This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anime,
manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose - with only two article usings this title, I see this as just a
WP:ONEOTHER situation. If the page views are similar, then we can consider the longer-term significance of the original over the remake to break the tie. --
Netoholic@ 00:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Support, doesn't look like there's a PRIMARYTOPIC]]. Maybe some sort of franchise page at the base name?--
Ortizesp (
talk) 20:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Requested move 25 December 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– It should be move and remove the bracket, This series was adapted from the manga
Hana Yori Dango and was named "Meteor Garden" so it was natural that the 2001 Taiwanese version came first but every time I searched on Google Meteor Garden 2018 always came up overshadowing the original because it's here the article name should be changed and returned to the previous one, which is just "Meteor Garden" without brackets, naturally this was the article title just because of the previous request, so it should be changed back to the previous one.
7starunited (
talk) 05:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC) — Relisting.echidnaLives -
talk -
edits 06:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Agreed, Meteor Garden 2001 should be no brackets even since 2007 when the article is created is no brackets because of the remake the article is moved i hope the fans of this both series is not bias i hope back the former article name.
Imruyi (
talk) 05:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Imruyi (
talk) 05:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)reply
@
7starunited there was a RM discussion which resulted the article being moved as it is now. Please open another discussion if you are seeking to overturn the determined consensus of the previous RM.
– robertsky (
talk) 13:11, 24 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Also note that I have reverted your move of the dab page, given that that was the outcome of the previous RM discussion.
– robertsky (
talk) 13:16, 24 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose, no primary topic. See RM discussion from earlier this year.
162 etc. (
talk) 16:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisting comment: To form a clearer consensus
echidnaLives -
talk -
edits 06:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose. The proposed primary topic gets more of the usage (among the links on the dab page, it gets 2.6 times more clicks than the other two series with the name
[1]). However, I'm not sure it necessarily has greater long-term notability (but I'll be open to arguments to the contrary). –
Uanfala (
talk) 13:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.