This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The correct plural for "census" is "censuses". I think, then, it might be useful to correct it. Past of "hold" is "held". Index should also be written in plural because there are more than one, hence there should be "indexes on prices to consumers or customers", rather than a literal translation. Unless, of course, the rules of Wikipedia establish that way of writing.
Friendly,-- Mbertoni 09:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
We should add a bit on the 2007 clash between the K government and Indec officials, on the preasures for a change on the INDEC's methodology. -- Mariano( t/ c) 12:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Why does somebody keep on removing relevant, sourced, neutral content from this article? bobrayner ( talk) 00:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Institute of Statistics and Census of Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of National Institute of Statistics and Census of Argentina's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "bloom":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)