This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Protected areas Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. United States: Mississippi Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Mid-importance).

Can someone please explain why they keep inserting black-and-white photos of a man-made bridge (for a total of TWO bridge photos) and a cabin into this article? In the very first paragraph, it says the park's most outstanding feature is outcrops. Twice I have added a photo of the outcrops and twice it has been deleted by someone else. Why are man-made structures so much more interesting than the natural features of this park? Why is a photo of outcrops unacceptable? Why do we need TWO pictures of a bridge? I will leave a few days for a salient answer, after which I will be changing the photos again. Berberry ( talk) 14:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC) reply