![]() | New messages will appear at the bottom of this page. |
![]() | Attention:
This WHOIS report. . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in theIf you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
![]() | This
IP address has been repeatedly
blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to
abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. |
The reason 411Mania.com is used is that a better website does not have a review up. The usual site Slam Sports did not place up a normal review. So 411Mania.com is its substitute. The Ice T thing is in the event section. It isn't notable enough to be in the lead. Ice T's fame has slowly died since the early 90s.-- Will C 21:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Multi-core, you will be
blocked from editing.
Piano non troppo (
talk) 07:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
A link to Alberta Highway 2 is not required at the top of the QE2 page. It is not the only thing that can be called the QE2...something, see List_of_titles_and_honours_of_Queen_Elizabeth_II#Structures. For an explanation of what can and cannot be there, see WP:DISAMBIGUATION, and note that QE2 Highway is not even the current title of the Alberta Highway article. MickMacNee ( talk) 23:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (208.38.59.163) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
UntilItSleeps PublicPC 15:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed on two occasions over the last two days you have reverted this version of the "I'm on a Boat summary from:
"The video opens with Andy Samberg pouring cereal into a bowl. To his delight, a coupon for a "FREE boat ride for 3!" falls out of the box. As he is deciding on whom he should bring, the shot opens to reveal his breakfast companions, Akiva Schaffer and Jorma Taccone. Samberg first choses Schaffer, but skips over an anxious Taccone in favor of the previously unseen rapper T-Pain, who is also eating with them.
to
The video opens with Andy Samberg pouring cereal into a bowl. To his delight, a coupon for a free boat ride for three falls out of the box. While selecting who will go with him, Samberg chooses bandmate Akiva Schaffer but skips over bandmate Jorma Taccone in favor of the previously unseen rapper T-Pain.
I am willing to the concede on the spelling change (which was taken from the video) and the briefer phrasing. But, the sentence "While selecting who will go with him, Samberg chooses bandmate..." is not grammatically sound. To select and choose are synonymous, so you cant do one while doing the other. Additionally, this phrasing doesn't really make clear the first sight gag. I made a minor adjustment to the wording to be grammatically sound while accurately describing what occurred. It reads as follows:
The video opens with Andy Samberg, Jorma Taccone and Akiva Schaffer eating breakfast together. When Samberg pours cereal into his bowl, a coupon for a "free boat ride for three" falls out of the box. Samberg ultimately chooses Schaffer to accompany him, but skips over Taccone in favor of the previously unseen rapper T-Pain.
In the future, I am humbly and honestly open discussion over reversion.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 20:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The video opens with Andy Samberg, sitting at a table with bandmates Akiva Schaffer and Jorma Taccone, pouring cereal into a bowl. To his delight, a coupon for a free boat ride for three falls out of the box. While selecting who will go with him, Samberg picks Schaffer but skips over Taccone in favor of the previously unseen rapper T-Pain.
The video opens with Andy Samberg — who is sitting at the kitchen table with bandmates Akiva Schaffer and Jorma Taccone — pouring cereal into a bowl. To his delight, a coupon for a free boat ride for three falls out of the box. After pondering who will go with him, Samberg picks Schaffer but skips over Taccone in favor of the previously unseen rapper T-Pain.
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a
personal attack as you did at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Digital Gangster LP, you will be
blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
MuZemike 15:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Toddst1 (
talk) 18:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)208.38.59.163 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
was civil, simply pointing out hypocrisy of other editors (who engaged in attacks of non-registered users) who were also violating policies with zero punishment. It was WLU who was violating deletion policy and making personal attacks on "anons" and MuZemike who started making demands and acting uncivil. Plus the block time is far too long- a WEEK?? There were no slurs or other blatant personal attacks that would call for even close to that long of punishment.
