This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Infobox military conflict module. |
|
Archives:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() |
Module:Infobox military conflict is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible module. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit.
|
![]() |
Military history Template‑class ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Useful links
Related pages |
---|
|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add custom header options for the other sections, and not just for combatants/belligerents Halo FC ( talk) 14:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Are transclusions of other documentation really the preferred practice on the Template:Infobox military conflict/doc page? A glance at the TOC shows three subheadings for "Parameters", and two each for "Usage", "Microformat", "TemplateData" and "See also". The hierarchy of headings offers no further clues either since the names of transcluded pages don't show up there at all. I understand how co-locating this information could be a convenience if you know how the documentation is organized in advance but otherwise using this as a reference tool is cumbersome. There's no clear way to distinguish which section is which without a bunch of scrolling around - at which point it might as well be a click into the actual template documentation being transcluded. -- N8 07:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
If information on only one belligerent is available and not the second one or strength of second one is only partly available like strength under one of the commanders of second belligerent then how to write in Infobox? Whether remove strength column altogether for both or keep one blank or write N.A. in one? Sajaypal007 ( talk) 15:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
See Template talk:Infobox military conflict#Campaignboxes causing infobox to stay above first paragraph. At Battle of Bakhmut (for example) the mobile transform that moves the lead paragraph above the infobox is failing. Moving the campaignbox outside the infobox fixes the issue, so it doesn't seem to be the fault of either the campaignbox template or {{ Military navigation}} but rather the problem lies here somewhere. Hairy Dude ( talk) 01:34, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Please see
this test case for an example of the infobox being replaced entirely by a script error when |map_type=
is used without coordinates. That condition should result in an error-tracking category, not a giant red error message. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 01:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)