Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a
soft block using {{
School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Ben 10 (2016 TV series) episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 16:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Saugus, Massachusetts— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u ( talk) 13:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kashrut, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton ( talk) 23:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
1. Christian theologian not rs for Kashrut. 2. Just some clarification of Maimonides. Look at source text: https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Substitution.4?lang=bi 3. Making clear that according to views on Kashrut, primary reason is divine commandment, benefits are just incidental.
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Boomerang_indeff_Triggerhippie4, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 06:47, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
CYBERPOWER (
Around) 15:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)155.246.151.38 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I feel confused, because I have been editing in accordance with wikipedia guidelines. There was a content dispute, but that was discussed on the talk page of the relevant article. I think this may be some kind of mistake. 155.246.151.38 ( talk) 15:25, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I have taken a closer look at the edits and what appeared at a glance to be removal of content, actually appears to be removal of unsourced content. I'm convinced this is a content dispute and will unblock per WP:AGF. — CYBERPOWER ( Around) 18:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Names of God in Judaism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Nightvour (
talk) 20:12, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Was reverting the sock of Orchomen called Pipsally. Warshy appears to be confused about who the sock is. 155.246.151.38 ( talk) 20:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Cyberpower678 Pipsally I think what happened is that the report came before this comment. [1] And then the report was for some reason not withdrawn. Anyways, although I am an IP, I am human.
"On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge." I am not deliberately obstructing or intending to defeat the projects purpose. I am using reliable sources, and effectively evaluating information. Based on this, it is against policy to block for vandalism when I am clearly not vandalizing. Which edit is allegedly misleading? 155.246.151.38 ( talk) 17:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Might as well just continue the joke ... Daniel Case ( talk) 17:26, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Daniel Case Or at least explain why I was blocked when I am clearly editing in good faith?
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Haredi Judaism, you may be blocked from editing. PabloMartinez ( talk) 22:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Again, this is content dispute. Since 2016, the divorce rate was 5% among the Haredi population, compared to the general Israeli population rate of 14%. [1] I could not find more recent nationwide data. If you can find it, I will certainly be happy. The other articles just mentioned data in isolated cities.
Hi. Why are you still editing under an IP address? You would have much more credibility on WP if you worked on WP under a user name of your choice. Thank you, IZAK ( talk) 18:42, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping an eye on Names of God in Judaism. S0091 ( talk) 18:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC) |
You've reverted three established editors—one of whom edited the article before the now-blocked Pipsally did. While your revert of Pipsally may qualify for an exemption from WP:3RR, the other reverts don't. You really need to discuss the matter at Talk:Names of God in Judaism and reach consensus. — C.Fred ( talk) 20:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
I agree that the section that you removed about "Adoshem" was completely unsourced. And not of high quality. On the other hand, I feel uncomfortable with removing any and all information about the use of the term from Wikipedia. Debresser ( talk) 23:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
The Dubai IP's reverting you most definitely are Orchomen. However, long-term established users like Hipocrite and Nomoskedasticity most definitely are not. Just because a user reverts you, doesn't automatically make them a sockpuppet. Sro23 ( talk) 15:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey IZAK, here are some helpful articles for /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Another_unreliable_Haaretz_article:
From Haaretz https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.HIGHLIGHT-how-the-haredi-street-turned-racist-and-ultra-nationalist-1.9513491 https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israeli-religious-teens-would-rescind-arab-vote-poll-1.9551732 https://www.haaretz.com/1.5158719 Not-Haaretz: https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/haaretz-wont-let-the-facts-get-in-the-way/ https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/29/world/israel-virus-rabbi-orthodox.html https://www.jewishpress.com/news/jewish-news/haredim-news/chul-mehudar-group-haaretz-claim-of-preferential-treatment-to-haredim-is-baseless-slander/2021/02/22/
There is a lot more in the sewages of Haaretz, but this is enough for today. 155.246.151.38 ( talk) 20:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC) StonyBrook I.am.qwerty SuperJew Pi314m Puzzledvegetable Pashute Nerguy Jfdwolff KirkCliff2 Zozoulia Muhandes Marbehraglaim Maor X Jdavi333 Invisiboy42293 Jaredscribe Rabbi Barry Charlie Smith FDTB
I intentionally avoid editing where my feelings could impair judgement. That being said, however, Haaretz is somewhat infamous for their far-left stances. Also, I’m not the type to demand mountains be moved over past articles; however, people should know that Haaretz is often unreliable in their reporting. KirkCliff2 ( talk) 12:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Then what the hell is the point of this whole thing? I was tagged in some discussion I never would’ve known existed otherwise, and now I get singled out by an IP address for hypocritical reasons. KirkCliff2 ( talk) 05:11, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
I thought the topic at hand was that Haaretz is unreliable and that I was being asked to share my thoughts. Did I miss something? KirkCliff2 ( talk) 05:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
I’m genuinely confused at this point. Why was I brought into this discussion, and what is it about, if not what I thought? KirkCliff2 ( talk) 05:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
PLease read wp:canvas. Slatersteven ( talk) 09:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Please read wp:not and wp:nothere as well as wp:rightgreatwrongs. Slatersteven ( talk) 09:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
One way around page protection is to edit using an account. Please read WP:BENEFITS as to why this is a good idea. Slatersteven ( talk) 10:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Doug Weller
talk 10:49, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Hello, I'm The Night Watch. I noticed that in this edit to MNIST database, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Night Watch (talk) 00:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Metal–organic biohybrid have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 ( talk) 18:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Nagol0929. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nariman Farvardin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Nagol0929 ( talk) 00:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |