This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
One could argue that it is bad if there are no submissions because that means IPs are not getting involved in creating new articles.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 14:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I reverted one editor once and another twice, that comes nowhere near 3RR, also the reverts were over two seperate issues. I ask for dsicussion, not editwarring.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 16:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Ipatrol, I restrict myself to 1RR when it comes to the appearance of a template, since there's really no point. If you're going to go beyond that, OK. But I'd advise you to adopt a similar policy. Someguy1221 ( talk) 21:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Are we done here?-- Ipatrol ( talk) 19:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
I absolutely fail to see the point in a smiley, doesn't that make some browers tougher to load the page?-- Ipatrol ( talk) 00:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
I've seen AFC clear, once after I cleared through the submissions. Is it really that rare that it's clear to deserve a smiley face?-- Ipatrol ( talk) 02:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Can we just go back to how it used to be?-- Ipatrol ( talk) 19:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
With this (and technically this too) edit I changed the range of the AfC status template. Normal now applies only up to 40 (instead of 50), backlogged appears from 40 to 75 (instead of 50 to 100), and severely backlogged starts at 75 (instead of 100). I feel these numbers more accurately represent the state of things, such as this past week. ~ Amory ( user • talk • contribs) 02:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Does brutally backlogged exist? And if it does what does it look like?-- The Master of Mayhem 19:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Why did you say that "???" is for over 10000? Isn't this illogical? "Out of order" seems better. Qwertyxp2000 ( talk) 05:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I have changed this template's status style from text to DEFCON. Is this OK with you? Phil roc My contribs 14:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
I honestly don't pay much attention to this template, as I go by the numbers themselves, but out of curiosity I decided to again look and see what the number breakdowns were. Having done so, I think they're ridiculously optimistic. With an average of 155 submissions per day, I think we should shift each colour up a notch. In other words, 400-649 goes from "semi-backlogged" to "normal", and 650-899 is the new "semi-backlogged".
The main reason I think we should do this is because we managed to keep the number of submissions sub-400 for about a month. Once. In all the time since I started at AFC (and that was when we were at 3000!). The numbers were last updated in 2014, and I think it's time we accounted for inflation. Primefac ( talk) 18:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
I doubt there's any way to fix this sensibly, but I clicked "random submission" on my third click ever and was taken to Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space. The chances were ~1/3600 per click. I do imagine this may get a lot more annoying if the AFC queue was much shorter. 84.250.17.211 ( talk) 22:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC); edited 22:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC); edited 22:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:AFC status/backlog has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
At Template:AFC status/backlog, please replace
{{Documentation|Template:AfCON/doc}} [[Category:WikiProject Articles for creation templates]]
with
{{documentation|Template:AFC status/doc}}
since Template:AfCON/doc was deleted (in 2015, log entry) as a copy of Template:AFC status/doc, which should be used, and since Template:AFC status/doc already includes the AfC templates category. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 19:55, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:AfC status/backlog has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add something like this:
{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Pending AfC submissions}}|1||s}}
so that it says 1 pending submissions. ―
Qwerfjkl
talk 11:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:AfC status/original has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
42.107.68.77 ( talk) 12:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
For adding extra information