From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon The Beatles Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis Beatles-related template is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
To-do list:
For WikiProject The Beatles

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?
WikiProject icon Albums Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Deletions

I've deleted some stuff; comments are here. Swanny18 ( talk) 20:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I deleted the The White Album (Lewis Black album) and The Grey Album as being unrelated to this album; they were restored without explanation. The Lewis Black album has nothing in common with the Beatles album save the name and a similar cover; the Grey album is a collection of unauthorized samples (read "rip-off") by the band Dangermouse. Please provide sources that can verify the connection being asserted here. Swanny18 ( talk) 22:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply

The Grey Album samples the original recordings of The White Album throughout. Therefore, there is no question that it is related. Authorized or not, it would not exist without The White Album. Please don't be a pedant about this. Hoops gza ( talk) 23:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply

The Lewis Black album was not restored because I can understand your point of it not being directly related, although I think that the direct influence on the artwork is self-evident and easily discernable. Hoops gza ( talk) 23:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply

"Don’t be a pedant"? Because I’ve asked for a source to back up your contention? You’ll need to get used to that, here. And "would not exist without the original album" is an argument for including TWA on the Grey Album article, not the other way around. Certainly items on The White Album are not enhanced by the connection. The Grey album was a rip-off, which traded on a perceived connection to TWA; that certainly shouldn’t be perpetuated here. Swanny18 ( talk) 20:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC) reply

The idea for including the Grey Album in the template is the same as that for including cover albums. They are unmistakably influenced by the original album, and the navigation box is meant to help people navigate to articles such as what was influenced by the original album. Hoops gza ( talk) 00:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply

We'll probably have to agree to disagree about the relevance of cover albums, but it isn't something I want to fall out over. Also, I found a quote here from Paul McCartney; so I reckon if he can be relaxed about it, everybody else can, too. Swanny18 ( talk) 17:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply