A request for you to revisit the discussion, as another source has been presented there by another user. (Sent per your comment there stating "the reviews cited are run of the mill...") Since another review was presented after your comment, it is fair for you to see the update in the discussion. Northamerica1000 (talk) 19:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
My point is that Cover Oregon is the marketplace, not just the website. No doubt the site is a miserable failure, but apparently many people are still able to get coverage via Cover Oregon. I added back your citation and tried to clarify that point a bit more. -- Esprqii ( talk) 20:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Candleabracadabra,
I realize that some information listed on the Wikipedia article about myself is seriously outdated and there are several wrong/biased additions have been made recently. I certainly do not want to be the final judge of edits and corrections myself. I am trying to find an objective independent appraiser/editor. I see that you had carefully edited the Wikipedia entry on me a while ago, and your edits suggest to me that you were very objective, so I am wondering whether you may wish to consider the following and perhaps make changes as you might see fit.
1. The first paragraph says that I am “a professor and chairman at the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine as well as adjunct professor at Tufts University School of Medicine and Professor of Medicine and Director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center at Stanford University School of Medicine.” I had chaired the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology at the University of Ioannina School of Medicine until 2010 and then I moved to Stanford. Since then I hold the C.F. Rehnborg Chair in Disease Prevention and I am Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy, and of Statistics at Stanford University. While I do have an adjunct appointment at Tufts since 2002, adjunct appointments are certainly not as important as the main appointment at Stanford and they should not take precedence over the primary Stanford appointment. I also have adjunct professor appointments at Harvard School of Public Health and at Imperial College London. So, I think the sentence should become something like, “the C.F. Renhborg Chair in Disease Professor at Stanford University, where he is Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy, and of Statistics, Director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center, and Director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS). Until 2010 he was Professor and Chairman of the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine and he has held adjunct professor appointments at Tufts (Medicine), Harvard (Epidemiology), and Imperial College London (Epidemiology and Biostatistics).” 2. In this same paragraph, the references 1 and 2 are outdated and they should be replaced since they pertain to an old webpage from Ioannina and an old CV at the time I was moving to Stanford. They should be replaced by (1) my Stanford webpage https://med.stanford.edu/profiles/john-ioannidis and (2) the CV that I have uploaded in the same Stanford webpage (curriculum vitae DOC under “Links” on the right side of the webpage). The webpage and the CV offer full documentation and other web and other sources, if any additional need to be quoted. 3. The majority of my biography seems to cover in an inaccurate and highly biased manner the discussion of a commentary by Goodman and Greenland and a paper by Jager and Leek: “Statisticians Goodman and Greenland agreed that "many medical research findings are less definitive than readers suspect" but found major flaws in Ioannidis's methods, noting that Ioannidis (who did not collaborate with any statisticians on the article) appeared to have confused alpha level with p value and also built the assumption that most findings are likely to be false into his reasoning, thereby making his logic circular. Therefore Goodman and Greenland rejected Ioannidis' claim as unsupportable by the methods used.[6][7] Ioannidis has responded to this critique.[8] …. In an advance access publication on September 25, 2013 Leah R. Jager of the US Naval Academy's Department of Mathematics and Jeffrey T. Leek of John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health's Department of Biostatistics did a study based on P-values from all 77,430 papers published in 5 major medical journals from 2000 to 2010 and found that "the overall rate of false discoveries among reported results is 14%, contrary to previous claims. We also found that there is not a significant increase in the estimated rate of reported false discovery results over time". The two concluded that "Statistical analysis must allow for false discoveries in order to make claims on the basis of noisy data. But our analysis suggests that the medical literature remains a reliable record of scientific progress" [10].” I think this is an extremely biased and distorted presentation. According to GoogleScholar, there are over 50,000 citations to my work in the scientific literature ( http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=A9e6sPYAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao). The 2005 PLoS Medicine paper that is discussed is indeed one of my most-cited ones (although not the most-cited), and it has received over 1,800 citations to-date (i.e. <4% of my total citations), while it is also the most-accessed and downloaded article in the history of the Public Library of Science (approaching 1 million hits as you can check in the metrics page in http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/metrics/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124). Among the thousands of enthusiastic and supportive quotes/comments about that specific PLoS Med paper, the ones by Goodman/Greenland and Jager/Leek are highly atypical. To give some objective numbers, the commentary by Goodman/Greenland has received only 25 citations in GoogleScholar and the paper by Jager/Leek has received just 1 (by Goodman). The Jager/Leek paper actually was published in a journal where Leek is the associate editor (I doubt any major journal would have published this otherwise), and it is seriously flawed, as I have shown in detail an extensive published rebuttal in that same journal commenting on the data and methods of Jager/Leek. (Reference: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false. Ioannidis JP. Biostatistics. 2014 Jan;15(1):28-36; discussion 39-45. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt036. Epub 2013 Sep 25). I think these two sections need to be deleted. 4. If for whatever reason one insists of mentioning the Goodman/Greenland commentary, one should probably delete at a minimum “but found major flaws in Ioannidis's methods, noting that Ioannidis (who did not collaborate with any statisticians on the article) appeared to have confused alpha level with p value and also built the assumption that most findings are likely to be false into his reasoning, thereby making his logic circular.” As I clarified above, I am professor of statistics and I teach statistics courses at Stanford and in Ioannina I was director (among others) of the Biostatistics-Biomathematics courses. The sentence above sounds as if I don’t know the 101 of the profession that I practice and I teach and where I am so heavily cited in the scientific literature. Also at a minimum, if for whatever reason one wants to keep some mention to the Jager/Leek paper, one should add after any description of their paper that “Ioannidis has published a rebuttal that demonstrates that Jager/Leek used wrong data and wrong methods, and made wrong inferences.” The reference is: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false. Ioannidis JP. Biostatistics. 2014 Jan;15(1):28-36; discussion 39-45. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt036. Epub 2013 Sep 25.” 5. If one wants to maintain focus on the PLoS Medicine paper, one should probably add something about the “average”, “mainstream” current interpretation of that paper: the estimate that most published research findings are false has been corroborated by several empirical studies on reproducibility of different research fields (e.g. in epidemiology, clinical research, pre-clinical research and beyond), e.g. you may cite the recent Economist issue in October 2013 (Reference: http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble), the recent coverage in New York Times (Reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/21/science/new-truths-that-only-one-can-see.html?_r=0), and the recent series of 5 review articles in the Lancet in January 2014 that reviewed the accumulated evidence that unfortunately 85% of research is wasted (Reference: http://www.thelancet.com/series/research). 6. Moreover, if one decides to keep the mention to the Goodman/Greenland and Jager/Leek items, I think it is important to clarify that I am a strong supporter and enthusiast of science and the scientific method, otherwise it sounds as if Goodman/Greenland and Jager/Leek are good crusaders defending science against some monster! E.g. you may add that “Ioannidis has repeatedly stated that scientific investigation is the noblest pursuit (e.g. reference: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0040215), but he stresses that his work aims to identify how to improve the efficiency of the scientific process. (e.g. Reference: http://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/magazine/article/?article_id=53345)” or something similar. 7. The current section External Links lists the old Ioannina webpage (may be deleted) and the adjunct appointment Tufts page. It should at a minimum show the Stanford webpage ( https://med.stanford.edu/profiles/john-ioannidis ). If you also want to list Tufts and Harvard and Imperial (there are webpages of mine for all these three) this is OK, but not as essential, my primary appointment is at Stanford. It seems also essential to list the webpage for Stanford Prevention Research Center: http://prevention.stanford.edu/
I thank you in advance for your attention to these suggestions and I would be grateful if you could find some time to make corrections to this Wikipedia entry as you might think fit.
