Template:Requested move is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Requested move template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
Is it possible for the template to check if one of the pages is a dab, and if so, then add a link to Wikinav after the move log links at the bottom-right? This new tool is little know, but really indispensable for primary topic proposals that aim to dislodge a dab page from the base title. – Uanfala (talk) 23:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
It has been proposed in this section that
Template:Requested move be
renamed and moved to
Cent. This proposal is for a cross-namespace move from Template to (Main/Article) namespace. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{
subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{
requested move/dated}} directly. |
I suggest changing
#ifeq:{{{multiple}}}|yes|{{#ifeq:{{{new1|}}}
to
#if:{{yesno-no|{{{multiple}}}}}|{{#ifeq:{{{new1|}}}
so that it calls {{ yesno}} to handle any malformed "yes" and reject non-yes content as it currently does -- 64.229.88.43 ( talk) 07:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
{{
requested move/dated}}
--
64.229.88.43 (
talk) 00:54, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
{{
subst:requested move}}
. Do not use {{
requested move/dated}}
directly. ?{{
subst:requested move}}
can be made to create a malformed "yes" then that issue should be addressed in
Template:Requested move –
wbm1058 (
talk) 23:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)@
Wbm1058, can you add a check somewhere in the module on the reason= parameter for the presence of <ref>
tags and append {{
reflist-talk}} automatically if there isn't a {{
reflist-talk}} invoked already? This should help with the occasional refs being bunched up at the end of the
WP:RMC page.
– robertsky (
talk) 03:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
This template currently produces a message that includes the text A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage.... The word moves should not be possessive (i.e. should not have an apostrophe), and the word "requested" should be preceded by the: A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage...; Or, maybe better: A bot will list this discussion on the current discussions subpage for requested moves.... I don't see how to edit this myself, so I'm posting the suggestion here. Eric talk 05:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Requested move/dated and
Template:Requested move/dated/mirror has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello- Please see my post from December 2022: Template_talk:Requested_move#Nix_possessive_in_template_message. Eric talk 20:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC) Eric talk 20:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
This template says "within half an hour", however, it took 37 minutes to post on Vamsi (name). Should we not change the time frame to "within one hour"? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 20:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
I have drafted some changes to
Module:Requested move (
sandbox diff) and
Template:Requested move/dated (
sandbox diff) so that {{
subst:requested move}} will automatically check current and proposed titles for page protection (admin or template-editor) and, if found, add a |protected=
parameter to the resulting {{
requested move/dated}} in new requested moves, which would then show the usual green lock or pink lock icons (
examples at /testcases).
Before now I have been using {{ RM protected}} to add an icon the top of move-protected RMs manually, but at Templates for discussion/Log/2024 January 31 it has been suggested that this shouldn't be a separate template, and hence this proposal. SilverLocust 💬 20:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Requested move/dated has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please edit
Template:Requested move/dated with the
sandboxed changes. This will add a small protection icon to the message box when |protected=
is specified (and not blank or "no"). This does not affect the appearance unless the parameter is added, which applies to a small number of RMs. I have checked that this will not affect the bots
(AAlertBot)
(RMCD bot).
Diff
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Example appearance
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
See Template talk:Requested move/dated/testcases.
|
See more above at #Detecting and showing page protection. For now, this parameter will be added manually. I will wait until later to request changes to Module:Requested move to add the parameter automatically at the time of creating the RM with {{ subst:RM}}. SilverLocust 💬 21:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
|protected=sysop
as part of what it returns. It gives |protected=yes
when the move would require an admin, whether because the protection log has "move=sysop" (move protection), "edit=sysop" (full protection), or "create=sysop" (salt). See
Template talk:Requested move/testcases#Fully creation-protected (salted) target for an example.
SilverLocust
💬 00:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Pakistan Soviet air confrontations during the Soviet Afghan war which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 15:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)