This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
A client has hired me to make minor changes to the FEARnet page. Most have to do with the capitalization of the FEARnet name. I have made the text changes, but I cannot figure out: a) How (or whether it's even possible) to change the capitalization of the page title, and b) How to replace the current logo with one that does not contain the URL. The uploading rules and procedures seem very complex. I'd appreciate any help you can give me. Thanks! Alexwillis ( talk) 17:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for those suggestions. While I did look at those articles, I have now taken a closer look. As far as I can tell, all the changes that the client requested are neutral and factual in nature, but in order to avoid any perceived COI issues, should I just make suggestions as to the changes on the Talk page of the fearnet page? I'm guessing that the answer to this is yes, because since I posted this request, another editor has rolled back some of the changes I made to the page. Also, I understand the copyright issues of the logo, and the client (who is the social media agent for fearnet) has assured me that they will get me any documentation needed on the licensing for the logo. However, I'm still having difficulty navigating the intricacies of getting the image uploaded. It can't go to Commons because it's copyrighted--but to upload it to Wikipedia directly, can they pull it from the fearnet.com page, or does it need to be on a URL on its own....any specifics would be very helpful. Alexwillis ( talk) 19:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
|
Silver seren C 03:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Silver seren C 01:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Silver seren C 01:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Silver seren C 06:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social Gaming Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Book of Life. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Alexwillis,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。) 07:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Onel5969 ( talk) 15:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Worldbruce ( talk) 19:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Woven Digital, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Worldbruce ( talk) 05:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Alexwillis. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article UPROXX, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. and Woven Digital. Undisclosed paid editing is against the Terms of Use. For more details see WP:COI. Widefox; talk 13:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
The article UPROXX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Widefox;
talk 14:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Widefox. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to UPROXX because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a " soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Widefox; talk 14:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UPROXX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPROXX until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 10:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Social Gaming Network Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)