This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
Consider joining this project's
Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are
transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
Misunderstanding about Virginia code change
User:Lkorleski noted that the Virginia statute regarding Smithfield had been repealed in October 2008, but it was later revealed to be a routine measure to remove superfluous wording.
No change in wording was made to the section entitled "Smithfield hams defined." Only a serial comma has been added.
User:DianaMcFarland posted these comments to the article, which I am moving here:
The statue concerning location was not removed in October 2008. Unfortunately, that was a mistake made by a reporter for a Virginia agriculture publication. Rather, the change to the code was made as part of a routine codification of Virginia's agriculture provisions, which was approved during the 2008 session of the General Assembly. The change in question was very small and can be noted by comparing code 3.1-868 to 3.2-5420 — from "no person, firm or corporation shall ..." to "no person shall ..." The second part of the law refers to the geographical requirements, which was not changed. The attorney that helped draft the new document said it was considered a housekeeping change. That is, according to the definitions used for agricultural provisions, "person" also includes firms and corporations.
Mostly, removing the superfluous wording helped to further shrink an already outsized document. After the editor of the publication was notified, a correction was run in the next issue.
Therefore, in order for a ham to be a genuine Smithfield ham, it must still be smoked and cured within the town limits of Smithfield, Virginia.
