To-do list for Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Article Classification:
|
The Beatles WikiProject manages over 5,000 articles related to the Beatles, with a broad and nested hierarchy of categories covering them. This section is an attempt to categorise some of the main ones as to quality level and address which ones need work the most.
This is an ongoing task and your help would be appreciated. Have a read of some of the existing classifications so you know what this about, and please do read the instructions before starting, as there are a few tweaks and other jobs we can do at the same time as classifying with minimal extra effort and good returns!
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Welcome to WikiProject The Beatles' Article Assessment Department.
Place some examples of the template usage/grading procedure here.
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained
featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. under discussion |
John Lennon (as of December 2022) |
FL | The article has attained
featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. |
List of songs recorded by George Harrison (as of December 2022) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the
A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | n/a |
GA | The article meets all of the
good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from
WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A
good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. |
The Beatles (album) (as of December 2022) |
B | The article meets all of the
B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach
good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. |
Rubber Soul (as of December 2022) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. |
Please Please Me (as of March 2014) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. |
The Beatles Anthology (TV series) (as of December 2022) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. |
Compilation Deluxe (as of August 2016) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. |
List of people who performed on Beatles recordings (as of July 2013) |
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information. | The Beatles |
High | This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge. | Help! (album) |
Mid | This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas. | Beat music |
Low | This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia. | Nowhere Boy |
??? | This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed. |
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/The Beatles articles by quality
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/John Lennon articles by quality
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Paul McCartney articles by quality
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/George Harrison articles by quality
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Ringo Starr articles by quality
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Apple Corps and Apple Records articles by quality
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/George Martin articles by quality
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Brian Epstein articles by quality
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Yoko Ono articles by quality log
I'm not sure if this should stand alone, or if the Beatles in Hamburg should have a larger more comprehensive article (which couold be quite spiffing if we can get photos). -- kingboyk 16:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:WikiProject_The_Beatles/Log#Page_merges
Click on "►" below to display subcategories: |
---|
Click on "►" below to display subcategories: |
---|
There were no logs for this project from April 19, 2024 - April 26, 2024.
There were no logs for this project from April 19, 2024 - April 26, 2024.
There were no logs for this project from April 19, 2024 - April 26, 2024.
There were no logs for this project from April 20, 2024 - April 27, 2024.
There were no logs for this project from April 19, 2024 - April 26, 2024.