This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
state highways and other major
roads in the
United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Jacksonville, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.JacksonvilleWikipedia:WikiProject JacksonvilleTemplate:WikiProject JacksonvilleJacksonville articles
I think this article should be merged into
Interstate 295, as they are basically the same highway. Both I-295 and SR 9A form the
Jacksonville Beltway, and SR 9A will soon be signed as I-295 as soon as the
Federal Highway Administration passes approval. SR 9A currently uses the mileage and exit numbers based off of I-295. The I-295 article already includes the entire beltway in its total length and exit list, so having the same information in two articles seems redundant. According to the
Florida Department of Transportation the entire beltway is internally assigned as SR 9A and once the rest of the beltway officially becomes an interstate, the route will still internally be recognized as SR 9A by FDOT (just how I-4 is SR 400, I-95 is SR 9, I-75 is SR 93, etc.). All this information can be viewed
here. –
Dream out loud (
talk) 20:19, 10 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Support: It sounds like this is essentially a done deal so I support this merger.
Viridiscalculus (
talk) 03:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - These two roads are mutually related and will become one road once I-295 is extended, so it makes sense to cover them together. Dough4872 04:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)reply
It doesn't seem that there is any opposition to this move, and you both are active members of
WP:USRD, so I'm going to go ahead and complete the merge. –
Dream out loud (
talk) 17:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)reply
