This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rajaraja I article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This   level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tamil civilization ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil civilization, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil civilizationWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTemplate:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTamil civilization articles Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance). Military history: Biography / Asian / Indian / South Asia / Medieval C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force Asian military history task force Indian military history task force South Asian military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) India: Tamil Nadu / History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance). This article was last assessed in May 2012. Middle Ages Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tamil Eelam ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil Eelam, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil EelamWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil EelamTemplate:WikiProject Tamil EelamTamil Eelam articles

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Raja raja 1 religion is Shaivism 2401:4900:483D:9840:0:0:833:41E9 ( talk) 03:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC) reply

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{ edit semi-protected}} template. This seems to be a controversial change (see discussions here and here), and the discussion should ideally reach a conclusion before any edit requests are made. Aidan9382 _{( talk)} 07:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC) reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

NDanraj (
talk) 08:58, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
reply

To edit the religion of raja raja (shaivism)

Shaivism NDanraj ( talk) 08:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC) reply

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{ Edit semi-protected}} template. The details are covered in the article, which present a more detailed explanation. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 10:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC) reply

That is incorrect 2405:3800:878:E8EE:6D52:CFC9:9E0B:6913 ( talk) 07:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. SKAG123 ( talk) 04:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I am working to improve this article as suggested in the tags. I am unable to vouch for the citations. I used existing one to apply as I revised the writing. I will likely continue to work on this article in the same manner. Kind regards to all Hu Nhu ( talk) 23:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I continued to work through the article and sometimes the meaning of the original language lacked specificity. Consequently, my revisions may at times be inaccurate to the original writer's intent. Additionally, I cannot vouch for the citations. While coherent, the content should be regarded as uncertain. I find it curious that this article has a B rating. It seems far to high. This would, I believe, be best served if the article was entirely rewritten from the beginning of the writing and research process. Kind regards to all. Hu Nhu ( talk) 21:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

On 4 APR, I tagged a section with need for clarification. There are several references to works without identifying what they are: poem, book, song, movie, play, and so on. After inserting four inline clarification needed messages, I decided to draw attention to the entire section with this section tag. Kind reagrds to all, Hu Nhu ( talk) 20:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply