From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Lōʻihi Seamount)
Featured articleKamaʻehuakanaloa Seamount is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 11, 2010.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 8, 2009 Peer reviewReviewed
April 11, 2009 Good article nomineeListed
May 9, 2009 Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 6, 2009 Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 15, 2009 Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on March 10, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although the summit of underwater volcano Loihi is 969 metres (3,180 ft) below sea level, it is still twice as tall, measured from the base of its southern flank, as Mount St. Helens ever was?
Current status: Featured article

Name

Who named it Lo'ihi? What does Lo'ihi mean? Serendi pod ous 15:58, 11 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Ermh...it's in the infobox...or did they change it again >.> Res Mar 04:10, 12 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Kudos, and a question

Nice article! Thank you for putting this together.

I was wondering about the magma chamber for this seamount. Is it independent of the magma chamber (if any) for Kīlauea? Or are they shared? Thank you.— RJH ( talk)

It all goes back to the hotspot, so linked in a sense, if not as intrinsically as the Kilaua/Mauna Loa connection for instance. Res Mar 04:10, 12 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Good point. Thank you for the reply.— RJH ( talk) 15:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lōʻihi Seamount. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lōʻihi Seamount. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Normalize spelling throughout article?

I noticed that the spelling within the article varies between Lōʻihi and Lōihi. While neither is wrong, having a mix of both in the article is odd. I was wondering what people's opinions are on which spelling should be used throughout the rest of the article. Gwingle ( talk) 01:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Good eye. Per the FAC, it’s supposed to be Lōʻihi. Too many cooks in the kitchen left the article in its current state. Viriditas ( talk) 23:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
I've made the changes - pretty sure without changing the contents of direct quotes or cited article titles. RegEx is truly a gift. I didn't check that the extant spelling in exact quotes or article citations matched the source to begin with, but I'm hopeful those who added the citations managed that. Gwingle ( talk) 22:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Name change

Lō'ihi has been renamed:

https://kawaiola.news/aina/a-change-of-name/

The new name is: Kamaʻehuakanaloa Angiest ( talk) 18:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply

This is an "official" name change by a state board, for an undersea location, so it is hardly used (by either name). If anyone refers to the seamount frequently, it is the body of researchers than monitor and investigate it. Does anyone know how much of this academic community has made the switch? While well-intentioned, the new name is significantly more unwieldly, and I'm betting the community will be slow to make the change. The U.S. Board of Geographic names seems to agree; it has not yet made the decision but notes the extant body of literature and the adequacy of the current name. Its inclination seemed to be to retain Loʻihi but use Kamaʻehuakanaloa and a shorter version, Kamaʻehu, as variants. Illexsquid ( talk) 17:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Even as Lōʻihi, its name was hardly used, since as a deeply submerged volcano it hasn't really entered the public consciousness. And since the old name has hardly had a chance to enter the popular knowledge, its baggage is light, making use of the new name not particularly problematic -- except for learning how to pronounce it! Which today I have managed to sort out (light boast here). For that reason I believe that this new name is going to stick. The Hawaiian Volcano Watch page seems to be taking delight in the new name (see HERE), and it's not hard to see why. The old name is rather prosaic: "Lō'ihi" means "long". And is rather like giving a tall person the nickname "Stretch." But the new name is culturally much more interesting, translated as "reddish child of Kanaloa" -- Kanaloa being the name of a ocean-related god in the ancient Hawaiian religion. Accordingly, I think there needs to be a section in the article explaining the name change. Cyberherbalist ( talk) 12:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC) reply

"I think there needs to be a section in the article explaining the name change." -- I came here to just to see if someone had mentioned this. I'll add it, since it has enough documentation to make it easy to write. As far as difficulty of pronouncing, it's not more difficult than many Hawaiian words, and I hope any serious scholar working on a Hawaiian topic will take the time to learn this little bit of local culture. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 00:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Kamaʻehuakanaloa_Seamount&oldid=1207900442"