This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Freemasonry Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. ◆  WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard": Improve to Featured Article status Freemasonry Tracing board Isaac Newton University Lodge Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia Operative Masonry Primitive Scottish Rite Add content to stubs… Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc. Requests [ Watch this list Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable) Participate in articles listed for deletion Need images Scottish Rite York Rite Sovereign Grand Lodge of Malta New Article to be created Adonhiramite Rite Portuguese Rite Brazilian Rite Irish Rite Moorish Rite Rite Français Moderne Rétabli Minnesota Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor posted the following at my Talk page, which I move to here:

Build dates

Regarding this edit to Fowler Methodist Episcopal Church (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views): The real situation with the build date is more complex. The original structure, a chapel, was built in 1894. The church was expanded with an addition in 1906. I had to look at a couple different sources to determine the listing of build dates, and there's a little bit of a difference in wording between the Minneapolis HPC and the Larry Millett books, but they basically confirm that part of the church was built in 1984 and the rest was built in 1906.

This may not make that much of a difference, but your edit summary of, "consistency of built date in infobox with text. Infobox date was probably from NRHP infobox generator, which interprets first date in a list as built date, sometimes incorrect" indicates that you're still asserting that I don't know how to use the NRHP database properly. That's why I keep insisting that editors refer to other resources, not just the database, when doing articles. I keep repeating this, but it seems like I'm talking to a brick wall. (Or, in this case, a hard quartzite wall.) -- Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 16:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

I think that suggests the built date field in the NRHP infobox here should show two dates, with some punctuation, e.g. "1894, 1906" or "1894 & 1906" or "1894; 1906". But not 1894-1906 which would imply it was under construction for that entire date range. I will update this article with one of those. Please discuss further here, anyone. thanks, -- do ncr am 20:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply

If the building is currently known as the "Scottish Rite Temple", should that not be the name of the article? Noting that it was formerly known as the "Fowler Methodist Episcopal Church" in the lede would make sense, but we are supposed to use current naming are we not? (Hence "Willis Tower" instead of the more commonly known "Sears Tower") — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2:4000:8E:8923:EEF4:3D49:B87 ( talk) 16:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC) reply