Kind regards,
John P.A. Ioannidis, MD, DSc C.F. Rehnborg Chair in Disease Prevention Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy, and of Statistics Stanford University 76.126.246.118 ( talk) 00:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyde Park (Tampa), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park Historic District ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
I closed this AfD where you !voted delete. The nominator's suggestion was WP:NUKEANDPAVE, and I think that has now been done satisfactorily. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 February 22. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 23:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thank you so much for your help with my article about Focus the Producer. They are about to delete it and I worked really hard on it. I wish I could really have more guys like you help me fix it up, or just answer a few questions to help me out. Everybody on here is so quick delete at times though. Either way thanks and if you think of any other way to help please do so. Rico2014 ( talk) 23:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC) |
You seem to have an active interest in editing Buddy Fletcher but little interest in properly formatting WP:ICs. Could you take the time to format your citations so that I don't have to undo all the content that you have changed.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
However, I have had minimal involvement in the article for the last few years. I am responsible for so many articles that when there is a lot of interest in maintaining one, I usually let the public handle it. In this case, I am just saying, I notice you have done a lot of editing to the article and hope you might consider spending some more time with it cleaning up the bare urls.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
I have no idea, I was just reading a news article about it, but the hash oil article talks about crystallisation, mentions butane as part of the process, and lists "wax" as a synonym. Google Images suggest that hash oil can look exactly like the picture in your source, and there are plenty of news sources talking about hash oil in Colorado this month. -- McGeddon ( talk) 14:08, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for creating the page for the Winter Park History Museum. I just wondered why you redirected the article to Winter Park Historical Museum, since the official name is "History Museum". In my opinion, the official name should be the one to use for the article, as it is also listed in the text. Thank you. Jllm06 ( talk) 19:03, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for creating so many articles about museums in Florida. I have been adding in categories and links to the WikiProject Florida. Great job! Jllm06 ( talk) 19:56, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Hernando State Bank has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk) 03:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on La Teresita, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix ( talk) 03:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Teresita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Teresita until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the new article! NorthAmerica 1000 13:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Accelerated Learning Solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Coderzombie (
talk) 14:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm not sure why you created all those red links on the Macon, Georgia article. Nothing links to them except Macon, Georgia? Thanks. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
NorthAmerica 1000 02:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Castlight Health has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Tiptoety
talk 08:15, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm still unsure of his notability. He may or may not fail WP:GNG, though he fails WP:ATHLETE. Here's what was in the article for you to start off (was pretty short): "Goetz played his high school baseball at Jesuit High School (Tampa) and won a team championship in 1997. Goetz is best known for being traded to the Florida Marlins in 1998 along with two other players in exchange for Mike Piazza.Niebuhr, Keith (August 27, 2000). "Ex-Tiger star uses smarts to move up". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved 2009-06-24." Wizardman 23:12, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Fernandez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Fernandez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 6 an 6 sh6 20:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Chocolate covered cherry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 06:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
|
Hi Candle. I was wondering if (generally speaking) you had any interest in collaborating on articles where I have a COI from time-to-time beyond just the Yelp page. Some editors don't like it (working for free for someone who is paid and all that) and I figure it's a matter of personal choice. Typically it is not as much drama/debate as the Yelp page. ( Triumph International is an example of a recent project that was handled in a more routine manner)
It is actually very hard to find editors that will focus on the content where a COI is disclosed. Some want to encourage disclosure so they will make COI edits by proxy as a way of showing their support for the editor's conduct. Others are overly defensive or will even make poor edits to thwart the COI editor. And others just aren't bold enough in article-space for me to make improvements in a Bright Line(ish) fashion. And the volume of my COI works are too large a burden to place on just a hand-full of editors I already know handle my COI well. User:Sphilbrick has mentioned he feels it takes a veteran editor to do it right and I'm increasingly coming over to his point-of-view, seeing as how different my COI RfCs result than identical RfCs where no COI is disclosed.
Anyways, any interest in chipping in from time to time? I would take no offense if you just don't want to. CorporateM ( Talk) 16:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tim Byrd (author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. John from Idegon ( talk) 16:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you created an unsourced page at Ortona, Florida. According to the USGS, there are two unincorporated communities in Florida by that name, one in Glades County ( 295516) and one in Volusia County ( 288253). Which one is it? • Gene93k ( talk) 13:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I think what you're looking for is Aeolian Islands, one of which is Lipari. Risker ( talk) 17:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
The deleted article from 2007 contained only a list of ten "Vernon High School beliefs" and a mission statement, apparently copied from the school website, though the link no longer works. You would do better starting from a clean sheet. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 19:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Consider creating articles for Chipley High School and Washington County School District (Florida) to replace the redirects that are there now. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 21:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Candleabracadabra,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Streamsong Resort for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ging287 ( talk) 21:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on American Education Resources Association, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.
