Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
![]() |
![]() | This
IP address has been repeatedly
blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to
abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. |
Hello, I'm
DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Democratic Socialists of America— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs 16:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
The Empire Strikes Back. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
KylieTastic (
talk) 19:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Fantasy, you may be
blocked from editing.
Shellwood (
talk) 14:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Ed (
Edgar181) 15:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC) You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Steve King.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Steve King was
changed by
143.231.249.130
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.951487 on 2017-10-27T19:12:56+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 19:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
False attribution, you may be
blocked from editing.
Waggers
TALK 14:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Cop.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Cop was
changed by
143.231.249.130
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.969793 on 2017-11-09T15:17:52+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 15:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Ed (
Edgar181) 15:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 14:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Donald Trump–Russia dossier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 16:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude. 11:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
AnAwesomeArticleEditor (
talk) 17:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
List of Bethesda Softworks video games— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Shellwood (
talk) 17:14, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,
Lindsey Graham. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. –
Gilliam (
talk) 21:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Amanda
(aka DQ) 21:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Creffett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Greg Murphy (politician) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a
neutral perspective. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
creffett (
talk) 23:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
I've re-added the Nancy Pelosi quote you removed from Trent Kelly as "subjective". While Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy does indeed mean that Wikipedia itself wouldn't make the claims Pelosi made. But the fact that Wikipedia itself won't espouse any particular viewpoint doesn't mean we can't describe other people's viewpoints where they are noteworthy. There's a difference between Wikipedia disagreeing with Kelly—a matter of opinion—and Wikipedia stating the fact that Pelosi disagrees with Kelly.
Politicians don't exist in a vacuum, and where a notable politician has views on another politician's actions, those are quite possibly (though not necessarily) worth mentioning in the article.
Finally, I should note that, based on your IP address, it seems likely that you are Kelly or one of his staffers. Wikipedia editors often take a dim view of articles being edited by people with a connection to their subject. I would strongly encourage you to disclose your affiliation with Kelly in future edits, and request that uninvolved editors make changes on your behalf rather than making them yourself; for more detail on this, see the conflict of interest policy and plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Gaelan 💬 ✏️ 20:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |