This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Polynesia: Cook Islands / Niue / Samoa / Tonga / Tuvalu / American Samoa / French Polynesia / Pitcairn Islands / Tokelau / Wallis and Futuna This template is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles Associated task forces: /  This template is supported by WikiProject Cook Islands. This template is supported by WikiProject Niue. This template is supported by WikiProject Samoa. This template is supported by WikiProject Tonga. This template is supported by WikiProject Tuvalu. This template is supported by the American Samoa work group. This template is supported by the French Polynesia work group. This template is supported by the Pitcairn Islands work group. This template is supported by the Tokelau work group. This template is supported by the Wallis and Futuna work group.

This needs to be modified to accept C-class articles. -- IdiotSavant ( talk) 03:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply

{{ editprotected}} Could the noinclude section at the bottom be changed from:

<noinclude>
{{esoteric}}
== Usage == 
__NOTOC__

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Polynesia/Project banner}}
[[Category:WikiProject banners|Polynesia]]
[[Category:WikiProject Polynesia|*]]
</noinclude>

to

<noinclude>
{{esoteric}}
{{documentation|1=Wikipedia:WikiProject Polynesia/Project banner|content=
== Usage == 
__NOTOC__

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Polynesia/Project banner}}
}}
[[Category:WikiProject banners|Polynesia]]
[[Category:WikiProject Polynesia|*]]
</noinclude>

Thanks, -- WOSlinker ( talk) 22:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Done. Cheers.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 16:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC) reply

{{ editprotected}} Somewhere in the code, it says {{PAGENAE}} instead of {{PAGENAME}}. Please see Talk:Xavier de Fürst for details. -- Joshua Issac ( talk) 19:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC) reply

 Done Fixed. Ruslik ( talk) 19:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC) reply

This needs to have C-class added.

{{ edit protected}} Please change this:

|#default=[[Category:Unassessed Wallis and Futuna articles|{{PAGENAME}}]][[Category:Unassessed-Class France articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]

To this:

|#default=[[Category:Unassessed Wallis and Futuna articles|{{PAGENAME}}]][[Category:Unassessed France articles|{{PAGENAME}}]] -- Funandtrvl ( talk) 23:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC) reply

 Done — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 07:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply

{{ edit protected}}

This is a request to lessen the protection level to either semi-protected or not protected, due to the fact that this template is only on 981 pages, so far, and it is more difficult and time-consuming to edit and update this template when it is fully protected. Please explain the reasons why this was rated as a "high-risk" template on January 14, 2008 and why it should continue to be a fully-protected template. Thanks. -- Funandtrvl ( talk) 17:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Correction, this template is on approx. 2,528 pages, due to the fact that the "AbQ" doesn't count non-standard category names. However, this rqst is still to lessen the protection level. -- Funandtrvl ( talk) 17:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Can you ask the admin who protected it first, John Carter, and if he declines or isn't available, go to WP:RFUP? Thank you, Amalthea 02:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply

{{ edit protected}} A /doc page has been created, could you implement this in the current banner, instead of having the redirected Wikipedia:WikiProject Polynesia/Project banner page used? Thanks -- Funandtrvl ( talk) 17:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC) reply

 Done — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 18:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC) reply

{{ edit protected}} Hi- Hopefully, the updated WPBM version in the sandbox is ready to go... -- Funandtrvl ( talk) 02:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC) reply

 Done. Looks good — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 07:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC) reply