If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 23:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Cocoanut candy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Coconut_candy. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Coconut_candy – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 00:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Leo Matiz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Origamite Please complain here 01:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Candle. I discussed some housekeeping items with User:Crisco 1492 here and have submitted the corresponding Request Edits. [1] [2]. They have to do with moving an article where the company changed their name slightly and making a clearer distinction between two companies that both have Purina in the name. It's a very boring, mundane task to ask of you and it may even be a borderline non-controversial edit, but per WP:COI, I need to ask someone else to make the edits and I was wondering if you had a moment to chip-in. CorporateM ( Talk) 17:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
NorthAmerica 1000 18:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey,
I was wondering if you could revisit this I was able to find some sources let me know what you think! Valoem talk contrib 23:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Please use user talk pages for discussion not user pages.-- Laun chba ller 20:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Clear toy candy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Iago
Qnsi 01:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
NorthAmerica 1000 02:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
NorthAmerica 1000 06:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello Candleabracadabra,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gehlhaar for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anastasia ( talk) 18:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Let me know if you want the article restored and userfied to, I know you were expanding the prose near the end of the AfD. I am happy to do it for you. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 16:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello Candleabracadabra,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gunster (law firm) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. KaraokeMac ( talk) 21:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
|
Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
If you need further help, you can:
or even:
{{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
![]() |
The Christianity Barnstar | |
Thanks for all your contributions to WikiProject:Christianity related articles! Keep up the good work! With regards, Anupam Talk 04:12, 12 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Kindly don't abuse important words. You sound like one of those conservatives who thinks Einstein's theory of relativity is bogus because Florida is flat. Please read WP:NOTGALLERY, which says nothing on building in a day or more--and speaking of "text", you're welcome. Drmies ( talk) 17:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm more than a little familiar with WP:BIAS. I've been here many, many years, so I'm also familiar with the most common outcomes here. Drmies is as well. For starters, we know that WP:BIAS is an essay, not a policy or guideline. Use that at a discussion, you will only hear snickers. I think it is a good essay, but it has zero effect in policy and is not considered as a rationale for any content discussion, I close those very discussions regularly, trust me, those arguments are ignored in the final count. I never said or thought "one" so you assumed wrong, however, 3 seems more than enough for an article that size. Or you can drag it to DRN, but again, WP:BIAS won't be considered as a valid rationale; it can't be, it isn't policy. The best bet is to trim it down to a more reasonable size, one that represents a few countries, say a lead a two more. As it stands, it doesn't meet the criteria for use in WP:GALLERY, which is a policy. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 01:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Candleabracadabra. I'm happy to welcome you to the cadre of editors who are paying attention to the topic that is somewhat euphemistically described as "unaccredited educational institutions." Articles about this topic are subject to a periodic editing campaigns to either whitewash or "expose" the article topic, so we need a small army of editors to watch them and make sure that the articles remain within policy. Also, because new degree sellers are created almost daily, it takes a small army to keep the articles up to date. I welcome you as a new recruit to the small army!
At the same time that I welcome you, I exhort you not to use the terms "degree mill", "diploma mill", or "accreditation mill" to describe a particular institution unless you are quoting or paraphrasing somebody who applied that label, who can be specifically identified, with a citation to a published reliable source. These terms are widely recognized, but they actually lack objectively defined meanings, so use of these terms does not effectively communicate the problems with a particular institution. Also, there is actually a history of diploma-mill operators successfully using defamation lawsuits to shut down government regulatory agencies in the United States -- or at least constrain their future activities -- because the agencies used these terms to describe their institutions.
My exhortation is based on my experience. I am a veteran of a lot of editing on the general topic of "unaccredited higher education institutions," including "degree mills." In case you don't believe me, my edit count data will help confirm my history for you. My lists of my 10 most-edited articles and talk pages include the topics List of unaccredited institutions of higher education, List of unrecognized higher education accreditation organizations, Warren National University, Bircham International University, and Warnborough College. Other related articles that I've edited (usually repeatedly), include (this is just a sample): diploma mill, accreditation mill, University Degree Program, Columbia State University, Breyer State University, Washington International University, Rutherford University, Isles International University, University of Atlanta, Accrediting Commission International, Oregon Office of Degree Authorization, Ronald Pellar, Maxine Asher, and List of animals with fraudulent diplomas. In order to defend articles like these, editors have learned that it's particularly important to have solid sourcing for statements, and to avoid terms like "diploma mill" except in the context of an attributed quoted statement. -- Orlady ( talk) 23:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Why did you just redo your reverted edit without discussion? Alexbrn talk| contribs| COI 04:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Materva, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. Read
