This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A fact from Jack Ruby Shoots Lee Harvey Oswald appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 February 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that six-tenths of a second is one reason that a photograph(pictured) won a Pulitzer Prize?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Lightbursttalk 04:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Article is new and long enough (created 28 Jan, RPS 4548 B). Sourcing looks good, hooks are interesting (I prefer ALT0, and I recommend adding a link to
Pulitzer Prize) and cited. Earwig is a little higher than normal but basically all flagged portions are direct quotes that are cited and attributed in the article. QPQ done. All good.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 23:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Iowa?
Why is the category « 1963 in Iowa » on this article? I’ve
read the article and unless I missed it, I didn’t see any Iowa connection?
Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (
talk) 01:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Mr Serjeant Buzfuz: Thank you for the note. I am unsure why that category was in the article so I changed it to 1963 in Texas.
Bruxton (
talk) 16:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply