From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History

I think the history section should be expanded to include the terminals buildings and additional topics. I added an ext link to the 1940 Air Terminal Museum. At one time Hobby (or Houston International) had a monorail system (so I heard). Have you heard of this? Postoak 03:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Here's something about the monorial, but I'm not sure if it was ever in production use. [1] reply

The old Sky Taxi was a short monorail that looped from the terminal

building out around what is now the multi-level parking garage and back to the terminal building. At the time (1965) there was only a surface-level blacktop parking lot between the terminal building and Airport Boulevard. The Sky Taxi was constructed in the wave of hype over the Seattle World’s Fair monorail and was at the time, along with the Astrodome, a mark of Houston’s cutting edge technology. Alas, before the Sky Taxi was fully functional it became obvious that more than a monorail, the airport required more parking. The Sky Taxi was abandoned and then dismantled. Before the parking situation was sorted out, Houston approved the construction of an newer, larger airport far to the north of the city. 202.79.62.19 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.62.19 ([[User talk:202.79.62.19|talk]]) 11:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Former Airlines

It was decided on the Sea-Tac talk page that the information about past airlines served little to no purpose and was removed. I didn't want to removed it here without asking the opinion first, but since the information on the Hobby article is slightly different in nature, I'll see what people think first. NW036 21:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

listing former airlines is useful. It's part of the history of the airport. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.62.16 ( talk) 02:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Header left.jpg

Image:Header left.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Dubious Claim

“…Despite occasional claims of being the only U.S. commercial airport to be named after a woman, it was not named after Oveta Culp Hobby.” This is a rather suspicious claim. Can we have a citation of any documented case of someone claiming William P. Hobby is a woman and therefore the airport is named after a woman? Dubious at best. A single citation – just one – would transform this rather flimsy and clearly un-referenced claim in to something that is possibly worth retaining in this piece. Otherwise, what possible use is this meaningless bit of drivel? 202.79.62.19 11:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Requested move 19 June 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 5 7 21:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC) reply

William P. Hobby Airport → Hobby Airport – WP:CONCISE and no ambiguity issues. --Relisted. George Ho ( talk) 05:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC) Sovereign Sentinel ( talk) 08:53, 19 June 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on William P. Hobby Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on William P. Hobby Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:William_P._Hobby_Airport&oldid=1205390370"