WP:MOSBOLD
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 04:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for all your edits on the Materva article- some nice improvements. LuisVilla ( talk) 07:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Candleabracadabra/Acoustic harassment, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Candleabracadabra/Acoustic harassment and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Candleabracadabra/Acoustic harassment during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy ( Help!) 08:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Note that this should be construed as a warning that further activist edits in the area of fringe or pseudoscience, may result in sanctions being applied. This notice is made following discussion on the adminitrators' noticeboard. Guy ( Help!) 13:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed
maintenance templates from
Cawy Bottling Company. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 13:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Cawy Bottling Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Thargor Orlando (
talk) 16:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Jupiña, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 06:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Crab Louie may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of museums in Florida may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 03:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cawy Bottling Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cawy Bottling Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quinabeer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinabeer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Yo diggity! About the edit summary for Morgan & Morgan: I had just read and was referring to this essay by banned user Qworty which I thought to be hilarious. Just a general summary, not related to the article itself lol cheers ~Helicopter Llama~ 20:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks a lot for all your "thanks". My pleasure to help :-) -- Dэя- Бøяg 18:07, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article Three Twins has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. A business journal and an alumni magazine reference don't make this business notable, see WP:CORP. NawlinWiki ( talk) 19:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
I added a More references tag to Regennas Candy Shop, trying to head off another editor who placed other tags, which you removed. You see that I added another inline citation and made some other changes. Perhaps there are newspaper mentions of this shop. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 00:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the tidy up. Koncorde ( talk) 01:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello Candleabracadabra. You have been suspected of sock puppetry. I was looking through sockpuppet investigations and found one with your username, which peaked my curiosity. You may wish to read the notes for the suspect and respond to the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChildofMidnight. All the best, Mz7 ( talk) 02:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
As far as I remember, the FRA requires dedicated tracks for high-speed rail beyond 150 mph. Perhaps check High-speed_rail#United_States. There is no such thing in the USA today .... but it will be the case for the CaHSR. Of course the CaHSR will use shared tracks in urban areas but that's the same for European high-speed rail - the trains won't run at high-speed on those sections anyway. Guidod ( talk) 18:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Per our previous discussions on my talk page, check out:
Cheers, NorthAmerica 1000 01:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for that little note of thanks, it means much to me. I try to edit one Wikipedia article each day to add something to this great project. Many time over zealous editors have caused me to consider leaving the editing to others, but your (and others) little gestures keep me going. Thanks again. Whoisjohngalt ( talk) 17:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for being so helpful, if you need some help with article creation let me know! I was also hoping if you could take a look at User:Valoem/UFO sightings in outer space. I know this is not your area of expertise, but hoping to DRV this article very soon, I've address the GNG issues and I hope for some clean up/citations help. Thanks! Valoem talk contrib 23:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Please be cautious about BLP violations. You've added false information to Samuel Estreicher twice now. This is not acceptable. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 20:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
This article should not exist separately from hawker (trade). Ambulante is not an English word, and simply means street vendors ie hawkers. Therefore, this information should be consolidated back into the hawkers article (under a Latin America section) and this separate entry deleted. It is against Wikipedia policy to have separate articles for the same thing. Keizers ( talk) 22:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for creating the new Lemon stick article and for your efforts to improve English Wikipedia! NorthAmerica 1000 02:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC) |
I will not escalate to a change war, however, I would like to make my point understood.
I understand your point about the fact that there may be residents of Odessa who are buried in Keystone. However, since the precedent line about there being many families who lived there for generations is unsourced, and essentially true of every city, stating that they are buried in Keystone (also unsourced) is irrelevant.
Also, your reason is that the people who established it are buried it is not mentioned in the existing text.
What do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ufomonster ( talk • contribs) 15:37, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
I believe you misunderstand my intention, which is that of good will. I have assumed good will on your part, and I expect the same. In that spirit, the page exists as a CDP, as the map, and main discription demonstrate, none of that did I write. I do agree that usage of "odessa" is broad, and covers parts of other CDPs. I believe it's in the readers' best interest to have that clarified and not to continue the ambiguity. On a second level, even if we agree that we should include Keystone in Odessa's article, the lines should be removed due to the fact that they are unsourced, and have been so for years. Furthermore, the information is not very meaningful at it's core.
I ask you to be rigorously honest and ask if those lines are helpful to the page. In good faith, I think you will see they are not.
Any thoughts?
