally get approved as we had to rework the page for a month to meet the criteria requested of the admin and Wikipedia. I am not sure why someone wanted to harm us and request it be removed but it is upsetting as a small business owner to see it occur yet see countless other companies be permitted to stay active.
Please do let me know if I can adjust anything or even if your kindly reconsider.
Thanks Jeff Gawronski — Preceding [[Wikipedia: 166.170.36.157 ( talk) 22:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)] comment added by 166.170.36.157 ( talk) 22:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Our organization is non-profit research center concentrating on the thorough studies of Korean studies, we are also granted numerous historical materials by private sectors. I tried to acknowledge our organization to the academia so researchers who want to gather information concerning Korean studies could share our endeavors. Please undo your speedy deletion, I would be very much appreciated. Many thanks. Bo Seung Kang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabade ( talk • contribs) 23:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I was going to leave a Welcoome message at User talk:Chrispinelover32 about test edits due to an apparent personal comment added to Revival (Selena Gomez album). However, it said that you had deleted his Talk page and that I should contact you. — Iknow23 ( talk) 04:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
I feel that your actions in protecting the Jeremy Corbyn page were not justified - if someone is edit warring then block them. Expecting everyone now to have to act through admin edit requests for such a currently high profile page is getting pretty silly. In addition, the photo that has been left on the page is controversial. -- ℕ ℱ 19:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
@ CambridgeBayWeather: I have tagged the page with {{ pp-dispute}} to make it clear to readers and any potential editors that the page is fully protected at the wrong version. -- KTC ( talk) 02:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
I would not block NickCT either. In cases of edit warring I prefer not to block, if possible, as blocked editors can't take part in discussions to solve the problems. As for the length of protection it was done to try and ensure discussion. If it is for a few hours then people will sometimes wait and restart after protection expires. If a resolution is formed then the protection can be removed before the time is up. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
I am writing to ask if you can restore the page /info/en/?search=User:MGMT90018_2015S2_highperformanceworksystems/sandbox. The reason given was that it was (U5: Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host). I can see how it might have appeared that way, but in fact it is just a sandbox that a group students in my class (I am a professor in Australia) are using to edit the page before it goes live. There is no other purpose for the page than to edit a Wikipedia page to the point that it is of sufficient quality that they can begin moving the content to a live Wikipedia article by the same name (once it has been submitted for review). Thus, I do not believe it is being used as a web host. My apologies for any confusion Abarsky123 ( talk) 01:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
I see that Swaleh Nguru has been deleted. He is an influencial figure that needs his own page. he is a much appreciated figure in the Kenyan Spotlight due to his conservation efforts, refugee protection and philanthropy and immense wealth. it is sad to see his page taken down. Perhaps the page should be recreated and exapanded on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.141.1.90 ( talk) 20:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Yes, there is plenty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.141.1.90 ( talk) 20:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This is the error received. "This page is protected from creation, so only administrators can create it." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.141.1.90 ( talk) 20:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Please unblock the Topic so it doesn't have to be created by admins only. Thanks. I really appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.141.1.90 ( talk) 20:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi CBW, note, that term is not a valid redirect for Bajót. This is a known sock who takes existing articles and makes copies of them in articles with a theme on "Bajótz". Using a closely named article like this is right in his M.O. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yalexandrov/Archive. Thanks! Crow Caw 19:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
I think you need to be aware of this: [1] I am aware of the block and unblock. Montanabw (talk) 20:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
I really wish you had not unblocked. The user is clearly gaming edit warring, harassment, and personal attacks. He made five reverts to an article Montanabw edits during her RFA, reverting three different editors in the process. When he was asked to stop, he continued to revert and harass Montanabw on her talk page. Then, he withdraws from the discussion as he's hauled to the edit warring noticeboard. He's then blocked, and games the unblock, returning right back to the same dispute he said he would withdraw from. Viriditas ( talk) 20:53, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you both for looking. — Ched : ? 22:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Why you keep removing my pages? emideuyjin ssibalnomma. Niebihongeo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.223.16.199 ( talk) 11:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi CambridgeBayWeather,
About 30 minutes ago you deleted the Onoff App Wikipedia page. We feel that this page satisfied all Wikipedia requirements and, as such, its existence on Wikipedia was justified.
Please can you tell us what more we need to do to make this page Wikipedia-worthy? Did we need more sources?
We look forward to hearing from you.
Best wishes,
The onoff App team — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onoffapp ( talk • contribs) 11:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
It appears you re-deleted a userspace article (User:Tiggerjay/Templates/HDR) I specifically asked an Admin to undelete. Can you please go back and re-un-delete it with history. Thanks Tiggerjay ( talk) 22:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
I understand that you deleted a page I had submitted Draft:Robin Chapman (Poet) for copyright issues. I would like to resolve these issues. I did do much work on that page that would not have had any copyright problems. There was some stock text that I found in multiple sources on Ms. Chapman and understand now I should not have used such without major editing on it. But I think the article could be salvaged with some work. Is it possible that I could still get a copy of the page back into my sandbox temporarily so that I could cut and paste it into an editor and revise it properly. I know now I should have made a copy of it earlier, but I am rather new here. Thanks for your help. Edward Dixon ( talk) 14:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I have re-created the Robin Chapman page in my sandbox. /info/en/?search=User:Edward_Dixon/sandbox/Robin_Chapman_%28Poet%29. If you have the time, I would appreciate if you could review it to assure that there is no possibility that it would be in violation of any copyrights any longer. Thank you. Edward Dixon ( talk) 23:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi CambridgeBayWeather.