Decline reason:
It was not civil, and your request is pointing the blame at everyone else. Please also see WP:NOTTHEM after thoroughly reviewing WP:NPA. Thanks, PeterSymonds ( talk) 00:49, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
LOL what an astonishingly bad block. 86.44.32.209 ( talk) 17:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Consensus at WP:PW was that finisher nmames are note italicised in prose, only in list. As it turns, out, this isn't reflected at WP:PW/Style Guide, so I'll mention it over at WT:PW. That being said, almost no articles here use italics for finisher names in prose, and consistency is needed. Any occurences of finisher italics in prose should be be removed. Thanks, Gavyn Sykes ( talk) 21:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Firstly I apologize, While using Huggle I rarely read what dosen't show up in red and your edits looked to wrong. They were not vandalism. However, calling the other "unintelligible" and telling me I need to have my "head examined." Goes against WP:CIVIL. You should comment on the contributions, not the contributor. Welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing. -- SKATER Speak. 18:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC) @ Skater:
Hello, 208.38.59.163. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- SKATER Speak. 20:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello! In your interest, I have closed the dispute on the Wikiquette alert page. If there are anymore further attacks by that particular user, please notify any administrator on the WP:AIAV or myself so further actions can be done; since this issue has been posted as a dispute; a temporary block might be issued. Don't worry, this message will be posted on the talk page of all the users involved in the matter. Thank you! Happy editing! -- A3RO (mailbox) 01:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts to improve Oxygen bar by adding internal links. However, all but one of the links you added were inappropriate and have been reverted. Please read WP:LINK#What generally should be linked, WP:LINK#Year linking, and especially WP:LINK#What generally should not be linked:
... it is generally inappropriate to link terms whose meaning can be understood by most readers of the English Wikipedia, including plain English words, the names of major geographic features and locations, ... common units of measurement (particularly if a conversion is provided), and dates ...
Hope that helps. -- RexxS ( talk) 19:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Is it really that hard for you to take a few minutes out of life to search the CRTC's website for CITV-TV-1? єmarsee • Speak up! 23:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
I am sure that that is not called "hot yoga" or whatever you said. -- Clarince63 ( talk) 21:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below; but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Cirt (
talk) 21:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC){
208.38.59.163 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was making valid edits to articles, which were being reverted with no reason. I even began discussion w/ editor Clarince63 over Bikram Yoga, which was been deleted from his talk page. They responded to me that they were sure Bikram Yoga isn’t' called hot yoga, even though hot yoga redirects to Bikram Yoga!! All my other edits (this is a shared IP, I'm talking about the edits done today) are totally valid- like removing crystal balling from LA X, which is apparently what I was banned for. To be banned for any length is ridiculous, an entire month seems like a slight exaggeration considering I didn't even break 3RR.
Decline reason:
You appear to have engaged in an edit war. Whether you technically breached the three revert-rule is not relevant. The only exception to the edit warring policy is reversion of blatant vandalism. Unfortunately, this ip address has a long history of disruptive editing, and it is impossible for us to tell if you are one of the previous users who caused it to be blocked or not. Blocks are escalated over time, and given the block log from this address a month is a reasonable length of time. You could avoid that particular problem by creating an account. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please take a walk through Category:Members of the Order of the British Empire, which currently has 1175 articles, and if you can find one that puts it your way, fine. Meanwhile, can we stick with the usual way of wording this in the UK? Thanks. Rodhull andemu 23:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
DJSasso (
talk) 17:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)208.38.59.163 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I can't put a reason why the block should be removed because there was no reason given for the block to be added.
Decline reason:
A quick look at this very talkpage and the contributions from this IP address are quite clear why the block was added. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
208.38.59.163 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The last warning was a month prior. The last edits done around the time of the block was 1 good edit which still stands (Cabin Boy), one good edit that was reverted by Djsasso thus making that article incorrect(TNA TV title, you might want to fix that btw if you truly care about the site and its quality), and one apparent good faith edit (Gretzky, wasn't me so IDK if really done in good faith, but it appears that way & I follow WP:AGF). None of those edits, nor any of the previous dozen+, appear to be vandalism as Djsasso claimed was the reason for the block. I'm honestly curious, do you guys actually do a real review when these blocks are contested because it seems one admin will do it and everyone else just follows in lockstep. I would really like to know your thought process on why this block should remain because the last actual vandalism according to WP:VAN I can see on this shared IP out of the last 50 edits over almost a monthlong period was from the Supertramp edit 7/16. Especially for a shared IP I'd say that was pretty decent, hardly deserving of any ban let alone a THREE MONTH one.
