Jan de Vries (philologist) has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 13, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article needs some cites from modern scholars on Altnordische Literaturgeschichte and Altgermanische Religionsgeschichte to balance all the stuff about his conduct during WWII. I don't have anything very modern. Other than that, what does it need for the stub template to be no longer justified? Or is it already full enough to no longer be a stub? Should information about his wife and children be included? The Dutch source has that. Yngvadottir ( talk) 19:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jan de Vries (linguist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was: rejected by
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk) 11:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Article was nominated for DYK far beyond the normal seven days. As the nominator has no prior credits, an IAR exemption could have been argued here, but a five-week delay is still significant enough that such a request would likely be denied. For the nominator, it is suggested that for their next nomination, they nominate the article within seven days of the article being created, a 5x expansion being accomplished, or being promoted to GA status.
Improved to Good Article status by Krakkos ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC).