Hello, EditpediaPro, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing!
KylieTastic (
talk) 19:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Hey there! I'm planning on creating a Wikipedia page that details the military campaigns of Banda Singh bahadur(More info in my talk page)I'm planning on getting sikh and panjabi wikipedia editors involved.Are you interested in participating in this project?Let me know.Thanks! Twarikh e Khalsa ( talk) 00:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello EditpediaPro,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Davinder Pal Singh for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Alpha3031 ( t • c) 10:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi EditpediaPro. In response to your question on my talk page: Due to repeated recreations, it is no longer possible to create an article on
Davinder Pal Singh without prior approval. However, the following policies and guidelines are relevant, and you may find reading them helpful for future editing:
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view § Describing aesthetic opinions and reputations (policy);
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch (guideline);
Wikipedia:Writing better articles § Information style and tone (help page).
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 11:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Alpha3031,
- Thank you for your prompt response and the guidance on the relevant policies and guidelines. I have reviewed the links you provided to ensure I better understand Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and notability.
- Given the repeated recreations and the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at the sources and the information I have compiled on Davinder Pal Singh. I genuinely believe that he meets the notability criteria due to his significant contributions to digital preservation and cultural heritage through the Panjab Digital Library.
- If possible, could you assist in creating the article or provide more detailed feedback on how to frame the content to meet the necessary standards? Your expertise and help in this matter would be invaluable.
- Thank you again for your assistance and time.
- Best regards,
- EditpediaPro
EditpediaPro (
talk) 14:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- At the moment, it is still possible to make use of the draft review process. I would suggest doing so. I would also suggest taking care to scrupulously avoid any words in the previously mentioned guideline, any synonyms or anything even remotely similar in tone. Every time it is rejected means it is less likely to be accepted in the future, and more likely that even the draft review process would be no longer available to you. As for notability, if you think you've got it, put the best three sources you have there and we'll see. Someone else will tell you if it meets the four requirements. Also, if you have any sort of external relation with the subject of the article (colleague, etc) I would suggest disclosing it. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 10:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)