From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Jionpedia (
talk ·
contribs) 18:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Will review it in the next coming days. Regards, --
Jionpedia
✉ 18:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
- Great job, Blofeld. Hardly any flaws. I fixed the minor problems, though.
Final analysis
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B.
MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C.
No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it
neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Don't get it delisted! Thanks, --
Jionpedia
✉ 15:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
reply
Thanks Jion, Ipigott deserves most of the credit though..♦
Dr. Blofeld 17:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
reply