I acknowledge and accept your quote of the boundaries of the CDP not corresponding with the local understanding. For that reason I will concede that point. However, I have removed the lines and an addition one for missing citations. Citations were asked for in 2009 and have not since been added, leading me to think it was simply someone's personal view that was input. Furthermore, I am not particularly driven to seek out citations for those lines, since it is my opinion that they are not meaningful enough to include at their core. However, if propery sourced, I would agree they're not harmful and it would be reasonable to keep them. Ufomonster ( talk) 16:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Source discussing borders and development of Odessa, Florida here. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 16:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
A cursory review of that article did not reveal the location of the deceased establishing families' burial sites. It cannot be used to source the claim that they are buried at the cemetery at Keystone Methodist Tampa Church. Ufomonster ( talk) 16:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
I have no idea how I reverted you, you weren't even on my mind and I wasn't even looking at your page or contribs. I was editing List of soft drink flavors then the computer was freezing up, jumping, then I noticed I had reverted you somehow. Must have been some misclicks while frozen. Anyway, I have no idea how that happened, but it was unintentional. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 15:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you added the {{ hoax}} tag to Delta Ratio without explaining why. I am also a bit perplexed as to why you would tag it as a hoax while it was in AfC before moving it into article space. Tagging an article as a potential hoax is a serious accusation that should not be done as a drive-by action. Please explain why you tagged the article as a hoax on the article talk page, or consider removing the tag. The {{ disputed}} tag is also available for articles which are not completely false but have serious factual accuracy issues, but that tag should also be explained on the talk page or at least in an edit summary. — KuyaBriBri Talk 17:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, Candleabracadabra, how are you doing your AfC reviewing? Several articles you've recently reviewed have wound up in Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space, and still have some AfC templates that don't belong in mainspace. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 17:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
I notices you moved Draft:Primus P. Mason into the main encyclopedia. This page was submitted with a request that it be reviewed by Articles for Creation WikiProjects.
You may want to turn on the "Yet Another Helper Script" "gadget" in your preferences. I'm not sure if this version of the script works in the "Draft:" namespace or not, but I think the beta version does. If you want to play with the beta version, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script#Beta version. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 19:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
When moving a page about a living person into the main encyclopedia, it is very important to add [[Category:Living people]] to the bottom and to add {{WPBiography|living=yes}} or some similar template to the top of the talk page. This puts everyone on notice that WP:Biographies of living persons applies to the page and puts the page into some categories that all biographies of living people should be in. It also prevents most search engines from indexing the article's talk page.
Also, when you see a page that has "bare links" in the reference section, consider running WP:REFLINKS on the page. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 19:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
I have nominated an AFC submission which you moved into the main encyclopedia, Kurt Gutenbrunner, for deletion as a copyright violation of http://kg-ny.com/about-kg and http://kg-ny.com/biography . In addition, the article is way to biased because it relies on non-independent sources. See more details at User talk:KG-NY. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 04:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey Candleabracadabra. Per your request at WP:Refund, click show below. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 21:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
'''Kurt Gutenbrunner''' is a chef and [[Austrian cuisine]] restaurateur. <ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/fashion/kurt-gutenbrunner-and-his-thonet-chairs.html?_r=0 In a Chair’s Curves, a Past Reclaimed] by David Colman January 20, 2012 New York Times</ref> <ref>[http://nypost.com/2010/02/04/world-of-kurt/ World of Kurt] New York Post</ref><ref>[http://gotham-magazine.com/personalities/articles/chef-kurt-gutenbrunner-on-his-three-manhattan-restaurants-and-his-cookbook Chef Kurt Gutenbrunner on his three manhattan restaurants and his cookbook] Gotham magazine]</ref> <ref>[http://blogs.villagevoice.com/forkintheroad/2011/10/wallse_chef_kurt_gutenbrunner_neue_cuisine.php Wallsé Chef Kurt Gutenbrunner Explains His Culinary Philosophy]: Interview Part 2 by Lauren Shockey Oct. 13 2011 Village Voice</ref> <ref>[http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/08/food/la-fo-neue-cuisine-20111208] LA Times</ref> === Career in New York === ==== Restaurants ==== == Art and Cuisine == ==References== {{reflist}} ==External links== *http://kg-ny.com/ *http://www.viamichelin.com/web/Restaurant/New_York-10014-Wallse-69542-41102 *http://gotham-magazine.com/dining/articles/restaurants-with-gallery-grade-art-collections *http://holadesign.blogspot.com/2013/12/new-york-through-my-lens-december.html [[Category:Living people]]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:49, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi User talk:Candleabracadabra This Refers your kind note left on my Article for creation,I.e, Azhar Naazir, A Contemporary Pakistani Poet, The Article is supported by Three Main Independent Sources deemed reliable by Wikipedia, Alongwith some other external References, So, I deem the Article is on borderline for inclusion into Article Space and merits notability.Thanks & Regards. Azhartokyo ( talk) 14:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC).
I see you "undid" my edit to the George E. Merrick article. My edit was an "undo" of 2601's edit. This I understand. What I don't understand is that the text I removed included the words "Although this project was never fully carried out, the Swiss Village and the Japanese village were completed and still stand today." When you "undid" my revert these words disappeared. What happened here? GroveGuy ( talk) 17:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
just saying, that was pretty awesome for Alejandro Villanueva — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codreezy ( talk • contribs) 10:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)