This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: South Carolina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as High-importance).

I visited and contributed to this article simply because the building is a U.S. National Historic Landmark. But isn't this the statehouse which was subject of controversy for having a Confederate battle flag flying, which figured into the 2000 or 2004 U.S. presidential election campaign? I am honestly not sure, but there seems to be some well-veiled reference in the article. For wikipedia, let's document that there was a controversy, please. Or tell me if I have the wrong place. doncram ( talk) 00:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Yes this is the place. Salon.com Politics 2000: John McCain to condemn Confederate flag. Out of the media spotlight and away from the presidential crucible, the Arizona senator will take a stand on a South Carolina controversy. By Jake Tapper. April 18, 2000

doncram ( talk) 00:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Actually, the section only gets it half right. The controversy had already been boiling over for a few years before 2000 election cycle and if I remember correctly, the legislators were attempting to settle the issue before it would cause unfavorable light to fall on the state when the nation's (and national press) attention would be on the primaries there.

In fact, it seems odd there isn't a separate article detailing the various protests that erupted in many Southern states in the 90's over the flag's use on official buildings. Not to mention, a photo of the dome's flagpole to illustrate that several flags are displayed up there. SteveCoppock ( talk) 00:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Seems like there should be mention of previous state houses in the article. This is the second state house to be on the site, and before that, Charleston would have had a state house of some kind since it was the capital until it was moved to Columbia DJGristle ( talk) 21:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Yes, very much. 129.133.127.244 ( talk) 23:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on South Carolina State House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.friesian.com/police.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC) reply