Decline reason:
Good edits do not balance out vandalism edits, you cannot make 100 good edits then have "fun" on 5 pages. As more vandal edits are made so the warning level increases, when we get to level 5, it's a block. As for the length, in nearly all cases, vandalism block lengths increase with each block, this is now the forth block and the length is not unexpected, I would expect the next block to be 6 months and then 1 year - there are plenty of IPs blocked for a year on Wikipedia. And we do look at the edits made when there is an unblock request, we don't just follow the result of the last request (although we will read the reasoning in that as well). As for Gretzky, I don't think for one minute that is a good faith edit - the data was referenced, and was then changed without any reasoning given. Note that blocks are not there as a punishment, they are to protect Wikipedia - there are limited amounts of resources to revert the vandalism that some editors persist in making. Where you find yourself blocked from editing then the only way forward is to create an account. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please note that:
Please stop adding it, it's just not appropriate. If there is ANY evidence that the name APA is used, it should first be added to Air Line Pilots Association, International, and only then to APA. -- Muhandes ( talk) 21:36, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
The point of the flags for the various non-American chefs on Iron Chef America is to better inform the reader about their origins, but as their culinary influence. We had a similar issue with Susur Lee: do we flag him as from China (where he was born) or from Canada (where he nationalized)? In the end, given his food, China was the better choice. Similarly, the Canadian flag misses a key element of Hughes' culinary style, thus the use of the flag of Quebec. It isn't a political statement, does not intend disrespect to the Canadian flag, and certainly doesn't intend to mislead, just to better inform. If you have any further issues with the flag in use, the standard procedure is to leave the edit intact and open a discussion on the article's talk page. Thanks! Drmargi ( talk) 20:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Canadian procurement, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Ahunt (
talk) 18:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Živilė Raudonienė. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 21:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello good friend! There's really no point in vandalizing Wikipedia... countless users have tools and programs that spot vandalism, and we have almost a constant lineup of users who volunteer to monitor harmful edits, as well as automated bots that can locate vandalism and change it back almost instantly. Vandalism just like yours has been done countless times in the past, and we know how to deal with it. Yes, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia anyone can edit, and sure, it might be tempting to totally fuck an article up, but that's not what we're here to do. If you'd like to edit Wikipedia in a constructive manner that doesn't make you look like a complete idiot, feel free to do so, otherwise, it's best to just leave it alone. That saves you the time of making pointless changes, and saves me the time of reverting those changes just as fast, if not faster, than you make them. Thank you for listening and I hope you enjoy using, and maybe editing, Wikipedia.
And if you have any questions, feel free to direct your inquiries to my delicious talk page; where we can sit and make banter over a lovely cup of green tea. BelloWello ( talk) 00:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Ron Swanson with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Marek.
69
talk 01:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
The Climb (song).
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
freshacconci
talktalk 18:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Ron Swanson. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. If you want to make this change, take it to the talk page to gain consensus. Until you do that it will be considered vandalism and reverted.
Karl 334
☞TALK to ME ☜ 18:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
I love the line "I was born ready. I'm Ron Fucking Swanson." as much as anybody else. It's a funny joke. But I'm sure you understand that Ron was not implying that the word "Fucking" is his middle name, and citing that episode as a reference does not work as a source. It's not his name. I'm sure your intentions are good here, but please refrain from making that edit again in the future, as it is vandalism and you can get in trouble if you show signs of repeated intentional vandalism. — Hun ter Ka hn 19:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the WSM issue. — Psychonaut ( talk) 12:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Security theater with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Hallows
AG(
talk) 17:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Athabasca oil sands. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Karl 334
☞TALK to ME ☜ 17:54, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Fernando Zylberberg, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
J36miles (
talk) 18:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
N2e. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Inspiration Mars Foundation, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
N2e (
talk) 05:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Hwy43. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Ponoka, Alberta, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Hwy43 (
talk) 06:14, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Alberta with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Donner60 (
talk) 03:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Justino Bambino, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, 208.38.59.163. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " Justino Bambino".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at
WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Justino Bambino}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 10:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
David Brewster— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk) 23:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Olive Garden, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Lectrician2 (
talk) 22:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
La Crete—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks. ...
discospinster
talk 21:04, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, 208.38.59.163!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gpkp
u •
t •
c 04:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
|
Hello, 208.38.59.163. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Everett Drozd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 05:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our
guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be
deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely
notable and can be verified according to our
policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see
Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and
not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see:
Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |