Uppsala Cathedral is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
To anyone interested in maintenance of this page, please see the
talk page of the cathedral picture; it may need to be replaced for copyright reasons, and a couple of possible alternatives are listed there. Or, if you can verify that there is license to use the image, please
tag it. --
Kbh3rd 04:11, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Contradictory dates
"inaugurated in 1435 ... It was completed within the following decades," and "When rebuilt, the Renaissance style of 1619 was modernised." Has some previous mention of building work in 1619 been deleted? The date seems to have come out of the blue. Incidentally, might a link to
brick gothic be good?
213.122.48.176 (
talk) 11:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)reply
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Don't get it delisted! Thanks, --Jionpedia✉ 15:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Thanks Jion, Ipigott deserves most of the credit though..♦
Dr. Blofeld 17:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)reply
IB
There has been a little to-ing and fro-ing on the thorny question of the infobox recently, with a number of IP's adding and pthers reverting. Rather than the continual slow-burn edit warring on this, could we please come to a consensus on whether there should be one included or not? In the interim, I have retirned the article to the status quo before the reverting cycle started. -
SchroCat (
talk) 13:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Info-boxes can be useful, but the one that was in situ was absurdly over-full, and no help to a visiting reader. I don't think a box is needed or desirable for this article.
Tim riley (
talk) 13:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Thanks, Ipigott and I decided it looked better without one. The length was ridiculous. At least it did contain info though. If it could be shrunken down with clickable sections it would be a lot more appropriate and I'd probably accept it. It was way too long to be acceptable to me though as it was.♦
Dr. Blofeld 14:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)reply
I agree that the infobox for this article was not helpful or useful in this article. --
Ssilvers (
talk) 05:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)reply
It was very long, but I think it added structure to the article. Rather than removing it, why not shorten it down? Virtually all articles on cathedrals have infoboxes, so we would definitely be in the minority if we ruled it to only be in the way. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2002:D572:DD80:0:0:0:D572:DD80 (
talk) 01:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)reply
I agree, restore the infobox and shorten it down if needed.
J 1982 (
talk) 16:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Uppsala Cathedral. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.