I like to think that I don't often get things woefully wrong, but it does happen. Here, apparently. Would you please userfy (and blank) User:Shingi Munyeza for me to look over? I will db-u1 it when done. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Apparently you deleted our company page from Wikipedia. The person who manages the page left the company so we did not pick up on this before it was removed
We have had a valid wikipedia page for years and take time to ensure that it covers the company in a business like way without being a commercial. We are a mid-sized, very credible company and leader in our market.
Please let me know why you deleted the page and how quickly you can put it back up
Thanks
128.177.169.66 ( talk) 13:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC) Paul Ricketts
Hi, MusikAnimal! I see you protected the The Young and the Restless cast members page and was wondering if you could do the same with the [[ "previous" cast page. The same 142-IP editor has been making the same nonsense edits on that page as well. Thanks in advance if you can help with this. Cebr1979 ( talk) 04:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello,I understand that you are an admin and I always count on you.So I came to ask you if a sock puppet investigation can be reported after it happened not long ago.I suspected a sock master in one of my pages of interest while I was on block .Can I report this now or it may deemed as invalid or obsolete.?The suspended sock happened on August. nyanchy 11:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Regards.
Hello there. About that protection. Don't you think it should be longer than one month? Last time the page was protected it was more than one month. This sock clearly has no intention of ever stopping their childish behavior (they've since started editing disruptively elsewhere). A one month protection is all well and good but having to request another protection after such a short amount of time would be annoying. Minutes after this protection expires, the editor will continue. — DangerousJXD ( talk) 07:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi CambridgeBayWeather, can you do me a solid and restore this article? I could do it myself but I'd like the recreation of an article on a missionary vicar to be above board. The PROD was done by an Indian troll who's been messing around with me and SpacemanSpiff; they PRODded it before and never notified me. Have a look at their contributions: total howling. (Spiff, who was that again? the idiot with the waterfall issue?) There's more to be found on Pumplun--she passes as a scholar too, having written and edited a couple of books that are pretty widely cited. Thanks, Drmies ([[User talk: |talk]]) 15:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
It seems like there was a misunderstanding on this page. I placed the G12 tag from the results of this tool. However, it appears that the site was a mirror site. I reverted your edit, reverted my own edit, so there is no longer a tag on that page. -- JustBerry ( talk) 00:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, CBW. Could you take a look at Talk:George Lake Aerodrome, where a poster is claiming that the airfield has a permanent gravel runway in addition to the seasonal ice runway referred to in the article. Can you confirm or confute this and alter the article text if necessary? Deor ( talk) 10:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear I requst you to publish the following version to bring out the true historical knowledge. The user Achayan everytime removes the references of the particular version that you had once saved from manipulating. 06:30, 25 September 2015 CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) m . . (9,411 bytes) (0) . . (Protected "Mar Hormiz Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, Angamaly": Persistent disruptive editing ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 06:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 06:30...) (thank)
Now he has again taken away the bibliographical notes with the help of you people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthwillmakeyoufree ( talk • contribs) 10:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
I request you to move back to the version that you had done on 25 September 2015 with the bibiographical notes especially in the section Mar Hormizd Church, built by Mar Abraham. At the moment there is no references in a long paragraph. the user Achayan does not like some true historians who tell the truth through their papers. Achayan has never contributed anything to history. He is using vandalism. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthwillmakeyoufree ( talk • contribs) 10:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, CambridgeBayWeather. I see that the issues at List of proposed state mergers are not entirely new to you. However, your involvement was to lock the page against IP editors. I would like you to have a look at the behaviour of editor MilanoLove and what editors have been trying to communicate to him. Please advise on whether you can there is clear enough evidence of bad faith for you to take action or whether you would prefer me to take the matter to ANI, which I confess is a schelp as it takes me ages to figure out where, what, and if I have covered all steps. Thanks and regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 00:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
You removed the G12 speedy deletion request from Debiganj with this edit, and the edit summary "Given the dates I think it was copied the other way". I entirely understand how you reached that conclusion, but when you know the context I think you'll find that the Wikipedia article is a blatant copyright violation and should be deleted.
Banglapedia, despite their cheesy web interface, is a highly respected scholarly encyclopedia published by the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. It would not be far wrong to call it the Encyclopaedia Britannica of Bangladesh. They don't use Wikipedia as a source. The text in question is taken from the first edition of Banglapedia, published on paper in 2003 (eight years before the content showed up in Wikipedia). Unfortunately Banglapedia changes their website and url scheme every 3-4 years, so from the url submitted with the copyvios report it isn't obvious that the content is that old.
Copying from Banglapedia to Wikipedia in violation of copyright has been a chronic problem for a long time, see for example Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Banglapedia (source). At WikiProject Bangladesh we still uncover these copyright violations with depressing regularity. I'd be obliged if you would reconsider speedily deleting Debiganj. If you're uncomfortable doing that, I know there are other mechanisms for removing copyright violations, but CSD G12 is by far the most straightforward. Worldbruce ( talk) 09:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey you deleted this page. I sent in the appropriate copyright/license for that webpage... in the interim I am willing to revise the page to be more of a list format rather than using the 'meat' from the smart page... is there a way to get the draft back so i don't have to recreate everything?
RC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowman727 ( talk • contribs) 13:47, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear I request you earnestly to extend for another week, the protection of the present status of the wikipage Mar Hormiz Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, Angamaly to save it from the unnecessary, sistematic, regular and vandal removal of information and references by a particular user. Truthwillmakeyoufree ( talk) 22:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)