The Knight First Amendment Institute is a non-profit established in 2016 by
Columbia University and the
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation to defend the
freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through
strategic litigation, research, and public education.[1] In its mission statement, the Institute states that it works to promotes a system of free expression that is open and inclusive, that broadens and elevates public discourse, and that fosters creativity, accountability, and effective self-government.[2]
Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. Paxton — A lawsuit challenging Texas Attorney General
Ken Paxton’s blocking of critics from his official Twitter.[12]
Davison v. Randall — A lawsuit challenging a local government official’s blocking of a critic on Facebook, in which the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit became the first federal appellate court in the country to address whether public officials’ social media accounts can be “public forums” under the First Amendment.[14][15][16][17][18][19]
Other free speech & social media
NetChoice LLC v. Attorney General, State of Florida — Amicus brief filed in an
Eleventh Circuit case challenging a Florida law that regulates social media platforms.[20]
NetChoice, LLC, v. Paxton — Amicus brief filed in a Fifth Circuit case challenging a Texas law that limits the power of social media companies to moderate speech on their platforms, while arguing that some of the law’s transparency provisions should be reviewed under a more deferential First Amendment framework.[21][22]
Knight Institute v.
DHS — A
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking records relating to searches of electronic devices at the U.S. border.[26]
Knight Institute v. DHS — A FOIA lawsuit seeking records on ideological screening at the border.[27]
Knight Institute v. Federal Bureau of Prisons — A FOIA lawsuit seeking records concerning the
Federal Bureau of Prisons’ digitization and surveillance of mail.[28]
Campaign for Accountability v. DOJ and Francis v. DOJ — A FOIA lawsuit seeking proactive disclosure of the
Office of Legal Counsel’s secret legal opinions, and a FOIA lawsuit, settled on August 13, 2021, seeking disclosure of OLC opinions issued over 25 years ago.[36][37]
OLC Reading Room: A Knight Institute project housing the most comprehensive, searchable public database of legal opinions written by the OLC, helping shed light on the body of “secret law” produced by the OLC and long-withheld from the public.[38][39] The Reading Room contains the approximately 1,400 opinions published by the OLC in its online database and the approximately 350 opinions produced to date in FOIA litigation that the Institute has brought on behalf of historians and other researchers. In January 2022, the Institute also launched
@OLCforthepeople, a Twitter account that alerts followers whenever the OLC posts a new legal opinion to its reading room.[40]
Notable research
Free speech & social media
"
Protocols, Not Platforms: A Technological Approach to Free Speech," by Mike Masnick, founder and CEO of Floor64 and editor of the
Techdirt blog (21 August 2019), on altering the internet's economic and digital infrastructure to promote free speech, cited by Electronic Frontier Foundation as a "crucial contribution to the discussion about accountability, choice and competition in social media."[41][42][43][44]
"
Is the First Amendment Obsolete?" by
Columbia Law School Professor
Tim Wu (1 September 2017), on new free expression challenges from “troll armies,” “flooding,” and propaganda robots that aim to distort or drown out disfavored speech. The essay was credited with being "largely responsible for pushing the [debate] onto center stage."[45]
"
The Rise of Content Cartels," by evelyn douek (11 February 2020), urging transparency and accountability in industry-wide content removal decisions.[51]
"Why Rely on the Fourth Amendment To Do the Work of the First?" by Knight Institute's Alex Abdo, on how the First Amendment might become a bulwark against overreaching government surveillance.[53]
Transparency & democracy
"
A Safe Harbor for Platform Research," by Knight Institute's Alex Abdo et al. (19 January 2022), on a proposal for legal protection for certain research and newsgathering projects focused on platforms.
"
A Standard for Universal Digital Ad Transparency," by Laura Edelson et al. (9 December 2021), on a proposal spelling out criteria that trigger transparency requirement, with ad data to be collected by government agency.[54]
Recent public events include the Reimagine the Internet virtual conference exploring what the internet could become over the next decade (2021)[55]; the
Data and Democracy symposium considering how big data is changing our system of self-government (2020); The Tech Giants, Monopoly Power, and Public Discourse, a symposium examining free speech implications of "breaking up" today's giant online platforms, (2019)[56];
Freedom of Expression in the Digital Age, a series of events examining the role of the First Amendment in assessing the lawfulness of government surveillance (2018); and
A First Amendment for All? Free Expression in an Age of Inequality, a symposium on the future of the First Amendment (2018).
"How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart" (with
Jamal Greene, author, and Dwight Professor of Law at Columbia Law School; and Katy Glenn Bass of the Knight First Amendment Institute) on why our obsession with rights is tearing America apart (May 6, 2021).[58]
"A Conversation with
Edward Snowden" (with Snowden, Jameel Jaffer of the Knight First Amendment Institute and
Amy Davidson Sorkin of
The New Yorker) about secrecy, surveillance, security, and the role of whistleblowers in exposing government wrongdoing (Oct. 29, 2019).[59]
Reading Room
The OLC's Opinions: Opinions published by the Office of Legal Counsel, including those released in response to a Knight Institute FOIA lawsuit. [60]
The Perilous Public Square (
Columbia University Press, 2020): A volume of essays exploring new or intensifying threats to the system of free expression, edited by Knight Institute inaugural Senior Visiting Research Scholar David Pozen of Columbia Law School.[68][69]