Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Administrators may want to consider using a range block as cellular IPs change frequently. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
This is a shared IP address; other customers of your internet service provider also use this address. If you did not make the edits discussed below, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Howdy! I just wanted to bring to your attention that not all of your copyedits to the page Garcia House (Los Angeles, California) actually improve upon the existing sentence structure or grammar, and in some cases they may even leave the sentence a bit clunkier than it already was. I genuinely trust that these edits were made in good faith, and your account looks pretty new, so I just wanted to leave you a little note to let you know that, in general, copyedits shouldn't be made in cases where no confusion or error really occurs. For example:
I appreciate your efforts to try to make Wikipedia better for all users. I hope these few notes will help. I also did want to make it clear which edits you got spot-on, because I don't want to bite the newcomer by only pointing out their mistakes:
Best of luck going forward, and happy editing! Crossark ( talk) 23:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Rubbish computer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Republic of Hawaii seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Rubbish computer (
Talk:
Contribs) 23:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Ecofeminism, you may be
blocked from editing.
Binksternet (
talk) 21:09, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Tell Me (The Rolling Stones song), you may be
blocked from editing.
Binksternet (
talk) 22:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Susmuffin. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
April Bowlby have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. ―
Susmuffin
Talk 01:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Path slopu. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person,
Lucy Liu, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a
reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
PATH
SLOPU 10:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did with
this edit to
Lucy Liu. Thank you.
PATH
SLOPU 10:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Lucy Liu, you may be
blocked from editing.
Serols (
talk) 10:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Corn dog. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
SpicyMilkBoy (
talk) 03:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Seamus has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:44, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Seamus.
Balon Greyjoy (
talk) 08:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Might I suggest
creating an account? {{u|
waddie96}} {
talk}
10:54, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Chandrayaan-2. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
70.180.245.165 (
talk) 01:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
You are being warned, do not vandalize the Chandrayaan-2 page anymore, it is an undeniable fact supported by all reliable reference sources that Chandrayaan-2 failed. Go read the sources:
1.)
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/09/india-chandrayaan-2-landing-attempt-moon-lunar-south-pole/
2.)
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/06/758419791/indias-attempt-to-land-rover-at-moon-s-south-pole-fails
3.)
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-49615665
4.)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/06/chandrayaan-2-indias-second-moon-mission-may-have-failed-scientists/
5.)
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/06/india/india-moon-lunar-landing-chandrayaan-2-scn/index.html
70.180.245.165 (
talk) 00:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Your edits may be in good faith, but you appear to be engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SuperWikiLover223 ( talk) 01:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ifnord. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
ADX Florence have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
Ifnord (
talk) 23:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DB1729. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Category:Redirects to disambiguation pages without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
DB1729 (
talk) 04:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Telenovelafan215. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Mi fortuna es amarte have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Telenovelafan215 (
talk) 02:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |